Stupid Script Kiddies Revisited
Alan Connor
How smart can a guy be who keeps sending M$ viruses to someone's address that
he OBVIOUSLY got off usenet and therefore should know that I run Linux.
But then, he may not know how to find the headers. I mean, maybe his mother
didn't show him how....I wouldn't be surprised if EVERONE he was sending that
virus to ran Linux.
Also been getting a LOT of posts with subjects taken from various newsgroups
and threads I have posted on recently.
They all get sent to /dev/null and receive a request to re-submit the mail
with a one-time password on the subject line. Since the return address was
faked (I assume), the poor fool doesn't even know his messages were rejected.
I see that sam is posting again. Still trying to get everyone else to wear those
aluminum foil hats he loves so much, I assume?
I mean, he wouldn't be wasting his time and making a fool of himself by send-
ing me all those posts with newsgroup subjects, would he ?
Here's a clue sammy-wammy: You'll never get to be a real hacker if you spend
all your time posting inanities and trying to hassle people that have impenet-
erable shields. The latter is called "beating your head against a brick wall"
in the vernacular. It won't make you smarter.
Alan
--
For Linux/Bash users: Eliminate spam from your life
with the Mailbox-Sentry-Program. See the post
MSP (v.1d) on comp.mail.misc.
Alan Connor
>
Well, well, well........Here's the most recent entry in my mail log:
From kd6...@bde-arc.ampr.org Thu Jul 24 16:53:46 2003
Subject: Re: Stupid Script Kiddie
Status: RO
Content-Length: 78
Folder: (formail -r \ -i"Subject: Sorry, Access Denie 2359
Sammy-wammy just proved that he is, in fact, who has been sending me all those
mails with forged headers.
That's harrassment, sammy-wammy. Perhaps I should send the various posts
and mails to abuse earthlink and abuse YOUR newserver and ISP.
Oh, did I mention that I run tethereal on my ppp0 interface? I can send them
ALL the packet headers too...
Maybe it's time someone talked your mother and had her rescind your computer
priveleges. I'll bet she's sick of having to show you how to turn it on, over
and over again.
Sam
> I see that sam is posting again. Still trying to get everyone else to wear those
> aluminum foil hats he loves so much, I assume?
What, it took you a full 24 hours to come up with that?
Sheesh, that's so pathetic that even a dead horse) would be ashamed of
something like that (not to mention the greasy spot where the dead horse
used to be.
Here, in the future feel free to borrow something that's at least somewhat
creative, such as:
* Still trying to find more than a handful of firing synapses?
* Still trying to figure out your gender?
* Still trying to figure out how to digest solids?
* Still trying to make your mouth wider, in order to accomodate the second
incoming foot?
That only took less than a minute.
> I mean, he wouldn't be wasting his time and making a fool of himself by send-
> ing me all those posts with newsgroup subjects, would he ?
Speaking of aluminium foil, I have not been sending anything to anyone. Your
overinflated hubris (that's your word for the day, slim, look it up) is
giving you hallucinations.
> Here's a clue sammy-wammy: You'll never get to be a real hacker if you spend
I still like to know how old you are. You must've had a difficult time
trying to survive puberty. People tend to grow out of this kind of
phraseology, like "real hacker", usually by the time they hit twenty.
> all your time posting inanities and trying to hassle people that have impenet-
> erable shields.
Nobody's hassling you, dimbulb. Sorry to disappoint you, but I haven't sent
you anything, nor have I ever had the slightest desire to ever do anything
so utterly pointless.
You're just pissing into the wind, trying to pretend to be more important
than you really are. You're not, trust me. I don't know who's been sending
you crap. I have no idea. At least that proves that there are even more
worthless wretches than you, somewhere out there. I congratulate you on
this splendid achievement. You've proven that somewhere out in the
wilderness there are souls that have an even bigger vacuum content than you
do. I applaud your outstanding mail filtering skills. Al Gore (the guy who
invented the Internet) could certainly learn a lesson from you.
