How to filter out BCM detractors?
asf
That was the only solution that came to mind, because half the topics in
this newsgroup seem to be from some completely insane person ranting about
battle cruiser, and they all have wildly varying topics, preventing
filtering them out that way :/
trying to decide if I should check this game out, looks to cover a huge
spectrum of game types, with a correspondingly huge amount of depth.
unfortunately, trying to get any interesting or factual information from
what would logically be the proper newsgroup seems to be the incorrect path
to take ;)
Daniel Blakemore
> That was the only solution that came to mind, because half the topics in
> this newsgroup seem to be from some completely insane person ranting about
> battle cruiser, and they all have wildly varying topics, preventing
> filtering them out that way :/
Hmm...yet another Toadie who doesn't wanna hear anything against his beloved
"supreme moron"....
> trying to decide if I should check this game out, looks to cover a huge
> spectrum of game types, with a correspondingly huge amount of depth.
By all means, check the game out. Just don't say we didn't warn you... :)
> unfortunately, trying to get any interesting or factual information from
> what would logically be the proper newsgroup seems to be the incorrect
path
> to take ;)
Why don't you try the BC3000 forums? You obviously already have
preconceptions about *this* forum*.
--
Daniel Blakemore - remove naespam from addy to reply
A person remains immature, whatever his age, as long as he
thinks of himself as an exception to the human race.
Usenet is like a herd of performing elephants with diarrhoea ...
Massive, difficult to re-direct, awe-inspiring, entertaining, and a source
of mind-boggling
amounts of excrement, when you least expect it.
- Gene Spafford
asf
> preconceptions about *this* forum*.
Jesus christ. Apparently well founded preconceptions. I thought it was a
*joke* about rabid insane detractors.
Anyway, you've given me a good way to figure out who to killfile :D Thanks.
Bill L.
OK, here is the info you need. The game is crap and the programmer doesn't
know whaat he is doing. Now you know. Save your money.
Bill
Tom Beckmann
"asf" <as...@asdf.com> wrote in message
news:tuvbrnn...@corp.supernews.com...
> wtf do I filter these idiots out? add them one by one to a killfile?
>
> That was the only solution that came to mind, because half the topics in
> this newsgroup seem to be from some completely insane person ranting about
> battle cruiser, and they all have wildly varying topics, preventing
> filtering them out that way :/
>
I plonked a couple of participants, but the best way
I found was to filter any message with
BCM
BC3K
BattleCruiser
Battle Cruiser
Derek Smart
in the subject.
But then I discovered I missed the cat fights so I let
them back in. It hasn't affected my sanity at all. Oh no.
We are all quite sane. Yes we are. Yessss.
The trouble is that Derek Smart and BC3k come with
a *LOT* of history. As we all know history is written
by the victor, and there hasn't been a conclusive
victor, so there are several versions of the history.
> trying to decide if I should check this game out, looks to cover a huge
> spectrum of game types, with a correspondingly huge amount of depth.
> unfortunately, trying to get any interesting or factual information from
> what would logically be the proper newsgroup seems to be the incorrect
path
> to take ;)
>
BC3K and BCM have an enormously wide scope. I haven't played
them so I can't tell you whether they succeed in this difficult
task.
You could try downloading the demos and the FAQs.
When BCM does appear in the shops there might be a
rational discussion of its merits here, but realistically
it is much more likely to degenerate into more mud wrestling.
If you want to discuss BC3K, your best bet is probably Derek
Smart's own forum, but I would advise you to lurk for a bit
there to get to learn the forum's posting conventions.
_____________
Tom
asf
> I found was to filter any message with
> BCM
> BC3K
> BattleCruiser
> Battle Cruiser
> Derek Smart
> in the subject.
I'd do that, but that'd sort of defeat the point of trying to find actual
bcm conversation :/ Though nuking DS is a good idea.
> If you want to discuss BC3K, your best bet is probably Derek
> Smart's own forum, but I would advise you to lurk for a bit
> there to get to learn the forum's posting conventions.
That place is so far beyond scary it boggles the mind. I checked it, some
guy posted about how a friend said he had the warez version, and 'Supreme
Commander' (wtf?), threatened to ban him if he didn't recieve an email
'explaining himself'. Insanity personified.
I could give a shit about the sanity of the dev though, just gimme the game
if it's good ;) (Deus Ex/Anachronox came out of Ion Storm after all :D)
Louis J.M
>
> That was the only solution that came to mind, because half the topics in
> this newsgroup seem to be from some completely insane person ranting about
> battle cruiser, and they all have wildly varying topics, preventing
> filtering them out that way :/
AFAIK, comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.space-sim was originally set up to divert the
flamewar Mr.Smart had perpetuated off comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic.
Therefore, flames are technically on-topic.
> trying to decide if I should check this game out, looks to cover a huge
> spectrum of game types, with a correspondingly huge amount of depth.
> unfortunately, trying to get any interesting or factual information from
> what would logically be the proper newsgroup seems to be the incorrect path
> to take ;)
Here's what I recommend:
1.) First, it is essential to read a stomach-full of its developer's hype,
up until the point you feel worked up about it, or nauseus. This is
necessary to establish the proper perspective.
This can be accomplished by doing a google search using keywords
"BCM" and dsm...@pobox.com, and especially looking through the
official site, 3000ad.com.
2.) Download the patched version of BCK, and the BCM demo. "Play" both
"games" as extensively as possible, or until your attention wains.
3.) Come back and post your thoughts. Good luck commander.
Idiot.
.-~~-.____ Louis J.M
/ | ' \
( ) O _
\_/-, ,----' // E-Mail: Lou...@worldnet.att.net
==== ___// AIM : Zsinj
/ \-'~; /~~~(O) ---------------------------------------------------
/ __/~| __/ | "Any sufficiently advanced bullshit is
==(______| (_________| indistinguishable from magic."
Bill Huffman
"Louis J.M" <Lou...@Worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:7lQH7.109007$WW.65...@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
>
> asf <as...@asdf.com> wrote in message news:tuvbrnn...@corp.supernews.com...
> > wtf do I filter these idiots out? add them one by one to a killfile?
> >
> > That was the only solution that came to mind, because half the topics in
> > this newsgroup seem to be from some completely insane person ranting about
> > battle cruiser, and they all have wildly varying topics, preventing
> > filtering them out that way :/
>
> AFAIK, comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.space-sim was originally set up to divert the
> flamewar Mr.Smart had perpetuated off comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.strategic.
>
> Therefore, flames are technically on-topic.
I believe this to be true. During the on-line discussion before the vote it was
specifically discussed. However, I doubt that the charter ended up saying that.
:-)
Mr. Smart himself resisted the move to space-sim. I think he liked the bigger
audience in strategic. After many flames he finally relented and the flame war
has been centered in space-sim ever since.
Well to tell the truth since Mr. Smart's number one lacky, Dan Brooks, cut back
on the supporting posts here Derek Smart hasn't posted as much and has been
flaming over on Planetcrap, evilAvatar, and VoodooExtreme more.
Daniel Blakemore
> > Why don't you try the BC3000 forums? You obviously already have
> > preconceptions about *this* forum*.
> Jesus christ. Apparently well founded preconceptions. I thought it was a
> *joke* about rabid insane detractors.
Nice to see you don't give any supporting evidence...(!)
> Anyway, you've given me a good way to figure out who to killfile :D
Thanks.
Good. I don't have to listen to *your* whining, then.
Lemming
>
>asf <as...@asdf.com> wrote in message
>news:tuvee62...@corp.supernews.com...
>> > Why don't you try the BC3000 forums? You obviously already have
>> > preconceptions about *this* forum*.
>> Jesus christ. Apparently well founded preconceptions. I thought it was a
>> *joke* about rabid insane detractors.
>
>Nice to see you don't give any supporting evidence...(!)
>
>> Anyway, you've given me a good way to figure out who to killfile :D
>Thanks.
