for those of you that care...
Christopher McKinstry
i've moved my personal homepage to http://clickable.com/kcm.html
BWS
Christopher McKinstry <ch...@clickable.com> wrote:
>i've moved my personal homepage to http://clickable.com/kcm.html
After the post about us "Loosers". Nobody gives a flying fuck.
You can take your homepage and stick it up you ass.
------------------------------------------------
"When you make an assumption, you make an ass of
you and umption"
------------------------------------------------
- Patrick
Christopher McKinstry
I tried to send you the email below, but your amazing cyberspc is
skrewed up... surprise.
Subject:
Returned mail: Local configuration error
Date:
Mon, 2 Dec 1996 23:23:31 GMT
From:
Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER...@cyberspc.cyberspc.mb.ca>
To:
postm...@cyberspc.cyberspc.mb.ca, <in...@clickable.com>
The original message was received at Mon, 2 Dec 1996 23:23:29 GMT
from kynes.gatewest.net [198.163.227.7]
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<bst...@cyberspc.mb.ca>
----- Transcript of session follows -----
554 MX list for cyberspc.mb.ca. points back to cyberspc.cyberspc.mb.ca
554 <bst...@cyberspc.mb.ca>... Local configuration error
Reporting-MTA: dns; cyberspc.cyberspc.mb.ca
Received-From-MTA: dns; kynes.gatewest.net
Arrival-Date: Mon, 2 Dec 1996 23:23:29 GMT
Final-Recipient: rfc822; bst...@cyberspc.mb.ca
Action: failed
Status: 5.5.0
Remote-MTA: dns; cyberspc.mb.ca
Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 2 Dec 1996 23:23:31 GMT
Subject:
posting
Date:
Mon, 02 Dec 1996 17:22:40 -0800
From:
Christopher McKinstry <in...@clickable.com>
Organization:
Clickable Systems International, Ltd.
To:
bst...@cyberspc.mb.ca
man you're <expletive edited>. read my response post and learn,
<expletive edited>.
and say hi to andrea... <expletive edited>.
BWS wrote:
>
> Christopher McKinstry <ch...@clickable.com> wrote:
>
> >are you 12? you sure don't act a day older.
>
> What makes you think I'm 12?
>
> Because I said "nobody gives a flying fuck" about you webpage?
>
> Because I told you to stick your webpage up your ass?
>
> I know it's impossible to actually stick your webpage up your ass
> but...
>
> Use your imagination.
>
> You're the one making the bonehead comments about people who pay for
> unlimited access. We're all a bunch of Losers right? You post your
> ads on this group and then you insult everyone here and you expect us
> to give a shit about your crap. I don't think so.
>
> BTW, this is what the mighty Christopher sent me via email.
>
> >man are you a freak or what. i suggest you vist http://www.dejanews.com
> >and do a little research before you open your trap.
>
> >BTW: you're a subscriber of the WORST isp in town... and if you do your
> >research, you'll discover i've said that since their first days...
> >(since i doubt you have the intelligence to discover it for yourself,
> >my old email address was cmc...@mbnet.mb.ca)
>
> >oh yeah, never, never, never speak for other people on the net...
> >"nobody gives a flying fuck" is in stark contridiction with your
> >signature, ass. "i don't give a flying fuck" is all you have a right to
> >cliam loser.
>
> You think I act like I'm 12?
>
> - Patrick
--
K. Christopher McKinstry
Personal: http://clickable.com/kcm.html
Work: http://www.clickable.com
--
K. Christopher McKinstry
Personal: http://clickable.com/kcm.html
Work: http://www.clickable.com
Christopher McKinstry
you're obviously brand-spanking new to the net and have no idea what
your doing. you'll take some flames for this posting, i suggest you pay
attention to them.
any 12 year old that's been on the net for more than a week will tell
you:
1)read the message title... it said "to those that care", those that
don't and respond anyway are real big idiots (you).
2)never flame for spelling mistakes. they happen all the time.
3)never quote email without permission. it's rude.
4)don't bring old threads into new ones... you end up sounding like my
wife "yeah, but in 1992 you called my mother a cow." it's history.
nobody cares.
in summary, you're definately a dink. but you'll learn or risk becoming
another jimp.
Christopher McKinstry
hey man, i see from the files you keep in your web directory, you're a
pretty (very) shallow person... nice picture of arnie though... and what
a way kewl animated gif of a body builder.
BTW: frontpage is for children... try coding you own pages... maybe some
original graphics or, god forbid, and original thought or two.
thanks for enriching our culture and contributing such valuable wisdom.
maybe you should try reading a book (without pictures).
Greg Kaletzke
In article <57vlvf$a...@canopus.cc.umanitoba.ca>, bst...@cyberspc.mb.ca
(BWS) wrote:
> You're the one making the bonehead comments about people who pay for
> unlimited access. We're all a bunch of Losers right? You post your
> ads on this group and then you insult everyone here and you expect us
> to give a shit about your crap. I don't think so.