> The latter is called "beating your head against a brick wall"
> in the vernacular. It won't make you smarter.
As far as net.kooks go, you still have a long, long way to go before you
even get into the same ballpark as the legends that preceded you. Which is a
darn shame. You've wasted all this time trying to impersonate an immature,
underdeveloped poster child for the American public school system. But the
time for silly laughs is over, and you can stop pretending to be a dimbulb.
You can drop the act now. You can finally reveal to everyone (who are
waiting with baited breath) how smart you really are. I'm sure we'll all be
impressed.
Sam
> On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 23:23:25 GMT, Alan Connor <xxx...@xxxx.xxx> wrote:
>>
>
> Well, well, well........Here's the most recent entry in my mail log:
>
> From kd6...@bde-arc.ampr.org Thu Jul 24 16:53:46 2003
> Subject: Re: Stupid Script Kiddie
>
> Status: RO
> Content-Length: 78
>
> Folder: (formail -r \ -i"Subject: Sorry, Access Denie 2359
>
>
> Sammy-wammy just proved that he is, in fact, who has been sending me all those
> mails with forged headers.
And how exactly did I prove that? I'd like to know how I did that.
> That's harrassment, sammy-wammy. Perhaps I should send the various posts
> and mails to abuse earthlink and abuse YOUR newserver and ISP.
Go ahead. Have fun.
> Oh, did I mention that I run tethereal on my ppp0 interface? I can send them
> ALL the packet headers too...
Please post the packet headers also. Everyone needs to see how smart you
are.
Sahil Tandon
> How smart can a guy be who keeps sending M$ viruses to someone's address that
> he OBVIOUSLY got off usenet and therefore should know that I run Linux.
Although I run Linux, many folks that frequent USENET do not.
> I mean, he wouldn't be wasting his time and making a fool of himself by send-
> ing me all those posts with newsgroup subjects, would he ?
If you're going to make personal (and incidentally groundless) accusations,
could you at least do so by email?
Regards,
--
Sahil Tandon <sa...@despammed.com>
http://people.brandeis.edu/~sahil
Sam
> Alan Connor wrote:
>
>> How smart can a guy be who keeps sending M$ viruses to someone's address that
>> he OBVIOUSLY got off usenet and therefore should know that I run Linux.
>
> Although I run Linux, many folks that frequent USENET do not.
I run Linux. According to our wunderkid, I'm sending him MS viruses.
Remember, you heard it here first.
>> I mean, he wouldn't be wasting his time and making a fool of himself by send-
>> ing me all those posts with newsgroup subjects, would he ?
>
> If you're going to make personal (and incidentally groundless) accusations,
> could you at least do so by email?
No! Where else can you get such entertainment, for free?
Wolfgang S. Rupprecht
Sahil Tandon <sa...@despammed.com> writes:
> Alan Connor wrote:
>
> > How smart can a guy be who keeps sending M$ viruses to someone's address that
> > he OBVIOUSLY got off usenet and therefore should know that I run Linux.
>
> Although I run Linux, many folks that frequent USENET do not.
>
> > I mean, he wouldn't be wasting his time and making a fool of himself by send-
> > ing me all those posts with newsgroup subjects, would he ?
>
> If you're going to make personal (and incidentally groundless) accusations,
> could you at least do so by email?
Or at least post some headers.
BTW. Going through the logs, I seem to have gotten a large number of
viruses the other day too. It looks like there is a recent flair-up
of some sort. I think it would be silly to jump to the conclusion
that some one person was trying to infect my computer with an
ms-windows virus because of a heated online exchange.
-wolfgang
--
Wolfgang S. Rupprecht http://www.wsrcc.com/wolfgang/
(NOTE: The email address above is valid. Edit it at your own peril.)