>
>Good. I don't have to listen to *your* whining, then.
Danny, you got it backwards. If he killfiles you, he doesn't have to
listen to *your* whining. Hmm ... there's an idea.
--
Lemming
Curiosity *may* have killed Schrödinger's cat.
Daniel Blakemore
news:usd0vtgh8gjgv0ru8...@4ax.com...
> "Daniel Blakemore" <dan...@blakemore81.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
> >Good. I don't have to listen to *your* whining, then.
> Danny, you got it backwards. If he killfiles you, he doesn't have to
> listen to *your* whining. Hmm ... there's an idea.
...and if he can't see my posts, he's got less to whine about, savvy? :)
Lemming
>Lemming <l3m...@bumblbee.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
>news:usd0vtgh8gjgv0ru8...@4ax.com...
>> "Daniel Blakemore" <dan...@blakemore81.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>> >Good. I don't have to listen to *your* whining, then.
>> Danny, you got it backwards. If he killfiles you, he doesn't have to
>> listen to *your* whining. Hmm ... there's an idea.
>
>...and if he can't see my posts, he's got less to whine about, savvy? :)
I concur.
Dan Fens
> > Anyway, you've given me a good way to figure out who to killfile :D
> Thanks.
>
> Good. I don't have to listen to *your* whining, then.
You're glad you don't have to hear contrary opinions?
That's remarkably insular. I infer from that that you're insecure
about your beliefs, and don't have the guts to hear the truth from the
people who have it.
Critical/analytical thinking is a marvellous thing - you should apply
it to the endless train of half-truths and misrepresentations peddled
by the detractors.
Dan Fens, PhD
LordHaHa
Three different devs. at (the now no-longer-in-existance) Ion Storm.
Dev. 1 - John Romero = Daikatana
Dev. 2 - Tom Hall = Anachronox
Dev. 3 - Warren Spector = Deus Ex
Warren Spector is working on DX2, Romero is doing console games, as is
Hall.
LordHaHa goes into "Looking Glass Studios historian" mode on
occasion...
Bill Huffman
"Dan Fens" <dfe...@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
news:afcf4f93.01111...@posting.google.com...
Dan Fens you fraud, care to elaborate on the "half-truths and
misrepresentations"?
Daniel Blakemore
news:<9sp26c$14hk0u$1...@ID-12797.news.dfncis.de>...
> > > Anyway, you've given me a good way to figure out who to killfile :D
> > Thanks.
> > Good. I don't have to listen to *your* whining, then.
> You're glad you don't have to hear contrary opinions?
You got it the wrong way round. I don't have to listen to you whining that
you don't like other's contrary opinions.
> That's remarkably insular. I infer from that that you're insecure
> about your beliefs, and don't have the guts to hear the truth from the
> people who have it.
And I infer exactly the same about you :)
> Critical/analytical thinking is a marvellous thing - you should apply
> it to the endless train of half-truths and misrepresentations peddled
> by the detractors.
Critical/analytical thinking is a marvellous thing - you should apply
it to the endless train of half-truths and misrepresentations peddled
by Derek and his toadies..
Daniel Blakemore
news:<9sp26c$14hk0u$1...@ID-12797.news.dfncis.de>...
> > > Anyway, you've given me a good way to figure out who to killfile :D
> > Thanks.
> > Good. I don't have to listen to *your* whining, then.
> You're glad you don't have to hear contrary opinions?
...and aren't you meant to be kill-filing me? Or is your filter as leaky as
Derek's? :)
Louis J.M
Daniel Blakemore <dan...@blakemore81.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message news:9sqq4a$14q9ib$1...@ID-12797.news.dfncis.de...
> Dan Fens <dfe...@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
> news:afcf4f93.01111...@posting.google.com...
> > "Daniel Blakemore" <dan...@blakemore81.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:<9sp26c$14hk0u$1...@ID-12797.news.dfncis.de>...
> > > > Anyway, you've given me a good way to figure out who to killfile :D
> > > Thanks.
> > > Good. I don't have to listen to *your* whining, then.
> > You're glad you don't have to hear contrary opinions?
>
> You got it the wrong way round. I don't have to listen to you whining that
> you don't like other's contrary opinions.
>
> > That's remarkably insular. I infer from that that you're insecure
> > about your beliefs, and don't have the guts to hear the truth from the
> > people who have it.
>
> And I infer exactly the same about you :)
>
> > Critical/analytical thinking is a marvellous thing - you should apply
> > it to the endless train of half-truths and misrepresentations peddled
> > by the detractors.
>
> Critical/analytical thinking is a marvellous thing - you should apply
> it to the endless train of half-truths and misrepresentations peddled
> by Derek and his toadies..
(Louis pats Daniel on the head approvingly and slips a Milk Bone under
his nose)
Good Rottweiler puppy. Now go knaw at Lemmings' ankle cuffs...
Daniel Blakemore
> (Louis pats Daniel on the head approvingly and slips a Milk Bone under
> his nose)
> Good Rottweiler puppy. Now go knaw at Lemmings' ankle cuffs...
Arf! <slobbers all over Louis's shoes...>
Bill Huffman
"rrevved" <ed_...@nope.com> wrote in message
news:clr1vtc2fir39vtgc...@4ax.com...
> On 12 Nov 2001 19:24:55 -0800, dfe...@yahoo.com.au (Dan Fens) wrote:
>
> >Critical/analytical thinking is a marvellous thing - you should apply
> >it
>
> For the Americans out there, maybe he's married to Miss Cleo.
>
> Cawl meh nouw.
I thought Miss Cleo was sued for fraud but I saw her advertisement again the
other day. Actually I think Miss Cleo and Dan Fens make a cute couple.
Note, Miss Cleo is this supposed telepath that advertizes on TV saying to call
her on the phone and she will answer all your questions, tell you your future
and generally make everything wonderful for yourself if you just call her
(credit cards accepted).
Lemming
>Dan Fens <dfe...@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
>news:afcf4f93.01111...@posting.google.com...
>> "Daniel Blakemore" <dan...@blakemore81.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
>news:<9sp26c$14hk0u$1...@ID-12797.news.dfncis.de>...
>> > > Anyway, you've given me a good way to figure out who to killfile :D
>> > Thanks.
>> > Good. I don't have to listen to *your* whining, then.
>> You're glad you don't have to hear contrary opinions?
>
>...and aren't you meant to be kill-filing me? Or is your filter as leaky as
>Derek's? :)
Do pay attention Danny. D-Fens wasn't the one killfiling you.
Lemming
Doesn't your employer mind you posting from work, Dan? You know, you
really should pay attention to the history here. Some people on this
group have even gone so far as to contact people's employers to try to
get them fired from their job because they didn't like what they were
saying. I'd be very careful if I were you.
Daniel Blakemore
Uhh..he said..."Anyway, you've given me a good way to figure out who to
killfile :D" That pretty much sez that he's at least seriously considering
it... :)
Bill Huffman
As long as he's being a supporter I think he's probably safe. Of course if Dan
Brooks pledges that he will not contact Dan Fens employer then it would be time
to worry.
Lemming
>Lemming <l3m...@bumblbee.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
>news:f5u2vtcrbv8nv2m0d...@4ax.com...
>> "Daniel Blakemore" <dan...@blakemore81.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>> >Dan Fens <dfe...@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
>> >news:afcf4f93.01111...@posting.google.com...
>> >> "Daniel Blakemore" <dan...@blakemore81.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in
>message
>> >news:<9sp26c$14hk0u$1...@ID-12797.news.dfncis.de>...
>> >> > > Anyway, you've given me a good way to figure out who to killfile :D
>> >> > Thanks.
>> >> > Good. I don't have to listen to *your* whining, then.
>> >> You're glad you don't have to hear contrary opinions?