Quite right. And while I think that the phrase "no-one gives a fuck" may
not be 100% accurate, it's sure as hell close enough.
Cheers,
Greg
--
"On an occasion of this kind it becomes more than a moral duty to speak one's mind. It becomes a pleasure."
- Oscar Wilde
BWS
Christopher McKinstry <ch...@clickable.com> wrote:
>are you 12? you sure don't act a day older.
What makes you think I'm 12?
Because I said "nobody gives a flying fuck" about you webpage?
Because I told you to stick your webpage up your ass?
I know it's impossible to actually stick your webpage up your ass
but...
Use your imagination.
You're the one making the bonehead comments about people who pay for
unlimited access. We're all a bunch of Losers right? You post your
ads on this group and then you insult everyone here and you expect us
to give a shit about your crap. I don't think so.
BWS
Christopher McKinstry <ch...@clickable.com> wrote:
>I tried to send you the email below, but your amazing cyberspc is
>skrewed up... surprise.
Hey, it's not there fault you don't know how to send email.
>man you're <expletive edited>. read my response post and learn,
><expletive edited>.
>and say hi to andrea... <expletive edited>.
Ok, I will.
- Patrick
BWS
Christopher McKinstry <ch...@clickable.com> wrote:
>you're obviously brand-spanking new to the net and have no idea what
>your doing. you'll take some flames for this posting, i suggest you pay
>attention to them.
Still waiting for the flames
>any 12 year old that's been on the net for more than a week will tell
>you:
>1)read the message title... it said "to those that care", those that
>don't and respond anyway are real big idiots (you).
But I do care. That is why I responded.
>2)never flame for spelling mistakes. they happen all the time.
I don't remember flaming for spelling.
>3)never quote email without permission. it's rude.
I would never do that to anyone else.
I like being rude to you though, your an asshole.
>4)don't bring old threads into new ones... you end up sounding like my
>wife "yeah, but in 1992 you called my mother a cow." it's history.
>nobody cares.
Yes sir, Mighty net god.
>in summary, you're definately a dink. but you'll learn or risk becoming
>another jimp.
You're just digging your hole deeper and deeper.
- Patrick
BWS
Christopher McKinstry <ch...@clickable.com> wrote:
>hey man, i see from the files you keep in your web directory, you're a
>pretty (very) shallow person... nice picture of arnie though... and what
>a way kewl animated gif of a body builder.
My webpage says nothing about me.
It's my first try dillweed. Don't know shit about HTML and I don't
care to.
>BTW: frontpage is for children... try coding you own pages... maybe some
>original graphics or, god forbid, and original thought or two.
Why should I when Frontpage is so easy to use. Why do something the
hard way?
>thanks for enriching our culture and contributing such valuable wisdom.
And what have you done to enrich our culture?
>maybe you should try reading a book (without pictures).
I've read many thankyou.
Your pathetic, you'll try anything to piss me off. Well, you've done
it. You should watch who you insult.
You see, now i'm going to pay you a visit.
Considering that your only 5'10" and 130 pounds It should not be to
hard to toss you around a bit. I'm going to put you in your place,
believe me. Next time I talk to you, it will be face to face.
- Patrick
Christopher McKinstry
This has gone WAY TOO FAR.
Not only have you threatened myself, and my wife in email, you've done
it here in public. Expect a vist by the police today. I am laying a
charge this morning.
Everyone is entitled to their opinions. But no one, my physically
threaten another. It is a crime.
--
Mark Forkheim
In article <32A37E...@clickable.com>, ch...@clickable.com says...
>1)read the message title... it said "to those that care", those that
>don't and respond anyway are real big idiots (you).
>2)never flame for spelling mistakes. they happen all the time.
>3)never quote email without permission. it's rude.
>4)don't bring old threads into new ones... you end up sounding like my
>wife "yeah, but in 1992 you called my mother a cow." it's history.
>nobody cares.
Gee Chris, how many times have you been married now? Sounds like you are alone
in not caring about what you said yesterday.
--
"Try not!...Do or do not, there is no try."
Yoda, The Empire Strikes Back, 1980
Mark Forkheim
mfor...@escape.ca
http://www.escape.ca/~mforkheim
Terry Johns
On Mon, 02 Dec 1996 17:13:01 -0800, Christopher McKinstry
<ch...@clickable.com> wrote:
>you're obviously brand-spanking new to the net and have no idea what
>your doing. you'll take some flames for this posting, i suggest you pay
>attention to them.
I don't know, I thought he said it rather well and straight forward.
>any 12 year old that's been on the net for more than a week will tell
>you:
>
>1)read the message title... it said "to those that care", those that
>don't and respond anyway are real big idiots (you).
And BWS was just trying to inform you that your title made no sense
in this newsgroupd, because "no one cares"
>2)never flame for spelling mistakes. they happen all the time.
He never flamed you for any spelling errors.
>3)never quote email without permission. it's rude.
