Dirk, making mistakes again.
John Schoenfeld
Here is a link to one of Dirk van de moortels "Immortal Fumbles" pages
where he attempts to ridicule one of my posts.
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/DisCont.html
He highlights the words "space" and "discrete", because he believes
spaces cannot be discrete.
Discrete spaces in fact do exist, as any competent mathematican can
tell you.
Here are some links:
http://planetmath.org/encyclopedia/Discrete.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discrete_space
After I revealed Dirks malicious ignorance on usenet, mistake making
Dirk responded by changing his story and stating that discrete spaces
have no place in quantum theory. Here is a quote:
"HAHAHAHAHA, I'm probably the last one in the
world who needs links to show me that mathematicians
use discrete spaces :-)
But last time I looked quantum theory didn't use a
discrete space for its setting. When and where was
the last time you looked?"
Here is a link to that post:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=JnS8c.1777%24zj4.1264%40news.cpqcorp.net
But as usual, Dirk made a mistake.
Discrete spaces have long been investigated in Quantum Theory and it
is not a fumble of any sort to investigate them further, as any
competent Physicist can tell you.
Here are some links:
http://www.wolframscience.com/reference/notes/1027c
http://adela.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~motl/Gibbs/discrete.htm
http://www.weburbia.demon.co.uk/press/html/g09.htm
Thanks for your attention.
JS
John Schoenfeld
Here is a link to one of Dirk van de moortels "Immortal Fumbles" pages
where he attempts to ridicule one of my posts.
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/DisCont.html
He highlights the words "space" and "discrete", because he believes
spaces cannot be discrete.
Discrete spaces in fact do exist, as any competent mathematican can
tell you.
Here are some links:
http://planetmath.org/encyclopedia/Discrete.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discrete_space
After I revealed Dirks malicious ignorance, mistake making Dirk
responded by changing his story and stating that discrete spaces have
no place in quantum theory. Here is a quote:
"HAHAHAHAHA, I'm probably the last one in the
world who needs links to show me that mathematicians
use discrete spaces :-)
But last time I looked quantum theory didn't use a
discrete space for its setting. When and where was
the last time you looked?"
Here is a link to that post:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=JnS8c.1777%24zj4.1264%40news.cpqcorp.net
But once again, Dirk made a mistake.
Discrete spaces have long been investigated in Quantum Theory, as any
Michael Varney
"John Schoenfeld" <j.scho...@programmer.net> wrote in message
news:a98beaaa.04032...@posting.google.com...
> Dear reader,
Hello Crackpot.
Bilge
Followups set to alt.sci.physics
John Schoenfeld:
>Dear reader,
>
>Here is a link to one of Dirk van de moortels "Immortal Fumbles" pages
>where he attempts to ridicule one of my posts.
Dirk just archives posts which are the butt of their own self-ridicule,
and so any attempt at ridicule would be in the content of the article...
>http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/DisCont.html
... this one being an excellent example.
>He highlights the words "space" and "discrete", because he believes
>spaces cannot be discrete.
To my knowledge, dirk has never made such a statement. Your post is
not absurd for any reason having to do with spacetime being discrete
or not. It has to do with your entire reasoning in arriving at that
conclusion, which _is_ ludicrous and patently false.
>Discrete spaces in fact do exist, as any competent mathematican can
>tell you.
Your point being what?
>After I revealed Dirks malicious ignorance, mistake making Dirk
>responded by changing his story and stating that discrete spaces have
>no place in quantum theory. Here is a quote:
>
>"HAHAHAHAHA, I'm probably the last one in the
>world who needs links to show me that mathematicians
>use discrete spaces :-)
>
>But last time I looked quantum theory didn't use a discrete space for
>its setting. When and where was the last time you looked?"
When have you _ever_ looked? Quantities like p and x have continuous
eigenvalues. The fact that those quantities are not simultaneously
well-defined does not mean that spacetime is discrete. Spacetime may
be fuzzy, but that is somewhat different than discrete.