Alan Connor
>
>
>
>
> BTW. Going through the logs, I seem to have gotten a large number of
> viruses the other day too. It looks like there is a recent flair-up
> of some sort. I think it would be silly to jump to the conclusion
> that some one person was trying to infect my computer with an
> ms-windows virus because of a heated online exchange.
>
> -wolfgang
Well, Wolfgang, it is also quite silly to jump to conclusions without having
all the facts.
Apparently your English is not very good, because I clearly said that I had
noticed an increase in those viruses after every time I provoked sammy-wammy.
I did not say that I had noticed an increase lately.
May I suggest an ESL course?
Not sure why I bother responding to anyone that takes that Sahil bozo
seriously.
Sam
> Well, Wolfgang, it is also quite silly to jump to conclusions without having
> all the facts.
>
> Apparently your English is not very good, because I clearly said that I had
> noticed an increase in those viruses after every time I provoked sammy-wammy.
And I clearly said (just now) that I had noticed in a worldwide increase of
gut-wrenching laughter every time you post.
So what are we to conclude from that?
Wolfgang S. Rupprecht
Alan Connor <xxx...@xxxx.xxx> writes:
> On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 04:10:05 GMT, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht <wolfgang+gnus2...@dailyplanet.wsrcc.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > BTW. Going through the logs, I seem to have gotten a large number of
> > viruses the other day too. It looks like there is a recent flair-up
> > of some sort. I think it would be silly to jump to the conclusion
> > that some one person was trying to infect my computer with an
> > ms-windows virus because of a heated online exchange.
> >
> > -wolfgang
>
> Well, Wolfgang, it is also quite silly to jump to conclusions without having
> all the facts.
>
> Apparently your English is not very good, because I clearly said that I had
> noticed an increase in those viruses after every time I provoked sammy-wammy.
>
> I did not say that I had noticed an increase lately.
>
> May I suggest an ESL course?
>
> Not sure why I bother responding to anyone that takes that Sahil bozo
> seriously.
>
> Alan
I think I have all the facts I need at this point. You are the
designated nutball for this group. Well, keep up the good work!
We all need a few laughs when dealing with spam.
Alan Connor
>
>> seriously.
>>
>> Alan
>
> I think I have all the facts I need at this point. You are the
> designated nutball for this group. Well, keep up the good work!
> We all need a few laughs when dealing with spam.
>
> -wolfgang
Well, *I* don't get any spam, and neither does anyone else that uses MSP.
Which makes *who* the "nutball"?
You don't need a few laughs, friend, you need to get a brain.
Let me guess: You make a living fighting spam? You work for or own a
company that sends spam? Fighting spam is your hobby? You are
invested in companies that send spam or sell spam-fighting software?
You are a spammer?
There are now over 130 people using MY version of the Challenge-Response
system. These are the ones that have contacted me. No telling how many have
just taken it off the newsgroup.
NONE of us get ANY spam at all?
Why do you?
Sam
> Well, *I* don't get any spam, and neither does anyone else that uses MSP.
Neither do they get much E-mail as well.
> Which makes *who* the "nutball"?
You tell us.
> You don't need a few laughs, friend, you need to get a brain.
This would be somewhat akin to Mike Tyson giving anger management classes.
> Let me guess: You make a living fighting spam? You work for or own a
> company that sends spam? Fighting spam is your hobby? You are
> invested in companies that send spam or sell spam-fighting software?
> You are a spammer?
And the magic 8-ball says...?
> There are now over 130 people using MY version of the Challenge-Response
> system.
Oooh! We've got a real wunderkid here!
> These are the ones that have contacted me. No telling how many have
> just taken it off the newsgroup.
>
> NONE of us get ANY spam at all?
It's easy not to get any spam at all: just stop receiving E-mail. Period.
> Why do you?
Because he actually wants to have a functioning E-mailbox.
David F. Skoll
> Well, I've been getting that M$ virus, and it goes to /dev/null.