>> >...and aren't you meant to be kill-filing me? Or is your filter as leaky
>as
>> >Derek's? :)
>> Do pay attention Danny. D-Fens wasn't the one killfiling you.
>
>Uhh..he said..."Anyway, you've given me a good way to figure out who to
>killfile :D" That pretty much sez that he's at least seriously considering
>it... :)
Oh, dear. Even after a clue, you still don't get it. Yes, *someone*
said "you've given me a good way to figure out who to killfile", but
it wasn't D-Fens.
Would you like me to tell you who it was, or can you work it out for
yourself?
Richard
"Daniel Blakemore" <dan...@blakemore81.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:9sp26c$14hk0u$1...@ID-12797.news.dfncis.de...
> Good. I don't have to listen to *your* whining, then.
>
Your continual strive for acceptance, and your poorly contrived mimicry of
long term "detracting" is starting to grate.
Daniel Blakemore
Richard <t...@t.com> wrote in message news:3bf24...@news2.prserv.net...
*yaaaawn* Nice to see that Derek isn't the only idiot that likes making
things up or making insulting assumations without supporting evidence....
--
Daniel Blakemore - remove naespam from addy to reply
Daniel Blakemore
> "Daniel Blakemore" <dan...@blakemore81.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
> >Uhh..he said..."Anyway, you've given me a good way to figure out who to
> >killfile :D" That pretty much sez that he's at least seriously
considering
> >it... :)
> Oh, dear. Even after a clue, you still don't get it. Yes, *someone*
> said "you've given me a good way to figure out who to killfile", but
> it wasn't D-Fens.
> Would you like me to tell you who it was, or can you work it out for
> yourself?
...<looks closer>
...<squints a bit>
...
Oh nuts... That's what I get for posting without coffee....
--
Daniel Blakemore - remove naespam from addy to reply
Richard
>
> Richard <t...@t.com> wrote in message news:3bf24...@news2.prserv.net...
> > "Daniel Blakemore" <dan...@blakemore81.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
> > news:9sp26c$14hk0u$1...@ID-12797.news.dfncis.de...
> > > Good. I don't have to listen to *your* whining, then.
> > Your continual strive for acceptance, and your poorly contrived mimicry
of
> > long term "detracting" is starting to grate.
>
> *yaaaawn* Nice to see that Derek isn't the only idiot that likes making
> things up or making insulting assumations without supporting evidence....
>
> --
Why would I. You provide sufficient. Again.
Daniel Blakemore
Richard <t...@t.com> wrote in message news:3bf28...@news2.prserv.net...
No supporting evidence. Again :)
Louis J.M
He makes up for it in common sense.
Lemming
>
>Lemming <l3m...@bumblbee.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
>news:ut63vtc4op6cf63t8...@4ax.com...
>> "Daniel Blakemore" <dan...@blakemore81.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>> >Uhh..he said..."Anyway, you've given me a good way to figure out who to
>> >killfile :D" That pretty much sez that he's at least seriously
>considering
>> >it... :)
>> Oh, dear. Even after a clue, you still don't get it. Yes, *someone*
>> said "you've given me a good way to figure out who to killfile", but
>> it wasn't D-Fens.
>> Would you like me to tell you who it was, or can you work it out for
>> yourself?
>
>...<looks closer>
>
>...<squints a bit>
>
>...
>
>Oh nuts... That's what I get for posting without coffee....
... and a brain.
Lemming
>
>Richard <t...@t.com> wrote in message news:3bf24...@news2.prserv.net...
>> "Daniel Blakemore" <dan...@blakemore81.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
>> news:9sp26c$14hk0u$1...@ID-12797.news.dfncis.de...
>> > Good. I don't have to listen to *your* whining, then.
>> Your continual strive for acceptance, and your poorly contrived mimicry of
>> long term "detracting" is starting to grate.
>
>*yaaaawn* Nice to see that Derek isn't the only idiot that likes making
>things up or making insulting assumations without supporting evidence....
Ok, what's an assumation? Is it a religious term?
Dan Fens
> > > > > Good. I don't have to listen to *your* whining, then.
> > > > Your continual strive for acceptance, and your poorly contrived
> mimicry
> of
> > > > long term "detracting" is starting to grate.
> > > *yaaaawn* Nice to see that Derek isn't the only idiot that likes making
> > > things up or making insulting assumations without supporting
> evidence....
> > Why would I. You provide sufficient. Again.
>
> No supporting evidence. Again :)
Blakemore, you are a typical detractor. You are weakminded, and
desperately want to be one of the 'in-crowd'. On this group, you do
that by trying to attack Derek Smart, even though you have no real
credentials - you're just a hanger-on pretending he's one of the boys.
On RGMW, you did it by helping hound Erik Setzer off the group.
Don't you ever get tired of harassing innocent people just because
you're socially inadequate?
Dan Fens, PhD
Ron
Whoever you are, you definitely have Blakemore pegged.
Daniel Blakemore
> "Daniel Blakemore" <dan...@blakemore81.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
> >...<looks closer>
> >...<squints a bit>
> >...
> >Oh nuts... That's what I get for posting without coffee....
> ... and a brain.
No Coffee + baby daughter = no sleep and no brain :)
Daniel Blakemore
news:<9su90o$15i2qn$1...@ID-12797.news.dfncis.de>...
> > > > > > Good. I don't have to listen to *your* whining, then.
> > > > > Your continual strive for acceptance, and your poorly contrived
> > mimicry
> > of
> > > > > long term "detracting" is starting to grate.
> > > > *yaaaawn* Nice to see that Derek isn't the only idiot that likes
making
> > > > things up or making insulting assumations without supporting
> > evidence....
> > > Why would I. You provide sufficient. Again.
> > No supporting evidence. Again :)
> Blakemore, you are a typical detractor. You are weakminded, and
> desperately want to be one of the 'in-crowd'.
"Want to be one of the in-crowd"? That's funny...I don't see anything to
show that. Care to quote? I'll happily butt heads with anyone being an
arsehole.
On this group, you do
> that by trying to attack Derek Smart, even though you have no real
> credentials - you're just a hanger-on pretending he's one of the boys.
*yaaaawn* As opposed to an obvious troll like you? :)
> On RGMW, you did it by helping hound Erik Setzer off the group.
I suggest you check your facts and do a bit more research before mentioning
that idiot again. For everyone else's record, Setzer is RGMW's very own
Derek Smart, except with fewer credentials (if that's possible :) )
> Don't you ever get tired of harassing innocent people just because
> you're socially inadequate?
Don't you get tired of trolling because *you're* socially inadequate? :)
Daniel Blakemore
> "Daniel Blakemore" <dan...@blakemore81.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
> >*yaaaawn* Nice to see that Derek isn't the only idiot that likes making
> >things up or making insulting assumations without supporting evidence....
> Ok, what's an assumation? Is it a religious term?
Assumation, from assume...
Jak Crow
> "Daniel Blakemore" <dan...@blakemore81.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message news:<9su90o$15i2qn$1...@ID-12797.news.dfncis.de>...
>>
>
> Blakemore, you are a typical detractor. You are weakminded, and
> desperately want to be one of the 'in-crowd'. On this group, you do
> that by trying to attack Derek Smart, even though you have no real
> credentials - you're just a hanger-on pretending he's one of the boys.
> On RGMW, you did it by helping hound Erik Setzer off the group.
> Don't you ever get tired of harassing innocent people just because
> you're socially inadequate?
>
> Dan Fens, PhD
You forgot to refer to Derek as Dr Smart
Bret Ripley
>
> Lemming <l3m...@bumblbee.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:m1n5vtkunvjki2bp2...@4ax.com...
> > "Daniel Blakemore" <dan...@blakemore81.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
> > >*yaaaawn* Nice to see that Derek isn't the only idiot that likes making
> > >things up or making insulting assumations without supporting evidence....
> > Ok, what's an assumation? Is it a religious term?
>
> Assumation, from assume...
