Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Darrick A Covenant-Breaker???

6 views
Skip to first unread message

darrick...@my-deja.com

unread,
Oct 3, 2000, 9:45:16 PM10/3/00
to

There is a new rumor going around that I, Darrick Evenson, is a
"covenant-breaker". I contacted the Baha'i National Center in Wilmette,
and they responded as usual by not acknowledging my email. So, if any of
you would like to find out I'd appreciate it. I'd like to know.

P.S. Has _The American Baha'i_ had any articles about how the Four-Year
Plan went? Or about if their national media campaign was successful (or
not)? I'm curious.
Darrick Evenson


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

patk...@my-deja.com

unread,
Oct 3, 2000, 10:50:56 PM10/3/00
to
In article <8re23c$shc$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>,

darrick...@my-deja.com wrote:
>
>
> There is a new rumor going around that I, Darrick Evenson, is a
> "covenant-breaker".

Wouldn't this be a great place to start a rumor?

> I contacted the Baha'i National Center in Wilmette,
> and they responded as usual by not acknowledging my email. So, if any
of
> you would like to find out I'd appreciate it. I'd like to know.

Hmmmm, ya'think Mr. Henderson is handling the email, recognized your
name and just trashed it?

Naw really, sending them email can be just as fast as sending them
snail mail. They'll take some time to get back to you. I guess they
don't want to write the wrong thing, wouldn't want ambiguous remarks to
be the basis of rumors; I'm sure you know how that can get.

Blessings!
- Pat
ko...@ameritel.net

Roger Reini

unread,
Oct 4, 2000, 3:00:00 AM10/4/00
to
On Wed, 04 Oct 2000 01:45:16 GMT, darrick...@my-deja.com wrote:

>
>
>There is a new rumor going around that I, Darrick Evenson, is a
>"covenant-breaker". I contacted the Baha'i National Center in Wilmette,
>and they responded as usual by not acknowledging my email. So, if any of
>you would like to find out I'd appreciate it. I'd like to know.

I have seen no announcement from the Universal House of Justice
stating that you are a Covenant-breaker. Any such message would be
published in "The American Baha'i" and would be posted on the US
administrative Web site. Indeed, within the last couple of months, I
have recalled seeing two announcements on the Web site that certain
individuals were officially declared to have broken the Covenant.
Your name was not among those mentioned.

Of course, if you're not regarded as a member of the Faith, then you
cannot be regarded as a CB, no matter what.

>
>P.S. Has _The American Baha'i_ had any articles about how the Four-Year
>Plan went? Or about if their national media campaign was successful (or
>not)? I'm curious.

There have been articles and statements. However, I don't think it
appropriate to discuss the contents of those statements here on an
open forum.


Roger (ro...@rreini.com)
http://www.rreini.com/

patk...@my-deja.com

unread,
Oct 4, 2000, 3:00:00 AM10/4/00
to
Allahu Abha!

In article <ng3bOTrTv8zPL3...@4ax.com>,
ro...@rreini.com wrote:

> Of course, if you're not regarded as a member of the Faith, then you
> cannot be regarded as a CB, no matter what.

I don't think it is so much organizational membership which is required
but a recognition of Baha'u'llah as the Manifestation of God, coupled
w/ actively undermining the institutions.

However, there is likely another reason why Darrick could not be a
Covenant Breaker, proto, crypto, quasi, or plain old garden variety.