LOL, considering what your e-mail said, I am sure most people would
have posted it....without asking your humble permission....LOL
>4)don't bring old threads into new ones... you end up sounding like my
>wife "yeah, but in 1992 you called my mother a cow." it's history.
>nobody cares.
Oh but a many people do care, we all would like to see you quit
posting but we also know that such an act will never happen.
>
>in summary, you're definately a dink. but you'll learn or risk becoming
>another jimp.
Now tell me, are you still working on your school psychology project,
I believe it is "Gauging the reactions of normal human beings on the
net to statements made by a supercilious piece of inconvenience" or
better know as "Chris has verbal diarrhea"
Now don't forget to take your medication.....
Roger Rempel
Christopher McKinstry wrote:
>
> This has gone WAY TOO FAR.
>
> Not only have you threatened myself, and my wife in email, you've done
> it here in public. Expect a vist by the police today. I am laying a
> charge this morning.
>
> Everyone is entitled to their opinions. But no one, my physically
> threaten another. It is a crime.
I've already e-mailed Patrick to let him know that if he has significant
trouble with you, and if he needs testimony for the authorities re:
harassment and threats from a C. McKinstry via e-mail, that I can
provide him with details of my experience with McKinstry from a year or
so ago.
If you don't want people to tell you that you're aksing for it...simply
don't ask for it Chris. One of these days you'll harass someone who
won't just stop thinking about you, they'll come after you. You profess
to know small amounts of theory relating to probability in your web
site. If so, then you have to know that if you go out of your way to
piss off as many people as you can, you're sure to come across someone
who will not be peaceful towards you.
Regards
Rog
Roger Rempel
Norman R. Gall wrote:
>
>
>While I sympathise with the sentiment above (since most people here >are just shooting their mouths off - you and I included), how should we >regard threats
*<snip>*
>should we 'stand by our private guns' and duke it out if it comes to >that or call the cops, as it most surely is the case that offerring >threats is punishable by summary conviction?
E-mail Tim Sale, ask him how he handled the same kind of public threat
from Premier Filmon?
Rog
Norman R. Gall
In article <32a45ec5....@news.cyberspc.mb.ca>, wag...@cyberspc.mb.ca
(Grant Wagner) wrote:
>On Tue, 03 Dec 1996 08:51:31 -0800, Christopher McKinstry
><ch...@clickable.com> wrote:
>
>>This has gone WAY TOO FAR.
>>Not only have you threatened myself, and my wife in email, you've done
>>it here in public. Expect a vist by the police today. I am laying a
>>charge this morning.
>>Everyone is entitled to their opinions. But no one, my physically
>>threaten another. It is a crime.
>Whine, whine, wimper, wimper, cry, cry.
>
>You get your mommy to fight your battles for you when you were a kid
>too?
Grant:
While I sympathise with the sentiment above (since most people here are
just shooting their mouths off - you and I included), how should we regard
threats (and it wasn't even thinly veiled, the public threat against
McKinstry) against oneself? Now granted, if Kaletzke threatened me, I'd
just go upstairs and run a firehose under his apartment door, but what if
you didn't have any reason to believe that the guy (who seems to know who
and where you are) threatening you was just blowing smoke?
I think we have a right to expect a little anger when we tell others that
they are piles of shit or that they are little more than pedophiles, but
should we 'stand by our private guns' and duke it out if it comes to that
or call the cops, as it most surely is the case that offerring threats is
punishable by summary conviction?
Perhaps you are suggesting that if we want to risk the chance that buddy is
going to come over and rearrange faces, we're going to have to play. It
*is* (I think) reasonable to think that telling someone that you nailed
their 15 year old daughter last night in the alley (and she called 'Daddy'
throughout) is going to provoke a pretty angry (and violent) response. Do
you think that if we do such things (which are dastardly and vile), we're
morally required to stand the consequences? (I.e., we don't have the moral
right to ask for police protection in such cases?)
Norm Gall
--
"A thing is not necessarily true because a man dies for it."
- Oscar Wilde
Grant Wagner
>This has gone WAY TOO FAR.
>
>Not only have you threatened myself, and my wife in email, you've done
>it here in public. Expect a vist by the police today. I am laying a
>charge this morning.
>
>Everyone is entitled to their opinions. But no one, my physically
>threaten another. It is a crime.
Whine, whine, wimper, wimper, cry, cry.
You get your mommy to fight your battles for you when you were a kid
too?
...Grant
---
People like us, who believe in physics, know that
the distinction between past, present, and future is
only a stubbornly persistent illusion.
Albert Einstein
Norman R. Gall
>E-mail Tim Sale, ask him how he handled the same kind of public threat
>from Premier Filmon?
Do you know what Sale is going to do? I'd suspect that there is the usual
Parliamentary immunity for what is said in the Legislature (save calling
someone a liar), so, other than a civil suit of some kind, I'm not sure if
there is any criminal charge that could be laid....
n
Christopher McKinstry
better yet, send me a copy... i have no idea what you're talking about.
Chris.
Roger Rempel wrote:
>
> Christopher McKinstry wrote:
> >
> > This has gone WAY TOO FAR.
