Where's George Hammond?
Peter Bowditch
New Zealand, and nothing has been heard about SPOG since then. This is
the longest hammond-free period since the latest outbreak began.
Is this a coincidence, or has George been busy discussing physics,
usenet tactics and linguistics with the Shade of Earl?
--
Peter Bowditch
It's Kooks Day somewhere right now
Celebrate at http://www.ratbags.com/loon/
David Evens
wrote:
>It is now 17 hours since Kooks Day first clicked in somewhere east of
>New Zealand, and nothing has been heard about SPOG since then. This is
>the longest hammond-free period since the latest outbreak began.
>
>Is this a coincidence, or has George been busy discussing physics,
>usenet tactics and linguistics with the Shade of Earl?
You spoke too soon, he posted something half an hour after you posted
this. Likes like he was on one of those excursions his increasingly
nervous neighbours have mentioned.
George Hammond
[Hammond]
Can you imagine this sick fuck scanning the entire internet
for my every post... pedant whipping boy and internet nummynut
following me around the internet....staying up 24 hours a day
stalking me around so he can post one of his kook one-liner
haraswsments to my thread... you'd think I was Elvis Presley
or something with paparrazi like this following me around.
=======================================================
GEORGE HAMMOND'S- SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://home.attbi.com/~ghammond/index.html
=======================================================
Peter Bowditch
>David Evens wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 26 Jun 2002 03:09:20 GMT, Peter Bowditch <pet...@ratbags.com>
>> wrote:
>> >It is now 17 hours since Kooks Day first clicked in somewhere east of
>> >New Zealand, and nothing has been heard about SPOG since then. This is
>> >the longest hammond-free period since the latest outbreak began.
>> >
>> >Is this a coincidence, or has George been busy discussing physics,
>> >usenet tactics and linguistics with the Shade of Earl?
>>
>> You spoke too soon, he posted something half an hour after you posted
>> this. Likes like he was on one of those excursions his increasingly
>> nervous neighbours have mentioned.
>
>[Hammond]
>Can you imagine this sick fuck scanning the entire internet
>for my every post... pedant whipping boy and internet nummynut
>following me around the internet....staying up 24 hours a day
>stalking me around so he can post one of his kook one-liner
>haraswsments to my thread... you'd think I was Elvis Presley
>or something with paparrazi like this following me around.
Wow! More stuff for my CV. Thanks, George.
Jim R Feliciano
>
No I don't search the entire internet. I just go to newsgroups. Just like
when I go to channel 2 to watch "Friends." Mr. Hammond makes me laugh just as
often. What does make Mr. Hammond special is that he just won't go away, no
matter what anyone says. By the way I do not think that IQ is the same in 4d
psych as time in 4d space. I think time is the 4th d in the brain.
>
>[Hammond]
>Can you imagine this sick fuck scanning the entire internet
>for my every post... pedant whipping boy and internet nummynut
>following me around the internet....staying up 24 hours a day
>stalking me around so he can post one of his kook one-liner
>haraswsments to my thread... you'd think I was Elvis Presley
>or something with paparrazi like this following me around.
>
>=======================================================
> GEORGE HAMMOND'S- SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
> http://home.attbi.com/~ghammond/index.html
>=======================================================
--
Sincerely from,
Jim R Feliciano
jfe...@muse.sfusd.edu
Hey!!! Buy My Book
"The Guys" it's a fun Book.
http://www.publishamerica.com
you need IE 5 or Netscape 6 to make publishamerica work, or go to
http://amazon.com
enter my name Jim R Feliciano to get it quickly and at a cheaper price.
Buy My Book. Thank You!!!
Hey my site Take your sense of humor with you.
http://www.fortunecity.com/lavender/banzai/834/shake1.html
Peter Bowditch
>you'd think I was Elvis Presley
>or something with paparrazi like this following me around
I knew Elvis Presley. I sang with him. He was my hero. George, you are
no Elvis Presley.
