"apollo men to the moon" never happened - deal with it!
Nomen Nescio
***********************************************
NASA never sent men to the Moon. "They couldn't
make it so they faked it". That's what they did.
***********************************************
Flags fluttering in the high-desert breeze, sand
buggies & actors running along in their deflated
monkeysuits-obviously recorded on highspeed film,
conspicuous absence of blast craters, impossibly
silent running under invisible exhaust emissions,
laughably obvious backdrops that contrast sharply
against the nearby high-desert terrain, etc. etc.
Obviously, the directors/producers of nasa's "men
to the moon" movies went to great lengths to make
certain that anyone who watches their movies, and
scrutinizes their photographs, also considers the
intense radiation of the Van Allen belt and up to
TWO- MILLION MILE-PER-HOUR RADIOACTIVE SOLAR WIND!
beyond the safety of the Van Allen belt, they made
sure anyone can see the whole thing was a big fake.
I'm reminded of the song "might as well be walking
on the Sun", i.e. the radiation would've fried 'em.
Be sure to bookmark & study these fact-filled links.
The evidence proves irrefutably that NASA are liars,
and not very good liars at that. They are found out:
http://internet.ocii.com/~dpwozney/apollo1.htm
http://www.aulis.com/nasa.htm
http://www.grade-a.com/moon/
http://www.apollohoax.com/
http://www.moonmovie.com/
http://www.futuresunltd.com/sudarshan/MoonShadows/MoonShadows.htm
http://www.geocities.com/nasascam/
http://www.ari.net/b2m/0198.html
http://myspeedtest.net/backwards/moon.html
http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/2666/MoonHoax2.html
http://advweb.com/kw/forum/misc/messages/689.shtml
http://clydelewis.com/dis/gorsky/gorsky.html
http://galactic-guide.com/articles/8S12.html
*Min's Tarot & Star Charts Homepage:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=95f8e368393c65e4...@dizum.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBPTt7D5ljD7YrHM/nEQIdqACg5H5lgQrdbHwpJRf1MFce4WwKLeYAoOKQ
0DM+5oEmQmNWTeDUdqZzI3yI
=PvaU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Flash Bazbo
"Nomen Nescio" <nob...@dizum.com> wrote in message
news:fdede4cb6a7b0b58...@dizum.com...
<snip drivel>
sorry, danny, you've been out-kooked and we've all lost interest.
Daniel Kolle
<snip>
Shad-up.
--
-Kolle (kohl-lee); 14. A.A.#2035.
Koji Kondo is my god.
EAC ConTroll Director.
The last time Jesus showed up for church, they killed him.
Newton Joseph
drnj...@socal.rr.com
"Nomen Nescio" <nob...@dizum.com> wrote in message
news:fdede4cb6a7b0b58...@dizum.com...
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=95f8e368393c65e458c801ab44abc281@dizum.
John Baker
Please, folks, do not feed this idiotic troll.
Oh, BTW, Nomen, <PLONK!> for the third time.
Matthew Ota
sci.space.history.
If you do not respond to trolls they eventually go away.
Matthew Ota
"TutAmongUs@theholeintheground" wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Jul 2002 06:30:11 +0200 (CEST), Nomen Nescio
> <nob...@dizum.com> Gave us:
>
> Snipped bullshit.
>
> You are an IDIOT, you retard.
Trentus
"Daniel Kolle" <DKo...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3d3a4bc7...@NEWS.cis.dfn.de...
> Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com> thought hard and said:
I'm not so sure the "thought hard" lead intro is appropriate with this guys
ramblings
Mac
Poor Danny boy!
Out-kooked by Nancy-the-Zeta!!!
Ye Gads; just imagine the two of them getting together in an
intimate embrace and the issue which would then spawn from their
diseased minds....
---Mac
Martin Hogbin
"Nomen Nescio" <nob...@dizum.com> wrote in message news:fdede4cb6a7b0b58...@dizum.com...
> NASA never sent men to the Moon. "They couldn't
> make it so they faked it". That's what they did.
We have heard this rubbish before. You cannot defend any of it.
Stop trolling.
Martin Hogbin
Rick Sobie
says...
>
>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> ***********************************************
> NASA never sent men to the Moon. "They couldn't
> make it so they faked it". That's what they did.
> ***********************************************
>
>Flags fluttering in the high-desert breeze, sand
>buggies & actors running along in their deflated
>monkeysuits-obviously recorded on highspeed film,
>conspicuous absence of blast craters, impossibly
>silent running under invisible exhaust emissions,
>laughably obvious backdrops that contrast sharply
>against the nearby high-desert terrain, etc. etc.
>
>Obviously, the directors/producers of nasa's "men
>to the moon" movies went to great lengths to make
>certain that anyone who watches their movies, and
>scrutinizes their photographs, also considers the
>intense radiation of the Van Allen belt and up to
>TWO- MILLION MILE-PER-HOUR RADIOACTIVE SOLAR WIND!
Jesus! Am I supposed to duck and cover or what???!!!
Are you trying to tell us something?
Rick Sobie
TutAm...@theheartofthecheopspyramid.hol says...
>
>
>On Sun, 21 Jul 2002 10:55:51 GMT, Rick Sobie <he...@my.com> Gave us:
>
>
>>Jesus! Am I supposed to duck and cover or what???!!!
>>Are you trying to tell us something?
>>
>
>
>are more of a lame, retarded troll than the original poster is with
>stupidity like that.
OK, now you guys are really starting to scare me. The thing was
only a page long. I am not suggesting that you are protesting too
much or anything like that, I mean why would people go through
all that trouble, why would we even bother to have a space
program at all, if there was nothing out there in space.
I mean really.
Of course there are stars, and planets and stuff. What are
you afraid of that the illusion will somehow dissipate and we
will find ourselves in some terrible reality? I mean get real.
I visit other realities in dreams all the time. People
have lucid dreams and visions and there is all sorts of
proof that other realities exist. Nice ones. Filled
with happy smiling people.
Sheesh.
-*-
Spaceman
>Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address above.
It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software.
So,
this was from an anonymous nobody!
<LOL>
It must have been a nothing from nothingness land.
maybe it was a photon that sent it?.
<LOL>
James M Driscoll Jr
Spaceman
http://www.realspaceman.com
Spàmster
Nomen Nescio wrote:
>
> ***********************************************
> NASA never sent men to the Moon. "They couldn't
> make it so they faked it". That's what they did.
> ***********************************************
>
FLUSH!
Edmond Wollmann
was real.
Nomen Nescio wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> ***********************************************
> NASA never sent men to the Moon. "They couldn't
> make it so they faked it". That's what they did.
> ***********************************************
--
Edmond H. Wollmann P.M.A.F.A. arctur...@earthlink.net (remove-)
© 2002 Altair Publications, SAN 299-5603
Astrological Consulting http://www.astroconsulting.com/
Artworks http://www.e-wollmann.com/
http://www.astroconsulting.com/FAQs/
MasterCougar
>
> ***********************************************
> NASA never sent men to the Moon. "They couldn't
> make it so they faked it". That's what they did.
>
Not this bullshit once again. Those claims have been proven wrong,
deal with it.
--
Marc,
"Desserts is Stressed spelled backwards."
pb125
http://brainsluice.tripod.com/moonlanding.html
MasterCougar
@news1.telusplanet.net:
> OK, now you guys are really starting to scare me. The thing was
> only a page long. I am not suggesting that you are protesting too
>
So? One page is too damn long for quoting when there is no need to do
so.
Ichimusai
> Any good astrologer can tell by the astrological aspects, that it indeed
> was real.
ASTROLOGER?
Come on...
--
AA#769 ICQ: 1645566 Yahoo & MSN: Ichimusai http://www.ichimusai.org/
Support the ASCII ribbon campaign - No HTML, RTF or MS Word in mail
"Don't feel you should be like you 'ought to' be, no one are like they
'ought to' be!"
