Regards,
Serge
"Victore" <i...@pandora.be> wrote in message
news:cuzMa.2599$7h....@afrodite.telenet-ops.be...
"Alaskan Butch" <a...@jackassmagnet.com> wrote in message news:<bdu2t5$k61$1...@terabinaries.xmission.com>...
I can see you getting into a little trouble if you are taking outdoor
pix at the wrong time of year, and your camera's auto timer is set a
little slow.
You'll get stiff in parts you don't want to - hahahahaha!
Mwah... Maybe the geocache should just be clearly labeled with something
saying 'Adult Content' as would the website that would give a clue of how to
find it be.
Especially since Alaskan Butch is a woman.
I bet that cops prefer the pictures of naked men...
:-)
Frank
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.495 / Virus Database: 294 - Release Date: 6/30/2003
Find a naked troll in a geocache... that would be a scare! ;-)
>Some folks just don't know a troll when they see one.....
So true!
Hans-Georg
--
No mail, please.
All the mosquitoes and black flies here in NS think its a great idea.
Ken
Some folks just don't know when some other folks are just farting
around knowingly feeding a troll - which is of course what they
themselves are also doing by responding to the thread.
>Hans-Georg Michna <hans-georgN...@michna.com> wrote:
>>"Frank Looper" <junkc...@charter.net> wrote:
>>So true!
A self-reflecting message. :-)
I don't think "self-reflecting" is exactly the best way to say it in
English.
You are probably trying to imply "self-describing", but a better way
to say it would be - - - - - duh? - I can't think of one off the top
of my head.
Tell me how you would say it in German and I'll find a better English
idiomatic translation for it. (selbsterlauterung, selbstaufklarung?)
Hey did i just write a hai-ku?
"Oldbie" <nomor...@myplace.com> wrote in message
news:be3qiq$m9t$1...@nobel2.pacific.net.sg...
>I don't think "self-reflecting" is exactly the best way to say it in
>English.
>You are probably trying to imply "self-describing", but a better way
>to say it would be - - - - - duh? - I can't think of one off the top
>of my head.
You probably want "self-referential".
Dave