> >
> > Not only have you threatened myself, and my wife in email, you've done
> > it here in public. Expect a vist by the police today. I am laying a
> > charge this morning.
> >
> > Everyone is entitled to their opinions. But no one, my physically
> > threaten another. It is a crime.
>
> I've already e-mailed Patrick to let him know that if he has significant
> trouble with you, and if he needs testimony for the authorities re:
> harassment and threats from a C. McKinstry via e-mail, that I can
> provide him with details of my experience with McKinstry from a year or
> so ago.
>
> If you don't want people to tell you that you're aksing for it...simply
> don't ask for it Chris. One of these days you'll harass someone who
> won't just stop thinking about you, they'll come after you. You profess
> to know small amounts of theory relating to probability in your web
> site. If so, then you have to know that if you go out of your way to
> piss off as many people as you can, you're sure to come across someone
> who will not be peaceful towards you.
>
> Regards
>
> Rog
--
Christopher McKinstry
now this is a nice healthy internet-retort.
full of shit, but harmless.
Doerksen on the other hand commited a criminal offence and shure as hell
can't deny he did it.
Anyone who threatens violence, in writing, and in public for being
called shallow, is either very, very stupid, dangerous or both.
I should not have to fear violence against myself, my family or my
property for what I say. period.
chris.
Terry Johns wrote:
--
Christopher McKinstry
Patrick Doerksen was charged by the Winnipeg Police Service at 3:30pm
today.
I hope all of us, especially Patrick learn from this experience.
Chris.
Roger Rempel
William John M. Christie wrote:
> Wpg. police department with frivolous complaints? Either way you said
> some stupid things and now you don't want to accept responsibility for them.
*
*
Classical McKinstry. Strive to annoy, insult people at random for
strange reasons (see the recent ISP rant), make veiled threats, then run
like hell to the closest authority figure for protection when someone
gets appropriately angry with Chris McKinstry.
I second Will Christie's statement. You just can't accept
responsibility.
You also have provided quite the testimony re: your character for those
people who may be potential clients of CLICKABLE.COM, most clients would
run away from a company that is run by an individual with your
temperment.
Rog
William John M. Christie
>better yet, send me a copy... i have no idea what you're talking about.
>Roger Rempel wrote:
>>
>> I've already e-mailed Patrick to let him know that if he has significant
>> trouble with you, and if he needs testimony for the authorities re:
>> harassment and threats from a C. McKinstry via e-mail, that I can
>> provide him with details of my experience with McKinstry from a year or
>> so ago.
How about something like this? This was one of the more presentable ones.
From Christophe...@MBnet.MB.CA Wed Aug 16 19:48:35 1995
Received: from access.mbnet.mb.ca
(cmc...@access.mbnet.mb.ca [130.179.16.143]) by
electra.cc.umanitoba.ca (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id TAA04231
for <chr...@cc.umanitoba.ca>; Wed, 16 Aug 1995 19:48:33 -0500
Received: by access.mbnet.mb.ca id AA07520
(5.67b/IDA-1.4.4 for "William John M. Christie" <chr...@cc.umanitoba.ca>); Wed, 16 Aug 1995 19:48:27 -0500
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 1995 19:48:27 -0500 (CDT)
From: Christopher McKinstry <Christophe...@MBnet.MB.CA>
To: "William John M. Christie" <chrstie>
Subject: Re: (no subject)
In-Reply-To: <950816180...@niven.cc.umanitoba.ca>
Message-Id: <Pine.SUN.3.91.95081...@access.mbnet.mb.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Status: RO
sour grapes can make a very good wine. i think you time on the net needs
to be audited by your employer.
--
You're a foul one Mr. Grinch. You're a nasty, wasty skunk! | Will Christie
Your heart is full of unwashed socks, your soul is full of |---------------
gunk, Mr. Grinch. The three words that best describe you / "How the Grinch
are as follows and I quote: "Stink, stank, stunk!" ---> stole Christmas"
William John M. Christie
>Patrick Doerksen was charged by the Winnipeg Police Service at 3:30pm
>today.
>I hope all of us, especially Patrick learn from this experience.
That even idiots can post on the net? Or that even idiots can tie up the
Wpg. police department with frivolous complaints? Either way you said
some stupid things and now you don't want to accept responsibility for them.
Christopher McKinstry
i love all you cyberwannabe's... hugs and kisses... you add such colour
to my life.
kissy, kissy, smoochie-pooh to everyone that hates my guts.
thanks,
chris.
Norman R. Gall
In article <32A508...@clickable.com>, Christopher McKinstry
<ch...@clickable.com> wrote:
>i love all you cyberwannabe's... hugs and kisses... you add such colour
>to my life.
>kissy, kissy, smoochie-pooh to everyone that hates my guts.
Sissy.
