Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Simple esoteric English grammer rule being ignored

3 views
Skip to first unread message

Sam

unread,
Jul 31, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/31/00
to
It seems that even "intellectuals" don't even know the proper usage of "an"
and "a".

If a noun or an adjective starts with a constinent it should always be
preceeded with "a".

Examples:

A bird.
A pickle.
A fish.
A reptile.
A man.
A woman.
A farmer.
A dog
A cat.
A yellow flower.

If a noun or an adjective starts with a vowel it should always be preceeded
with "an".

An apple.
An orange.
An antibiotic.
An episode.
An umbrella.
An umpire.
An instrument
An intention.

This simple rule is being overlooked in most schools in the USA and even
"intellectuals" who do not know proper usage of "a" and "an" come off
sounding awkward to those who do speak and write with proper usage of "an"
and "a".

This post is posted for your enlightenment.

John Flynn

unread,
Jul 31, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/31/00
to
Sam wrote, in part:

> If a noun or an adjective starts with a vowel it should always be
> preceeded with "an".
>
> An apple.
> An orange.
> An antibiotic.
> An episode.
> An umbrella.
> An umpire.
> An instrument
> An intention.

An euphemism.
An uniform.

> This simple rule is being overlooked in most schools in the USA and
> even "intellectuals" who do not know proper usage of "a" and "an"
> come off sounding awkward to those who do speak and write with proper
> usage of "an" and "a".
>
> This post is posted for your enlightenment.

It certainly opened MY eyes.

--
johnF

"Rafiki yangu ameanza kufuga ndevu."


Michael

unread,
Jul 31, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/31/00
to
All very interesting but what is a "constinent". Is it a whole group of
countries that can't poo, or what?

Sam <no...@nonesorry.edu> wrote in message
news:kDkh5.588$K2....@newsfeed.slurp.net...
> It seems that even "intellectuals" don't even know the proper usage of
"an"
> and "a".
>


> If a noun or an adjective starts with a constinent it should always be
> preceeded with "a".
>
> Examples:
>
> A bird.
> A pickle.
> A fish.
> A reptile.
> A man.
> A woman.
> A farmer.
> A dog
> A cat.
> A yellow flower.
>

> If a noun or an adjective starts with a vowel it should always be
preceeded
> with "an".
>
> An apple.
> An orange.
> An antibiotic.
> An episode.
> An umbrella.
> An umpire.
> An instrument
> An intention.
>

N.Mitchum

unread,
Jul 31, 2000, 3:00:00 AM7/31/00
to
Sam wrote:
-----

> It seems that even "intellectuals" don't even know the proper usage of "an"
> and "a".
>......

Sorry, but it seems even you got the rules wrong.

------


> If a noun or an adjective starts with a constinent it should always be

> preceeded with "a". [...]


>
> If a noun or an adjective starts with a vowel it should always be preceeded

> with "an". [...]
>
> This simple rule is being overlooked in most schools [...]


>
> This post is posted for your enlightenment.

>......

It's not vowels and consonants that determine whether you use "a"
or "an." It's the vowel and consonant SOUNDS that do so. You
write "an umpire" but "a university," don't you? "An hour" but "a
home"? Same letters, different sounds.

Nor is the rule all that simple. I always say (and write) "an
historic" but "a history." It has to do with the unstressed
nature of the first syllable. And don't think I'm alone in this
usage.


----NM

Koji Hishinuma

unread,
Aug 1, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/1/00
to
John Flynn wrote.

> An euphemism.
> An uniform.

They should be "a euphemism" and " a uniform" because
both "euphemism" and "uniform" start with a consonant, right?

However, if the word starts with a vowl, the indefinite article
for it should not be "a" but "an." So the following examples are
grammatically correct, right?

an oofy man
an oozy ground

If I am wrong, please let me know. Thank you in advance.

||||||| |||||
||| ||
||| ||
|||||
||| ||
||| ||
||||||| |||||
=======================
Koji Hishinuma
Tokyo, Japan
=======================


Dave Fossett

unread,
Aug 1, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/1/00
to
[crossposted newsgroups trimmed back to japan.lang.english.communication]

Koji Hishinuma wrote...