Look, Alan, if someone wanted to harrass you, he'd fake e-mail from
t...@uwasa.fi because you've obviously whitelisted that address.
The thing is, most people don't care about you. You may have
paranoid delusions, but we'd appreciate it if you'd not share them with us.
You may be unaware that many M$ viruses pick random sender and recipient
addresses. So your conspiracy theories are quite amusing.
--
D. Stussy
> On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 23:23:25 GMT, Alan Connor <xxx...@xxxx.xxx> wrote:
> Well, well, well........Here's the most recent entry in my mail log:
>
> From kd6...@bde-arc.ampr.org Thu Jul 24 16:53:46 2003
> Subject: Re: Stupid Script Kiddie
>
> Status: RO
> Content-Length: 78
>
> Folder: (formail -r \ -i"Subject: Sorry, Access Denie 2359
Actually, NO. I legitimately sent you a REPLY to a QUESTION you asked in the
newsgroup comp.mail.misc to the last post you made of that title - and I did so
in e-mail since you directed the question only to me. It was not a mail from
whomever it is that has been causing you trouble.
Obviously, you are so screwed up that you can't tell the difference between
legitimate mail and that which is otherwise.
> Sammy-wammy just proved that he is, in fact, who has been sending me all those
> mails with forged headers. [Remainder snipped]
Here is the original message you posted:
From xxx...@xxxx.xxx Sat Jul 26 00:32:00 2003
Path:
bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net!bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net!wnmast
er11!wn12feed!worldnet.att.net!64.154.60.72!cyclone2.usenetserver.com!c03.at
l99!sjc70.webusenet.com!news.webusenet.com!elnk-nf2-pas!newsfeed.earthlink.n
et!stamper.news.pas.earthlink.net!newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net.POSTED!no
t-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc
From: Alan Connor <xxx...@xxxx.xxx>
Subject: Re: Stupid Script Kiddie
References: <yL0Ta.113681$Io.97...@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net>
<slrnbhp8m6...@diane.unet.brandeis.edu>
<Pine.LNX.4.56.03...@kd6lvw.ampr.org>
<wloTa.115833$Io.98...@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net>
<Pine.LNX.4.56.03...@kd6lvw.ampr.org>
Reply-To: alanc...@earthlink.net
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.3 (Linux)
Lines: 86
Message-ID: <U8GTa.18914$Mc.14...@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 00:56:20 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 63.187.225.55
X-Complaints-To: ab...@earthlink.net
X-Trace: newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net 1059008180 63.187.225.55 (Wed,
23 Jul 2003 17:56:20 PDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 17:56:20 PDT
Organization: EarthLink Inc. -- http://www.EarthLink.net
Xref: wnmaster11 comp.mail.misc:45657
X-Received-Date: Thu,
24 Jul 2003 00:58:58 GMT (bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net)
[Text snipped - leaving only the question:]
Have you ever seen that post that was a parody of a key poem in The Lord of
the Rings: One OS to Rule Them All ? Is a crackup. Is quite short. I will post
it if you are interested.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My answer, in e-mail, which you apparently thought was spam, was:
No, I haven't, but since others probably haven't either, why don't you go ahead
and post it. [Paraphrased]
-----
At this point, I don't care if you do or not. You are obviously a mental case
- and I hope that Washington State has a facility for you.
ynotssor
news:Pine.LNX.4.56.03...@kd6lvw.ampr.org
> On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, Alan Connor wrote:
[...]
> At this point, I don't care if you do or not. You are obviously a
> mental case - and I hope that Washington State has a facility for you.
Funny you should say that ... his IP address is in the Tacoma WA area, and
Western Washington State Hospital a.k.a. "Steilacoom" a.k.a. "the loony bin"
is very, very near there.
Coincidence? You be the judge ... I just use the killfile, and the signal to
noise ratio is vastly increased since.