Right. As opposed to Assumption, from asumpt.
Bret
Bill Green
Bret Ripley
I hope he does Lemming next.
Bret
Louis J.M
Bill Green <bilg...@mb.sympatico.ca> wrote in message news:hGEI7.1466$7b2....@news1.mts.net...
I still maintain the gu..ahem, bloke, has more common sense then all of you
put together. I mean, look at Lemming, he killfiles me, and yet keeps every
thread I start going.
Bill Huffman
"Jak Crow" <new...@werewolves.org> wrote in message
news:bnEI7.4175$Le.1...@sea-read.news.verio.net...
It's already been established that Dan Fens is a liar and a fraud, given that it
shouldn't be surprising that he doesn't do what he says he will do as well.
Bill Huffman
When you're summing up asses, it's called assumation.
Daniel Blakemore
Ron <kra...@NOSPAMearthlink.net> wrote in message
news:k1EI7.41891$hZ.39...@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net...
> Whoever you are, you definitely have Blakemore pegged.
*yaaaawn*...
Twit.
Daniel Blakemore
<slaps own forehead>
...
I gotta get me some coffee.....
Daniel Blakemore
news:ij27vtgeeoqtqe1l2...@4ax.com...
> On 14 Nov 2001 15:24:24 -0800, dfe...@yahoo.com.au (Dan Fens) wrote:
> > On this group, you do
> >that by trying to attack Derek Smart, even though you have no real
> >credentials
> boorish, insulting liar?
> You see, Doc, I was once just like you. I defended Derek Smart
> right 'chere on this very newsgroup. I did it for a long time.
<snip>
Now watch the troll either *completely* ignore your post, or try to
smokescreen it by slinging yet more insults our way...
Espen Berntsen
>"Daniel Blakemore" <dan...@blakemore81.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message news:<9su90o$15i2qn$1...@ID-12797.news.dfncis.de>...
[thnip]
>> No supporting evidence. Again :)
>
>Blakemore, you are a typical detractor. You are weakminded, and
>desperately want to be one of the 'in-crowd'. On this group, you do
>that by trying to attack Derek Smart, even though you have no real
>credentials - you're just a hanger-on pretending he's one of the boys.
> On RGMW, you did it by helping hound Erik Setzer off the group.
>Don't you ever get tired of harassing innocent people just because
>you're socially inadequate?
Of course he is socially inadequate. I can even give you evidence to prove it,
since you forgot to include it in your post.
(muahaha!! AG must die!!!)
1) He managed to get on usenet.
2) He managed to find an obscure newsgroup dealing with flight sims.
3) He posts to usenet.
If he were socially adequate, he wouldn't even manage 1, cause he would be,
you know, talking to people and stuff.
--
Name, the leader of the nerd herd,
Daniel Blakemore
Espen Berntsen <name...@mo.himolde.no> wrote in message
> Of course he is socially inadequate. I can even give you evidence to prove
it,
> since you forgot to include it in your post.
> (muahaha!! AG must die!!!)
> 1) He managed to get on usenet.
> 2) He managed to find an obscure newsgroup dealing with flight sims.
> 3) He posts to usenet.
> If he were socially adequate, he wouldn't even manage 1, cause he would
be,
> you know, talking to people and stuff.
Heh...true... :)
Xan
news:XDJI7.35797$D5.13...@typhoon.san.rr.com...
> It's already been established that Dan Fens is a liar and a fraud, given
that it
> shouldn't be surprising that he doesn't do what he says he will do as well.
Ya know, these noble qualities remind me of a certain bargain bin individual
that can't be named... <g>
// Xan, Ph.D.
// I worship His Shadow.
Lemming
Lemming
>
>Ron <kra...@NOSPAMearthlink.net> wrote in message
>news:k1EI7.41891$hZ.39...@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net...
>> Whoever you are, you definitely have Blakemore pegged.
>
>*yaaaawn*...
Quick, get him some coffee. And put plenty of bromide in it so he
doesn't get tempted to sire any more offspring. Maybe we'll get the
old clear thinking Daniel back again.
>Twit.
Twat.
Lemming
Say what you like about Dan Fens, I think he's fun, I'm glad he came
out to play.
Brad Martin
If ever there was an unnecessary post...
brad
Lemming
Dan Fens
> rrevved <ed_...@nope.com> wrote in message
> news:ij27vtgeeoqtqe1l2...@4ax.com...
> > On 14 Nov 2001 15:24:24 -0800, dfe...@yahoo.com.au (Dan Fens) wrote:
> > > On this group, you do
> > >that by trying to attack Derek Smart, even though you have no real
> > >credentials
> > So, Sarge, what kind of 'credentials' do you need to spank a
> > boorish, insulting liar?
> > You see, Doc, I was once just like you. I defended Derek Smart
> > right 'chere on this very newsgroup. I did it for a long time.
> <snip>
>
> Now watch the troll either *completely* ignore your post, or try to
> smokescreen it by slinging yet more insults our way...
I wasn't insulting you. I was being honest. "rreved" is known to me
- and it's curious that one of his links takes you to a thread that
shows that Mr Bear was misquoted by Bill Huffman - who's the liar now?
But, of course, he's worshipped nonetheless, as the leader of this
little anti-Smart cult.
Dan Fens, PhD
Dan Fens
> Dan Fens <dfe...@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
> news:afcf4f93.01111...@posting.google.com...
> > "Daniel Blakemore" <dan...@blakemore81.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:<9su90o$15i2qn$1...@ID-12797.news.dfncis.de>...
> > > > > > > Good. I don't have to listen to *your* whining, then.
> > > > > > Your continual strive for acceptance, and your poorly contrived
> > > mimicry
> > > of
> > > > > > long term "detracting" is starting to grate.
> > > > > *yaaaawn* Nice to see that Derek isn't the only idiot that likes
> making
> > > > > things up or making insulting assumations without supporting
> evidence....
> > > > Why would I. You provide sufficient. Again.
> > > No supporting evidence. Again :)
> > Blakemore, you are a typical detractor. You are weakminded, and
> > desperately want to be one of the 'in-crowd'.
>
> "Want to be one of the in-crowd"? That's funny...I don't see anything to
> show that. Care to quote? I'll happily butt heads with anyone being an
> arsehole.
Nonsense. You behave in the way the group approves of - you just see
senior people in newsgroups and want to be part of their groups.
Remember how, in high school, there were some weeds who always hung
around and imitated the big kids? They thought they were cool but
everyone, including the people they were trying to suck up to, was
laughing at them behind their back. That's you.
> > On RGMW, you did it by helping hound Erik Setzer off the group.
>
> I suggest you check your facts and do a bit more research before mentioning
> that idiot again. For everyone else's record, Setzer is RGMW's very own
> Derek Smart, except with fewer credentials (if that's possible :) )
My father knew his father, and I assure you that most of what was
thrown around on that newsgroup was wrong.
Dan Fens, PhD
Xan
> How?
That should be obvious. =)
Xan
> DAMN!!!!!!
>
> I never thought he'd tell.
>
> That bitch.
Careful with the wording there, or Lemming might reply. <snicker>
Bill Huffman
Bill Huffman
What misquote of Dr. Bear is that? It looks like you are still the liar, Dan
Fens. You claim a bogus PhD that makes you a liar and a fraud.
> But, of course, he's worshipped nonetheless, as the leader of this
> little anti-Smart cult.
>
> Dan Fens, PhD
Now everyone don't forget to send me your tithe.
Daniel Blakemore
> I wasn't insulting you. I was being honest. "rreved" is known to me
> - and it's curious that one of his links takes you to a thread that
> shows that Mr Bear was misquoted by Bill Huffman - who's the liar now?
> But, of course, he's worshipped nonetheless, as the leader of this
> little anti-Smart cult.
*sigh*....
You were good at this to begin with...you really had us going. But you seem
to have lost your momentum.
