#ANTICHRIST SEEBER DID CONDEMN ALL NON-CATHOLICS ON THE NGs!!
Ted McMillan
condemn all non-Catholics back on December 5, 2001. I have brought up
issues to prove that he did exactly that, but there is a certain bent
a person's IQ would take when he or she works for the Antichrist.
Here now again is the actual conversation and where you can find it
posted on the newsgroups. Here is the evidence every worker for the
Antichrist, be they sabbathkeepers or even witches, have ignored in
favor over their paranoia that uncivil posts are being submitted to
the newsgroups. Being workers for the Antichrist, their solution to
this problem was to submit more uncivil postings:
I reprove despot Seeber for gloating over the dead bodies of the
Protestants! The following is the actual statement and reply:
Ted McMillan:
> > But you did understand how to hang people in chains. And your
> > founding Fathers also can't tell the difference between shedding the
> > blood of millions of bible-believers in the most unbelievable ways for
> > their descendants to now presume upon the world to teach them what is
> > the definition of love, hate and plagiarism.
>
Ted Seeber:
> Can you really be said to be believing in the Bible if you don't live it?
> NONE of the groups persecuted by the Catholics were living the Bible. They were living their personal interpretations of God, not the Bible.
------------------
FREEZE!
In this simple statement, Ted Seeber acknowledges not only that
Catholics have persecuted and killed Protestants, but he states why.
He speaks clearly with approval as if he is expressing an eternal
principle. He is talking as if he is proud of what he is saying. I,
being infuriated, respond:
------------------
Ted McMillan:
NO WONDER YOU DON'T CARE ABOUT ME BRINGING BACK YOUR RECORD OF
HORRIBLE ATROCITIES! They were not even living the bible! Why even
worry about them! Were the 5 to 6 thousands who were killed by the
terrorist attacks living by the bible? You don't have any consistent
principles, if you even know the meaning of the word! Your principles
change only for you to even look like you are winning an argument.
------------------
Ted Seeber was clearly telling the world that people deserve to die or
should even be persecuted and killed if they don't live the bible
according to his standards. My reply to him continues:
------------------
Your statement is incredibly insensitive and you constantly reveal
that what is written by your uncomparably bloody religion is true.
All I know is that you people murdered millions in the most horrible
ways. I DON'T CARE IF YOU MURDERED ATHEISTS!! I am not that
inhumanly insensitive for an animal like you to be worried about me
having guns!
Again, despot: WHY IS THE POPE APOLOGIZING!! You have just sent us
your bigoted despot opinions without providing any MAYBEES! Why not
try to prove what you are saying against me using the scriptures then?
How often have you even answered my questions?
Thousands of people lost their lives in the World Trade Center
disaster. How many of them lived by the bible? They were not even in
rural settings nor under persecution. All those in the WTC were
products of the modern revolution. I would even say that most of them
believe that homosexual activity is acceptable behavior. They all
lived in the modern age and are products of it. I can bet you that
homosexuality was not a problem for those who were slain by Rome!
I don't care whether or not they lived by the bible according to a
murderous despot!
------------------
What I was saying here was that the Protestants viewed homosexual
behavior as intolerable and abominable. Likely most of the victims of
911 did not view matters that way. Since they likely did not live the
bible according to Seeber's standards, what should be their fate?
So here we see the issues and prove that Rome has not changed. These
statements of Seeber did not just come like a bolt of lightning. This
was the last leg of a series of emotional ramblings between us both as
I was defending human liberty, privacy and the American Constitution
while Seeber was condemning all of these and demanding change under
the false pretext that the terror attacks require a police state for
security. Seeber told us boldly that he works against the
Constitution to change it to be interpreted opposite from what it
currently is under "acceptable confines" from the INSIDE! This is
just what people like Jack Chick WERE SAYING FOLKS!!
Interestingly, although he was even telling us that privacy was
NOWHERE to be found in the American Constitution, go to his website
and you will find something strange. Would you like to have an email
account given to you by Ted Seeber? Well go to his website and you
can get one. What's more is, according to him, IT'S FREE! Want to
get a free email account from a man arguing against basic human
privacy? You go right ahead!
For a long time he was spitting upon the principles of human liberty
as had ALL those brutal regimes that easily took the lives of people
and committed atrocities. He even told me that the current American
system respecting privacy was "increibly stupid" and "outdated." He
told me the current principles were as old as Martin Luther during the
Reformation. When I asked him the date his contrary principles were
created, he behaved just like Antichrist MSiciliana, Cindy, Nicholas
and so many others.
You can view this evidence in much of the war that took place between
Ted Seeber and myself on the following webpage:
http://www.seventh-dayadventism.com/TSeeber.htm
After I demonstrated his terrible responsibility for saying words like
that on the newsgroups directly in the climate of September 11th
fulfilling the stated definition of a terrorist, Ted Seeber ducked out
from dialoguing with me even though he had been trailing my postings
and wrangling with me tit-for-tat.
I then kept raving and raving about what Ted Seeber had said. NONE OF
THE OTHER WORKERS FOR THE ANTICHRIST DARED TO TAKE NOTICE OVER WHAT
TED SEEBER HAD SAID OR DONE. They came to attack me telling me that I
insulted the man, and I therefore was an "incomprehensible" and "evil"
man sending in uncivil postings. Antichrist Lamarr told us that I was
not human as I dared to respect the lives of millions of men, women
and little children who were not just ordinary people, but were the
very saints of God! All of them attacked me taking turns and telling
the world I am the only problem on the newsgroups. Through this we
discover that Rome has not changed. It shows they are not to use the
claim that Ted Seeber was not representing Rome here. His words did
not offend them.
That is why you notice all claims that Seeber did not do what I said
he did, are just a squeak and from among the most unscrupulous of them
all, Antichrist MSiciliana. I have told Antichrist MSiciliana to LET
THE MAN SPEAK FOR HIMSELF many times over. The advice sounds logical,
does it NOT? From day one, TED SEEBER COULD NOT DENY WHAT I HAD SAID
ABOUT WHAT HE HAD DONE. FROM DAY ONE HE HAD NOTHING TO SAY ABOUT MY
CLAIMS AGAINST WHAT HE HAD DONE. He had been posting on the
newsgroups for almost two months afterward and then ducked out at the
end of January.
Just like Antichrist MSiciliana was the only one trying to show the
world I taught that Ellen White was the Antichrist, so she is the only
one now trying to babble to us that Ted Seeber did not boldly condemn
the lives of all non-Catholics on the basis of Vatican principle!