--
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-----
Alan Connor
>
>
> On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, Alan Connor wrote:
>> On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 23:23:25 GMT, Alan Connor <xxx...@xxxx.xxx> wrote:
>> Well, well, well........Here's the most recent entry in my mail log:
>>
>> From kd6...@bde-arc.ampr.org Thu Jul 24 16:53:46 2003
>> Subject: Re: Stupid Script Kiddie
>>
>> Status: RO
>> Content-Length: 78
>>
>> Folder: (formail -r \ -i"Subject: Sorry, Access Denie 2359
>
> Actually, NO. I legitimately sent you a REPLY to a QUESTION you asked in the
> newsgroup comp.mail.misc to the last post you made of that title - and I did so
> in e-mail since you directed the question only to me. It was not a mail from
> whomever it is that has been causing you trouble.
>
Okay. I made a mistake. Can you say the samething about the other 50 or so
that came that day, several with the same subject line?
I just picked one out of the bunch.
Judging from this post, it WAS from someone I don't want to hear from.
Why didn't you follow through? Can't cut and paste a little password onto
the subject line?
Hell, my filters are MADE for people like you: If you just shoot your mouth
off via email with no intention of following through, then I don't WANT
to hear from you. Post on the group and stay the hell out of my mailbox.
It's for my friends. Lazy people who don't take responsibility for their
actions are a DRAG.
> No, I haven't, but since others probably haven't either, why don't you go ahead
> and post it. [Paraphrased]
>
> -----
> At this point, I don't care if you do or not. You are obviously a mental case
> - and I hope that Washington State has a facility for you.
I'm sure that your judgement just devastates me.
I notice that you didn't attack my MSP, which given what I see above, you
surely would if you could.
You can't because it worked just great!
Alan
--
For Linux/Bash users: Eliminate spam from your life
with the Mailbox-Sentry-Program. See the thread
MSP on comp.mail.misc.
Alan Connor
>
>
> "D. Stussy" <kd6...@bde-arc.ampr.org> quoted and wrote in message
> news:Pine.LNX.4.56.03...@kd6lvw.ampr.org
>
>> On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, Alan Connor wrote:
> [...]
>> At this point, I don't care if you do or not. You are obviously a
>> mental case - and I hope that Washington State has a facility for you.
>
> Funny you should say that ... his IP address is in the Tacoma WA area, and
> Western Washington State Hospital a.k.a. "Steilacoom" a.k.a. "the loony bin"
> is very, very near there.
>
> Coincidence? You be the judge ... I just use the killfile, and the signal to
> noise ratio is vastly increased since.
>
Hey! I do the same thing. And YOU have just earned a place there.
Alan
--
For Linux/Bash users: Eliminate spam from your life
with the Mailbox-Sentry-Program. See the thread
MSP on comp.mail.misc.
Alan Connor
>
>
> news:Pine.LNX.4.56.03...@kd6lvw.ampr.org
>
>> On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, Alan Connor wrote:
> [...]
>> At this point, I don't care if you do or not. You are obviously a
>> mental case - and I hope that Washington State has a facility for you.
>
> Funny you should say that ... his IP address is in the Tacoma WA area, and
> Western Washington State Hospital a.k.a. "Steilacoom" a.k.a. "the loony bin"
> is very, very near there.
>
> Coincidence? You be the judge ... I just use the killfile, and the signal to
> noise ratio is vastly increased since.
>
I really hope noone thinks that it is unfair to killfile a hypocrite who
generates noise while claiming to be above it.
Add that to the fact that he is too stupid to even REALIZE that he is a
hypocrite, and I think no one with half-a-brain could NOT killfile him.
Alan
--
For Linux/Bash users: Eliminate spam from your life
with the Mailbox-Sentry-Program. See the thread
MSP on comp.mail.misc.
Sam
> "D. Stussy" <kd6...@bde-arc.ampr.org> quoted and wrote in message
> news:Pine.LNX.4.56.03...@kd6lvw.ampr.org
>
>> On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, Alan Connor wrote:
> [...]