Norm Gall
Christopher McKinstry
but then, you'd have nothing to post about, mr. netparasite...
did you know, of the 40 messages you've posted to wpg.general in the
last while, zero have been original thoughts? 100% follow-ups. infact
the only original posting i could find made locally was your fs: 486
DX66 message... wow, what an intellectual power.
why don't you start a new thread. or have you not figured it out yet...
there are thread creaters (they get all the heat), and parasites like
you who cling on to the thoughts and words of others, forever
complaining, never ever creating anything new.
you deserve your lot in life, as i do mine. mine just pays better.
Sean A. Walberg wrote:
>
> >i love all you cyberwannabe's... hugs and kisses... you add such colour
> >to my life.
> >
> >kissy, kissy, smoochie-pooh to everyone that hates my guts.
>
> Hmmm... I'm thinking Chris here deserves to be nominated for the
> "Golden Killfile Award"....
>
> http://www.wetware.com/mlegare/kotm/
>
> He certainly fits the description...
>
> Sean
Norman R. Gall
In article <32A51D...@clickable.com>, Christopher McKinstry
<ch...@clickable.com> wrote:
>tee hee hee. thanks normi. i sure oscar would send you his smoochies if
>he could.
>
>chris.
Please re-submit your post in english. I've been able to plow through the
other crap you write, but it seems that you might be making pass at me in
this passage and I want to know if I'm justified in shivering in
disgust....
Christopher McKinstry
tee hee hee. thanks normi. i sure oscar would send you his smoochies if
he could.
chris.
Norman R. Gall wrote:
>
> In article <32A508...@clickable.com>, Christopher McKinstry
> <ch...@clickable.com> wrote:
>
> >i love all you cyberwannabe's... hugs and kisses... you add such colour
> >to my life.
>
> >kissy, kissy, smoochie-pooh to everyone that hates my guts.
>
> Sissy.
>
> Norm Gall
>
> --
> "A thing is not necessarily true because a man dies for it."
> - Oscar Wilde
--
Christopher McKinstry
well since you can't see this pickell... na na, na na na
S.Pickell wrote:
>
> On Wed, 04 Dec 1996 04:37:12 GMT, umwa...@cc.umanitoba.ca (Sean A.
> Walberg) wrote:
>
> -->Hmmm... I'm thinking Chris here deserves to be nominated for the
> -->"Golden Killfile Award"....
>
> Why bother just put him in your killfile, I just did, can't be
> bothered to put up with his type.
Christopher McKinstry
what was that you were shivering in again normi? hope you didn't stain
anything.
Norman R. Gall wrote:
>
> In article <32A51D...@clickable.com>, Christopher McKinstry
> <ch...@clickable.com> wrote:
>
> >tee hee hee. thanks normi. i sure oscar would send you his smoochies if
> >he could.
> >
> >chris.
>
> Please re-submit your post in english. I've been able to plow through the
> other crap you write, but it seems that you might be making pass at me in
> this passage and I want to know if I'm justified in shivering in
> disgust....
>
> Norm Gall
>
> --
> "A thing is not necessarily true because a man dies for it."
> - Oscar Wilde
--
Christopher McKinstry
terry,
my posting are not a psychology experiment. i do not try to provoke
people. if calling you shallow, causes you to threaten violence, there
is something wrong with you, not me.
Terry Johns wrote:
>
> On Tue, 03 Dec 1996 15:39:48 -0800, Christopher McKinstry
> <ch...@clickable.com> wrote:
>
> >Patrick Doerksen was charged by the Winnipeg Police Service at 3:30pm
> >today.
> >
> >I hope all of us, especially Patrick learn from this experience.
>
> If this is true, then I also hope that you have learned from this
> experience as well, provocation can bring disastrous events into your
> life.
>
> You deliberately went out of your way to harasse Wpg.general simply to
> complete a passing grade on your thesis. I do not condone what Patrick
> said to you but I do think you should shoulder some of the
> responsibility.
>
> I tend to handle you in a different way, I intend on boycotting your
> page, clickable.com and all companies that use your service and urge
> other people, who feel they have been harassed, to do the same.
>
> As you have said, you are in titled to your opinion, as is everyone
> else on here, and we can also shop where we want.
>
> Terry Johns (Manitoba Horse Council)
> http://www.escape.ca/~mhc (1999 Pan-Am Games Equestrian Venues)
> ...come ride with us
Christopher McKinstry
my business is fine. thanks for asking. just bought a nice new
jaguar... and secured yet another large 1000+ employee client today.
not to mention the asshole who threatened my wife got to say hello to
mr. handcuff.
oh yeah... and i don't code HTML, nor does my company do HTML work (that
will change next week though... just hired someone new), we do real
software development, for very real money.
exactly how many people do you employ? and how many of them do you pay
$60,000 or more per year? i doubt you can even keep yourself employed.
w3sp...@escape.ca wrote:
>
> Christopher McKinstry <ch...@clickable.com> wrote:
>
> >Patrick Doerksen was charged by the Winnipeg Police Service at 3:30pm
> >today.
> >
> >I hope all of us, especially Patrick learn from this experience.
