http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A8884-2003Jan31.html
---------------------------
check my blog at:
http://www.bobview.blogspot.com/
updated 1/27/03
wf...@ptnospam.com wrote:
Your blog is bullshit, now get the hell out of here, you whiny little
wimp.
Your wife must be a lesbian, cause she sure as hell married a 'pussy'.
IOW you can't handle the truth.....(apologies to jack nicholson)...
yeah, we already know that.
wf...@ptnospam.com wrote:
> On Sat, 01 Feb 2003 22:04:43 -0500, N8KDV <n8...@iserv.net> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >wf...@ptnospam.com wrote:
> >
> >> turns out the darling of the NRA, prof. john lott, invented a
> >> character named mary rosh, and then pimped his own books:
> >>
> >> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A8884-2003Jan31.html
> >> ---------------------------
> >> check my blog at:
> >> http://www.bobview.blogspot.com/
> >> updated 1/27/03
> >
> >Your blog is bullshit, now get the hell out of here, you whiny little
> >wimp.
> >
> >Your wife must be a lesbian, cause she sure as hell married a 'pussy'.
> >
>
> IOW you can't handle the truth.....(apologies to jack nicholson)...
>
> yeah, we already know that.
I'm quite comfotable with the truth... I just told you the truth... You are
the one who obviously can't handle it. But then, we already knew that. ;-)
>
>
>wf...@ptnospam.com wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 01 Feb 2003 22:04:43 -0500, N8KDV <n8...@iserv.net> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >wf...@ptnospam.com wrote:
>> >
>> >> turns out the darling of the NRA, prof. john lott, invented a
>> >> character named mary rosh, and then pimped his own books:
>> >>
>> >> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A8884-2003Jan31.html
>> >> ---------------------------
>> >> check my blog at:
>> >> http://www.bobview.blogspot.com/
>> >> updated 1/27/03
>> >
>> >Your blog is bullshit, now get the hell out of here, you whiny little
>> >wimp.
>> >
>> >Your wife must be a lesbian, cause she sure as hell married a 'pussy'.
>> >
>>
>> IOW you can't handle the truth.....(apologies to jack nicholson)...
>>
>> yeah, we already know that.
>
>I'm quite comfotable with the truth... I just told you the truth... You are
>the one who obviously can't handle it. But then, we already knew that. ;-)
>
>>
ah. so you're calling lott a liar for admitting the truth?
true orwell-speak from the gun nut crowd!
>Right..
>Certainly anyyhing from the Washington Post must be believed as gospel!
>All the world knows how neutral that piece'o'shit is!
so john lott is a liar for admitting the truth?
makes sense only to the gun nut crowd...
>
>so john lott is a liar for admitting the truth?
>
>makes sense only to the gun nut crowd...
Ok, So he's a Gun Nut..
has 10-20 - 100- 200 Guns
Guns Guns & More Guns
Guns for Psycho's
Guns for Tiny Tots..
( SIGH! )
- Take it off line please..
Here's some more truth. Your post is totally OT, as is your
transparent attempt to flog your blog.
my topic IS off topic; but given the number of gun nuts here...just
thought you guys would be interested in facts. after all, you have so
few of them...
Well, since you're obviously so interested in both facts and the the
Post, here's something else:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&conten
tId=A52876-2002Dec13¬Found=true
This was a far, far more significant scandal than that which brought
about your original post, but I didn't notice you posting about *it.*
But, then, why be fair when you can be selective? I'll be looking
forward to reading about it in your blog, though.
i agree it was a more significant scandal. it's also irrelevant. that
issue has been dealt with.
looks like lott's a liar, too.