> John Flynn wrote.
>
> > An euphemism.
> > An uniform.
>
> They should be "a euphemism" and " a uniform" because
> both "euphemism" and "uniform" start with a consonant, right?

John's reply was just showing that the statement by the orignal poster was
incorrect.
He stated that "an" should always be used before words beginning with a
vowel (= a,e,i,o,u). This is actually wrong as is shown by the examples "an
uniform".

Whether you use "a" or "an" depends on the *pronunciation* and not the
spelling, so words like "euphemism" or "uniform" with a "yu-" sound take "a"
not "an".

--
Dave Fossett
Saitama, JAPAN

ggarside

unread,
Aug 1, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/1/00
to

And just to reinforce Dave's point (it's the pronunciation that
matters), here's the little-known rule for words beginning with "h"
(sometimes silent, eg: "hour", sometimes not silent [aspirated], eg:
"helicopter", sometimes appearing in a word with the stress on the
*first* syllable, eg: "history" [his'tory], and sometimes appearing in a
word with the stress on the *second* syllable, eg: "historical"
[histor'ical]

an hour ("h" is a consonant, but is silent)
a helicopter ("h" is aspirated, stress on first syllable)
a history of Japan ("h" is aspirated, stress on first syllable)
an historical essay ("h" is aspirated, but stress is on second syllable)

Now what was that about "intellectuals not knowing the rules"???


Geoff.

willia...@my-deja.com

unread,
Aug 1, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/1/00
to
In article <398605...@lafn.org>,
"N.Mitchum" <aj...@lafn.org> wrote:

> It's not vowels and consonants that determine whether you use "a"
> or "an." It's the vowel and consonant SOUNDS that do so.

I suspect that not only Sam but some people who teach English for a
living fail to distinguish, or at least to make clear the distinction,
between sound and symbol.

Gary Williams


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

Elissa Degennaro

unread,
Aug 1, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/1/00
to
John Flynn wrote:

> Sam wrote, in part:


>
> > If a noun or an adjective starts with a vowel it should always be
> > preceeded with "an".
> >

> > An apple.
> > An orange.
> > An antibiotic.
> > An episode.
> > An umbrella.
> > An umpire.
> > An instrument
> > An intention.
>

> An euphemism.
> An uniform.


>
> > This simple rule is being overlooked in most schools in the USA and
> > even "intellectuals" who do not know proper usage of "a" and "an"

> > come off sounding awkward to those who do speak and write with proper


> > usage of "an" and "a".
> >

> > This post is posted for your enlightenment.
>

> It certainly opened MY eyes.
>
> --
> johnF
>
> "Rafiki yangu ameanza kufuga ndevu."

Are you sure that "An euphemism" or "An uniform" is appropriate? I don't
believe it is... There may be some exceptions to the rule.

-Elissa


Elissa Degennaro

unread,
Aug 1, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/1/00
to
Koji Hishinuma wrote:

> John Flynn wrote.
>
> > An euphemism.
> > An uniform.
>
> They should be "a euphemism" and " a uniform" because
> both "euphemism" and "uniform" start with a consonant, right?

No, both "euphemism" and "uniform" start with vowels... "E" and "U".

I'm still not sure that "an" works with them, though...


> However, if the word starts with a vowl, the indefinite article
> for it should not be "a" but "an." So the following examples are
> grammatically correct, right?
>
> an oofy man
> an oozy ground

Yes, aside from the fact that "oofy" and "oozy" arn't words :)

-Elissa

Elissa Degennaro

unread,
Aug 1, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/1/00
to
Dave Fossett wrote:

> [crossposted newsgroups trimmed back to japan.lang.english.communication]
>
> Koji Hishinuma wrote...
>

> > John Flynn wrote.
> >
> > > An euphemism.
> > > An uniform.
> >
> > They should be "a euphemism" and " a uniform" because
> > both "euphemism" and "uniform" start with a consonant, right?
>

> John's reply was just showing that the statement by the orignal poster was
> incorrect.
> He stated that "an" should always be used before words beginning with a
> vowel (= a,e,i,o,u). This is actually wrong as is shown by the examples "an
> uniform".
>
> Whether you use "a" or "an" depends on the *pronunciation* and not the
> spelling, so words like "euphemism" or "uniform" with a "yu-" sound take "a"
> not "an".
>

> --
> Dave Fossett
> Saitama, JAPAN

Okay, cool, I was confused there for a minute, but something about those two
just rubbed me wrong.