>
> Fuckhead, do you hear the toilet flushing? It's your business going
> down the drain. What a complete limpwit you are.
>
> BTW: You should really learn how to code HTML if you're going to offer
> it as a service. Your site is an excellent example of ineptitude.
> You're a joke, waiting for an audience.
>
> Heh heh heh.
>
> spider
S.Pickell
Sean A. Walberg
>i love all you cyberwannabe's... hugs and kisses... you add such colour
>to my life.
>
>kissy, kissy, smoochie-pooh to everyone that hates my guts.
Hmmm... I'm thinking Chris here deserves to be nominated for the
Terry Johns
On Tue, 03 Dec 1996 11:34:37 -0600, ga...@umanitoba.ca (Norman R. Gall)
wrote:
>Grant:
>
>While I sympathise with the sentiment above (since most people here are
>just shooting their mouths off - you and I included), how should we regard
>threats (and it wasn't even thinly veiled, the public threat against
>McKinstry) against oneself? Now granted, if Kaletzke threatened me, I'd
>just go upstairs and run a firehose under his apartment door, but what if
>you didn't have any reason to believe that the guy (who seems to know who
>and where you are) threatening you was just blowing smoke?
Your right in the fact the we have all shot off our mouths on here at
one time or another, but there is such a thing as provocation, which
Chris was definitely doing, in fact I am convinced he is trying to see
how far he can push people until they snap. He does say he is an
honours psychology student which leads me to believe that you may even
know him Norm. But I also don't agree with threats of bodly harm, that
in itself over steps the bounds of free speech.
Terry Johns
On Tue, 03 Dec 1996 15:39:48 -0800, Christopher McKinstry
<ch...@clickable.com> wrote:
>Patrick Doerksen was charged by the Winnipeg Police Service at 3:30pm
>today.
>
>I hope all of us, especially Patrick learn from this experience.
If this is true, then I also hope that you have learned from this
experience as well, provocation can bring disastrous events into your
life.
You deliberately went out of your way to harasse Wpg.general simply to
complete a passing grade on your thesis. I do not condone what Patrick
said to you but I do think you should shoulder some of the
responsibility.
I tend to handle you in a different way, I intend on boycotting your
page, clickable.com and all companies that use your service and urge
other people, who feel they have been harassed, to do the same.
As you have said, you are in titled to your opinion, as is everyone
else on here, and we can also shop where we want.
Terry Johns (Manitoba Horse Council)
Norman R. Gall
In article <32A524...@clickable.com>, Christopher McKinstry
<ch...@clickable.com> wrote:
>but then, you'd have nothing to post about, mr. netparasite...
Hysterical wimp.
>did you know, of the 40 messages you've posted to wpg.general in the
>last while, zero have been original thoughts? 100% follow-ups.
Big deal... 100% of everything you've ever written here has been dross.
>why don't you start a new thread.
Whining that someone threatened to kick sand in your face doesn't count as
originality.
>you deserve your lot in life, as i do mine. mine just pays better.
Intellectual prostitutes make quite a bit, do they?
Norman R. Gall
In article <32a50b4b....@news.escape.ca>, tjo...@escape.ca (Terry
Johns) wrote:
>On Tue, 03 Dec 1996 11:34:37 -0600, ga...@umanitoba.ca (Norman R. Gall)
>wrote:
>Your right in the fact the we have all shot off our mouths on here at
>one time or another, but there is such a thing as provocation, which
>Chris was definitely doing, in fact I am convinced he is trying to see
>how far he can push people until they snap. He does say he is an
>honours psychology student which leads me to believe that you may even
>know him Norm.
Maybe he'll find himself in one of my courses. *I'll* be fair. But I
suppose I can look forward to him whining about grades, I guess.
>But I also don't agree with threats of bodly harm, that
>in itself over steps the bounds of free speech.
I'd concur, if in fact it is reasonable to interpret the 'threat' as being
able to be acted upon. But nothing in what was said even hints that buddy
intended to head over to McKinstry's house with a crowbar.... though, I can
see why someone might be so tempted.
Norm Gall
Norman R. Gall
In article <32A536...@clickable.com>, Christopher McKinstry
<ch...@clickable.com> wrote:
>exactly how many people do you employ?
Exactly how many child prostitutes can you really claim to have in your stable?
>and how many of them do you pay $60,000 or more per year?
Sounds like you've got a lot of people duped. Congrats. You've got a
future with Filmon's PCs. You even look like Gratzer.
Christopher McKinstry
you know, i actually meant to only send this by email... it was a
mistake to post it publically. now i have to be afraid my jag's going to
get some keys run down it.
but it's all true. if you discover any of it to be untrue, i'll
publically do anything you ask.
w3sp...@escape.ca wrote:
>
> On Wed, 04 Dec 1996 00:29:19 -0800, you wrote:
>
> >my business is fine. thanks for asking. just bought a nice new
> >jaguar...
>
> Can you prove this? I think you're a liar.
>
> >and secured yet another large 1000+ employee client today.
>
> See above.