Uncle Al
>
> It is now 17 hours since Kooks Day first clicked in somewhere east of
> New Zealand, and nothing has been heard about SPOG since then. This is
> the longest hammond-free period since the latest outbreak began.
>
> Is this a coincidence, or has George been busy discussing physics,
> usenet tactics and linguistics with the Shade of Earl?
Hammond is engaged in an intensive e-mail debate with himself. He is
loudly whining to his God that he is suffering a denial of service
attack. The more he complains the more intense the attack becomes.
One expects him to start gnawing bibles and rending garments, then
commence ineptly playing with himself as he grows ever more excited
about SPLOOGE.
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/eotvos.htm
Science is empirical.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" The Net!
George Hammond
[Hammond]
On this NG (.relativity) there are 100 "internet-kooks" claiming
a hundred different ways to "prove Einstein's theory is wrong"...
what does that mean.... it means everytime some top notch physicist
such as Einstein or Hammond makes a historic discovery... the kooks
go into paroxysms of fellus jage and start harassing the theory.
It simply proves the theory is CORRECT.
Then of course there are the morons like you, who keep saying
"jeez..umm, , I got a big laff out of that one..".
George Hammond
>
> Peter Bowditch wrote:
> >
> > It is now 17 hours since Kooks Day first clicked in somewhere east of
> > New Zealand, and nothing has been heard about SPOG since then. This is
> > the longest hammond-free period since the latest outbreak began.
> >
> > Is this a coincidence, or has George been busy discussing physics,
> > usenet tactics and linguistics with the Shade of Earl?
>
> Hammond is engaged in an intensive e-mail debate with himself. He is
> loudly whining to his God that he is suffering a denial of service
> attack. The more he complains the more intense the attack becomes.
> One expects him to start gnawing bibles and rending garments, then
> commence ineptly playing with himself as he grows ever more excited
> about SPLOOGE.
[Hammond]
J - A - C - K - A - S - S ......!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Sally Arturo
> On Wed, 26 Jun 2002 03:09:20 GMT, Peter Bowditch <pet...@ratbags.com>
> wrote:
> >It is now 17 hours since Kooks Day first clicked in somewhere east of
> >New Zealand, and nothing has been heard about SPOG since then. This is
> >the longest hammond-free period since the latest outbreak began.
> >
> >Is this a coincidence, or has George been busy discussing physics,
> >usenet tactics and linguistics with the Shade of Earl?
George is terrified of me, and I have started posting a lot in the
last few days. This is the reason that his posting frequency has
dropped so sharply. He knows that I know all about his pathetic life
and his hilarious theories, and will shoot down any stupid point he
makes. WHAT A COWARD!!!
Sally 'George's Nightmare' Arturo
JWBrittland
"Jim R Feliciano" <jfe...@muse.sfusd.edu> wrote in message
news:afceqg$ct3j4$1...@ID-115442.news.dfncis.de...
> In article <3D19A3D9...@attbi.com>, gham...@attbi.com says...
> >
> No I don't search the entire internet. I just go to newsgroups. Just
like
> when I go to channel 2 to watch "Friends." Mr. Hammond makes me laugh
just as
> often. What does make Mr. Hammond special is that he just won't go away,
no
> matter what anyone says. By the way I do not think that IQ is the same in
4d
> psych as time in 4d space. I think time is the 4th d in the brain.
*chuckle*
And I thought fire engines were red because that was the color of the
paint...so they would stand out.
But you know, even if this purported relationship between space-time and
psychometric axes-IQ *did* have any significance, it is incredible how he
simply asserts that God fits into the formula somehow. Anyway, it sounds
like he is establishig the premise: "Anything that there is three of is
significantly related to anything else that there is three of, except when
there is four of it; then you find a fourth element of the other thing and
they are intimately related once again, and in fact, proves the existence of
God."
Oh, that's right...I'm forgetting about the all-important observation of
human height increases over the last century.
In any case, I'm just glad to be able to live in a time when somebody
actually made such an amazing discovery.
George, if you are reading this, did you know that the formula for the
area of a sphere is the derivative of the formula for the volume of a
sphere? This would be a more convincing argument for the existnce of God,
don't you think?