-Elissa


Elissa Degennaro

unread,
Aug 1, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/1/00
to
"N.Mitchum" wrote:

> Sam wrote:
> -----
> > It seems that even "intellectuals" don't even know the proper usage of "an"
> > and "a".


> >......
>
> Sorry, but it seems even you got the rules wrong.
>
> ------

> > If a noun or an adjective starts with a constinent it should always be
> > preceeded with "a". [...]


> >
> > If a noun or an adjective starts with a vowel it should always be preceeded

> > with "an". [...]
> >
> > This simple rule is being overlooked in most schools [...]


> >
> > This post is posted for your enlightenment.

> >......


>
> It's not vowels and consonants that determine whether you use "a"

> or "an." It's the vowel and consonant SOUNDS that do so. You
> write "an umpire" but "a university," don't you? "An hour" but "a
> home"? Same letters, different sounds.
>
> Nor is the rule all that simple. I always say (and write) "an
> historic" but "a history." It has to do with the unstressed
> nature of the first syllable. And don't think I'm alone in this
> usage.
>
> ----NM

No, you're not alone there.


Jerry Friedman

unread,
Aug 1, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/1/00
to
In article <8m4rft$f1a$1...@newsflood.tokyo.att.ne.jp>,

"Koji Hishinuma" <koj...@tkh.att.ne.jp> wrote:
> John Flynn wrote.
>
> > An euphemism.
> > An uniform.
>
> They should be "a euphemism" and " a uniform" because
> both "euphemism" and "uniform" start with a consonant, right?
>
> However, if the word starts with a vowl, the indefinite article
> for it should not be "a" but "an." So the following examples are
> grammatically correct, right?
>
> an oofy man
> an oozy ground
>
> If I am wrong, please let me know. Thank you in advance.

You're right. (Except that "oofy" doesn't appear to be a word--I've
never heard it, and it's not in the Merriam-Webster dictionary at
<http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary>. Also, it's better to say that
"euphemism" and "uniform" start with a consonant *sound*--or better
still, with a semivowel sound.)

--
Jerry Friedman
jfrE...@nnm.cc.nm.us
i before e
and all the disclaimers

Jerry Friedman

unread,
Aug 1, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/1/00
to
In article <fsoh5.238800$7o1.6...@news2.rdc1.on.home.com>,

ggarside <"imunroted"@ttne...@pna-yvax.pbz> wrote:
> Dave Fossett wrote:
> >
> > [crossposted newsgroups trimmed back to
japan.lang.english.communication]
> >
> > Koji Hishinuma wrote...
> >
> > > John Flynn wrote.
> > >
> > > > An euphemism.
> > > > An uniform.
> > >
> > > They should be "a euphemism" and " a uniform" because
> > > both "euphemism" and "uniform" start with a consonant, right?
> >
> > John's reply was just showing that the statement by the orignal
poster was
> > incorrect.
> > He stated that "an" should always be used before words beginning
with a
> > vowel (= a,e,i,o,u). This is actually wrong as is shown by the
examples "an
> > uniform".
> >
> > Whether you use "a" or "an" depends on the *pronunciation* and not
the
> > spelling, so words like "euphemism" or "uniform" with a "yu-" sound
take "a"
> > not "an".
> >
>
> And just to reinforce Dave's point (it's the pronunciation that
> matters), here's the little-known rule for words beginning with "h"
> (sometimes silent, eg: "hour", sometimes not silent [aspirated], eg:
> "helicopter", sometimes appearing in a word with the stress on the
> *first* syllable, eg: "history" [his'tory], and sometimes appearing in
a
> word with the stress on the *second* syllable, eg: "historical"
> [histor'ical]
>
> an hour ("h" is a consonant, but is silent)
> a helicopter ("h" is aspirated, stress on first syllable)
> a history of Japan ("h" is aspirated, stress on first syllable)
> an historical essay ("h" is aspirated, but stress is on second
syllable)
>
> Now what was that about "intellectuals not knowing the rules"???