-- MEow/Nikitta's mother
Edmond Wollmann
> Edmond Wollmann <E...@astroconsulting.com> writes:
> > Any good astrologer can tell by the astrological aspects, that it indeed
> > was real.
> ASTROLOGER?
> Come on...
Come on what?
"Astrology, bar sinister in the escutcheon of astronomy, maintains a
unique and lonely position in human thought. It is "believed in" by a
lot of people who know practically nothing about it; and it is
"disbelieved in" by even more who know ABSOLUTELY nothing about it. Of
no other art or science can this be said." Grant Lewi, "Why I believe in
Astrology"
lmg
wrote in message news:bthkjugit5pm5b850...@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 21 Jul 2002 06:30:11 +0200 (CEST), Nomen Nescio
> <nob...@dizum.com> Gave us:
>
> Snipped bullshit.
>
> You are an IDIOT, you retard.
For the facts, see the various links at:
http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc/apollohoax.html
I was a kid, but I lived through it. I followed every development, watched
every launch, stayed up all night to watch the missions. I saw photos taken
through amateur telescopes of the spacecraft 100,000 miles out en route to
the moon, and photos of the earth that could only have been taken from that
distance. I've seen the moon rocks, talked with scientists, seen the results
of rock analyses. Experiments left on the lunar surface returned results for
years afterwards, and the laser retroreflectors are still there being used
to measure the distance to the moon.
Space travel is dangerous. They could have died on the moon - President
Nixon even had a prepared statement just in case the LM engine failed to
fire and the astronauts were stranded on the lunar surface. They did receive
significant doses of radiation and experienced physical effects of zero-G.
They reentered the atmosphere at the speed of a meteor and could have
disintegrated if the trajectory was wrong. They did it all with 1960's
technology. Make no mistake - they were braver men than you or I will ever
be.
It's a crime that the U.S. "education" system produces such IDIOTS that
would believe it to be a hoax.
--
lmg AA#2063
Ichimusai
> Ichimusai wrote:
>
> > Edmond Wollmann <E...@astroconsulting.com> writes:
>
> > > Any good astrologer can tell by the astrological aspects, that it indeed
> > > was real.
>
> > ASTROLOGER?
>
> > Come on...
>
> Come on what?
You've been had. Sorry.
Follow-ups adjusted. I don't know who starts all this bloody trolling
crossposts, but I apologize.
--
AA#769 ICQ: 1645566 Yahoo & MSN: Ichimusai http://www.ichimusai.org/
Support the ASCII ribbon campaign - No HTML, RTF or MS Word in mail
The best defense against logic is ignorance.
Ross
news:m3znwlk...@h43n2fls31o965.telia.com:
> Edmond Wollmann <E...@astroconsulting.com> writes:
>
>> Any good astrologer can tell by the astrological aspects, that it indeed
>> was real.
>
> ASTROLOGER?
>
> Come on...
I trust that you have yet to meet Usenet's Village Idiot, Edmond Wollmann.
Check out: www.smbtech.com/ed and make sure you have all coffe & cats
safely away from your computer before you do.
R.
--
"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity,
and I'm not sure about the former."
--Albert Einstein
Gary Hand
Elvis is living in Florida
The CIA caused A.I.D.S.
The UN has an army of 1 Million in Utah waiting to take over the USA.
Kissenger is the leader of the new world order.
Isreal planned the Twin Towers bombing.
Professional Wrestling is real
Dude, put it to bed.
Yawn
"Paranoia strikes deep
Into your life it will creep
It starts when your always afraid
Step out of line the man comes and takes you away. "
by The Buffalo Springfield
Astral Wildlife
<E...@astroconsulting.com>wrote:
>Any good astrologer can tell by the astrological aspects, that it indeed
>was real.
Well I guess that leaves you out eh Edmo?
MOOHAHAHAHAHAHAH!
>Nomen Nescio wrote:
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>
>> ***********************************************
>> NASA never sent men to the Moon. "They couldn't
>> make it so they faked it". That's what they did.
>> ***********************************************
--
HOOVA! Mun Muhtma!
Astral Wildlife
<E...@astroconsulting.com>wrote:
>
>Ichimusai wrote:
>
>> Edmond Wollmann <E...@astroconsulting.com> writes:
>
>> > Any good astrologer can tell by the astrological aspects, that it indeed
>> > was real.
>
>> ASTROLOGER?
>
>> Come on...
>
>Come on what?
Come on with that February the 145th law suit.
--
HOOVA! Mun Muhtma!
Ichimusai
> Check out: www.smbtech.com/ed and make sure you have all coffe & cats
> safely away from your computer before you do.
Oh. Well then, to the killfile with him.
--
AA#769 ICQ: 1645566 Yahoo & MSN: Ichimusai http://www.ichimusai.org/
Support the ASCII ribbon campaign - No HTML, RTF or MS Word in mail
The Bible wasn't "written" by those people. They were simply writing
it down.
-- Georgann, alt.atheism
Ross
news:m3adolk...@h43n2fls31o965.telia.com:
> Ross <Ro...@SingingFrog.com> writes:
>
>> Check out: www.smbtech.com/ed and make sure you have all coffe & cats
>> safely away from your computer before you do.
>
> Oh. Well then, to the killfile with him.
A very good policy. I like the comic relief he unwittingly posts.
R.
--
Go not to Usenet for counsel, for they will say both yes and no.
John Hattan
>And Hitler is living in Argentina
>Elvis is living in Florida
>The CIA caused A.I.D.S.
>The UN has an army of 1 Million in Utah waiting to take over the USA.
>Kissenger is the leader of the new world order.
>Isreal planned the Twin Towers bombing.
>Professional Wrestling is real
I think James Randi said it best. Watergate involved about twelve
people, and they couldn't manage to keep it secret. A faked moon landing
would involve thousands of co-conspirators who not only managed to keep
it secret but are still all keeping it secret today.
---
John Hattan Grand High UberPope - First Church of Shatnerology
jo...@thecodezone.com http://www.shatnerology.com
Edmond Wollmann
>
> Ross <Ro...@SingingFrog.com> writes:
>
> > safely away from your computer before you do.
>
> Oh. Well then, to the killfile with him.
http://www.astroconsulting.com/FAQs/abusive_isps_list.htm
http://www.astroconsulting.com/FAQs/propagan.htm
MEow
my own business, when suddenly at Sun, 21 Jul 2002 14:56:09 GMT, Gary
Hand <gary....@verizon.net> appeared in front of me and said:
>And Hitler is living in Argentina
>Elvis is living in Florida
>The CIA caused A.I.D.S.
>The UN has an army of 1 Million in Utah waiting to take over the USA.
>Kissenger is the leader of the new world order.
>Isreal planned the Twin Towers bombing.
>Professional Wrestling is real
Don't forget about the cattle mutilations!
>
>Dude, put it to bed.
>
Aaaw! O-kay!
--
Nikitta - aa#1759. Apatriot# 18.
My sig-program is weird and broken,
so no weird quotes for a while...
Actucally my computer is generally weird,
but then again - Computers tend to be...
Ichimusai
> It was in alt.atheism, I tell you. There I was, hopping along, minding
> my own business, when suddenly at Sun, 21 Jul 2002 14:56:09 GMT, Gary
> Hand <gary....@verizon.net> appeared in front of me and said:
>
> >And Hitler is living in Argentina
> >Elvis is living in Florida
> >The CIA caused A.I.D.S.
> >The UN has an army of 1 Million in Utah waiting to take over the USA.
> >Kissenger is the leader of the new world order.
> >Isreal planned the Twin Towers bombing.
> >Professional Wrestling is real
>
> Don't forget about the cattle mutilations!
They are up again I hear...
--
AA#769 ICQ: 1645566 Yahoo & MSN: Ichimusai http://www.ichimusai.org/
Support the ASCII ribbon campaign - No HTML, RTF or MS Word in mail
Necrohippoflagellation, theists can't refuse it!