>
> >not to mention the asshole who threatened my wife got to say hello to
> >mr. handcuff.
>
> Well admittedly the guy was an idiot, but I believe there are probably
> not a few people in this group who agree with his sentiments.
>
> >oh yeah... and i don't code HTML,
>
> No need to belabour the obvious.
>
> >nor does my company do HTML work
>
> See above.
>
> >(that will change next week though... just hired someone new),
> >we do real software development, for very real money.
>
> If the demo on your site is any indication of the quality of work you
> do, then I imagine you have some very unhappy clients.
>
> BTW: dbWeb is a _very_ simple program to use, need a tutorial?
>
> >exactly how many people do you employ?
>
> 12
>
> >and how many of them do you pay
> >$60,000 or more per year?
>
> 3
>
> >i doubt you can even keep yourself employed.
>
> Funny, I have the very same thoughts about you, judging by your
> website and the crud you call wavepad.
>
> Face it chrissy, you're a jerk, the only one that doesn't seem to know
> this is you. Anyone who is trying to run an Internet based business
> and conducts themselves in USENET as you do is an imbecile, but I
> don't expext you to understand why.
>
> I'm fedexing you a crowbar so you can get your head out of your ass.
Christopher McKinstry
Norman R. Gall wrote:
>
> In article <32A536...@clickable.com>, Christopher McKinstry
> <ch...@clickable.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> future with Filmon's PCs. You even look like Gratzer.
>
so now i'm rightwing. sheesh. you guys make me into whatever you don't
like.
i'm liberal damn it. how the hell did my politics get into this?
> --
> "A thing is not necessarily true because a man dies for it."
> - Oscar Wilde
--
Christopher McKinstry
okay. i was WRONG WRONG WRONG. bad chris bad bad chris.
jim get off my side.
Jim Jaworski wrote:
>
> On Wed, 4 Dec 1996, S.Pickell wrote:
>
> > Date: Wed, 04 DEC 1996 04:52:23 GMT
> > From: S.Pickell <net...@cyberspc.mb.ca>
> > Newgroups: wpg.general
> > Subject: Re: for those of you that care...
> I don't see what Chris is doing wrong? He is just informing us
> of a chang in URL for his Web page that you can download a Java app.
> from. What is the problem with this? The reason he posted here is
> because he is a Winnipegger who has a Java app. that is worthy of
> mention. I like what Chris is doing and I support his Java efforts.
>
> Stu, you're just on the wrong side of the fence on this one, man.
>
> Winnipeg MB Canada soo696 @ freenet.mb.ca
> TEAM OS/2
> http://www.winnipeg.freenet.mb.ca/~soo696/ -- in English and Polish.
> -- Angielski i Polski.
Norman R. Gall
In article <32A53C...@clickable.com>, Christopher McKinstry
<ch...@clickable.com> wrote:
>my posting are not a psychology experiment. i do not try to provoke
>people. if calling you shallow, causes you to threaten violence, there
>is something wrong with you, not me.
At least make an attempt at intelligible noises for once. I question your
integrity (or intelligence) for that second attempt at a coherent thought.
I think we all know who has the problem.....
Norm Gall
Greg Kaletzke
In article
<Pine.SOL.3.91.961204...@winnie.freenet.mb.ca>, Jim
Jaworski <soo...@freenet.mb.ca> wrote:
> I don't see what Chris is doing wrong? /snip/ I like what
Chris is doing /snip/
>
> Stu, you're just on the wrong side of the fence on this one, man.
Well, there you go McChimpanzee! At least good ol' Jimp is on your side...
--
"On an occasion of this kind it becomes more than a moral duty to speak one's mind. It becomes a pleasure."
- Oscar Wilde
Norman R. Gall
In article <32A561...@clickable.com>, Christopher McKinstry
<ch...@clickable.com> wrote:
>you know, i actually meant to only send this by email... it was a
>mistake to post it publically. now i have to be afraid my jag's going to
>get some keys run down it.
Christ, you *still* have to do a reality check. You aren't that important.
If Chimp's house hasn't been firebombed yet, your precious little car is
safe.
>but it's all true. if you discover any of it to be untrue, i'll
>publically do anything you ask.
We'll hold you to this. I've never seen anyone pull his own head out of
his ass on Videon 11.
Norman R. Gall
In article <32A55F...@clickable.com>, Christopher McKinstry
<ch...@clickable.com> quoted an entire article to write one line:
For a guy who likes to criticise others for lack of originality, you sure
don't seem to care about consistency.
Perhaps you simply don't know how to use the newsreader...
Norman R. Gall
In article <32A560...@clickable.com>, Christopher McKinstry
<ch...@clickable.com> wrote:
>okay. i was WRONG WRONG WRONG. bad chris bad bad chris.
>
>
>jim get off my side.
You can't disavow the Chimmp once it's climbed on your back.... Maybe this
give you the first real clue that what you did was spineless and feeble.