On the troll-o-meter, I'd give ya 4/10...and that's being generous. You're
still *waaaay* behind Smart and Setzer.
--
Daniel Blakemore
Daniel Blakemore
> Now everyone don't forget to send me your tithe.
Will young virgins do? I'll send Dan Fens your way... :)
--
Daniel Blakemore
pjl
calling themselves "Bill ", did cause
<bG1J7.35940$D5.14...@typhoon.san.rr.com> to appear on my glass typewriter
and spake thus:
You want the left or the right?
pjl
change $ to s to email
coming soon! the exciting conclusion to A Battlecruiser Named Desire!
http://www.geocities.com/dosferatu_pjl/ABCND.html
Tom Beckmann
> "Daniel Blakemore" <dan...@blakemore81.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>
> >
> >Ron <kra...@NOSPAMearthlink.net> wrote in message
> >news:k1EI7.41891$hZ.39...@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net...
> >> Whoever you are, you definitely have Blakemore pegged.
> >
> >*yaaaawn*...
>
> Quick, get him some coffee. And put plenty of bromide in it so he
> doesn't get tempted to sire any more offspring. Maybe we'll get the
> old clear thinking Daniel back again.
What do mean... "back again"
If you'd said we may get a clear thinking Danial, then I'd
have merely accused you of unjustified optimism.
_________________
Tom
Lemming
It was sarcasm. I didn't realise you had suddenly become American,
Tom.
Now, get back to work. How's E4 coming along, BTW?
Lemming
>On 15 Nov 2001 15:19:46 -0800, dfe...@yahoo.com.au (Dan Fens) wrote:
>
>>"Daniel Blakemore" <dan...@blakemore81.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message news:<9t09p0$16f2l0$1...@ID-12797.news.dfncis.de>...
>>> rrevved <ed_...@nope.com> wrote in message
>>> news:ij27vtgeeoqtqe1l2...@4ax.com...
>>> > On 14 Nov 2001 15:24:24 -0800, dfe...@yahoo.com.au (Dan Fens) wrote:
>>> > > On this group, you do
>>> > >that by trying to attack Derek Smart, even though you have no real
>>> > >credentials
>>> > So, Sarge, what kind of 'credentials' do you need to spank a
>>> > boorish, insulting liar?
>>> > You see, Doc, I was once just like you. I defended Derek Smart
>>> > right 'chere on this very newsgroup. I did it for a long time.
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>> Now watch the troll either *completely* ignore your post, or try to
>>> smokescreen it by slinging yet more insults our way...
>>
>>I wasn't insulting you. I was being honest. "rreved" is known to me
>
>How?
In the Biblical sense?
Tom Beckmann
> "Tom Beckmann" <tbec...@frontier.co.uk> wrote:
>
> >"Lemming" <l3m...@bumblbee.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
> >news:p588vt0foqrso97i0...@4ax.com...
> >> "Daniel Blakemore" <dan...@blakemore81.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >Ron <kra...@NOSPAMearthlink.net> wrote in message
> >> >news:k1EI7.41891$hZ.39...@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net...
> >> >> Whoever you are, you definitely have Blakemore pegged.
> >> >
> >> >*yaaaawn*...
> >>
> >> Quick, get him some coffee. And put plenty of bromide in it so he
> >> doesn't get tempted to sire any more offspring. Maybe we'll get the
> >> old clear thinking Daniel back again.
> >
> >What do mean... "back again"
> >If you'd said we may get a clear thinking Danial, then I'd
> >have merely accused you of unjustified optimism.
>
> It was sarcasm.
I was explaining for Daniel's sake.
> I didn't realise you had suddenly become American,
> Tom.
I wouldn't get in.... I don't have the qualifications.
>
> Now, get back to work. How's E4 coming along, BTW?
Ermm E4. Yes.
Are you waiting for it?
_________________
Tom.
Lemming
Bret Ripley
>
> "Lemming" <l3m...@bumblbee.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:a5iavtcmakov4tp1j...@4ax.com...
> > "Tom Beckmann" <tbec...@frontier.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> > >"Lemming" <l3m...@bumblbee.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
> > >news:p588vt0foqrso97i0...@4ax.com...
> > >> "Daniel Blakemore" <dan...@blakemore81.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >> >Ron <kra...@NOSPAMearthlink.net> wrote in message
> > >> >news:k1EI7.41891$hZ.39...@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net...
> > >> >> Whoever you are, you definitely have Blakemore pegged.
> > >> >
> > >> >*yaaaawn*...
> > >>
> > >> Quick, get him some coffee. And put plenty of bromide in it so he
> > >> doesn't get tempted to sire any more offspring. Maybe we'll get the
> > >> old clear thinking Daniel back again.
> > >
> > >What do mean... "back again"
> > >If you'd said we may get a clear thinking Danial, then I'd
> > >have merely accused you of unjustified optimism.
> >
> > It was sarcasm.
>
> I was explaining for Daniel's sake.
>
> > I didn't realise you had suddenly become American,
> > Tom.
>
> I wouldn't get in.... I don't have the qualifications.
Repeat after me: 'Sked-yule'
Good! Now: 'Al-loom-in-um'
Bonus points for: 'Nuke-you-lar'
You're in, mate. Your single-wide is waiting for you.
Bret
Lemming
>Tom Beckmann wrote:
>>
>> "Lemming" <l3m...@bumblbee.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
>> news:a5iavtcmakov4tp1j...@4ax.com...
>> > "Tom Beckmann" <tbec...@frontier.co.uk> wrote:
>> >
>> > >"Lemming" <l3m...@bumblbee.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
>> > >news:p588vt0foqrso97i0...@4ax.com...
>> > >> "Daniel Blakemore" <dan...@blakemore81.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> >
>> > >> >Ron <kra...@NOSPAMearthlink.net> wrote in message
>> > >> >news:k1EI7.41891$hZ.39...@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net...
>> > >> >> Whoever you are, you definitely have Blakemore pegged.
>> > >> >
>> > >> >*yaaaawn*...
>> > >>
>> > >> Quick, get him some coffee. And put plenty of bromide in it so he
>> > >> doesn't get tempted to sire any more offspring. Maybe we'll get the
>> > >> old clear thinking Daniel back again.
>> > >
>> > >What do mean... "back again"
>> > >If you'd said we may get a clear thinking Danial, then I'd
>> > >have merely accused you of unjustified optimism.
>> >
>> > It was sarcasm.
>>
>> I was explaining for Daniel's sake.
>>
>> > I didn't realise you had suddenly become American,
>> > Tom.
>>
>> I wouldn't get in.... I don't have the qualifications.
Easy!
>Repeat after me: 'Sked-yule'
Shed-yule.
>Good! Now: 'Al-loom-in-um'
Al-you-mini-um.
>Bonus points for: 'Nuke-you-lar'
New-clee-are.
>You're in, mate. Your single-wide is waiting for you.
Where's de white women at?
Bill Huffman
"pjl" <do$fer...@msn.com> wrote in message news:9t33v...@drn.newsguy.com...
It should be ten percent of both.
Daniel Blakemore
Dan Fens <dfe...@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
news:afcf4f93.01111...@posting.google.com...
> "Daniel Blakemore" <dan...@blakemore81.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
> > "Want to be one of the in-crowd"? That's funny...I don't see anything
to
> > show that. Care to quote? I'll happily butt heads with anyone being an
> > arsehole.
> Nonsense. You behave in the way the group approves of - you just see
> senior people in newsgroups and want to be part of their groups.
> Remember how, in high school, there were some weeds who always hung
> around and imitated the big kids? They thought they were cool but
> everyone, including the people they were trying to suck up to, was
> laughing at them behind their back. That's you.
Absolute bullcrap :) Things aren't true merely because you say they are,
y'know.. :) No amount of bluster will change that.
> > > On RGMW, you did it by helping hound Erik Setzer off the group.