>But once again, Dirk made a mistake.
Why? Did he fail to include a post of yours in his list that you think
he should have included?
>Discrete spaces have long been investigated in Quantum Theory, as any
>competent Physicist can tell you.
>
>Here are some links:
>http://www.wolframscience.com/reference/notes/1027c
>http://adela.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~motl/Gibbs/discrete.htm
>http://www.weburbia.demon.co.uk/press/html/g09.htm
You have misconstrued what is in those articles. Saying that physicists
have considered the possibility that spacetime is discrete, is true.
Saying that discrete spacetime is part of quantum theory is not true.
Connecting discrete spacetime to quantum mechanics as you did in your
post bordered on bizarre.
Dirk Van de moortel
"John Schoenfeld" <j.scho...@programmer.net> wrote in message news:a98beaaa.0403...@posting.google.com...
You are most welcome.
Keep going - there is plenty of room at the bottom:
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/DisCont.html
Dirk Vdm
Androcles
"John Schoenfeld" <j.scho...@programmer.net> wrote in message
news:a98beaaa.0403...@posting.google.com...
'fumble' of mine listed where I stated that 1 has two square roots, 1
and -1, and I'm still amazed to find it doesn't.
Androcles.
Cesar Sirvent
"Androcles" <jp006...@nospamblueyonder.co.uk> escribió en el mensaje
news:ircac.702$6n5...@news-binary.blueyonder.co.uk...
Knowing Dirk, maybe he expects the solution written in the form exp(i*pi*n) with
n >= 0 and integer. But he will not tell and will have laugh about it. :-)
Dirk Van de moortel
"Androcles" <jp006...@nospamblueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message news:ircac.702$6n5...@news-binary.blueyonder.co.uk...
>
> We are used to Dinky's arrogance and lack of knowledge. I think he has a
> 'fumble' of mine listed where I stated that 1 has two square roots, 1
> and -1, and I'm still amazed to find it doesn't.
> Androcles.
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/SqrtAnswers.html
Dirk Vdm
Cesar Sirvent
"Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvand...@ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com> escribió en
el mensaje news:c2hac.55482$9q5.3...@phobos.telenet-ops.be...
Oh, my!!!
This is more serious that I had thought. There is evidence that Androcles didn't
even pass High School maths, and probably Elementary School maths either.
> Dirk Vdm
>
>
Franz Heymann
"Dirk Van de moortel"
<dirkvand...@ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com> wrote in
message
news:c2hac.55482$9q5.3...@phobos.telenet-ops.be...
Thanks, Dirk, for yet again reminding us of Androcles'
extreme stupidity.
And he still does not see it, which compounds his failure
even more.
Franz
Franz Heymann
"Androcles" <jp006...@nospamblueyonder.co.uk> wrote in
message
news:ircac.702$6n5...@news-binary.blueyonder.co.uk...
[snip]
> We are used to Dinky's arrogance and lack of knowledge. I
think he has a
> 'fumble' of mine listed where I stated that 1 has two
square roots, 1
> and -1, and I'm still amazed to find it doesn't.
> Androcles.
Are you saying that you are amazed to find that 1 doesn't
have two square roots?
Where did you find that?
Franz
Cesar Sirvent
"Franz Heymann" <notfranz...@btopenworld.com> escribió en el mensaje
news:c4cjkj$g3u$1...@titan.btinternet.com...
To be precise, the square roots of 1 in C are exp(i* n * pi)
where n>=0 and integer. :-)
> Franz
>
>
Dirk Van de moortel
"Franz Heymann" <notfranz...@btopenworld.com> wrote in message news:c4cjkj$g3u$1...@titan.btinternet.com...
hm, forgot to mention this one:
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/AndersenLogic.html
;-)
Dirk Vdm
Franz Heymann
A reminder a day keeps the doctor away.
Yes, as Androcles himself says atthe end of that snippet, he
is a rather sad case.
>
> Dirk Vdm
>
>