-- Liz, alt.atheism
Cujo
news:3D3ADB...@astroconsulting.com:
> Ichimusai wrote:
>>
>> Ross <Ro...@SingingFrog.com> writes:
>>
>> > Check out: www.smbtech.com/ed and make sure you have all coffee &
>> > cats safely away from your computer before you do.
>>
>> Oh. Well then, to the killfile with him.
>
> http://www.astrocons.com/kook.htm <-De-Kookified!!!1!!!!
> http://www.astrocons.com/whine.htm <-De-Kookified!!!1!!!!
For a few laughs, check out these hilarious URL's and you'll appreciate
what a kook Wollmann really is:
http://www.shore.net/~a/bin/wollmann/quote.cgi
http://www.smbtech.com/ed
http://www.petitmorte.net/phoenix/wollmann.html
http://www.spinics.net/plagiarism.html
http://www.rahul.net/falk/quickrefs.html#W
http://www.shore.net/~a/wollmann/spank.html
http://www.kook-watch.net/Ed/edlish.html
http://www.lart.com/auk/whiners.html
http://home.earthlink.net/~sigyn/suepiggy/
http://www.angelfire.com/ego2/edmowollmann/
The Wollkook must be seen in all its kookery to be fully appreciated as
the Uberkook. You might not be able to see this post only because Edmo
defeated me months ago, if so, please write to Edmo and tell him to
restart the Internet, Usenet and Supernews. TIA!
--
There wouldn't be as many satisfied ladies around, if I
hadn't ditched them long ago! - Edmo in a moment of candor.
Cujo - The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in
alt.paranormal, alt.astrology and alt.astrology.metapsych.
Winner of the August, 2000 HL&S award. Hail Petitmorte!
http://www.petitmorte.net/cujo/cujcert.jpg
Fanatic Legion # 555-PLNTY
Rank: Colonel
Motto: "ABUNDANCE!"
Jake
John Baker wrote:
>
> "Nomen Nescio" <nob...@dizum.com> wrote in message
> news:fdede4cb6a7b0b58...@dizum.com...
>
> Please, folks, do not feed this idiotic troll.
>
> Oh, BTW, Nomen, <PLONK!> for the third time.
To which I can only say:
a) shame on you for unplonking him twice; or
b) my sympathies for having the cross-posting twit follow you from group
to group.
Ichimusai
> The Wollkook must be seen in all its kookery to be fully appreciated
> as the Uberkook. You might not be able to see this post only because
> Edmo defeated me months ago, if so, please write to Edmo and tell
> him to restart the Internet, Usenet and Supernews. TIA!
My non-existent god, what have I stumbled into? :)
--
AA#769 ICQ: 1645566 Yahoo & MSN: Ichimusai http://www.ichimusai.org/
Support the ASCII ribbon campaign - No HTML, RTF or MS Word in mail
As for the 'stories' in the Bible. They are all true... at least those
that have happened.
-- Jeremy Walker, alt.atheism
Ross
news:m3it39h...@h43n2fls31o965.telia.com:
> Cujo <cu...@petitmorte.net> writes:
>
>> The Wollkook must be seen in all its kookery to be fully appreciated
>> as the Uberkook. You might not be able to see this post only because
>> Edmo defeated me months ago, if so, please write to Edmo and tell
>> him to restart the Internet, Usenet and Supernews. TIA!
>
> My non-existent god, what have I stumbled into? :)
Welcome to the wonderful feild of Kookology. Eddie is one of the prime
specimens.
watermelon
wrote in message news:bthkjugit5pm5b850...@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 21 Jul 2002 06:30:11 +0200 (CEST), Nomen Nescio
> <nob...@dizum.com> Gave us:
>
> Snipped bullshit.
>
> You are an IDIOT, you retard.
For the facts, see the various links at:
http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc/apollohoax.html
I was a kid, but I lived through it. I followed every development, watched
every launch, stayed up all night to watch the missions. I saw photos taken
through amateur telescopes of the spacecraft 100,000 miles
#########################################
So when the Chinese go to the moon in the next ten years, you are going to
say that never happened either.
Flash Bazbo
"Mac" <nur99-NoGreenEgg...@spiritone.com> wrote in message
news:pspkjuc9av6g9ep31...@4ax.com...> SNIP SNIP
> Poor Danny boy!
> Out-kooked by Nancy-the-Zeta!!!
Even Nancy has been trumped by peat staplehead in alt.astrology. you should
check it out.
> Ye Gads; just imagine the two of them getting together in an
> intimate embrace and the issue which would then spawn from their
> diseased minds....
> ---Mac
>
zamb...@knowspamatcomcast.net
Just curious. I know the Chinese have announced they will go to the
moon in ten years. Has anyone heard them say why? I mean I know it
might be one of those "because it's there" kinda thing. And I know the
U.S did it to beat the Soviets. But why, now? That's alot of money and
alot of risk for minimum payback.
Flash Bazbo
"Edmond Wollmann" <E...@astroconsulting.com> wrote in message
news:3D3AC5...@astroconsulting.com...
> Any good astrologer can tell by the astrological aspects, that it indeed
> was real.
More science from the guy who debunked that pesky "the earth is round"
theory.
"Hence we never proved that the Earth was round, we only disproved to some
degree, in this reality, at this time with these assumptions-that it is not
flat (in relative terms)."
- ed wollmann, modern day Einstein
Flash Bazbo
"Ross" <Ro...@SingingFrog.com> wrote in message
news:Xns92528B6...@207.35.177.135...
> Ichimusai <ic...@ichimusai.org> wrote in
> news:m3it39h...@h43n2fls31o965.telia.com:
>
> > Cujo <cu...@petitmorte.net> writes:
> >
> >> The Wollkook must be seen in all its kookery to be fully appreciated
> >> as the Uberkook. You might not be able to see this post only because
> >> Edmo defeated me months ago, if so, please write to Edmo and tell
> >> him to restart the Internet, Usenet and Supernews. TIA!
> >
> > My non-existent god, what have I stumbled into? :)
>
> Welcome to the wonderful feild of Kookology. Eddie is one of the prime
> specimens.
Be sure to visit the visitor's center and gift shop at
http://www.smbtech.com/ed .
Mark Gradwell
>
> ***********************************************
> NASA never sent men to the Moon. "They couldn't
> make it so they faked it". That's what they did.
> ***********************************************
>
> buggies & actors running along in their deflated
> monkeysuits-obviously recorded on highspeed film,
> conspicuous absence of blast craters, impossibly
> silent running under invisible exhaust emissions,
> laughably obvious backdrops that contrast sharply
> against the nearby high-desert terrain, etc. etc.
<snip>
I'll give a couple of sample debunks. To give an idea of the sheer idiocy of
this.
I quote from the above paragraph:
---------
Impossibly silent running under invisible exhaust emissions.
--------
1. In a vacuum sound doesn't travel
2. The Lunar Rover ran on electricity
From the page:
http://www.apollohoax.com/
-----------
Look at how the background suddenly changes. The surface is all rough and
filled with rocks, and then in a straight line it just becomes all smooth
and no rocks appear anymore. I think that they took the picture and then
superimposed another picture with a smoother background.
---------
The accompanying photo is here:
http://www.apollohoax.com/c2.gif
The background looks smooth because it's much further away. If you look the
Rover is obviously parked near the brow of a hill.
You can see the brow of the hill much more clearly without the red graffiti
in this version of the same photo:
http://www.apollohoax.com/c.gif
I find it amazing that such obvious nonsense is believed. Still it's nice to
see NASA photos anywhere even with such silly red markings and captions.
--
Yours,
Mark
aa#1478
Daniel Kolle
>
>"Daniel Kolle" <DKo...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:3d3a4bc7...@NEWS.cis.dfn.de...
>> Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com> thought hard and said:
>
>I'm not so sure the "thought hard" lead intro is appropriate with this guys
>ramblings
Sarcasm.
--
-Kolle (kohl-lee); 14. A.A.#2035.
Koji Kondo is my god.
EAC ConTroll Director.
The last time Jesus showed up for church, they killed him.
Cujo
news:7cD_8.8614$Qk6....@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net:
>
> "Ross" <Ro...@SingingFrog.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns92528B6...@207.35.177.135...
>> Ichimusai <ic...@ichimusai.org> wrote in
>> news:m3it39h...@h43n2fls31o965.telia.com:
>>
>> > Cujo <cu...@petitmorte.net> writes:
>> >
>> >> The Wollkook must be seen in all its kookery to be fully
>> >> appreciated as the Uberkook. You might not be able to see this
>> >> post only because Edmo defeated me months ago, if so, please write
>> >> to Edmo and tell him to restart the Internet, Usenet and
>> >> Supernews. TIA!
>> >
>> > My non-existent god, what have I stumbled into? :)
>>
>> Welcome to the wonderful field of Kookology. Eddie is one of the
>> prime specimens.
>
> Be sure to visit the visitor's center and gift shop at
> http://www.smbtech.com/ed .
Son of a bitch! That's what the site is missing! A gift shop! Now what
would be proper Edmo memoribilia to sell?
Tweety Bird panties as headwear.
We could sell Ed's book repackaged as bird cage liner. [keep your
parakeet amused]
Any other suggestions?
pb125
> I wish that I could "pop up" and jack your jaw.
It is a link, I have no resposibility for its content.
And chill out.
Flash Bazbo
"Cujo" <cu...@petitmorte.net> wrote in message
news:Xns925291FA9CB28s...@216.168.3.40...
> "Flash Bazbo" <lsdlll...@llll.lll> wrote in
> news:7cD_8.8614$Qk6....@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net:
>
> >
> > "Ross" <Ro...@SingingFrog.com> wrote in message
> > news:Xns92528B6...@207.35.177.135...
> >> Ichimusai <ic...@ichimusai.org> wrote in
> >> news:m3it39h...@h43n2fls31o965.telia.com:
> >>
> >> > Cujo <cu...@petitmorte.net> writes:
> >> >
> >> >> The Wollkook must be seen in all its kookery to be fully
> >> >> appreciated as the Uberkook. You might not be able to see this
> >> >> post only because Edmo defeated me months ago, if so, please write
> >> >> to Edmo and tell him to restart the Internet, Usenet and
> >> >> Supernews. TIA!
> >> >
> >> > My non-existent god, what have I stumbled into? :)
> >>
> >> Welcome to the wonderful field of Kookology. Eddie is one of the
> >> prime specimens.
> >
> > Be sure to visit the visitor's center and gift shop at
> > http://www.smbtech.com/ed .
>
> Son of a bitch! That's what the site is missing! A gift shop! Now what
> would be proper Edmo memoribilia to sell?
>
> Tweety Bird panties as headwear.
> We could sell Ed's book repackaged as bird cage liner. [keep your
> parakeet amused]
> Any other suggestions?
Stuffed falcons and owls.
Fake diplomas.
Gubberment security clearances.
This thing could be a cash cow!
Cujo
@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net:
Shit, how about a "crash your mustang into a ditch" arcade game? See how
many friends you can kill!
Ms. Femininazi
Cujo <cu...@petitmorte.net> wrote:
I want a "YOU ARE OUT OF INTEGRITY" T-shirt, a Panti-Head mouse pad and
an Uberkook mug. :)
Gee, the thought occurs to me that such things could help finance a
really nice little "usenet free speech legal defense fund/trust" -just a
little back-up to make filing frivolous complaints against any members a
little less attractive. ;D
Oh, and I want a stuffed Sue-Piggy, with true to life oinking sounds,
and his very own screed trough, yeah!
--
@-,--
Ms. Femininazi
"She seemed quite satisfied before I dumped her anyway. She was quite "loose"
sexually to put it mildly when she came to visit me." -Edmo, the Great Lover
Visit the Pig Pen @:
http://home.earthlink.net/~sigyn/suepiggy/
Cujo
news:anuserbitch-F948...@pita.alt.net:
If you have a jpg or .gif you can do that right now. Nymmie's got a few
on his site that are perfect. Go to http://www.cafepress.com and you can
open a business selling just that. The skepticult already sells
merchandise. I have my own skepticult sweatshirts. (yes, two of them)
http://www.cafeshops.com/cp/store.aspx?s=skepticult,skepticult2
> Gee, the thought occurs to me that such things could help finance a
> really nice little "usenet free speech legal defense fund/trust" -just
> a little back-up to make filing frivolous complaints against any
> members a little less attractive. ;D
How about a bDan hair painting kit? Paint hair on yourself just like
Kettler does. Put a pink pate on your head and paint away!!!1!!!
> Oh, and I want a stuffed Sue-Piggy, with true to life oinking sounds,
> and his very own screed trough, yeah!
That's a little bit much, the pigs will sue for defamation and probably
win. Apologize to the pigs real fast before they get a lawyer!
watermelon
>every launch, stayed up all night to watch the missions. I saw photos taken
>through amateur telescopes of the spacecraft 100,000 miles
>#########################################
>So when the Chinese go to the moon in the next ten years, you are going to
>say that never happened either.
>
Just curious. I know the Chinese have announced they will go to the
moon in ten years. Has anyone heard them say why? I mean I know it
might be one of those "because it's there" kinda thing. And I know the
U.S did it to beat the Soviets. But why, now? That's alot of money and
alot of risk for minimum payback.
They are out to prove communism is best, they think we are dumb, they have
stolen all their technology,they seem to pick it up almost as soon as the
Yanks themselves.
Then I think the Americans are chocker block with Chinese spies, but then
they seem to be giving a lot of it to them gratis.
MooJoo
think they've gone at last, they scurry under the stove when the kitchen
light goes on.
How anyone could believe the the gub'mint could keep a secret like this
for 33 years is in dire need of medication.
--
There are no stupid questions,
but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots.
Matty
So please go away you little acknowledgeable troll.
On a brighter note, the Military already has a base on the Moon so it's
still a point of destination.
"TutAmongUs@theholeintheground" <TutAm...@theheartofthecheopspyramid.hol>
Darth Smartass
news:Xns92528B6...@207.35.177.135:
> Ichimusai <ic...@ichimusai.org> wrote in
> news:m3it39h...@h43n2fls31o965.telia.com:
>
>> Cujo <cu...@petitmorte.net> writes:
>>
>>> The Wollkook must be seen in all its kookery to be fully appreciated
>>> as the Uberkook. You might not be able to see this post only because
>>> Edmo defeated me months ago, if so, please write to Edmo and tell
>>> him to restart the Internet, Usenet and Supernews. TIA!
>>
>> My non-existent god, what have I stumbled into? :)
>
> Welcome to the wonderful feild of Kookology. Eddie is one of the prime
> specimens.
>
> R.
>
Wow...we in a.a. only have a few relatively amateurish kooks. Let's hope
Georgann and Boaty don't learn new tricks! :)
--
Darth Smartass: Dark Paddleboater of the Sith
Commander, EAC Kayak Infiltration Commadoes
aa #One double one, one, double-oh, one hundred, double-one.
BAAWA Knight
---Begin Atheist Codeblock---
del *.god
----End Atheist Codeblock----
Darth Smartass
From a.a., we could have genu-wine replicas of the Giza pyramid, complete
with the missing cap/cornerstone that is actually Jesus! (long
story...can't remember the thread name, but look up "georgann" and
"pyramid" for starters :)
Don
> On Sun, 21 Jul 2002 07:53:46 GMT, Matthew Ota <kenj...@earthlink.net>
> Gave us:
>
>
>>If you do not respond to trolls they eventually go away.