>> At this point, I don't care if you do or not. You are obviously a
>> mental case - and I hope that Washington State has a facility for you.
>
> Funny you should say that ... his IP address is in the Tacoma WA area, and
> Western Washington State Hospital a.k.a. "Steilacoom" a.k.a. "the loony bin"
> is very, very near there.
Someone call them, and ask them to do a head count.
Sam
It's time for today's episode of...
How To Win Friends And Influence People
by Alan Connor
Alan Connor writes:
> On Sat, 26 Jul 2003 00:38:56 GMT, D. Stussy <kd6...@bde-arc.ampr.org> wrote:
>> Have you ever seen that post that was a parody of a key poem in The Lord of
>> the Rings: One OS to Rule Them All ? Is a crackup. Is quite short. I will post
>> it if you are interested.
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> My answer, in e-mail, which you apparently thought was spam, was:
>>
>
> Judging from this post, it WAS from someone I don't want to hear from.
>
> Why didn't you follow through? Can't cut and paste a little password onto
> the subject line?
>
> Hell, my filters are MADE for people like you: If you just shoot your mouth
> off via email with no intention of following through, then I don't WANT
> to hear from you. Post on the group and stay the hell out of my mailbox.
> It's for my friends. Lazy people who don't take responsibility for their
> actions are a DRAG.
I'm wondering, Sherlock, have you yet tracked down my name, address, and
telephone number?
I'm asking because all the subscribers to this newsgroup should be able to
do that in less than a minute. I don't understand what the delay is.
Come on, Einstein, put your thinking cap on, and let's get on with the show.
ynotssor
>>> On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, Alan Connor wrote:
>> [...]
>>> At this point, I don't care if you do or not. You are obviously a
>>> mental case - and I hope that Washington State has a facility for you.
>>
>> Funny you should say that ... his IP address is in the Tacoma WA area, and
>> Western Washington State Hospital a.k.a. "Steilacoom" a.k.a. "the loony bin"
>> is very, very near there.
> Someone call them, and ask them to do a head count.
A head count? They'd be one short, even when he's there all tucked in his bunk
with the restraining straps.
D. Stussy
What password? My system failed to get a rejection message from yours, if
that's what you're referring to (some sort of "challenge" system). Are you
challenge responses malformed? My system promptly kills non-RFC mail.
> Hell, my filters are MADE for people like you: If you just shoot your mouth
> off via email with no intention of following through, then I don't WANT
> to hear from you. Post on the group and stay the hell out of my mailbox.
> It's for my friends. Lazy people who don't take responsibility for their
> actions are a DRAG.
Then DON'T direct your questions made on newsgroups to single individuals.
> > No, I haven't, but since others probably haven't either, why don't you go ahead
> > and post it. [Paraphrased]
> >
> > -----
> > At this point, I don't care if you do or not. You are obviously a mental case
> > - and I hope that Washington State has a facility for you.
>
> I'm sure that your judgement just devastates me.
>
> I notice that you didn't attack my MSP, which given what I see above, you
> surely would if you could.
>
> You can't because it worked just great!
From what I can tell, I saw nothing that indicated that you didn't receive my
e-mail because I got no rejection message at all back from you that survived
RFC checking. This tells me that whatever you're doing is in itself non-RFC
compliant and you should be added to rfc-ignorant.org's DNSBL.
Alan Connor
>>
>> Why didn't you follow through? Can't cut and paste a little password onto
>> the subject line?
>
> What password? My system failed to get a rejection message from yours, if
> that's what you're referring to (some sort of "challenge" system). Are you
> challenge responses malformed? My system promptly kills non-RFC mail.