And did you miss the one where somebody already proved the existence of
God because of all the spiral forms found in nature? Yes, George...you've
been PRE-EMPTED!
Britt
Kevin
news:afcn26$l6d$1...@news.chatlink.com...
Let's not forget e^(i*pi) = -1 . ' . God exists :O)
0gre
> Uncle Al wrote:
> >
> > Peter Bowditch wrote:
> > >
> > > It is now 17 hours since Kooks Day first clicked in somewhere east of
> > > New Zealand, and nothing has been heard about SPOG since then. This is
> > > the longest hammond-free period since the latest outbreak began.
> > >
> > > Is this a coincidence, or has George been busy discussing physics,
> > > usenet tactics and linguistics with the Shade of Earl?
> >
> > Hammond is engaged in an intensive e-mail debate with himself. He is
> > loudly whining to his God that he is suffering a denial of service
> > attack. The more he complains the more intense the attack becomes.
> > One expects him to start gnawing bibles and rending garments, then
> > commence ineptly playing with himself as he grows ever more excited
> > about SPLOOGE.
>
> [Hammond]
>
> J - A - C - K - A - S - S ......!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Nice rant-caps, Hammond. Is your brain still shaped like a cube?
>
>
> =======================================================
> GEORGE HAMMOND'S- SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
> http://home.attbi.com/~ghammond/index.html
> =======================================================
I still say that part should read
=======================================================
GEORGE HAMMOND'S AN INFAMOUS USENET KOOK
http://home.pacifier.com/~dkossy/hammond.html
=======================================================
JWBrittland
"Kevin" <kmo...@rogers.com> wrote in message
news:afd0a3$ev1$1...@testinfo.cs.uoguelph.ca...
<snip>
> > George, if you are reading this, did you know that the formula for
the
> > area of a sphere is the derivative of the formula for the volume of a
> > sphere? This would be a more convincing argument for the existnce of
God,
> > don't you think?
> > And did you miss the one where somebody already proved the existence
of
> > God because of all the spiral forms found in nature? Yes,
George...you've
> > been PRE-EMPTED!
> >
> > Britt
> >
> >
>
> Let's not forget e^(i*pi) = -1 . ' . God exists :O)
>
Well, yeah. That *too*! What was the one some French guy pulled on a
critic and the critic apparently just hung his head and walked away. Oh,
this was a century or two ago and I can't remember the circumstances. He
just gave some simple equation, stated that it proved that God exists, and
then demanded a response. Did you ever read about that one?
Britt
Eric Gisse
>[Hammond]
>
> J - A - C - K - A - S - S ......!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
>
But he's a funny jackass!
RG
That was smartass french writer/philosopher Denis Diderot who was humiliated
by Euler. Euler addressed him and declared " (a+b^n)/n=x , donc Dieu
existe- respondez!" . Diderot was held speechless and laughed out of the
court.
JWBrittland
"RG" <RG...@SPAMhotmail.com> wrote in message
news:tEIS8.5072$%N4.15...@news20.bellglobal.com...
> That was smartass french writer/philosopher Denis Diderot who was
humiliated
> by Euler. Euler addressed him and declared " (a+b^n)/n=x , donc Dieu
> existe- respondez!" . Diderot was held speechless and laughed out of the
> court.
Thanks. That's the one I was talking about. Only the way you present it
here, it seems as if Diderot was the one who "had it coming" and Euler was
just razzing him to the delight of the crowd. Is that a correct
interpretation?
Britt
JWBrittland
"JJ" <jak...@parkin.ca> wrote in message
news:pan.2002.06.27.22...@parkin.ca...
> On Thu, 27 Jun 2002 18:09:38 -0400, JWBrittland wrote:
<snip>
>...(just in case you think that all mathematicians are
> loonies who believe in Gawd...)
Ha! I just got finished watching "A Beautiful Mind" right before going
online and reading this!