>
>
> I don't need a primer from you about usenet.
Um, yes you do. Either that, or you are also a member of the troller
community perhaps?
Don
>
> Dumbshit. I am saying that it did happen, and that the RETARD that
> says it didn't is stupid. I grew up with it too. My parents couldn't
> afford to get me a telescope like your did though. I'm on your side.
> Get some reading skills.
Please organise to receive some anger management classes.
Don
> On Sun, 21 Jul 2002 10:55:51 GMT, Rick Sobie <he...@my.com> Gave us:
>
>
>
>>Jesus! Am I supposed to duck and cover or what???!!!
>>Are you trying to tell us something?
>>
>
>
>
> Did you have to quote the entire post over again, you retard? You
> are more of a lame, retarded troll than the original poster is with
> stupidity like that.
How's that anger management class going?
Ms. Femininazi
Cujo <cu...@petitmorte.net> wrote:
LOL! You know the jpg I'm thinking of, I'll wager.
Nymmie's got a few
> on his site that are perfect. Go to http://www.cafepress.com and you can
> open a business selling just that. The skepticult already sells
> merchandise. I have my own skepticult sweatshirts. (yes, two of them)
> http://www.cafeshops.com/cp/store.aspx?s=skepticult,skepticult2
Kewl!
>
> > Gee, the thought occurs to me that such things could help finance a
> > really nice little "usenet free speech legal defense fund/trust" -just
> > a little back-up to make filing frivolous complaints against any
> > members a little less attractive. ;D
>
> How about a bDan hair painting kit? Paint hair on yourself just like
> Kettler does. Put a pink pate on your head and paint away!!!1!!!
heh, I like it.
Also:
The Kook Kit! Comes complete with instructions on how to build a hateful
web site, wacky belief templates (choice of Astrology, UFOs or Psychic)
Klassic Kook Meltdowns to study, and reems of canned screed for your
spamming pleasure. The perfect gift for the aspiring Kook on your
Christmas lits!
>
> > Oh, and I want a stuffed Sue-Piggy, with true to life oinking sounds,
> > and his very own screed trough, yeah!
>
> That's a little bit much, the pigs will sue for defamation and probably
> win. Apologize to the pigs real fast before they get a lawyer!
:( But I just wanted a Sue-Piggy! I didn't say anything wrong! (Besides,
won't the lawyers just have a luau? Those piggies better be careful,
they might end up as the main course at a victory party!)
--
@-,--
Ms. Femininazi
"Liars and Lawsuits and Kooks! Oh my!"
Don
> On Sun, 21 Jul 2002 15:35:49 +0100, "pb125" <pb125...@yahoo.co.uk>
> Gave us:
>
>
>>You forgot the most convincing link of all!
>>
>>http://brainsluice.tripod.com/moonlanding.html
>>
>
>
> Get rid of the fucking spawning page bullshit in that site, retard.
> I wish that I could "pop up" and jack your jaw.
I'm sure you don't really mean that do you? A nice little chap like
yourself? Your mommy (nancy) will send you off to zetaland if you don't
stop.
johac
nik...@aub.spammustdie.dk wrote:
> It was in alt.atheism, I tell you. There I was, hopping along, minding
> my own business, when suddenly at Sun, 21 Jul 2002 14:56:09 GMT, Gary
> Hand <gary....@verizon.net> appeared in front of me and said:
>
> >And Hitler is living in Argentina
> >Elvis is living in Florida
> >The CIA caused A.I.D.S.
> >The UN has an army of 1 Million in Utah waiting to take over the USA.
> >Kissenger is the leader of the new world order.
> >Isreal planned the Twin Towers bombing.
> >Professional Wrestling is real
>
> Don't forget about the cattle mutilations!
Chupacabras!
> >
> >Dude, put it to bed.
> >
> Aaaw! O-kay!
--
John Hachmann, aa #1782
It was the schoolboy who said: "Faith is believing what you know ain't so."
- Mark Twain (1835-1910).
Ichimusai
> They are out to prove communism is best, they think we are dumb,
> they have stolen all their technology,they seem to pick it up almost
> as soon as the Yanks themselves. Then I think the Americans are
> chocker block with Chinese spies, but then they seem to be giving a
> lot of it to them gratis.
I don't think you have studied this at all.
--
AA#769 ICQ: 1645566 Yahoo & MSN: Ichimusai http://www.ichimusai.org/
Support the ASCII ribbon campaign - No HTML, RTF or MS Word in mail
I can see it now...goats with "Warning, High Pressure Liquid Goat" on
the side.
-- Guy King, uk.rec.sheds
Rick Sobie
master...@snotmail.com says...
>
>
>Rick Sobie <he...@my.com> wrote in news:Bly_8.10358$7p1.365578
>@news1.telusplanet.net:
>
>> OK, now you guys are really starting to scare me. The thing was
>> only a page long. I am not suggesting that you are protesting too
>>
>
> So? One page is too damn long for quoting when there is no need to do
>so.
>
>--
>Marc,
>"Desserts is Stressed spelled backwards."
Come here one second please.
Stand right here. Thats right, now face the group. Thankyou
(Taking out his pointer...)
Now then, I would like to direct your attention to the
typical non-functioning consciousness of homo sapiens mentiri.
Due to an excess of vapors here, and here (pointing to the
frontal lobe area of the brain) the result of sitting too close
to the television set as a child, the subject is incapable
of what we refer to as rational thought.
The area usually reserved for the frontal lobe is now quite
hollow as you can clearly see by the hollow echo sound,
which results when I strike him HERE, (whack) with the pointer.
<<bock...>>
It is interesting to note, that in this primitive specimen,
a tendancy towards policing the system, or what we often refer
to as the FAQnazi syndrome, is quite common.
Also, as you can clearly see, from his comment above, he exhibts
the 'fear of wasted electrons'. However, this very fear, will
drive his sort on, to do the exact thing, which he despises
the most, to waste electrons himself.
You may rejoin the others. (whack!)
<<bock...>>
That wasn't me.
-*-
Spaceman
>> Don't forget about the cattle mutilations!
>
>Chupacabras!
>
Chupacabras in black helicopters with portable
laser cutting devices?
Oh no..
Call the COW health department, division six!
Quick!
<LOL>
tell them
Agent S said it's a go!
and give coordinates of the sighting.
<LOL>
James M Driscoll Jr
Spaceman
http://www.realspaceman.com
MasterCougar
wrote in news:46bnju8bd6bbon4u8...@4ax.com:
> La Chupacabra, La Chupacabra... La la la la la la la la...
>
>
Thanks for the smile
MasterCougar
@news2.telusplanet.net:
> Also, as you can clearly see, from his comment above, he exhibts
> the 'fear of wasted electrons'. However, this very fear, will
> drive his sort on, to do the exact thing, which he despises
> the most, to waste electrons himself.
>
>
*Yawn*
James Oberg
arguments are either merely ignorant, or deliberately deceptive, with the
hard data and examples to prove it. I'm collecting good websites and good
explanations posted on discussion groups, and all contributions will be
appreciated. The monograph should be published in late 2003 and will be THE
authoritative refutation of this nonsense -- thanks to the help iIve already
gotten, and will be getting.
Jim Oberg
www.jamesoberg.com
Ichimusai
> I've embarked on the definitive writing project to examine why all these
> arguments are either merely ignorant, or deliberately deceptive, with the
> hard data and examples to prove it.
*LOL*
--
AA#769 ICQ: 1645566 Yahoo & MSN: Ichimusai http://www.ichimusai.org/
Support the ASCII ribbon campaign - No HTML, RTF or MS Word in mail
<Ichimusai> rasher; And I know what LGPL is. I was dealing with
psychos before.
Uncle Al
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" The Net!
Wayne Howell
James Oberg wrote:
Good luck! I suspect trying to convince those who insist on believing otherwise
will be much like trying to teach a pig to sing---it only frustrates you and
amuses the pig!