> > I suggest you check your facts and do a bit more research before
mentioning
> > that idiot again. For everyone else's record, Setzer is RGMW's very own
> > Derek Smart, except with fewer credentials (if that's possible :) )
> My father knew his father, and I assure you that most of what was
> thrown around on that newsgroup was wrong.
I'd do your research a bit better if I were you. Care to mention any
examples? Or are you all talk? Besides...aren't you in Aussie? :)
Daniel Blakemore
Dan Fens <dfe...@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
news:afcf4f93.01111...@posting.google.com...
> "Daniel Blakemore" <dan...@blakemore81.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
> > I suggest you check your facts and do a bit more research before
mentioning
> > that idiot again. For everyone else's record, Setzer is RGMW's very own
> > Derek Smart, except with fewer credentials (if that's possible :) )
> My father knew his father, and I assure you that most of what was
> thrown around on that newsgroup was wrong.
A quick test, just to find out whther or not you're talking out of your
arse.
On board which vessel did Erik's father serve? At what rank did he leave
the service? And under what discharge code did he leave?
Also...have you heard of a retired ex-Seal captain by the name of Larry
Bailey? (He's quite famous in the states) Perhaps a US Navy Chief at the
Navy's PR offices by the name of Todd Willebrand? If you've bothered to do
your research, you'll know why I'm asking... :)
Daniel Blakemore
Dan Fens <dfe...@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
news:afcf4f93.01111...@posting.google.com...
> "Daniel Blakemore" <dan...@blakemore81.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
> > I suggest you check your facts and do a bit more research before
mentioning
> > that idiot again. For everyone else's record, Setzer is RGMW's very own
> > Derek Smart, except with fewer credentials (if that's possible :) )
> My father knew his father, and I assure you that most of what was
> thrown around on that newsgroup was wrong.
I've just twigged...you actually know bugger all about Setzer. You've just
worked out how best to get a rise out of me.
Kudos, Mr Troll... :)
Dan Fens
> "Dan Fens" <dfe...@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
> news:afcf4f93.01111...@posting.google.com...
> > "Daniel Blakemore" <dan...@blakemore81.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:<9t09p0$16f2l0$1...@ID-12797.news.dfncis.de>...
> > > rrevved <ed_...@nope.com> wrote in message
> > > news:ij27vtgeeoqtqe1l2...@4ax.com...
> > > > On 14 Nov 2001 15:24:24 -0800, dfe...@yahoo.com.au (Dan Fens) wrote:
> > > > > On this group, you do
> > > > >that by trying to attack Derek Smart, even though you have no real
> > > > >credentials
> > > > So, Sarge, what kind of 'credentials' do you need to spank a
> > > > boorish, insulting liar?
> > > > You see, Doc, I was once just like you. I defended Derek Smart
> > > > right 'chere on this very newsgroup. I did it for a long time.
> > > <snip>
> > >
> > > Now watch the troll either *completely* ignore your post, or try to
> > > smokescreen it by slinging yet more insults our way...
> >
> > I wasn't insulting you. I was being honest. "rreved" is known to me
> > - and it's curious that one of his links takes you to a thread that
> > shows that Mr Bear was misquoted by Bill Huffman - who's the liar now?
>
> What misquote of Dr. Bear is that? It looks like you are still the liar, Dan
> Fens. You claim a bogus PhD that makes you a liar and a fraud.
Read the links, dopey - you should do your research before you run
your mouth off like that.
Dan Fens, PhD
Dan Fens
> Bill Huffman <bhuf...@REMOVE-THISsan.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:bG1J7.35940
> > Now everyone don't forget to send me your tithe.
>
> Will young virgins do? I'll send Dan Fens your way... :)
That is strictly personal, and shouldn't be a subject of this
flamewar. Accelerated programs do cut into your personal life, you
know.
Dan Fens, PhD
Dan Fens
> Dan Fens <dfe...@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
> news:afcf4f93.01111...@posting.google.com...
> > "Daniel Blakemore" <dan...@blakemore81.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:<9sv2qr$131t6d$1@ID-
> > > "Want to be one of the in-crowd"? That's funny...I don't see anything
> to
> > > show that. Care to quote? I'll happily butt heads with anyone being an
> > > arsehole.
> > Nonsense. You behave in the way the group approves of - you just see
> > senior people in newsgroups and want to be part of their groups.
> > Remember how, in high school, there were some weeds who always hung
> > around and imitated the big kids? They thought they were cool but
> > everyone, including the people they were trying to suck up to, was
> > laughing at them behind their back. That's you.
>
> Absolute bullcrap :) Things aren't true merely because you say they are,
> y'know.. :) No amount of bluster will change that.
See the endless smiley faces? You claim to be participating in a
flamewar, but you're still trying to make friends. You're just
desperate for approval - note that the regulars here don't like you.
> > > > On RGMW, you did it by helping hound Erik Setzer off the group.
> > > I suggest you check your facts and do a bit more research before
> mentioning
> > > that idiot again. For everyone else's record, Setzer is RGMW's very own
> > > Derek Smart, except with fewer credentials (if that's possible :) )
> > My father knew his father, and I assure you that most of what was
> > thrown around on that newsgroup was wrong.
>
> I'd do your research a bit better if I were you. Care to mention any
> examples? Or are you all talk? Besides...aren't you in Aussie? :)
Living here doesn't mean never leaving here. If you could hear some
of the stories Tom tells, you'd never dream of insulting a man who's
done the kind of things he's done.
Dan Fens, PhD
Dan Fens
> Dan Fens <dfe...@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
> news:afcf4f93.01111...@posting.google.com...
> > "Daniel Blakemore" <dan...@blakemore81.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:<9sv2qr$131t6d$1@ID-
> > > I suggest you check your facts and do a bit more research before
> mentioning
> > > that idiot again. For everyone else's record, Setzer is RGMW's very own
> > > Derek Smart, except with fewer credentials (if that's possible :) )
> > My father knew his father, and I assure you that most of what was
> > thrown around on that newsgroup was wrong.
>
> A quick test, just to find out whther or not you're talking out of your
> arse.
> On board which vessel did Erik's father serve? At what rank did he leave
> the service? And under what discharge code did he leave?
As I dimly recall, he was invalided out as an E-7. he was in one of
the SEAL teams, can't remember which.
Dan Fens, PhD
> Also...have you heard of a retired ex-Seal captain by the name of Larry
> Bailey? (He's quite famous in the states) Perhaps a US Navy Chief at the
> Navy's PR offices by the name of Todd Willebrand? If you've bothered to do
> your research, you'll know why I'm asking... :)
No, and no.
Dan Fens, PhD
Daniel Blakemore
Dan Fens <dfe...@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
news:afcf4f93.01111...@posting.google.com...
> "Daniel Blakemore" <dan...@blakemore81.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
> > Absolute bullcrap :) Things aren't true merely because you say they
are,
> > y'know.. :) No amount of bluster will change that.
> See the endless smiley faces? You claim to be participating in a
> flamewar, but you're still trying to make friends. You're just
> desperate for approval - note that the regulars here don't like you.
Making stuff up and assuming you know what I'm thinking is the fastest way
to make yourself look a prat. And as I've stated many times before, I
couldn't give a fuck what anyone thought of me.
> > > > > On RGMW, you did it by helping hound Erik Setzer off the group.
> > > > I suggest you check your facts and do a bit more research before
> > mentioning
> > > > that idiot again. For everyone else's record, Setzer is RGMW's very
own
> > > > Derek Smart, except with fewer credentials (if that's possible
:) )
> > > My father knew his father, and I assure you that most of what was
> > > thrown around on that newsgroup was wrong.
> >
> > I'd do your research a bit better if I were you. Care to mention any
> > examples? Or are you all talk? Besides...aren't you in Aussie? :)
>
> Living here doesn't mean never leaving here. If you could hear some
> of the stories Tom tells, you'd never dream of insulting a man who's
> done the kind of things he's done.