Not to repeat an argument from a short time ago, which you can find in
deja if you want, but the majority of prescriptive authorities prefer "a
historical essay".

Aaron J Dinkin

unread,
Aug 1, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/1/00
to
Elissa Degennaro <hotar...@mindspring.com> wrote:

> Koji Hishinuma wrote:
>
>> John Flynn wrote.
>>
>> > An euphemism.
>> > An uniform.
>>
>> They should be "a euphemism" and " a uniform" because
>> both "euphemism" and "uniform" start with a consonant, right?
>

> No, both "euphemism" and "uniform" start with vowels... "E" and "U".

No, both "euphemism" and "uniform" start with a consonants: /j/. A
consonant is a sound, not a letter.

> I'm still not sure that "an" works with them, though...

I doesn't. They begin with consonants.

-Aaron J. Dinkin
Dr. Whom

ggarside

unread,
Aug 1, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/1/00
to
Jerry Friedman wrote:
>
<Surgical removal>

>
> Not to repeat an argument from a short time ago, which you can find in
> deja if you want, but the majority of prescriptive authorities prefer "a
> historical essay".
>

Fortunately, not being a democrat, I'm quite accustomed to the
majority's being wrong 8-)

(I bet a lot of prescriptive "authorities" [and *all* descriptive
"authorities"] would "prefer": "...the majority being wrong")

> --


>
> i before e
> and all the disclaimers
>

Like "weird", man!


Geoff.

Elissa Degennaro

unread,
Aug 1, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/1/00
to
Aaron J Dinkin wrote:

Wow... You learn something new every day... Thanks! I wish they taught
that more clearly in school...

-Elissa


Chuck Maurer

unread,
Aug 2, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/2/00
to
On Tue, 01 Aug 2000 15:27:45 -0500, Elissa Degennaro <hotar...@mindspring.com>
wrote:

>
>Are you sure that "An euphemism" or "An uniform" is appropriate? I don't
>believe it is... There may be some exceptions to the rule.
>
>-Elissa
>

What matters is how the noun is pronounced, not the spelling. I pronounce them
as if they start with 'Y' and treat that as a consonant.
Chuck Maurer / Dallas, Texas

"Usenet is like a herd of performing elephants with diarrhea -- massive,
difficult to redirect, awe-inspiring, entertaining, and a source of mind-
boggling amounts of excrement when you least expect it."
-- Gene "spaf" Spafford (1992)

Peter Hoogenboom

unread,
Aug 2, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/2/00
to
Sam wrote:

> It seems that even "intellectuals" don't even know the proper usage of "an"
> and "a".

They are especially unclear when it comes to the proper usage of "a" in
"grammar."

>If a noun or an adjective starts with a constinent it should always be
preceeded with "a".

What about "an honest man" or "a ukelele"?

--
Peter Hoogenboom

Matti Lamprhey

unread,
Aug 2, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/2/00
to
"Jerry Friedman" <jfried...@my-deja.com> wrote...
>
> ... "oofy" doesn't appear to be a word--I've

> never heard it, and it's not in the Merriam-Webster dictionary at
> <http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary>.

Oofy means wealthy, rich. Wodehouse names the wealthiest man in the Drones
Club as Oofy Prosser.

It's probably based on a Yiddish word /ooftish/, money laid down on a table.
(NSOED)

Matti

K. Edgcombe

unread,
Aug 2, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/2/00
to
In article <8m7dmi$euk$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>,
Jerry Friedman <jfried...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>
>You're right. (Except that "oofy" doesn't appear to be a word--I've

>never heard it, and it's not in the Merriam-Webster dictionary at

Of course it's a word! Doesn't anyone read P.G.Wodehouse any more?