.....Wayne Howell.....
...Port Townsend, WA..
who...@gensearch.com
A day without sunlight is like.....night.
Rawley
news:3D3C4224...@gensearch.com:
> Good luck! I suspect trying to convince those who insist on believing
> otherwise will be much like trying to teach a pig to sing---it only
> frustrates you and amuses the pig!
>
OR worse.. brings death to the pig.
Have a shpadoinkle day!
-Rawley a.a #2029
--
"Man, I just found out that I have phlegmpis."
- Phip Miskell
"Properly read, the Bible is the most potent force for atheism ever
conceived."
- Asimov
Keenan Clay Wilkie
>Ichimusai <ic...@ichimusai.org> wrote in
>news:m3znwlk...@h43n2fls31o965.telia.com:
>> Edmond Wollmann <E...@astroconsulting.com> writes:
>>
>>> Any good astrologer can tell by the astrological aspects, that it indeed
>>> was real.
>>
>> ASTROLOGER?
>>
>> Come on...
>I trust that you have yet to meet Usenet's Village Idiot, Edmond Wollmann.
You say that like there's only one...
--
d a r k s t a r @ i g l o u . c o m | atheist #29
"You're a group of Christian-based, conservative organizations with
several million dollars to spend. Do you: feed the hungry? Clothe the
poor? Don't be so naieve! You blow the millions on a series of slickly-
worded, logic-bending ads espousing a widely-discredited theory that one
can be 'cured' of homosexuality through counseling and prayer."
-- MAD Magazine #337, p. 32
Daniel Kolle
>I've embarked on the definitive writing project to examine why all these
>arguments are either merely ignorant, or deliberately deceptive, with the
>hard data and examples to prove it.
Excuse me while I laugh.
--
-Kolle (kohl-lee); 14. A.A.#2035.
Koji Kondo is my god.
EAC ConTroll Director.
The last time Jesus showed up for church, they killed him.
Everett Hickey
news:clW_8.180272$q53.4...@twister.austin.rr.com...
Just one question... do you believe Apollo happened, or that it's a hoax?
Your message is a little ambiguous...
Nomen Nescio
That's very interesting, Brad. I'll be sure to add your
url's to this ever-burgeoning list of fact-filled links.
Frankly the single and absolutely incontrovertible fact
that the radioactively-intense solar wind is sufficient
cause to wholly invalidate any and all claims ever made
of successfully sending men anywhere through and beyond
the likewise intensely-radioactive Van Allen Belt, that
glaring fact all by itself proves the "apollo" missions,
or any other allegedly manned missions into outer space,
all such missions could not possibly have occurred with-
out ultra-sophisticated, UFO-quality space technologies
in place. Now, unless JPL-NASA wants to fess up to such
superior "antigrav" or "zero-point" energy technologies
etc, then logic dictates that no manned missions beyond
Earth's own inner space have ever been successfully com-
pleted. Big brother can't cover up the Sun. Case closed
(okay maybe they can hide behind an asteroid in tow etc,
but no damn way in hades did NASA land men on the moon
with those cheesy little foil-wrapped LEMs, 'nuff said).
Enjoy!
Daniel
*Min's Tarot & Star Charts Homepage:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=95f8e368393c65e4...@dizum.com
On 22 Jul 2002, brad...@yahoo.com (Brad Guth) wrote:
>I have some interest in your research. Perhaps you can review what I
>have to offer and then to discover what other is cooking under the
>carpet at NASA.
>
>I've tried to post here before (mostly regarding "GUTH Venus") and,
>I'm being blocked by you know who.
>
>My two URL's
>http://guthvenus.tripod.com
>http://geocities.com/bradguth
>
>Specifically my lunar stuff: http://geocities.com/bradguth/moon-02.htm
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBPT2jFZljD7YrHM/nEQLW/gCgxehbtnnCM0isVADFNo2YhTz84lAAoPPC
EyjTrHDQ50T5Nm2swffulZDC
=KiPt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Ichimusai
> That's very interesting, Brad. I'll be sure to add your url's to
> this ever-burgeoning list of fact-filled links.
>
> Frankly the single and absolutely incontrovertible fact that the
> radioactively-intense solar wind is sufficient cause to wholly
> invalidate any and all claims ever made of successfully sending men
> anywhere through and beyond the likewise intensely-radioactive Van
> Allen Belt, that glaring fact all by itself proves the "apollo"
> missions, or any other allegedly manned missions into outer space,
> all such missions could not possibly have occurred with- out
> ultra-sophisticated, UFO-quality space technologies in place. Now,
> unless JPL-NASA wants to fess up to such superior "antigrav" or
> "zero-point" energy technologies etc, then logic dictates that no
> manned missions beyond Earth's own inner space have ever been
> successfully com- pleted. Big brother can't cover up the Sun. Case
> closed (okay maybe they can hide behind an asteroid in tow etc, but
> no damn way in hades did NASA land men on the moon with those cheesy
> little foil-wrapped LEMs, 'nuff said).
I am sure then you can provide us with accurate numbers of the
radiation at the end of the sixties and beginning of seventies?
Please?
--
AA#769 ICQ: 1645566 Yahoo & MSN: Ichimusai http://www.ichimusai.org/
Support the ASCII ribbon campaign - No HTML, RTF or MS Word in mail
I pledge resistance to the flag of the United States of Americhrist, and to
the theocapitalist empire for which it stands: one nation undereducated,
irredeemably, with liberty and justice for all major campaign contributors.
-- Michael Nash, alt.atheism
Ichimusai
> James Oberg wrote:
> >
> > I've embarked on the definitive writing project to examine why all these
> > arguments are either merely ignorant, or deliberately deceptive, with the
> > hard data and examples to prove it. I'm collecting good websites and good
> > explanations posted on discussion groups, and all contributions will be
> > appreciated. The monograph should be published in late 2003 and will be THE
> > authoritative refutation of this nonsense -- thanks to the help iIve already
> > gotten, and will be getting.
>
> http://www.crank.net/
Crank of today:
"Actually, you can make your own cells by boiling korean ginsang, dong
guey, long mountain ginsang, and other vegetables or herbs together
then leave the boiled material on the stove for three days, then you
can see 1/2 cm diameter cells formed in a single line. (Yes these
cells are big!) See picture below. This is what you should see in
your pan."
--
AA#769 ICQ: 1645566 Yahoo & MSN: Ichimusai http://www.ichimusai.org/
Support the ASCII ribbon campaign - No HTML, RTF or MS Word in mail
Let sleeping bags lie.
-- Guy King, uk.rec.sheds
Anonymous
That's very interesting, Brad. I'll be sure to add your
url's to this ever-burgeoning list of fact-filled links.
Frankly the single and absolutely incontrovertible fact
that the radioactively-intense solar wind is sufficient
cause to wholly invalidate any and all claims ever made
of successfully sending men anywhere through and beyond
the likewise intensely-radioactive Van Allen Belt, that
glaring fact all by itself proves the "apollo" missions,
or any other allegedly manned missions into outer space,
all such missions could not possibly have occurred with-
out ultra-sophisticated, UFO-quality space technologies
in place. Now, unless JPL-NASA wants to fess up to such
superior "antigrav" or "zero-point" energy technologies
etc, then logic dictates that no manned missions beyond
Earth's own inner space have ever been successfully com-
pleted. Big brother can't cover up the Sun. Case closed
(okay maybe they can hide behind an asteroid in tow etc,
but no damn way in hades did NASA land men on the moon
with those cheesy little foil-wrapped LEMs, 'nuff said).
Enjoy!
lmg
news:ahhkvp$1n6$3...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
> In article <clW_8.180272$q53.4...@twister.austin.rr.com>, James Oberg
>
You people are mind-bogglingly stupid.