Although Antichrist MSiciliana claims that Ted Seeber did not condemn
all non-Catholics, with all my ravings about what was done, she is the
only one unscrupulous enough to claim Seeber did not do it. All the
rest of them acknowledge that he did. The Pope should give Antichrist
MSiciliana an award or elect her the next pope!
For the Work Finished!
Ted McMillan
tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com
THE LAST WORD ON ADVENTIST TRUTH!
http://www.seventh-dayadventism.com
Andrew
Mr. Seeber has been gone for many months now. We don't
know if he is even still alive. He was suffering from a number
of major health problems.
As I recall from his posts, he was far more kind, courteous
and respectful to others than his critic who insults everyone
with ridicule and contempt.
When Jesus interacted with others, He was redemptive. He knew
that through His grace the most degraded could become children
of the Most High. His life was a constant revelation of love for
others. He did not insult sinners with ridicule and contempt. No,
for they were the objects of His redemptive mission. He came to
SAVE---NOT to CONDEMN.
"For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the
world; but that the world through him might be saved.
John 3:17
"Since you cannot discern motive, you are incapable of judging another.
In criticizing him,(Mr Seeber) you are passing sentence upon yourself;
for you show that you are a participant with Satan, the accuser of the
brethren. The Lord says, 'Examine yourselves, whether ye be in the faith;
prove your own selves.' This is our work".
Desire of Ages 314
"If we have a sense of the long-suffering of God toward us, we shall not
be found judging or accusing others. When Christ was living on the earth,
how surprised His associates would have been, if, after becoming
acquainted with Him, they had heard Him speak one word of accusation,
of fault-finding, or of impatience. Let us never forget that those who love
Him are to represent Him in character."
Ministry of Healing 489
The "accuser of the brethren" is Satan. Rev 12:10
Let us not join ranks with Satan, "whom the Lord shall consume with the
spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming;"
but with Jesus Christ to whom was given all power in heaven and earth,
and who will confer immortality on all who have followed Him and who
love His appearing. Amen.
Mike
Why do you continue? Your hatred of Catholics is all people see. Bigotry,
heresies and lies are the only truths you promote. Christians of all walks
have pointed this out to you. Even non-Christians have tried to reason with
you.
Brotherly Correction
'If your brother does something wrong, go and have it out with him alone,
between your two selves. If he listens to you, you have won back your
brother. If he does not listen, take one or two others along with you:
whatever the misdemeanour, the evidence of two or three witnesses is
required to sustain the charge. But if he refuses to listen to these,
report it to the community; and if he refuses to listen to the community,
treat him like a gentile or a tax collector.'In truth I tell you, whatever
you bind on earth will be bound in heaven; whatever you loose on earth will
be loosed in heaven. (Mat 18:15-18 NJB)
Maybe you should do a search of the NG's and see how many times you have
been told this by one or more members of Christ's body.
--
Mike
[139] "Grace: I ask for the gift of being able to recognize the false lights
of Lucifer and for the help not to be lead astray; I also ask for what I
desire: a graced knowledge of true human living exemplified in Jesus Christ,
my Lord and my God, and the grace to live my life in His way." Amen! (St.
Ignatius)
Ted McMillan
does not deal at all with the topic nor the points that are expressed
in the original posting:
"Mike" <hope2b...@justice.com> wrote in message news:<qEwq8.3833$lA6.1...@news2.east.cox.net>...
> Ted,
> Why do you continue? Your hatred of Catholics is all people see. Bigotry,
> heresies and lies are the only truths you promote. Christians of all walks
> have pointed this out to you. Even non-Christians have tried to reason with
> you.
Sir, I don't know why I keep harping about murdered Protestants who
were shown love in your incredible eyes. I would say that you need to
relieve all association with the Antichrist and you will have some
hope and will know the difference between love and hate.
> Brotherly Correction
Antichristly correction!
> 'If your brother does something wrong, go and have it out with him alone,
> between your two selves.
That was already done. Will you all stop preaching things you are
immuned to? Just cut all association with the Antichrist and you will
have some form of chance.
> If he listens to you, you have won back your
> brother. If he does not listen, take one or two others along with you:
> whatever the misdemeanour, the evidence of two or three witnesses is
> required to sustain the charge. But if he refuses to listen to these,
> report it to the community; and if he refuses to listen to the community,
> treat him like a gentile or a tax collector.'In truth I tell you, whatever
> you bind on earth will be bound in heaven; whatever you loose on earth will
> be loosed in heaven. (Mat 18:15-18 NJB)
You all have already expressed too much hatred for me and other
Non-Catholics.
> Maybe you should do a search of the NG's and see how many times you have
> been told this by one or more members of Christ's body.
And I have seen every single one of them break this principle as if
they never knew it. It was members of ANTICHRIST'S BODY. Did the IQ
you claim was given to you by Jesus in any way tell you that you are
to deal with the points and issues presented?
Cut your ties to the Antichrist and you will at least make humanity!
http://www.seventh-dayadventism.com/AntiJesM.htm
Ted McMillan
tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com
Ted McMillan
> Why do you continue? Your hatred of Catholics is all people see. Bigotry,
> heresies and lies are the only truths you promote. Christians of all walks
> have pointed this out to you. Even non-Christians have tried to reason with
> you.
>
> Brotherly Correction
>
> 'If your brother does something wrong, go and have it out with him alone,
> between your two selves. If he listens to you, you have won back your
> brother. If he does not listen, take one or two others along with you:
> whatever the misdemeanour, the evidence of two or three witnesses is
> required to sustain the charge. But if he refuses to listen to these,
> report it to the community; and if he refuses to listen to the community,
> treat him like a gentile or a tax collector.'In truth I tell you, whatever
> you bind on earth will be bound in heaven; whatever you loose on earth will
> be loosed in heaven. (Mat 18:15-18 NJB)
>
> Maybe you should do a search of the NG's and see how many times you have
> been told this by one or more members of Christ's body.
Again Antichrist MSiciliana dares to tell us that Ted Seeber did not
Ted McMillan
> Mr. Seeber has been gone for many months now. We don't
> know if he is even still alive. He was suffering from a number
> of major health problems.
The millions of Non-Catholics who were brutally murdered have been
gone for many decades now and even centuries. They were suffering
from a number of health problems induced from where they often had to
flee and also from the tortures they were receiving. They did not
hate Catholics, nor did they make statements like Ted Seeber that
Antichrist Andrew, being another such super-terrorist is ignoring
here.
> As I recall from his posts, he was far more kind, courteous
> and respectful to others than his critic who insults everyone
> with ridicule and contempt.