And no, I don't have any reason to believe that. In fact, I'm kind of
envious of mathematicians (and physicists), except for the fact that once
you reach a certain level, it must get kind of lonely in there. But I would
love to have that kind of grasp of logic, problem-solving, patterns, and
fundamental descriptions of things. Or does it just continue to get
increasingly esoteric and frustrating the higher or deeper one goes--feeling
like you might be at the verge of understanding the most profound of
principles, only to discover with the conquest of each new territory, that
the horizon never gets any closer?
Britt
Jason P
of Intelligence. Here's the line by line:
George Hammond <gham...@attbi.com> wrote in message news:<3D19CB02...@attbi.com>...
> [Hammond]
> On this NG (.relativity) there are 100 "internet-kooks" claiming
> a hundred different ways to "prove Einstein's theory is wrong"...
You're an idiot.
> what does that mean....
You're an idiot.
> it means everytime some top notch physicist such as Einstein or Hammond makes > a historic discovery...
You're an idiot.
> the kooks go into paroxysms of fellus jage and start harassing the theory.
You're an idiot. LOL.
> It simply proves the theory is CORRECT.
It "simply proves the theory is correct?" Do you fucking listen to
yourself George?
Here's my theory. George's IQ on a given day can be determined by y =
-x + 90. x=0 is the start of the Varney / Dummond mess. Every day he
loses an IQ point. He's probably at 60 or so now. At 45, he will
forget to breath and die in his sleep.
Unfortunately, I think most people will agree that George is getting
dumber and dumber (and many would argue that its expontential, not
linear), so I guess that proves the theory is WRONG, right dumbass, I
mean, dummond?
> Then of course there are the morons like you, who keep saying
> "jeez..umm, , I got a big laff out of that one..".
Uh-huh. You're an idiot George.
Jason
Dr. Dickie
There you go again, trying to confuse him with the facts.
Best to let sleeping psyco's sleep. They sometime bite the hand than feeds them....and it is usually their
own!
--
Dr. Dickie
Skepticult member in good standing #394-00596-438
Poking kooks with a pointy stick
------------------------------------------------------
"The important thing is not to stop questioning.
Curiosity has its own reason for existing."
A. Einstein
RG
Diderot was a noted atheist, Euler was a confirmed believer. Here's an
abstract
of the encounter from a book by Lancelot Hogben, "Mathematics, the Mirror of
Civilisation".
"Diderot was staying at the Russian court, where his elegant flippancy was
entertaining the nobility. Fearing that the faith of her retainers was at
stake, the Tsaritsa commissioned Euler, the most distinguished mathematician
of the time, to debate with Diderot in public. Diderot was informed that a
mathematician had established a proof of the existence of God. He was
summoned to court without being told the name of his opponent. Before the
assembled court, Euler accosted him with the following pronouncement, which
was uttered with due gravity: a + bn/n = x, donc Dieu existe repondez!
Algebra was Arabic to Diderot. Unfortunately he did not realize that was the
trouble. Had he realized that algebra is just a language in which we
describe the sizes of things in contrast to the ordinary languages which we
use to describe the sorts of things in the world, he would have asked Euler
to translate the first half of the sentence into French. Translated freely
into English, it may be rendered: "A number x can be got by first adding a
number a to a number b multiplied by itself a certain number of times, and
then dividing the whole by the number of b's multiplied together. So God
exists after all. What have you got to say now?" If Diderot had asked Euler
to illustrate the first part of his remark for the clearer understanding of
the Russian court, Euler might have replied that x is 3 when a is1 and b is
2 and n is 3.... Euler's troubles would have begun when the court wanted to
know how the second part of the sentence follows from the first part.
[ That's how George Hammonds troubles began! ]
Like many of us, Diderot had stagefright when confronted with a sentence
in size language. He left the court abruptly amid the titters of the
assembly ...
and promptly returned to France."
JWBrittland
others see it. The nice thing about the Internet is that this forum can, at
any time, be contributed to by experts in any field. When extraordinary
claims come up, there is always someone with relevant expertise. Too bad
Diderot didn't have a mathematician with him. But at least this way we all
have a lesson to learn from.
Britt