James Oberg is a military aerospace writer, and a well-known one at that. He
is writing a book to DEBUNK the "Apollo never happened" nonsense.
--
lmg AA#2063
James Oberg
wind up muddy, and the pig loves it.
"Wayne Howell" <who...@gensearch.com> wrote in message
news:3D3C4224...@gensearch.com...
James Oberg
"Anna Konda" <daisy...@bin.laden> wrote in message news:ahhl3v$1n6
> And I look forward to being very amused by this loon. When's the book
> coming out and where can we get it, preferably so as few of us as possible
> will buy it to share with as many as possible to laugh at it.
Been having trouble with 'Reading for Comprehension' lately, 'Anna'?
I can recommend a local community college class that might help... <grin>
James Oberg
waver. It's the innocent youngsters who need some protection. There are
already a lot of good sites doing this.
"Everett Hickey" <lit...@ev1.net> wrote in message
news:3d3c4ddc$1...@newsa.ev1.net...
James Oberg
"lmg" <nosp...@att.net> wrote in message
news:ahhog3$rsu$1...@bob.news.rcn.net...
Dennis Tetreault
And we'll find that on the shelf next to the well-known book entitled:
"The Wit and Wisdom of Archie Bunker"... right?
Hap Griffin
manuscript. You may want to check with him before duplicating his effort.
I agree, those gullible folks like many on this newsgroup who are easily
taken in by the conspiricy theorists should have easily accessible
explanations of the tired old "evidence" going around...but this already
exists on many site on the web. But, for those hungry for some juicy
conspiricy theory, no amount of logic is going to sway them. I'm afraid it
is wasted effort in this society of sadly lacking science education. Just
look at some of the "evidence" put forth that is so easily explained by
anyone who knows a lick about photography, physics, rocketry, etc.
HG
"James Oberg" <james...@houston.rr.com> wrote in message
news:Fc%_8.161145$eF5.4...@twister.austin.rr.com...
Rick Sobie
says...
>
>
>In article <3D3C4224...@gensearch.com>, Wayne Howell
>
>> James Oberg wrote:
>>
>> > I've embarked on the definitive writing project to examine why all these
>> > arguments are either merely ignorant, or deliberately deceptive, with the
>> > hard data and examples to prove it. I'm collecting good websites and good
>> > explanations posted on discussion groups, and all contributions will be
>> > appreciated. The monograph should be published in late 2003 and will be
THE
>> > authoritative refutation of this nonsense -- thanks to the help iIve
already
>> > gotten, and will be getting.
>>
>> Good luck! I suspect trying to convince those who insist on believing
otherwise
>> will be much like trying to teach a pig to sing---it only frustrates you and
>> amuses the pig!
>
>coming out and where can we get it, preferably so as few of us as possible
>will buy it to share with as many as possible to laugh at it.
>
James, keep in mind, that 90% of Americans according to polls,
believe that the sun, revolves around the earth.
You will need to use large block letters in your posts and divide
the argument into two camps. Handing out sweaters that are one
solid color is also necessary.
On the back in large letters, should be initials at least.
Like IBWLOTM (I believe we landed on the moon)
and IDBWLOTM (For the non-believers)
This way, the people in your own camp, will not shoot you
in the back quite as often, by mistake.
Actually maybe the initials won't be sufficient, as it is likley
too confusing.
Just state clearly, in every post whether you are pro or con.
But use block letters, and place it at the beginning, as they
will base their remarks to your post on your being pro or con
at the onset.
Actally state it as so...
I BELIEVE WE LANDED ON THE MOON AND I WORK FOR NASA
Something like that.
Just some helpful advice.
-*-
Rick Sobie
The reason I chose this originally was I was reminded of the
FBI and their shirts which carry the large letters.
It helps at times to prevent the old "Wait a minute Sam, I
don't think these are large indians we are shooting at!"
Steve Knight
<james...@houston.rr.com> wrote:
Please clarify. It sounds like, from your subject line, that you're
saying the landing never happened and from your post, you want to
prove it.
Warlord Steve
BAAWA
www.sonic.net/~wooly
Rick Sobie
>
>
>>You will need to use large block letters in your posts and divide
>>the argument into two camps. Handing out sweaters that are one
>>solid color is also necessary.
>>
>>On the back in large letters, should be initials at least.
>>
>>Like IBWLOTM (I believe we landed on the moon)
>>
>>and IDBWLOTM (For the non-believers)
>>
>
>The reason I chose this originally was I was reminded of the
> FBI and their shirts which carry the large letters.
>
>It helps at times to prevent the old "Wait a minute Sam, I
>don't think these are large indians we are shooting at!"
>
>
"Nonsense, it says right there on the back, "F*ckin big indian"
"You're right!"
That's why they also have to wear bullet proof vests.
-*-
Jim Cowling
>
>Frankly the single and absolutely incontrovertible fact
>that the radioactively-intense solar wind is sufficient
>cause to wholly invalidate any and all claims ever made
>of successfully sending men anywhere through and beyond
>the likewise intensely-radioactive Van Allen Belt, that
>glaring fact all by itself proves the "apollo" missions,
>or any other allegedly manned missions into outer space,
>all such missions could not possibly have occurred with-
>out ultra-sophisticated, UFO-quality space technologies
>in place. Now, unless JPL-NASA wants to fess up to such
http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html#radiation
says it all. Thank you for playing.
--
Spamblock: There is no 'p' in my address.
Rick Sobie
Oh, and one more thing, maybe change the name of the book,
to "Apollo Happened"
-*-
Adam Marczyk
Actually, I also initially read his post as saying he was denying the moon
landing. But it's good to hear I misinterpreted him. Hasn't Phil Plait (of
www.badastronomy.com) already published a book on this and similar nonsense?
--
a.a. #2001
"Blasphemy is a victimless crime."
Director, EAC Black Monolith Division - "My God, it's full of stars"
Operative: EAC Electronic Warfare Division
EAC Subversive Fiction Division
http://www.ebonmusings.org ICQ: 8777843 PGP Key ID: 0x5C66F737
Bruce Burke
news:f46fc9bb48da2a6f...@nox.lemuria.org:
> That's very interesting, Brad. I'll be sure to add your
> url's to this ever-burgeoning list of fact-filled links.
>
> Frankly the single and absolutely incontrovertible fact
> that the radioactively-intense solar wind is sufficient
> cause to wholly invalidate any and all claims ever made
> of successfully sending men anywhere through and beyond
> the likewise intensely-radioactive Van Allen Belt, that
> glaring fact all by itself proves the "apollo" missions,
> or any other allegedly manned missions into outer space,
> all such missions could not possibly have occurred with-
> out ultra-sophisticated, UFO-quality space technologies
> in place. Now, unless JPL-NASA wants to fess up to such
> superior "antigrav" or "zero-point" energy technologies
> etc, then logic dictates that no manned missions beyond
> Earth's own inner space have ever been successfully com-
> pleted. Big brother can't cover up the Sun. Case closed
> (okay maybe they can hide behind an asteroid in tow etc,
> but no damn way in hades did NASA land men on the moon
> with those cheesy little foil-wrapped LEMs, 'nuff said).
>
> Enjoy!
> Daniel
>
So where is your mathmatical model that supports this?
Some numbers please.
Also cite some references to the studies that show this is true as well,
especially when the velocity of the spacecraft is factored in.
Darth Smartass
news:Ij0%8.21777$vB3.6...@twister.southeast.rr.com:
> Ron Miller, who used to frequent this newsgroup, has already written a
> manuscript. You may want to check with him before duplicating his
> effort.
>
> I agree, those gullible folks like many on this newsgroup who are
> easily taken in by the conspiricy theorists should have easily
> accessible explanations of the tired old "evidence" going around...but
> this already exists on many site on the web. But, for those hungry
> for some juicy conspiricy theory, no amount of logic is going to sway
> them. I'm afraid it is wasted effort in this society of sadly lacking
> science education. Just look at some of the "evidence" put forth that
> is so easily explained by anyone who knows a lick about photography,
> physics, rocketry, etc.