As I recall, the title of this post and those of the other workers of
the Antichrist including "Teddy McMillan" is along this line:
Re: JESUS came to SAVE---NOT to CONDEMN
When will Antichrist Andrew, Nick, Lamarr, Cindy, Angelo and the rest
ever learn this. If they would stop preaching it for a minute and
look at the evidence and deal with the evidence, they might understand
the titles they usually post. If they would stop preaching against
condemning people as worse than murdering them, they would learn what
it is to attack and condemn someone. If Antichrist Andrew would stop
blaspheming the name of Christ with teachings on love he has no
intention to keep, he would have some chance at being saved and would
save himself from the blood of guilt that is constantly weighing on
his grotequely nefarious head.
> When Jesus interacted with others, He was redemptive. He knew
> that through His grace the most degraded could become children
> of the Most High. His life was a constant revelation of love for
> others. He did not insult sinners with ridicule and contempt. No,
> for they were the objects of His redemptive mission. He came to
> SAVE---NOT to CONDEMN.
Jesus told much more innocent people: the Pharisees that they were
liars. Jesus also told them that they were the children of the Devil.
How then can He leave the Children of the Antichrist--skilled in much
more years of deceit and bloodshed--without exposition?
Will Antichrist Andrew finally learn not to condemn? Why is he
constantly writing posts of condemnation against McMillan? What is
the issue of blood again with Seeber? Why can't any of the workers of
the Antichrist--even Nick--deal with the points and questions I bring?
They ran out of Vatican gas.
> "For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the
> world; but that the world through him might be saved.
>
> John 3:17
So in all this Jesuit preaching, Ted McMillan is condemned as hateful,
etc. Terrorist Seeber is being helped to capture sympathy. The dead
bodies of the saints are again urinated upon, and so is the system of
liberty currently still alive in the United States.
> "Since you cannot discern motive, you are incapable of judging another.
Does Antichrist Andrew Judge McMillan?
> In criticizing him,(Mr Seeber) you are passing sentence upon yourself;
Is Antichrist Andrew proving his damnation? How many people who
denounced Osama Bin Laden are going to hell for that?
> for you show that you are a participant with Satan, the accuser of the
> brethren.
Well spoke by one of the workers of the Antichrist exclusively
condemning me.
> The Lord says, 'Examine yourselves, whether ye be in the faith;
> prove your own selves.' This is our work".
> Desire of Ages 314
When have the workers of the Antichrist ever examined themselves?
They still believe that evidence and points must not be addressed.
They must just send attack posts to smother the evidence. Why then do
they charge me with doing that? It is not because I disagree with
them. It is because they are unscrupulous: they are the Children of
the Antichrist.
> "If we have a sense of the long-suffering of God toward us, we shall not
> be found judging or accusing others.
Is and has Antichrist Andrew ever been found NOT judging and
condemning McMillan?
> When Christ was living on the earth,
> how surprised His associates would have been, if, after becoming
> acquainted with Him, they had heard Him speak one word of accusation,
> of fault-finding, or of impatience. Let us never forget that those who love
> Him are to represent Him in character."
> Ministry of Healing 489
The problem is that Christ accused them to their faces of being liars
and of being Children of Satan. I have mentioned this before, but
this attack by Antichrist Andrew accomplishes two things: first it is
to attack McMillan, and second it is to establish the non-reliability
of Ellen White's writings.
> The "accuser of the brethren" is Satan. Rev 12:10
Hi Satan!
> Let us not join ranks with Satan, "whom the Lord shall consume with the
> spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming;"
> but with Jesus Christ to whom was given all power in heaven and earth,
> and who will confer immortality on all who have followed Him and who
> love His appearing. Amen.
You are too late Antichrist Andrew! But here is the originating post
Antichrist Andrew is trying to obscure in order to protect another
super-terrorist from the Antichrist:
------------------
FREEZE!
------------------
------------------
------------------
------------------
http://www.seventh-dayadventism.com/TSeeber.htm
For the Work Finished!
Ted McMillan
Andrew
Let us consider God's long-suffering toward us before accusing others.
"If we have a sense of the long-suffering of God toward us, we shall not
be found judging or accusing others. When Christ was living on the earth,
Will Nordmeyer
"Ted McMillan" <tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com> wrote in message
news:c9dac66d.02040...@posting.google.com...
> "Andrew" <and...@321.net> wrote in message
news:<a8e2dj$30t$1...@nntp9.atl.mindspring.net>...
> > Mr. Seeber has been gone for many months now. We don't
> > know if he is even still alive. He was suffering from a number
> > of major health problems.
>
> The millions of Non-Catholics who were brutally murdered have been
> gone for many decades now and even centuries.
Millions? Please document MILLIONS Ted. Specific documentation for
your claim please.
______________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Still Only $9.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
With NINE Servers In California And Texas - The Worlds Uncensored News Source
Mike
"Ted McMillan" <tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com> wrote in message
news:c9dac66d.02040...@posting.google.com...
> Antichrist Mike starts for an attack again. You will >notice that he
does not deal at all with the topic nor the >points that are expressed in
the original posting:
>
> "Mike" <hope2b...@justice.com> wrote in message
news:<qEwq8.3833$lA6.1...@news2.east.cox.net>...
> > Ted,
> > Why do you continue? Your hatred of Catholics is all >>people see.
Bigotry, heresies and lies are the only >>truths you promote. Christians of
all walks
> > have pointed this out to you. Even non-Christians >>have tried to reason
with you.
>
> Sir, I don't know why I keep harping about murdered >Protestants who were
shown love in your incredible >eyes. I would say that you need to relieve
all association >with the Antichrist and you will have some hope and will
>know the difference between love and hate.
>
Ted this is a frist good step you admit you don't have control over
yourself.
> > Brotherly Correction
>
> Antichristly correction!
>
> > 'If your brother does something wrong, go and have it >>out with him
alone, between your two selves.
>
> That was already done. Will you all stop preaching >things you are
immuned to? Just cut all association with >the Antichrist and you will have
some form of chance.
I know it was already done. But you still don't listen, and I know two or
more of us have tried to talk to you. I guess my next step is to take your
advice and treat you as you have requested.
> > If he listens to you, you have won back your
> > brother. If he does not listen, take one or two others >>along with you:
whatever the misdemeanour, the >>evidence of two or three witnesses is
> > required to sustain the charge. But if he refuses to >>listen to these,
report it to the community; and if he >>refuses to listen >>to the
community, treat him like a >>gentile or a tax collector.'In truth I tell
you, whatever
> > you bind on earth will be bound in heaven; whatever >>you loose on earth
will be loosed in heaven. (Mat >>18:15-18 NJB)
>
> You all have already expressed too much hatred for me >and other
Non-Catholics.
Ted, not that you care about truth but, I don't hate anyone.
> > Maybe you should do a search of the NG's and see >>How many times you
have been told this by one or >>more members of Christ's body.
