joe wrote:
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
Check out our new Unlimited Server. No Download or Time Limits!
-----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! ==-----
"Anonymous" <anon...@anonymous.anonymous> wrote in message
news:3C90180B...@tld.net...
:-)
Fawks
Steve
--
Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
Brooklyn, NY
718-258-5001
http://www.dentaltwins.com
"Roy Brown" <royb...@on.aibn.com> wrote in message news:<5zUj8.53957$hb6.2...@news20.bellglobal.com>...
dental assistant
Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS <born...@dentaltwins.com> wrote in message
news:<3C90CD63...@dentaltwins.com>...
Hope this helps,
Steve
--
Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
No more decay.
That was my solution to similar problem.
...from the chair.
Pudge
I think (me personally here) that we were misled in school regarding the
amount of remaining tooth structure needed to justify full coverage cast
restorations.
We were taught that if we had a 2-3 mm ferrule at the cervical portion of
the tooth, we could engage this area with our casting, and that we would
have long tern success.
After 18 years of doing this (not counting dental school clinic), I no
longer think this concept is valid. I have seen far too many broken teeth,
where the crown snaps off the root stump leaving 4-5 mm of ferrule inside
the crown.
The consistent factor I have seen is the width of the residual tooth
material in this "ferrule region". The broken teeth all have very thin
"shells" of tooth on which the crown was finished. The beautifully done
cores (amalgam, composite and/or gold) were all nicely attached to the
inside of the casting. I always had to grind the cores to get them out of
the crown, so I could temporize the crown back on the tooth. We have all
done wonderful cores with great retention, then gone ahead and prepared the
tooth for the casting with the core in place. The problem has been that we
now cannot see the thickness of the tooth in this "ferrule area". We seek
perfection (like we were taught) and prepare lovely finish lines in the
"ferrule area". Only thing is,,,,,,,, we cut the only strong portion of the
tooth down to the approximate thickness of egg-shell. We are setting up
these teeth to fail later on.
A "short-crown" bonded to the tooth without reducing the thickness of the
cervical third of the clinical crown makes a lot more sense to me.
In addition, the "short-crown" would reduce the incidence of abfraction
lesion we see at the margins of full cast crowns. With the full cast crown,
all the flexion of the tooth is limited to be between the crown margin and
the crest of the alveolar bone. The tooth flexes more in this narrow band,
and abfraction begins. With the "short-crown" concept, the tooth is free to
flex along more of its vertical height. This flexing pressure is more
spread out and the potential for abfraction lesion is less. We see teeth
every day (in our practices), where abfraction has caused what seem to be
open margins on the facial aspect of full cast crowns. How much energy do
we spend each year just trying to extend the life of these crowns, (or
re-doing them)?
And, please Mrs. Ralph, this is a theoretical debate, not a statement of how
your crowns should be done in your own mouth.
Steve
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Stephen Mancuso, D.D.S.
drs...@home.msen.com
Troy, Michigan USA
+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+
This posting is intended for informational or conversational purposes only.
Always seek the opinion of a licensed dental professional before acting on
the advice or opinion expressed here. Only a dentist who has examined you
in person can diagnose your problems and make decisions which will effect
your health.
......................
"Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS" <born...@dentaltwins.com> wrote in message
news:3C98E211...@dentaltwins.com...
Steve
--
+=_-+=_-+=_-+=_-+=_-+=_-+=_-+=_-
Stephen Mancuso, D.D.S.
Troy, Michigan USA
drs...@mancusodds.com
sma...@home.msen.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Steven Bornfeld" <mars...@netzero.net> wrote in message
news:3C9BA0C0...@netzero.net...
Steve