>
From kd6...@bde-arc.ampr.org Thu Jul 24 16:53:46 2003
Subject: Re: Stupid Script Kiddie
Status: RO
Content-Length: 1908
Lines: 39
Status: RO
Content-Length: 109
Lines: 3
Status: RO
Content-Length: 78
Folder: (formail -r \ -i"Subject: Sorry, Access Denie 2359
procmail: Error while writing to " (formail -r \
See that? It's YOUR headers that were screwed up. And it was rejected by
MY system which does not accept non-RFC mail.
I also have a packet-log and the full headers (MSP saves the full headers of
any mail that's not on the pass or temp list)
and I think I will just put them in a seperate file in case they are needed.
A troll is the least of what you are.
MSP worked PERFECTLY
Alan
D. Stussy
> >> Why didn't you follow through? Can't cut and paste a little password onto
> >> the subject line?
> >
> > What password? My system failed to get a rejection message from yours, if
> > that's what you're referring to (some sort of "challenge" system). Are you
> > challenge responses malformed? My system promptly kills non-RFC mail.
>
> From kd6...@bde-arc.ampr.org Thu Jul 24 16:53:46 2003
> Subject: Re: Stupid Script Kiddie
>
> Status: RO
> Content-Length: 1908
> Lines: 39
>
> Status: RO
> Content-Length: 109
> Lines: 3
>
> Status: RO
> Content-Length: 78
>
> Folder: (formail -r \ -i"Subject: Sorry, Access Denie 2359
> procmail: Error while writing to " (formail -r \
>
>
>
> See that? It's YOUR headers that were screwed up. And it was rejected by
> MY system which does not accept non-RFC mail.
It looks as if your system is not set up to handle valid headers that you
CHOSE not to support.
Regardless, that does not explain why I never received your alleged error
message back to me....
> I also have a packet-log and the full headers (MSP saves the full headers of
> any mail that's not on the pass or temp list)
>
> and I think I will just put them in a seperate file in case they are needed.
>
> A troll is the least of what you are.
Actually, it is fitting of you, and you don't need me to say such; others
already have....
> MSP worked perfectly.
Not if there was no error message generated it didn't.
Sahil Tandon
> Well, Wolfgang, it is also quite silly to jump to conclusions without having
> all the facts.
Good advice; use it.
> Apparently your English is not very good, because I clearly said that I had
> noticed an increase in those viruses after every time I provoked sammy-wammy.
Correlation does not imply causation.
> May I suggest an ESL course?
Why resort to tasteless, immature insults against people who oppose your views?
ynotssor
news:slrnbi94t1...@diane.unet.brandeis.edu
> Alan Connor wrote: [... drivel deleted]
> Why resort to tasteless, immature insults against people who oppose
> your views?
I'm confident that Mssr. Connor is at the limit of his expression.
--
use hotmail com for any email replies
KB9WFK
TROLL.
"You are behaving like a troll, disguising your attacks as reasonable
discussion."
'Alan Connor'
KB9WFK
>On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 04:10:05 GMT, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht <wolfgang+gnus2...@dailyplanet.wsrcc.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> BTW. Going through the logs, I seem to have gotten a large number of
>> viruses the other day too. It looks like there is a recent flair-up
>> of some sort. I think it would be silly to jump to the conclusion
>> that some one person was trying to infect my computer with an
>> ms-windows virus because of a heated online exchange.
>>
>> -wolfgang
>
>Well, Wolfgang, it is also quite silly to jump to conclusions without having
>all the facts.
>
>Apparently your English is not very good, because I clearly said that I had
>noticed an increase in those viruses after every time I provoked sammy-wammy.
>
>I did not say that I had noticed an increase lately.
>
>May I suggest an ESL course?
>
>Not sure why I bother responding to anyone that takes that Sahil bozo
>seriously.
>
>Alan
Why don't you tell them about your commune and how you smoke weed and
are not a part of "our society"? Haven't had a chance to killfile the
entire group here yet? Don't try to deny it cause the proof is in the
archives. probably a hundred such posts from you. Do a search for
misc.survivalism and alan's name for a really good laugh.