>
> And I have seen every single one of them break this >principle as if they
never knew it. It was members of >ANTICHRIST'S BODY. Did the IQ you claim
was >given to you by Jesus in any way tell you that you are
> to deal with the points and issues presented?
And you stay true to your principles of bigotry, heresies and lies.
What points, all I have seen from you are your abusive extraneous attacks on
people and not on the subject. Complicated by you interjecting a false cause
(non causa, pro causa) "taking what is not the cause for the cause" then
you rely on (Argumentum ad Verecundiam) "Appeal to Authority" that is an
appeal to an unqualified expert or irrelevant authority such as yourself, to
make your case. I have yet to see you enter into a discussion with anyone,
were you used coherent and persuasive reasoning to make a point.
> Cut your ties to the Antichrist and you will at least make >humanity!
Take Care Ted
--
Mike
>
> >
> Ted McMillan
>
Ted McMillan
> "Ted McMillan" <tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com> wrote in message
> news:c9dac66d.02040...@posting.google.com...
> > "Andrew" <and...@321.net> wrote in message
> news:<a8e2dj$30t$1...@nntp9.atl.mindspring.net>...
> > > Mr. Seeber has been gone for many months now. We don't
> > > know if he is even still alive. He was suffering from a number
> > > of major health problems.
> >
> > The millions of Non-Catholics who were brutally murdered have been
> > gone for many decades now and even centuries.
>
> Millions? Please document MILLIONS Ted. Specific documentation for
> your claim please.
Ted McMillan is unloving? Mean? A monster? Kindly provide
documentation please dear worker for the Antichrist! Isn't it weird
that the workers of the Antichrist, so skilled in evading evidence,
are requesting it?
OH I'M SORRY! 999,999 Christians were murdered. That is still more
than all the present-day cults combined to an exponential degree!
Worse than this is that Antichrist Nordy is upset that I mentioned
about millions of Saints murdered by his cult and he will not see that
one of the cult members by the name of Ted Seeber gave approval to
that action and showed that it should be a way of life. After making
that statement, Antichrist Nordy uses his Jesuit arts to focus
attention on the man who reproved the reincarnate monster.
Here again is what your fellow super-terrorist from the Antichrist did
on the newsgroups:
TERRORIST TED SEEBER CONDEMNED ALL NON-CATHOLICS ON THE NEWSGROUPS!
Ted McMillan
> Let us consider God's long-suffering toward us before accusing others.
Let's consider almost all the posts of Antichrist Andrew were
accusations against Ted McMillan, who reproved someone who condemned
all non-Catholics to persecution and death.
> "If we have a sense of the long-suffering of God toward us, we shall not
> be found judging or accusing others.
But Antichrist Andrew can and does. He is the best at teaching us not
to however, and there is no conscience enough to make any of his eyes
even blink slightly.
> When Christ was living on the earth,
> how surprised His associates would have been, if, after becoming
> acquainted with Him, they had heard Him speak one word of accusation,
> of fault-finding, or of impatience. Let us never forget that those who love
> Him are to represent Him in character."
Ministry of Healing 489
How surprised Christ would be to see one posting this stuff and
accusing right at the same time as the workers of the Antichrist are
skilled in doing?
Ted McMillan
> In article <c9dac66d.02040...@posting.google.com>,> And none of Ted McMillan's ravings prove his statements.
We both indeed rave. Look at the proofs of Antichrist MSiciliana
above, and now look at my proof that Ted Seeber condemned all
non-Catholics. You can first ask yourselves why Ted Seeber himself
has not been able to defend against what I said about him, but has to
breast feed from the unscrupulous queen:
------------------
FREEZE!
principle. He is talking as if he is proud of what he is saying. And
why were the 5 to 6 thousand people killed in the WTC terrorist
disaster of September 11 again? You can see that Osama can speak
similar words!
Andrew
"Since you cannot discern motive, you are incapable
of judging another. In criticizing (Mr Seeber),
you are passing sentence upon yourself; for you
show that you are a participant with Satan, the
accuser .."
Desire of Ages p. 314
E.G.White
. The Lord says, 'Examine yourselves, whether ye be in the faith;
Will Nordmeyer
"Ted McMillan" <tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com> wrote in message
news:c9dac66d.02040...@posting.google.com...
> "Will Nordmeyer" <wi...@nospam.daytondigital.net> wrote in message
news:<3cab4734$1...@news5.uncensored-news.com>...
> > "Ted McMillan" <tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com> wrote in message
> > news:c9dac66d.02040...@posting.google.com...
> > > "Andrew" <and...@321.net> wrote in message
> > news:<a8e2dj$30t$1...@nntp9.atl.mindspring.net>...
> > > > Mr. Seeber has been gone for many months now. We don't
> > > > know if he is even still alive. He was suffering from a number
> > > > of major health problems.
> > >
> > > The millions of Non-Catholics who were brutally murdered have been
> > > gone for many decades now and even centuries.
> >
> > Millions? Please document MILLIONS Ted. Specific documentation for
> > your claim please.
>
>
> Ted McMillan is unloving?
By your non-Christian namecalling, I'd say yes.
> Mean?
Never called you that...
> A monster?
Also never called you that.
> Kindly provide documentation please dear worker for the Antichrist!
The documentation is exactly above - your calling me a worker for the
Antichrist. That's pretty unloving (not to mention bearing false
witness).
> Isn't it weird that the workers of the Antichrist, so skilled in
evading evidence, are requesting it?
>
And yet, I've continually pointed you to the evidence of your
non-Christian, non-loving namecalling. There's another case of it there
"workers of the Antichrist"
>
> OH I'M SORRY! 999,999 Christians were murdered.
Documentation please? Cite authoritative material that documents the
number of Christians murdered.
> That is still more than all the present-day cults combined to an
exponential degree!
Except you can't back it up with evidence.
> Worse than this is that Antichrist Nordy is upset that I mentioned
about millions of Saints murdered by his cult
I'm bothered about you making up numbers and lying. I'm also bothered
about you calling the Roman Catholic Church a cult.
Snipped irrelevant namecalling and comments about Ted Seeber
Paul
Step back and analyze every thread you have had with Ted. Next think back
to about the third grade. I think you will see a correlation. In the name
calling; putting the ever powerful third-grade insult of tacking a 'y' on
the end of your opponents name, or if you really want to get them rhyming
it--as in georgie porgie. Then there is the eternal list of wrongs that
every third grader can recall when needed to justify why their opponent is
deserving of condemnation.