Has it occured to you that they're just stories? Has he told you the one
about the time he got hit by a .50 cal bullet in the hand? And that's why
he has bad arthritis in it? Despite the physics of the event being that his
hand and half his arm would be blown off by a shot of that calibre?
Daniel Blakemore
Dan Fens <dfe...@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
news:afcf4f93.01111...@posting.google.com...
> "Daniel Blakemore" <dan...@blakemore81.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
you're talking out of your
> > arse.
> > On board which vessel did Erik's father serve? At what rank did he
leave
> > the service? And under what discharge code did he leave?
> As I dimly recall, he was invalided out as an E-7.
Wrong. RE-R4, which means a dishonourable discharge. Ask him to show you
his DD-214. It's all there. Hell, look on the "Wall of Shame". He's on
there. http://www.cyberseals.org/wos.htm Hell, I even have a *copy* of
Tom's DD-214..it's not exactly confidential material!
> he was in one of
> the SEAL teams, can't remember which.
So he wants people to think. Yet no records of his BUD/S training exist.
Ask him for his training class number. He'll tell you it's "top secret",
but if you ask Larry or Todd, you'll find out just how full of BS Tom is is.
Tom will *also* claim he was a SEAL team sniper for Team six. Now, all the
sources, *including the CO of Team six*, will tell you that the SEALS didn't
use snipers during VN.
> Dan Fens, PhD
> > Also...have you heard of a retired ex-Seal captain by the name of Larry
> > Bailey? (He's quite famous in the states) Perhaps a US Navy Chief at
the
> > Navy's PR offices by the name of Todd Willebrand? If you've bothered to
do
> > your research, you'll know why I'm asking... :)
> No, and no.
These two people are the people to contact if you want to know if he's a
fake or not. Ask some of the yanks on this NG about Capt Bailey. He's been
on TV showing up fakes. http://www.midcoast.com/~waterman/higley.html
Have you got the guts to contact Capt Bailey? Have you got the guts to
visit these sites? Have you got the guts to call Tom on some of this? I
doubt it. As far as I can see, you're a chicken-shit troll who's intent on
riling people up. I doubt you'll even have the guts to reply to this post.
Hell, mail me privately if you want!
Bill Huffman
This post is another perfect Derek Smart imitation of a Derek Smart post that
has been proofread. This plus Dan Brooks claiming it is a detractor lends more
credence to it being Derek Smart.
Bill Huffman
You are a proven liar and fraud. I have not misquoted Dr. Bear. Perhaps you saw
a post where Delightfully Dense Dan couldn't believe that Dr. John Bear had
agreed to be an expert witness against Derek Smart should he actually file a
lawsuit. Dr. John Bear has brought down many academic frauds as well as helping
putting a few degree mill operators behind bars.
Louis J.M
> > What misquote of Dr. Bear is that? It looks like you are still the liar, Dan
> > Fens. You claim a bogus PhD that makes you a liar and a fraud.
>
> Read the links, dopey - you should do your research before you run
> your mouth off like that.
>
> Dan Fens, PhD
Wow, look, Dan is acting like a 10 year old, just like Derek. What a
cooincidence. How many people with Ph.D's do you know act like that?
.-~~-.____ Louis J.M
/ | ' \
( ) O _
\_/-, ,----' // E-Mail: Lou...@worldnet.att.net
==== ___// AIM : Zsinj
/ \-'~; /~~~(O) ---------------------------------------------------
/ __/~| __/ | "Any sufficiently advanced bullshit is
==(______| (_________| indistinguishable from magic."
Louis J.M
Bill Huffman <bhuf...@REMOVE-THISsan.rr.com> wrote in message news:0XZJ7.38097$D5.16...@typhoon.san.rr.com...
Come on, Bill. You don't really think that's him, do you? How would he be posting
from an Australian server then?
Louis J.M
> Has it occured to you that they're just stories? Has he told you the one
> about the time he got hit by a .50 cal bullet in the hand? And that's why
> he has bad arthritis in it? Despite the physics of the event being that his
> hand and half his arm would be blown off by a shot of that calibre?
That's ridiculous. His hand would likely be destroyed, but the 50.BMG (FMJ)
round would just blast through it, transferring hardly an energy whatsoever.
Louis J.M
> visit these sites? Have you got the guts to call Tom on some of this? I
> doubt it. As far as I can see, you're a chicken-shit troll who's intent on
> riling people up.
And doing a bang up job at it I might add!
Allan Parent
Allan
"Louis J.M" <Lou...@Worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:Cc_J7.117536$WW.73...@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
Louis J.M
Allan Parent <all...@charter.net> wrote in message news:tvh6uq2...@corp.supernews.com...
> Thats because he has no PhD. He is a troll.
>
> Allan
Brilliant deduction, teach. Now, go up to the chaukboard and write
10,000 times:
I will not reply to Dan Fens' trolls
I will not reply to Dan Fens' trolls
I will not reply to Dan Fens' trolls
I will not reply to Dan Fens' trolls
I will not reply to Dan Fens' trolls
I will not reply to Dan Fens' trolls
I will not reply to Dan Fens' trolls
I will not reply to Dan Fens' trolls
Dan Fens
> Dan Fens <dfe...@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
> news:afcf4f93.01111...@posting.google.com...
> > "Daniel Blakemore" <dan...@blakemore81.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:<9t697l$jonu$1@ID-> > A quick test, just to find out whther or not
> you're talking out of your
> > > arse.
> > > On board which vessel did Erik's father serve? At what rank did he
> leave
> > > the service? And under what discharge code did he leave?
> > As I dimly recall, he was invalided out as an E-7.
>
> Wrong. RE-R4, which means a dishonourable discharge. Ask him to show you
> his DD-214. It's all there. Hell, look on the "Wall of Shame". He's on
> there. http://www.cyberseals.org/wos.htm Hell, I even have a *copy* of
> Tom's DD-214..it's not exactly confidential material!
Blakemore, I'm warning you. You can't go around attacking the honesty
of people who were wounded in action. Tom is a far better man than
you will ever be. Insulting a combat veteran who was wounded
defending the freedoms that we all take for granted is beneath even
you. Such an action is indefensible, even by detractor standards.
> > he was in one of
> > the SEAL teams, can't remember which.
>
> So he wants people to think. Yet no records of his BUD/S training exist.
> Ask him for his training class number. He'll tell you it's "top secret",
> but if you ask Larry or Todd, you'll find out just how full of BS Tom is is.
> Tom will *also* claim he was a SEAL team sniper for Team six. Now, all the
> sources, *including the CO of Team six*, will tell you that the SEALS didn't
> use snipers during VN.
Harry Mattingley, trained sniper, deployed with Seal Team one. So
that's two. You obviously don't have a clue.
> > Dan Fens, PhD
> > > Also...have you heard of a retired ex-Seal captain by the name of Larry
> > > Bailey? (He's quite famous in the states) Perhaps a US Navy Chief at
> the
> > > Navy's PR offices by the name of Todd Willebrand? If you've bothered to
> do
> > > your research, you'll know why I'm asking... :)
> > No, and no.
>
> These two people are the people to contact if you want to know if he's a
> fake or not. Ask some of the yanks on this NG about Capt Bailey. He's been
> on TV showing up fakes. http://www.midcoast.com/~waterman/higley.html
>
> Have you got the guts to contact Capt Bailey? Have you got the guts to
> visit these sites? Have you got the guts to call Tom on some of this? I
> doubt it. As far as I can see, you're a chicken-shit troll who's intent on
> riling people up. I doubt you'll even have the guts to reply to this post.
> Hell, mail me privately if you want!
As for "guts", do you have the guts to admit that you were wrong?
Just listen to Tom's voice as he describes it. You must know him
well, to have personal documentation relating to him- why don't you
ask him outright? And as for his records, they were lost in a fire.