*nod* I didn't get a _great_ science education...but I made up for it by
being a voracious reader in any field that caught my attention. Still...I'm
constantly amazed at how so many people can be taken in by conspiracy
crackpots :/
--
Darth Smartass: Dark Paddleboater of the Sith
Commander, EAC Kayak Infiltration Commadoes
aa #One double one, one, double-oh, one hundred, double-one.
BAAWA Knight
---Begin Atheist Codeblock---
del *.god
----End Atheist Codeblock----
Jim
>In article <ujp912...@corp.supernews.com>, Adam Marczyk <ebon...@hotmailNOTexcite.com> wrote:
>
>> lmg <nosp...@att.net> wrote in message news:ahhog3$rsu$1...@bob.news.rcn.net...
>> > "Phoenix" <hu...@dewey.louie> wrote in message
>> > news:ahhkvp$1n6$3...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
>> > > In article <clW_8.180272$q53.4...@twister.austin.rr.com>, James Oberg
>> > <james...@houston.rr.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > I've embarked on the definitive writing project to examine why all these
>> > > > arguments are either merely ignorant, or deliberately deceptive, with
>> > the
>> > > > hard data and examples to prove it. I'm collecting good websites and
>> > good
>> > > > explanations posted on discussion groups, and all contributions will be
>> > > > appreciated. The monograph should be published in late 2003 and will be
>> > THE
>> > > > authoritative refutation of this nonsense -- thanks to the help iIve
>> > already
>> > > > gotten, and will be getting.
>> > >
>> > > Say Jim, how did that mirror get on the Moon?
>> > >
>> >
>> > You people are mind-bogglingly stupid.
>> >
>> > James Oberg is a military aerospace writer, and a well-known one at that. He
>> > is writing a book to DEBUNK the "Apollo never happened" nonsense.
>>
>> Actually, I also initially read his post as saying he was denying the moon
>> landing.
>
>Yes, so did Anna and me.
There seems to be alot of that going around.
>If he could unintentionally troll this good it'd
>be interesting to see what he could do with the peanut gallery.
>
>> But it's good to hear I misinterpreted him. Hasn't Phil Plait (of
>> www.badastronomy.com) already published a book on this and similar nonsense?
>
>Just the tip of the iceberg over here. We still got a crackpot who can't
>tell a star from a constellation.
Brad Guth
attempting to state what I perceive as a serious compromise, one
that's affecting why NASA can't budge on the "GUTH Venus" discoveries,
has been a difficult and disappointing phase of my research.
I've learned far more then I ever wanted to know about Club NASA and
their boss NSA/DoD.
I'll check out your work to see if there's something I've missed or
overshot the mark. If I've made any mistake, I want to correct that
becaust, it makes everything else so much more effective. NASA can
make lots of mistakes and get away with it, where you and I can't but
make one mistake, even syntax or spelling and it seems we're done for.
My Venusgate page: http://guthvenus.tripod.com/venusgate.htm
This has my lunar stuff mostly within this following page
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/moon-02.htm
Good luck, Brad Guth / IEIS http://geocities.com/bradguth
Ichimusai
This post intentionally left blank.
--
AA#769 ICQ: 1645566 Yahoo & MSN: Ichimusai http://www.ichimusai.org/
Support the ASCII ribbon campaign - No HTML, RTF or MS Word in mail
"Don't feel you should be like you 'ought to' be, no one are like they
'ought to' be!"
-- MEow/Nikitta's mother
Eric Winter
Looks like your message needs to be worder a little more carefully - I
understood what you meant, but it seems you have set off a lot of
trigger-happy troll hunters. I am personally looking forward to the book,
and for those of you who shot first and then read:
We landed on the Moon. James Oberg believe we landed on the Moon. The book
is about the kooks who think we did NOT land on the Moon, and the junk and
pseudoscience they use to buttress their arguments. It is a DEBUNKING book,
not a supporting book.
Whew.
Eric Winter
"James Oberg" <james...@houston.rr.com> wrote in message
news:clW_8.180272$q53.4...@twister.austin.rr.com...
> I've embarked on the definitive writing project to examine why all these
> arguments are either merely ignorant, or deliberately deceptive, with the
> hard data and examples to prove it. I'm collecting good websites and good
> explanations posted on discussion groups, and all contributions will be
> appreciated. The monograph should be published in late 2003 and will be
THE
> authoritative refutation of this nonsense -- thanks to the help iIve
already
> gotten, and will be getting.
>
> Jim Oberg
> www.jamesoberg.com
>
>
>
>
Ichimusai
> In article <clW_8.180272$q53.4...@twister.austin.rr.com>, James Oberg <james...@houston.rr.com> wrote:
>
> > I've embarked on the definitive writing project to examine why all these
> > arguments are either merely ignorant, or deliberately deceptive, with the
> > hard data and examples to prove it. I'm collecting good websites and good
> > explanations posted on discussion groups, and all contributions will be
> > appreciated. The monograph should be published in late 2003 and will be THE
> > authoritative refutation of this nonsense -- thanks to the help iIve already
> > gotten, and will be getting.
>
> Say Jim, how did that mirror get on the Moon?
Oh, they got an answer to that as well. Unmanned landing. :) There is
no end to the contortions they go through...
--
AA#769 ICQ: 1645566 Yahoo & MSN: Ichimusai http://www.ichimusai.org/
Support the ASCII ribbon campaign - No HTML, RTF or MS Word in mail
Try some hard cheese in 20 times magnification. If you have no
nightmares then, you are immune.
-- Ichi
Chuck Stewart
> I agree, those gullible folks like many on this newsgroup
But _which_ newsgroup are you speaking of?
I can understand JimO responding to the apollo-hoax troll...
It's a bit harder to understand a followup to that troll spamming the
originally trolled groups...
Or, in simpler terms, TRIM THE DAMN GROUPS ALREADY.
Followups to sci.skeptic
(Sometimes it's not easy being Jim Oberg.)
> HG
--
Chuck Stewart
"Anime-style catgirls: Threat? Menace? Or just studying algebra?"
xyzzy
>Ron Miller, who used to frequent this newsgroup, has already written a
>manuscript. You may want to check with him before duplicating his effort.
>
>I agree, those gullible folks like many on this newsgroup who are easily
>taken in by the conspiricy theorists should have easily accessible
>explanations of the tired old "evidence" going around...but this already
>exists on many site on the web. But, for those hungry for some juicy
>conspiricy theory, no amount of logic is going to sway them. I'm afraid it
>is wasted effort in this society of sadly lacking science education.
More than that, the society is missing critical thinking. Science
education is often understood to be learning *about* science, which is
fine, but not enough. Even when/if critical thinking is emphasized
(extremely rare) it is often presented as something that is useful
only in science, which is false. I would like to see critical thinking
encoruraged and practiced throughout the school year, in various forms
and shapes, from science to sports to TV to magic. Randi should be
required reading. Crop circles should be part of science and
mathematics curriculum. Psychic claims should be investigated in
physics class. Failed hypotheses, scientific blunders, hoaxes should
be studied alongside valid theories and contrasted. With the present
system, kids are trained to believe anyone who sounds important or to
any book that's published because they are only exposed to the
"correct stuff". Learning to differentiate between valid and invalid
is just as important as being able to parrot what's valid.
Rod Mollise
> arguments are either merely ignorant, or deliberately deceptive, with the
> hard data and examples to prove it.
Hi Jim:
I think that would make for a very interesting project. HOWEVER...the
short answer to the "why" of the Apollo-never-happened crowd is one
little word:
L-O-O-N!
:-)
Peace,
Rod Mollise
Author of _Choosing and Using a Schmidt Cassegrain Telescope_
<http://members.aol.com/RMOLLISE/index.html>