Greg Kaletzke
In article <32A560...@clickable.com>, Christopher McChimpanzee
<ch...@clickable.com> wrote:
> okay. i was WRONG WRONG WRONG. bad chris bad bad chris.
> jim get off my side.
A little too late for *that*, my friend... You guys are going down in
wpg.general history as 'Postus Primatus', Jimp and McChimp!
As well, I'd go see someone about those paranoid delusions you're having:
In article <32A561...@clickable.com>, Christopher McChimpanzee
<ch...@clickable.com> wrote:
> you know, i actually meant to only send this by email... it was a
> mistake to post it publically. now i have to be afraid my jag's going to
> get some keys run down it.
Ooooh yeaaaa. That's *exactly* what's going to happen. Someone from this
newsgroup is going to take the *effort* to 1) find out where you live; 2)
actually get themselve's down there at a time when your precious little
car is outside, alone and unprotected (you can afford the car but not a
garage and indoor parking? Sounds like someone sold the pig to buy pig
food); and 3) scrape it with their keys. Whatever *you* say... Maybe you'd
better stay away from grassy knolls too... Don't forget to wash your hands
every five minutes and wear a surgical mask so you aren't contaminated by
germs that someone has spread around to infect you... (what an idiot)
Derek Ward
Norman R. Gall <ga...@umanitoba.ca> wrote in article
<gall-ya02348000...@news.cc.umanitoba.ca>...
> In article <32A51D...@clickable.com>, Christopher McKinstry
> <ch...@clickable.com> wrote:
>
> >tee hee hee. thanks normi. i sure oscar would send you his smoochies if
> >he could.
> >
> >chris.
>
> Please re-submit your post in english. I've been able to plow through
the
> other crap you write, but it seems that you might be making pass at me in
> this passage and I want to know if I'm justified in shivering in
> disgust....
Maybe you should file sexual harassement charges?
Derek
Ward
Christopher McKinstry <ch...@clickable.com> wrote:
>This has gone WAY TOO FAR.
>Not only have you threatened myself, and my wife in email, you've done
>it here in public. Expect a vist by the police today. I am laying a
>charge this morning.
>Everyone is entitled to their opinions. But no one, my physically
>threaten another. It is a crime.
You are correct, I did go to far. For that I apologize. I never
really intended any harm, I said it in the heat of the moment.
I am not posting this because I want you to drop the charges. I don't
expect you to. I deserve whatever I get for my conduct. It was
childish and stupid.
Once again, I really do apologize.
- Patrick
Ward
tjo...@escape.ca (Terry Johns) wrote:
>Your right in the fact the we have all shot off our mouths on here at
>one time or another, but there is such a thing as provocation, which
>Chris was definitely doing, in fact I am convinced he is trying to see
>how far he can push people until they snap. He does say he is an
>honours psychology student which leads me to believe that you may even
>know him Norm. But I also don't agree with threats of bodly harm, that
>in itself over steps the bounds of free speech.
You're right, I stepped way over the line. It is something I will
never do again.
- Patrick
Greg Kaletzke
Ok McChimpanzee, prove to everyone that you're not just some Mike
Douglas/Falling Down understudy out to fuck someone over. This guy has
appologised three times. Hey, that's kind of funny; appearently he
threatened you three times as well. So let's see... you were afraid that
he'd come over and hurt you and your wife on the basis of three (lame)
usenet/e-mail 'threats'. Now can you put as much weight behind his
appologies, confessed stupidity and lack of composure transmitted through
the same medium?
Quite frankly, I think that you are more of an asshole than a man. That
even though you've proved your point; scared the hell out of him; taught
him a lesson he won't soon forget; and have gotten as honest a group of
apologies as you did threats, you'll still waste tens of thousands of
taxpayer dollars just to fuck him over some more. Yea, you'll show him all
right! No fucken prisoners! You're sitting there (in your Mickey Mouse
(TM) Diapers), thinking of all the times you got pushed around... But now
it's your turn.
Face it, you're just *too* much of a sad little boy to know when to draw
the line. As a matter of fact, I've got a bottle of single malt scotch
riding on it.
In article <585mup$i...@wpg-01.escape.ca>, p...@escape.ca (Ward) wrote:
> Christopher McKinstry <ch...@clickable.com> wrote:
> >Patrick Doerksen was charged by the Winnipeg Police Service at 3:30pm
> >today.
> >I hope all of us, especially Patrick learn from this experience.
>
> Believe me, I have.
> - Patrick
In article <585msa$i...@wpg-01.escape.ca>, p...@escape.ca (Ward) wrote:
> You're right, I stepped way over the line. It is something I will
> never do again.
> - Patrick
In article <585mnj$i...@wpg-01.escape.ca>, p...@escape.ca (Ward) wrote:
> You are correct, I did go to far. For that I apologize. I never
> really intended any harm, I said it in the heat of the moment.
>
> I am not posting this because I want you to drop the charges. I don't
> expect you to. I deserve whatever I get for my conduct. It was
> childish and stupid.
>
> Once again, I really do apologize.
>
> - Patrick
--