I guess for me it came down to waking up one day and asking myself: Why am
I arguing as if I were back in the third grade. Nothing ever changes and
here I am allowing myself to react to a third-grade mentality: Why? Anyway
I just quit responding after that and boy was it a relief. Believe me you
have nothing to prove with Ted and he can go on an on about you and no one
is going to pay the least bit of attention to it. Anyway I just thought I'd
share that thought.
Godspeed,
Paul
"Will Nordmeyer" <wi...@nospam.daytondigital.net> wrote in message
news:3cac4...@news5.uncensored-news.com...
Ted McMillan
> "Since you cannot discern motive, you are incapable
> of judging another. In criticizing (Mr Seeber),
> you are passing sentence upon yourself; for you
> show that you are a participant with Satan, the
> accuser .."
>
>
> Desire of Ages p. 314
> E.G.White
Then how does Antichrist Andrew know that Ted McMillan is mean,
unloving and needs to surrender to Christ? How did Antichrist Cindy,
Lamarr, Nordy and even Nick know? They all posted publicly that it is
without doubt that Ted McMillan is not even human! And how come
Antichrist Andrew didn't see fit to teach these this valuable lesson
he is blasphemously quoting from Desire of Ages? He gives us this
word of caution he never performed with himself:
> . The Lord says, 'Examine yourselves, whether ye be in the faith;
> prove your own selves.' This is our work".
Here again is a word about the super-terrorist who posted on these
newsgroups. The other super-terrorists, including Antichrist Andrew,
cannot notice him, but the evidence ultimately will:
------------------
FREEZE!
principle. He is talking as if he is proud of what he is saying. And
why were the 5 to 6 thousand people killed in the WTC terrorist
disaster of September 11 again? You can see that Osama can speak
similar words!
I, being infuriated, respond:
Robert A. Walker
tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com (Ted McMillan) wrote in message news:<c9dac66d.02040...@posting.google.com>...
Ted McMillan
> Ted the only conflict is in your mind.
Spoken by the Vatican despot!
Again, Antichrist Mike provides only names against me calling me
delusional and despotic. There is no evidence of anything and he just
wastes our non-Antichrist time.
Here therefore again is what their fellow Super-terrorist brother from
the Antichrist did:
------------------
FREEZE!
principle. He is talking as if he is proud of what he is saying. And
why were the 5 to 6 thousand people killed in the WTC terrorist
disaster of September 11 again? You can see that Osama can speak
similar words!
I, being infuriated, respond:
Ted McMillan
> No one cares about your lunacy.
Isn't it odd that you workers for the Antichrist always advise each
other to ignore me, but never can? That I am nothing, but you can't
dismiss me, and then you all take turns because you have to trail my
postings?
Again, here is the evidence against Antichrist Ted Seeber who
condemned all non-Catholics just as much as the other workers of the
Antichrist here who do everything to cover up what was done and won't
let Antichrist Seeber speak for himself and answer the issues:
Ted McMillan
> "Ted McMillan" <tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com> wrote in message
> news:c9dac66d.02040...@posting.google.com...
> > "Will Nordmeyer" <wi...@nospam.daytondigital.net> wrote in message
> news:<3cab4734$1...@news5.uncensored-news.com>...
> > > "Ted McMillan" <tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com> wrote in message
> > > news:c9dac66d.02040...@posting.google.com...
> > > > "Andrew" <and...@321.net> wrote in message
> news:<a8e2dj$30t$1...@nntp9.atl.mindspring.net>...
> > > > > Mr. Seeber has been gone for many months now. We don't
> > > > > know if he is even still alive. He was suffering from a number
> > > > > of major health problems.
> > > >
> > > > The millions of Non-Catholics who were brutally murdered have been
> > > > gone for many decades now and even centuries.
> > >
> > > Millions? Please document MILLIONS Ted. Specific documentation for
> > > your claim please.
> >
> >
> > Ted McMillan is unloving?
>
> By your non-Christian namecalling, I'd say yes.
Yes you people killed millions. My documentation is better than
yours. But on the issue of meanness, do you remember that a man
condemned to death many Christians? Which is worse? Let us know.
But as far as being mean is concerned:
You mean like Christ called the more innocent Pharisees liars and
Children of the Devil? That's a principle that the Children of Satan
have to be made known. So that's why I acted like Christ.
> > Mean?
>
> Never called you that...
Well then I never called you a worker for the Antichrist, Antichrist
Nordymeyer.
> > A monster?
> Also never called you that.
Well then I never called you a worker for the Antichrist, Antichrist
Nordymeyer.
> > Kindly provide documentation please dear worker for the Antichrist!
>
> The documentation is exactly above - your calling me a worker for the
> Antichrist. That's pretty unloving (not to mention bearing false
> witness).
Your documentation that you are a worker for the Antichrist is
everywhere. You falsely act as if it is worse to name-call than to
murder someone just to smother out the fact that Ted Seeber boldly
condemned all non-Catholics to persecution and death on December 5,
2001. I have already told you to agree that Protestants can hire
criminals to slowly torture you and your clan to death together and
that we would agree for you all to call us all the names you want
freely. There is just part of the documentation that you do work for
the Antichrist. You didn't even give the answer for whether or not
you would want to try the proposition.
> > Isn't it weird that the workers of the Antichrist, so skilled in
> evading evidence, are requesting it?
> >
> And yet, I've continually pointed you to the evidence of your
> non-Christian, non-loving namecalling. There's another case of it there
> "workers of the Antichrist"
And yet I'm constantly pointing you to the evidence that you work for
the Antichrist. You keep calling me mean and unloving. Others are
making attack posts against me and you don't notice it just like
Antichrist Cindy. It is not me who chose to work for the antichrist.
It is you people.
> > OH I'M SORRY! 999,999 Christians were murdered.
>
> Documentation please? Cite authoritative material that documents the
> number of Christians murdered.
I keep giving you the evidence pointing you to the millions that you
all have killed and you still act unscrupulous. Ted Seeber even
gladly told us that Protestants are supposed to be persecuted and
killed. To cover that over you keep name-calling people as mean,
unloving and name-callers.
I can't help it if you can't see the evidence. You work for the
Antichrist. You will not be able to see it and your crematoriums if
you don't quit the cult.
> > That is still more than all the present-day cults combined to an
> exponential degree!
>
> Except you can't back it up with evidence.
The evidence is all over, but you have to stop working for the
Antichrist to see it.
> > Worse than this is that Antichrist Nordy is upset that I mentioned
> about millions of Saints murdered by his cult
>
> I'm bothered about you making up numbers and lying. I'm also bothered
> about you calling the Roman Catholic Church a cult.
