I was surprised at the extreme negativity of the review in the EG
(what's his name?). Very harsh indeed.
Phil
Leigh Paastch was the same person who gave X-Men(2000) 4 stars out of 5, yet
this around 2.5 out of 5.
Yes I know generally sequels can suck(not in the case of X2 though) and most
of the time deserve the poor score- but this time he definitely got it
wrong.
In regards to the bit about Magnetto and X-Men joining forces and what
Paatsch wrote about this- a definite WTF is in order!!
Name one good Australian newspaper critic.
--
/^\damnfine/^\
"Good morning, people of Texraq. This is your superior white
liberator speaking. Please discontinue your anarchic orgy of
looting and burning for a few minutes in order to luxuriate in
a soothing sonic bath of my monosyllabic magnificence..."
- Whitehouse.org
>"Ian Galbraith" wrote:
>> One thing that I've found interesting is that the reviews of X2 have
>> been uniformly lukewarm yet the reaction here has been uniformly
>> positive. Maybe its a movie for the fans. Although some of the reviews
>> have made clear that the reviewers didn't really watch the film, for
>> example Leigh Paatsch in the Melbourne Herald Sun stated that there
>> was no explanation for the X-Men and Magneto teaming up. WTF!!
>
>Name one good Australian newspaper critic.
Adrian Martin, The Age.
I don't always agree with him, but at least he knows what he's talking
about.
-- Keith Gow --
I'm surprised too. I would have thought that X2 was gonna be hearld as the
next Gone With The Wind.
--
" 'Religion' is just another word for 'Mainstream Cult' "
"Ian Galbraith" <igalb...@ozonline.com.au> wrote in message
news:rkq8bv4siaqvbl29k...@4ax.com...
Jim Schembri who has very little credibility as a critic. He appears
to deliberately go against the grain on most of his reviews. He's an
entertaining writer but don't read him for an informed review.
>Adrian Martin, The Age.
Seconded.
out of interest what did straigthorn and pommeranian think of it
--
cb250rs->gpx600r->xj650->fzs600->trx850->zx7r->trx850->900ss->zx636r.
Ian Galbraith wrote in message ...
You can find out all about what they thought here:- http://tinyurl.com/axsj
:)
> Maybe its a movie for the fans.
Most definatley - what has got me most excited about it is being able
to draw parallels with the first movie and more importantly the
animated series. Its a movie for the fans, no doubt.
But that isn't to say it isn't a good film - its a cracker.
--
Trev.
"Sculpture him in the nude so that it will be easier for you to kiss his ass"
Eustache Bruix - Commander in Chief Boulogne Flotilla - French Navy
on being asked for a suitable costume for a sculpture
of First Counsul Napoleon
I think X-Men was a sleeper (for my age group anyway) - a $480M sleeper. Only
really recognized by it's potential by comic book readers and those more
enlightened. X2 will do better IMO.
Mitch
[snip]
>I think X-Men was a sleeper (for my age group anyway) - a $480M sleeper. Only
>really recognized by it's potential by comic book readers and those more
>enlightened. X2 will do better IMO.
It had the 2nd biggest opening in the US ever behind only Spiderman.
--
Ian Galbraith
Email: igalb...@removeozonline.com.au
"When I get a little money, I buy books. If any is left, I buy
food and clothes." - Erasmus
Equivalently, for people who have read the comic books.
Unfortunately, I haven't read them myself.
<snip>
--
David Barnett
Dr Was
"you can't outrun Death forever, but you can make the Bastard work for it"
Andromeda: Lava & Rockets