How about you present proof that he wasn't in the SEALS? You made
these heinous allegations, why don't you back them up?
I think you lost all credibility when you claimed that a .50 cal round
hitting someone in the hand would remove part of the arm - it would
punch through and keep going, without very much of its energy being
lost. No-one with half a brain cell working could fail to understand
that. You're mistaken about something, but you use that
misapprehension to abuse a vet. That's proof that you're not just
contemptible, you're stupid too.
Dan Fens, PhD
Dan Fens
> > This post is another perfect Derek Smart imitation of a Derek Smart post that
> > has been proofread. This plus Dan Brooks claiming it is a detractor lends more
> > credence to it being Derek Smart.
>
> Come on, Bill. You don't really think that's him, do you? How would he be posting
> from an Australian server then?
You don't think that after all these years of obssessive behaviour,
that Huffman can register a simple fact like 'my server's in
Australia, I couldn't possibly be in Florida.", do you?
Dan Fens, PhD
Brad Martin
>"Daniel Blakemore" <dan...@blakemore81.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message news:<9t9oll$17kfo$1...@ID-12797.news.dfncis.de>...
>> Dan Fens <dfe...@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
>> news:afcf4f93.01111...@posting.google.com...
>> > "Daniel Blakemore" <dan...@blakemore81.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
>> news:<9t697l$jonu$1@ID-> > A quick test, just to find out whther or not
>> you're talking out of your
>> > > arse.
>> > > On board which vessel did Erik's father serve? At what rank did he
>> leave
>> > > the service? And under what discharge code did he leave?
>> > As I dimly recall, he was invalided out as an E-7.
>>
>> Wrong. RE-R4, which means a dishonourable discharge. Ask him to show you
>> his DD-214. It's all there. Hell, look on the "Wall of Shame". He's on
>> there. http://www.cyberseals.org/wos.htm Hell, I even have a *copy* of
>> Tom's DD-214..it's not exactly confidential material!
>
>Blakemore, I'm warning you. You can't go around attacking the honesty
>of people who were wounded in action. Tom is a far better man than
>you will ever be. Insulting a combat veteran who was wounded
>defending the freedoms that we all take for granted is beneath even
>you. Such an action is indefensible, even by detractor standards.
Dan, I have no idea about the ins and outs of this argument, and have
no wish to become involved, but I take it you will be sending a copy
of the above paragraph to Derek, with 'Blakemore' replaced by 'Smart'.
After Derek famously slagged off a veteran, I know you'd want to
remain consistent.
brad
(who knows damn well he's getting he's chain pulled.
Louis J.M
Hey, how did this subject come up. Hey, you two ever heard of Richard
Marcinko? That guy is a bad_ass.
Louis J.M
> You don't think that after all these years of obssessive behaviour,
> that Huffman can register a simple fact like 'my server's in
> Australia, I couldn't possibly be in Florida.", do you?
>
> Dan Fens, PhD
How can I tell? Your using a Google account:
.worldnet.att.net!wnslaves3!wnmasters2!wn4feed!worldnet.att.net!144.212.100.101!newsfeed.mathworks.com!news.maxwell.syr.
edu!stdio!news.iac.net!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: dfe...@yahoo.com.au (Dan Fens)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.space-sim
Subject: Re: A typical detractor
Date: 18 Nov 2001 22:25:23 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <afcf4f93.01111...@posting.google.com>
References: <tuvbrnn...@corp.supernews.com> <9str00$1612vb$1...@ID-12797.news.dfncis.de> <3bf28...@news2.prserv.net>
<9su90o$15i2qn$1...@ID-12797.news.dfncis.de> <afcf4f93.01111...@posting.google.com>
<9sv2qr$131t6d$1...@ID-12797.news.dfncis.de> <afcf4f93.01111...@posting.google.com>
<9t68p8$kmh6$1...@ID-12797.news.dfncis.de> <afcf4f93.01111...@posting.google.com>
<0XZJ7.38097$D5.16...@typhoon.san.rr.com> <5f_J7.117538$WW.73...@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.9.193.32
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1006151123 14897 127.0.0.1 (19 Nov 2001 06:25:23 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups...@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 19 Nov 2001 06:25:23 GMT
Xref: wnmasters2 comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.space-sim:80524
X-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 06:25:25 GMT (bgtnsc06-news.ops.worldnet.att.net)
For all I know you could typing that out on a laptop with a wireless modem and
sitting on a rock where the World Trade Center used to be.
Daniel Blakemore
> > Has it occured to you that they're just stories? Has he told you the
one
> > about the time he got hit by a .50 cal bullet in the hand? And that's
why
> > he has bad arthritis in it? Despite the physics of the event being that
his
> > hand and half his arm would be blown off by a shot of that calibre?
> That's ridiculous. His hand would likely be destroyed, but the 50.BMG
(FMJ)
> round would just blast through it, transferring hardly an energy
whatsoever.
Exactly. It wouldn't just "give him bad arthritis"....
Daniel Blakemore
In other words, you're a chicken-shit troll.
> > > he was in one of
> > > the SEAL teams, can't remember which.
> >
> > So he wants people to think. Yet no records of his BUD/S training
exist.
> > Ask him for his training class number. He'll tell you it's "top
secret",
> > but if you ask Larry or Todd, you'll find out just how full of BS Tom is
is.
> > Tom will *also* claim he was a SEAL team sniper for Team six. Now, all
the
> > sources, *including the CO of Team six*, will tell you that the SEALS
didn't
> > use snipers during VN.
> Harry Mattingley, trained sniper, deployed with Seal Team one. So
> that's two. You obviously don't have a clue.
Wrong. Team six. And he was never used *as* a sniper. He was a trained
sniper, but they never used him as such during his time there. Is that so
hard to understand?
ROFLMAO! You've heard the "lost in a fire" story too, huh? Then why do I
have a scan of Tom's DD-214? Even if it *was* lost in a fire at his home,
it's easy enough to replace from Govt. records. Or are you being
deliberately dumb?
Let's see...you've heard it verbally from Tom. I've heard it verbally from
both a retired SEAL Capt and the US Navy PR office, and seen his DD-214.
Want me to put you in contact with them? Or are you still chicken-shit?
> I think you lost all credibility when you claimed that a .50 cal round
> hitting someone in the hand would remove part of the arm - it would
> punch through and keep going, without very much of its energy being
> lost.
As opposed to just giving him bad arthritis? :) Hell, that was straight
from Tom!
> No-one with half a brain cell working could fail to understand
> that. You're mistaken about something, but you use that
> misapprehension to abuse a vet. That's proof that you're not just
> contemptible, you're stupid too.
...and the fact that you won't look at the evidence I've put in front of
you? :)
Daniel Blakemore
ROFLMAO! I knew it!
Louis J.M
rrevved <ed_...@nope.com> wrote in message news:fpnhvtcq745atf1jl...@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 19 Nov 2001 09:46:21 GMT, "Louis J.M" <Lou...@Worldnet.att.net> wrote:
[Snip headers]
Thanks for the clarification. I'm still getting familiar with the Windows version of OE.
Louis J.M
Daniel Blakemore <dan...@blakemore81.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message news:9tamih$1ap01$1...@ID-12797.news.dfncis.de...
> Louis J.M <Lou...@Worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
> news:7x_J7.117562$WW.73...@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> > > Has it occured to you that they're just stories? Has he told you the
> one
> > > about the time he got hit by a .50 cal bullet in the hand? And that's
> why
> > > he has bad arthritis in it? Despite the physics of the event being that
> his
> > > hand and half his arm would be blown off by a shot of that calibre?
> > That's ridiculous. His hand would likely be destroyed, but the 50.BMG
> (FMJ)
> > round would just blast through it, transferring hardly an energy
> whatsoever.
>
> Exactly. It wouldn't just "give him bad arthritis"....
(Louis smacks Daniel over the head with a rolled up issue of National Geographic)