But the proof is all over. You have to quit the Antichrist in order
to see it. Why can't you see it all around you? I gave you the
answer. You have to quit the Antichrist. There is one such murderer
posting on the newsgroups who told us that all non-Catholics should be
persecuted and killed. He has had time to concoct an excuse by now as
he is back. If you can see this super-terrorist, you would more get
to know about the millions that were slain.
> Snipped irrelevant namecalling and comments about Ted Seeber
Pasting the evidence against Ted Seeber here:
------------------
FREEZE!
principle. He is talking as if he is proud of what he is saying. And
why were the 5 to 6 thousand people killed in the WTC terrorist
disaster of September 11 again? You can see that Osama can speak
similar words!
I, being infuriated, respond:
------------------
------------------
------------------
------------------
After I demonstrated his terrible responsibility for saying words like
Ted McMillan
> In message <c9dac66d.02040...@posting.google.com>, tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com (Ted McMillan) wrote:
> > Again Antichrist MSiciliana dares to tell us that Ted Seeber did not
> > condemn all non-Catholics back on December 5, 2001.
>
WOW! I AM SO SURPRISED!! SAW TED SEEBER BACK AND IT NEVER OCCURRED
TO ME THAT FINALLY HE WILL COME AND TELL US THAT HE DIDN'T DO WHAT HE
DID!! Left after almost two months since condemning all non-Catholics
on December 5, 2001. The charge is very very serious and the man saw
me posting and raving about it. Ducked out of the conversation and
didn't come back till now. The man has been virulently defended by
every other super-terrorist but himself. He's back now!! Was his
time spent away been put to good use?
> > I have brought up
> > issues to prove that he did exactly that, but there is a certain bent
> > a person's IQ would take when he or she works for the Antichrist.
>
> Yeah, one that actually understands what is written, rather than what
> one wishes to interpret. Guess which I see as the AntiChrist.
WOW! I AM SO SURPRISED!! SAW TED SEEBER BACK AND IT NEVER OCCURRED
TO ME THAT FINALLY HE WILL COME AND TELL US THAT HE DIDN'T DO WHAT HE
DID!! Left after almost two months since condemning all non-Catholics
on December 5, 2001. The charge is very very serious and the man saw
me posting and raving about it. Ducked out of the conversation and
didn't come back till now. The man has been virulently defended by
every other super-terrorist but himself. He's back now!! Was his
time spent away been put to good use?
> > Here now again is the actual conversation and where you can find it
> > posted on the newsgroups. Here is the evidence every worker for the
> > Antichrist, be they sabbathkeepers or even witches, have ignored in
> > favor over their paranoia that uncivil posts are being submitted to
> > the newsgroups. Being workers for the Antichrist, their solution to
> > this problem was to submit more uncivil postings:
>
> http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&group=alt.religion.christian.adventist&scoring=r&as_drrb=b&as_mind=5&as_minm=10&as_miny=2001&as_maxd=7&as_maxm=10&as_maxy=2001&selm=55de15cf.0110071743.205a5dea%40posting.google.com
>
> And looking at that, I was assessing the events of the past by the
> morals of the past, and the events of the present by the morals of the
> present.
>
> To do otherwise would be to commit intellectual dishonesty.
And he put denying what I was exposing about him way in the past. To
add to that was the man's arguments about liberty. Was he arguing in
the past about that? He was telling us it was necessary to eradicate
liberty because of the present terrorist climate, but in the year 2000
and previous, he was pushing the same thing.
Right! And Jack and Jill did break their crown and tumbled over.
> > I reprove despot Seeber for gloating over the dead bodies of the
> > Protestants! The following is the actual statement and reply:
>
> And I have reproved you for attempting to use the morals of a
> Protestant and in fact REBELIOUS group to try to judge
> the difference.
Let's see the terrorist in action again:
> > Ted Seeber:
> > > Can you really be said to be believing in the Bible if you don't live it?
> > > NONE of the groups persecuted by the Catholics were living the Bible. They were living their personal > > interpretations of God, not the Bible.
>
> Yep, that's exactly right. NONE of the groups persecuted by Catholics were
> living the Bible.
>
> Now for your false interpretation:
Ted McMillan replies:
> > WERE THE 5 TO 6 THOUSANDS WHO WERE KILLED BY THE TERRORIST
> > ATTACKS LIVING BY THE BIBLE?
There you go. The entire case answered!
> No, they were living the Greed of Capitalism.
What were the victims of September 11 living terrorist Seeby?
> > Your statement is incredibly insensitive and you constantly reveal
> > that what is written by your uncomparably bloody religion is true.
> > All I know is that you people murdered millions in the most horrible
> > ways. I DON'T CARE IF YOU MURDERED ATHEISTS!! I am not that
> > inhumanly insensitive for an animal like you to be worried about me
> > having guns!
>
> Why not? You're out to murder us.
Dear Readers: I was not trained at the Vatican. The charge is false.
I talk about blood. In their minds they talk about something they
claim is worse: name-calling those who would shed blood.
> > Again, despot: WHY IS THE POPE APOLOGIZING!! You have just sent us
> > your bigoted despot opinions without providing any MAYBEES! Why not
> > try to prove what you are saying against me using the scriptures then?
> > How often have you even answered my questions?
>
> Why should I use scripture against somebody who won't even be bothered
> to see that the ONLY true Christians for the first 1500 years were Catholic?
> If you can't understand basic history the way it happened, how can you EVER
> hope to see the other point of view?
You mean the same ones here who cannot do without dishonesty including
the dishonesty in the statement before my reply? You mean the ones
who have to apologize for shedding blood and get diarrhea because of
David Koresh in their switchable cult-busting mode? You mean the ones
I have been asking to provide evidence for all they say but instead
have been just attacking? What is the proof that the terrorists
around me psting here are the only true Christians?
> > Thousands of people lost their lives in the World Trade Center
> > disaster. How many of them lived by the bible?
>
> None, but that's the wrong question, since they were killed by Islamics.
Did they deserve to be killed by Islamics? If you say no, I ask, did
the Protestants deserve to be killed by the Antichrist? Of course,
Meehan has to test his Vatican training in order to scramble our
minds. He came out zealously showing us why the Protestants had to be
persecuted and killed. He told us why. That's why he only shows up
now to continue into deceive mode.
It is the principle. According to him before, anyone who doesn't live
the bible according to his Antichrist standards should be persecuted
and killed. Now he tells us it only matters if Rome does the killing.
> The question SHOULD be "How many of them lived by the Koran?"
I don't care what they lived by. All I focus on is the person who
made the statement. If a religious leader says people should be
killed if they don't live by the Koran, then I am against that person.
He is a super-terrorist though not as much as Seeber.
> > They were not even in
> > rural settings nor under persecution.
>
> Actually, yes, the murderers do see themselves as being persecuted,
> just like you do.