Blessings!
- Pat
ko...@ameritel.net

darrick...@my-deja.com

unread,
Oct 4, 2000, 3:00:00 AM10/4/00
to
Thank you Roger, I appreciate a direct and honest answer; so rare among
Baha'is in this discussion group. Why are the articles about the 4-year
plan "secret"? I don't understand this.
Darrick Evenson

> On Wed, 04 Oct 2000 01:45:16 GMT, darrick...@my-deja.com wrote:
>
> >
> >

> >There is a new rumor going around that I, Darrick Evenson, is a
> >"covenant-breaker". I contacted the Baha'i National Center in
Wilmette,
> >and they responded as usual by not acknowledging my email. So, if any
of
> >you would like to find out I'd appreciate it. I'd like to know.
>

> I have seen no announcement from the Universal House of Justice
> stating that you are a Covenant-breaker. Any such message would be
> published in "The American Baha'i" and would be posted on the US
> administrative Web site. Indeed, within the last couple of months, I
> have recalled seeing two announcements on the Web site that certain
> individuals were officially declared to have broken the Covenant.
> Your name was not among those mentioned.
>

> Of course, if you're not regarded as a member of the Faith, then you
> cannot be regarded as a CB, no matter what.
>
> >

> >P.S. Has _The American Baha'i_ had any articles about how the
Four-Year
> >Plan went? Or about if their national media campaign was successful
(or
> >not)? I'm curious.
>

> There have been articles and statements. However, I don't think it
> appropriate to discuss the contents of those statements here on an
> open forum.
>
> Roger (ro...@rreini.com)
> http://www.rreini.com/
>

Roger Reini

unread,
Oct 5, 2000, 3:00:00 AM10/5/00
to
On Wed, 04 Oct 2000 20:25:42 GMT, darrick...@my-deja.com wrote:

>Thank you Roger, I appreciate a direct and honest answer; so rare among
>Baha'is in this discussion group. Why are the articles about the 4-year
>plan "secret"? I don't understand this.

You're welcome. The various Plans within the Baha'i community aren't
really secret, as such. However, there are topics there that aren't
appropriate for discussion in a public forum -- administrative stuff,
etc.

Roger (ro...@rreini.com)
http://www.rreini.com/

YOUSAIDWHAT1

unread,
Oct 5, 2000, 3:00:00 AM10/5/00
to
>Thank you Roger, I appreciate a direct and honest answer; so rare among
>Baha'is in this discussion group. Why are the articles about the 4-year
>plan "secret"? I don't understand this.
>Darrick Evenson

Darrick,
You are not a Baha'i. Why would you expect that the information contained in
documents sent to Baha'is would be openly shared with you? You've shown your
true colors on many newsgroups. We know why you want information about our
community.
We're loving and caring people, but we're not stupid. You'll just have to
accept that fact that there are *some* things that are simply not your
business.

Andrea

darrick...@my-deja.com

unread,
Oct 8, 2000, 3:00:00 AM10/8/00
to
Dear Andrea,

You're not just an idiot, you're a FUCKING idiot. That..I think..says
it all.
;@)


In article <20001005161600...@ng-ci1.aol.com>,

Pat Kohli

unread,
Oct 8, 2000, 3:00:00 AM10/8/00
to
Allahu Abha!

darrick...@my-deja.com wrote:

> Dear Andrea,
>
> (snip). . . .. That..I think..says
> it all.
> ;@)

It says you need to take your lithium. If you are going to lecture about
personal appearance, zip your fly at least. If you are gong to lecture
about spirituality, don't post profanity. Capiche?

May Allahu guide us in the straight path,
- Pat
ko...@ameritel.net


darrick...@my-deja.com

unread,
Oct 19, 2000, 12:07:35 AM10/19/00
to
Dear Pat,

As soon as I start claiming spirituality, or being a beacon of it, I'll
take your advice.
;@)


In article <39E0DE0B...@ameritel.net>,

dfio...@my-deja.com

unread,
Oct 19, 2000, 3:00:00 AM10/19/00
to
In article <8sls24$56a$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>,

darrick...@my-deja.com wrote:
> Dear Pat,
>
> As soon as I start claiming spirituality, or being a beacon of it,
> I'll take your advice.
> ;@)


So, you claim to have all the answers yet you admit to having no form
of spiritual life. Why should anyone listen to a person who admits to
being spiritually dead?

0 new messages