Katy

Jerry Friedman

unread,
Aug 2, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/2/00
to
In article <IXQh5.3946$bi.12968@NewsReader>,

"Matti Lamprhey" <ma...@polka.bikini> wrote:
> "Jerry Friedman" <jfried...@my-deja.com> wrote...
> >
> > ... "oofy" doesn't appear to be a word--I've

> > never heard it, and it's not in the Merriam-Webster dictionary at
> > <http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary>.
>
> Oofy means wealthy, rich. Wodehouse names the wealthiest man in the
Drones
> Club as Oofy Prosser.
>
> It's probably based on a Yiddish word /ooftish/, money laid down on a
table.
> (NSOED)

Thanks to you and Katy for the correction. I remember Oofy Prosser's
name, but I suspect I didn't think it had a slang meaning.

--
Jerry Friedman
jfrE...@nnm.cc.nm.us


i before e
and all the disclaimers

ggarside

unread,
Aug 2, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/2/00
to
Peter Hoogenboom wrote:
>
> Sam wrote:
>
> > It seems that even "intellectuals" don't even know the proper usage of "an"
> > and "a".
>
> They are especially unclear when it comes to the proper usage of "a" in
> "grammar."
>
> >If a noun or an adjective starts with a constinent it should always be
> preceeded with "a".
>

And finally (bet Sam wishes he hadn't started this now...)

you can "precede", and you can "proceed", but you can't "preceed"!


Geoff.

Bob Cunningham

unread,
Aug 3, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/3/00
to
On 2 Aug 2000 08:41:52 GMT, ke...@cus.cam.ac.uk (K. Edgcombe) said:

>In article <8m7dmi$euk$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>,
>Jerry Friedman <jfried...@my-deja.com> wrote:

>>You're right. (Except that "oofy" doesn't appear to be a word--I've


>>never heard it, and it's not in the Merriam-Webster dictionary at

>Of course it's a word! Doesn't anyone read P.G.Wodehouse any more?

I have about forty of his books, each of which I've read at least
twice, some three or four times, in recent years.

Oofy is the nickname of a well-heeled (oofy) member of the Drones
Club.

But you knew that.

NSOED says "oofy" is first attested in the mid 20th century, by which
they mean during the period 1930-1969, but the 1980s _Supplement to
the OED_ has a citation of "oof", meaning "wealth", from 1888.

The 1980s _Supplement_ doesn't have "oofy". Can someone tell us what
OED2 says about it? Do they quote P. G. Wodehouse? He was doing some
of his best writing in the 1930s.


Aaron J Dinkin

unread,
Aug 3, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/3/00
to
Bob Cunningham <spa...@alt-usage-english.org> wrote:

> The 1980s _Supplement_ doesn't have "oofy". Can someone tell us what
> OED2 says about it? Do they quote P. G. Wodehouse? He was doing some
> of his best writing in the 1930s.

It's listed as a subentry under "oof". The first citation of "oofy" is:

: 1896 Blackw. Mag. Dec. 727 My oofy maiden-aunt.

There is also a citation of "oofiness" from Wodehouse:

: 1935 Wodehouse Luck of Bodkins xvii. 211 His amazing oofiness had a tendency
: to slip from the mind.

Hmm.... How odd. The etymology of "oof" is given as "Understood to be short for
_oof-tish_, Yiddish for Ger. _auf tische_, i.e. _auf dem tische_ `on the
table'". Except it was my understanding that the Yiddish cognate of German
"auf" is "af", not "uf", when it's used as a preposition. ("Uf" does exist in
Yiddish, but it's a verbal complement, not a preposition, e.g. in "vaks uf",
'grow up'.)

erilar

unread,
Aug 3, 2000, 3:00:00 AM8/3/00
to
In article <39878C49...@weSPAMsleyan.edu>, Peter Hoogenboom
<phooge...@weSPAMsleyan.edu> wrote:

> Sam wrote:
>
> > It seems that even "intellectuals" don't even know the proper usage of "an"
> > and "a".
>
> They are especially unclear when it comes to the proper usage of "a" in
> "grammar."
>
> >If a noun or an adjective starts with a constinent it should always be
> preceeded with "a".
>

> What about "an honest man" or "a ukelele"?

I have yet to hear honest pronounced with an initial consonant or ukelele
without one.

--
Mary Loomer Oliver (aka erilar)


Erilar's Cave Annex: http://www.win.bright.net/~erilarlo


0 new messages