I wasn't talking about the murderers. I was talking about the victims
of September 11.
> They see themselves as being persecuted by
> immoral people who keep broadcasting pornographic images
> and commercials at them through TV sets. Those people are funded
> by the people who were in the World Trade Center.
>
> This is all quite easy to understand, if you bother to learn about the
> OTHER point of view. Since you don't, I don't expect you to understand.
I don't relish Osama's point of view. Neither do I relish yours.
Have you found the other point of view proving that Catholics are not
the only true Christians thinking themselves superior to their FELLOW
brothers and sisters in Christ? Have you found out yet that Christ
did not say the true church is designated by age or appointment of
religious leaders in lineage?
> > All those in the WTC were
> > products of the modern revolution. I would even say that most of them
> > believe that homosexual activity is acceptable behavior. They all
> > lived in the modern age and are products of it. I can bet you that
> > homosexuality was not a problem for those who were slain by Rome!
>
> But those in the WTC weren't slain by Rome, they were slain by Mecca.
But Seeber told us as a point of principle why Rome slew the
Protestants and demonstrated his approval of those principles. He
know this, but he is in deceive mode again.
> > I don't care whether or not they lived by the bible according to a
> > murderous despot!
>
> And you also don't care about the truth.
Why do you think I am showing that Rome has not changed through your
remarks that all non-Catholics should be persecuted and killed?
> > ------------------
> > What I was saying here was that the Protestants viewed homosexual
> > behavior as intolerable and abominable. Likely most of the victims of
> > 911 did not view matters that way. Since they likely did not live the
> > bible according to Seeber's standards, what should be their fate?
>
> What makes you think that Homosexuality has ANYTHING to do with my standard
> for interpreting the Bible?
Antichrist Seeber is using his arts to stray from the subject. I was
dwelling on Seeber's statement that people who do not live the bible
according to him should be persecuted and killed. That's a principle
stated that is irrelevant to who have killed the victims of September
11.
> > So here we see the issues and prove that Rome has not changed. These
> > statements of Seeber did not just come like a bolt of lightning. This
> > was the last leg of a series of emotional ramblings between us both as
> > I was defending human liberty, privacy and the American Constitution
>
> None of which are Biblical, by the way.....
Seeber's statements are not American but we can find the Communists,
Nazis and Facists saying the same things he is always saying.
> > while Seeber was condemning all of these and demanding change under
> > the false pretext that the terror attacks require a police state for
> > security. Seeber told us boldly that he works against the
> > Constitution to change it to be interpreted opposite from what it
> > currently is under "acceptable confines" from the INSIDE! This is
> > just what people like Jack Chick WERE SAYING FOLKS!!
>
> And that's why people like Jack Chick are neither Christian nor on the
> side of Truth.
Jack Chick did not condemn all non-Protestants to persecution and
death. Seeber is using his training to veer off the issue. Jack
Chick was just a small mention in the last point, but Seeber
endeavored to put all weight on him to take away from what I was
saying.
> > Interestingly, although he was even telling us that privacy was
> > NOWHERE to be found in the American Constitution, go to his website
> > and you will find something strange. Would you like to have an email
> > account given to you by Ted Seeber? Well go to his website and you
> > can get one. What's more is, according to him, IT'S FREE! Want to
> > get a free email account from a man arguing against basic human
> > privacy? You go right ahead!
>
> Yep. Not a problem....Well, there has been one problem with that....
> Some privacy nut upstream from me at Verio decided to kill incoming
> relay packets.
Like I said for all who agree with Seeber: he has argued against basic
human liberties and including the rights to privacy. He is offering
email accounts and he offers them for free. Cast your vote to receive
one and to use it honestly. Only the fellow workers for the
Antichrist would be dumb enough to do that!
> > For a long time he was spitting upon the principles of human liberty
> > as had ALL those brutal regimes that easily took the lives of people
> > and committed atrocities. He even told me that the current American
> > system respecting privacy was "increibly stupid" and "outdated." He
> > told me the current principles were as old as Martin Luther during the
> > Reformation. When I asked him the date his contrary principles were
> > created, he behaved just like Antichrist MSiciliana, Cindy, Nicholas
> > and so many others.
>
> Interesting, I'm like Nicholas now.
Interesting, the point was not dealt with.
> > You can view this evidence in much of the war that took place between
> > Ted Seeber and myself on the following webpage:
> >
> > http://www.seventh-dayadventism.com/TSeeber.htm
>
> Why should they believe propaganda written by you?
Try dealing with the evidence and stop veering from it and more would
believe you instead.
> > After I demonstrated his terrible responsibility for saying words like
> > that on the newsgroups directly in the climate of September 11th
> > fulfilling the stated definition of a terrorist, Ted Seeber ducked out
> > from dialoguing with me even though he had been trailing my postings
> > and wrangling with me tit-for-tat.
>
> Actually, I decided to give up Usenet for Lent.
Ted Seeber decided to do that almost two months after he made the
damning statement and I was constantly posting my outrage about it and
his fellow super-terrorists from the Antichrist were busy defending
him for him.
> > I then kept raving and raving about what Ted Seeber had said. NONE OF
> > THE OTHER WORKERS FOR THE ANTICHRIST DARED TO TAKE NOTICE OVER WHAT
> > TED SEEBER HAD SAID OR DONE. They came to attack me telling me that I
> > insulted the man, and I therefore was an "incomprehensible" and "evil"
> > man sending in uncivil postings. Antichrist Lamarr told us that I was
> > not human as I dared to respect the lives of millions of men, women
> > and little children who were not just ordinary people, but were the
> > very saints of God! All of them attacked me taking turns and telling
> > the world I am the only problem on the newsgroups. Through this we
> > discover that Rome has not changed. It shows they are not to use the
> > claim that Ted Seeber was not representing Rome here. His words did
> > not offend them.
>
> Interesting that you consider people who believed that suicide was a virtue
> to be "Saints", and you worship them too I'll bet.
Veered off the point and issue. Who is he talking about who believed
that suicide was a virtue? It couldn't be the Protestants! Suicide
cults tend to destroy themselves. They don't need the greatest power
of the time to do that to them.
> > That is why you notice all claims that Seeber did not do what I said
> > he did, are just a squeak and from among the most unscrupulous of them
> > all, Antichrist MSiciliana. I have told Antichrist MSiciliana to LET
> > THE MAN SPEAK FOR HIMSELF many times over. The advice sounds logical,
> > does it NOT? From day one, TED SEEBER COULD NOT DENY WHAT I HAD SAID
> > ABOUT WHAT HE HAD DONE. FROM DAY ONE HE HAD NOTHING TO SAY ABOUT MY
> > CLAIMS AGAINST WHAT HE HAD DONE. He had been posting on the
> > newsgroups for almost two months afterward and then ducked out at the
> > end of January.
>
> End of February, actually.
OH THANKS!! ALL THE BETTER, HUH?? So it wasn't two months: IT WAS
THREE!!
> > Just like Antichrist MSiciliana was the only one trying to show the
> > world I taught that Ellen White was the Antichrist, so she is the only
> > one now trying to babble to us that Ted Seeber did not boldly condemn
> > the lives of all non-Catholics on the basis of Vatican principle!
>
> Because I didn't.
More proof that he did folks! Even Antichrist Caillean doesn't seem
to know this!
> > Although Antichrist MSiciliana claims that Ted Seeber did not condemn
> > all non-Catholics, with all my ravings about what was done, she is the
> > only one unscrupulous enough to claim Seeber did not do it. All the
> > rest of them acknowledge that he did. The Pope should give Antichrist
> > MSiciliana an award or elect her the next pope!
>
> And he would arrange that how, given the fact that he'd be dead when she's
> elected?
But Ted Seeber condemned all non-Catholics to persecution and death!!
WHY DID HE DO IT!!
>
> > For the Work Finished!
>
> He means for the Great Lie!
>
> The real truth about Adventism:
> http://www.ellenwhite.org
The real truth about Seeber:
http://www.seventh-dayadventism.com/TSeeber.htm
Ted McMillan
tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com
Ted McMillan
> Will,
>
> Step back and analyze every thread you have had with Ted. Next think back
> to about the third grade. I think you will see a correlation. In the name
> calling; putting the ever powerful third-grade insult of tacking a 'y' on
> the end of your opponents name, or if you really want to get them rhyming
> it--as in georgie porgie. Then there is the eternal list of wrongs that
> every third grader can recall when needed to justify why their opponent is
> deserving of condemnation.
Why do non-Catholics deserve to be persecuted and killed again Paul?
> I guess for me it came down to waking up one day and asking myself: Why am
> I arguing as if I were back in the third grade.
Especially when you all keep advising each other not to get paranoid
about Ted McMillan's postings!
> Nothing ever changes and
> here I am allowing myself to react to a third-grade mentality: Why? Anyway
> I just quit responding after that and boy was it a relief.
There you go! They keep responding and then now telling us how they
have quite responding.
> Believe me you
> have nothing to prove with Ted and he can go on an on about you and no one
> is going to pay the least bit of attention to it.
That is what they are counting on. But they, in constantly trailing
my posts while advising each other to ignore them, will do there best
to thwart and cover over the facts over what Ted Seeber has done.
They are JUST AS MUCH SUPER-TERRORISTS AS IS SEEBER.
> Anyway I just thought I'd
> share that Antichrist thought.
>
> Godspeed,
>
> Paul
Ted McMillan
tmac...@seventh-dayadventism.com
Ted McMillan
> In article <a8k76...@enews2.newsguy.com>, Theodore M. Seeber says...
> > > For a long time he was spitting upon the principles of human liberty
> > > as had ALL those brutal regimes that easily took the lives of people
> > > and committed atrocities. He even told me that the current American
> > > system respecting privacy was "increibly stupid" and "outdated." He
> > > told me the current principles were as old as Martin Luther during the
> > > Reformation. When I asked him the date his contrary principles were
> > > created, he behaved just like Antichrist MSiciliana, Cindy, Nicholas
> > > and so many others.
> >
>
> "evangelism", and the anti-Ted promptly labeled Nick an "antiChrist".
> Nick returned the favor, accusing the anti-Ted of being a Jesuit Agent.
>
> The whole scene was quite amusing. :-D
>
> Edward
There is much in that post that you are quoting. You dare tell me
what I missed? You only focus on the microscopic mention of
Antichrist Nick and ignore all the rest. All your buddies are calm in
the presence of a super-terrorist and are going haywire that someone
is pointing it out. How is it that you all are not workers of the
Antichrist? Everything is backwards! Paranoid about people pointing
out terrorists. Calm with the terrorists and preaching to people
against being paranoid!
It is very amusing?
I know it bothers you, but here is again the evidence against your
fellow super-terrorist buddy of the Vatican:
------------------
FREEZE!
principle. He is talking as if he is proud of what he is saying. And
why were the 5 to 6 thousand people killed in the WTC terrorist
disaster of September 11 again? You can see that Osama can speak
similar words!
I, being infuriated, respond:
------------------
------------------
------------------
------------------
After I demonstrated his terrible responsibility for saying words like
Ted McMillan
> know if he is even still alive. He was suffering from a number
> of major health problems.
>
> As I recall from his posts, he was far more kind, courteous
> and respectful to others than his critic who insults everyone
> with ridicule and contempt.
I do not insult everyone with ridicule and contempt. I present
super-terrorists before the world and show how they are now ready for
the end-times: with scripture in their mouths! I expose murderers and
very wicked people. I am being insulted, condemned and accused by
Jesuit Andrew here.
Ted Seeber condemned all non-Catholics after speaking in every way
against basic human liberties. A man who does that obviously has a
penal code for those who refuse to go by anti-liberty law. We have
all of history to tell what kinds of people would argue against
liberty. Here is what he has done and I would claim that Antichrist
Andrew comment upon the man who condemned all non-Catholics:
------------------
FREEZE!
principle. He is talking as if he is proud of what he is saying. And
why were the 5 to 6 thousand people killed in the WTC terrorist
disaster of September 11 again? You can see that Osama can speak
similar words!
I, being infuriated, respond:
------------------
------------------
------------------
------------------
After I demonstrated his terrible responsibility for saying words like
Ted McMillan
> know if he is even still alive. He was suffering from a number
> of major health problems.
>
> As I recall from his posts, he was far more kind, courteous
> and respectful to others than his critic who insults everyone
> with ridicule and contempt.
Of course. Ted Seeber condemned all non-Catholics to persecution and
death. Historically, haven't you all been very happy when that was
done?
To you, that is showing kindness to all non-Catholics, but I already
told you people of the antichrist that, if you want, we can switch
places and hire criminals to slowly torture you all to death. In
return, we don't mind you all calling us names. You are capable of
that and everything else!
But here again is the proof that super-terrorist Ted Seeber condemned
all non-Catholics after giving every argument against human privacy
and liberty:
------------------
FREEZE!
principle. He is talking as if he is proud of what he is saying. And
why were the 5 to 6 thousand people killed in the WTC terrorist
disaster of September 11 again? You can see that Osama can speak
similar words!
I, being infuriated, respond:
------------------
------------------
------------------
------------------
After I demonstrated his terrible responsibility for saying words like