Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

hail

0 views
Skip to first unread message

amaro jackhammer

unread,
Sep 10, 2002, 5:44:50 PM9/10/02
to
applause to jeff oakley for his well-assembled thoughts in recent posts.
keep it up!

--
- scott. - http://www.nakedintruder.net
"interview yourself in your own magazine. interview bands on your label, too
(be sure to ask them how they got signed). when you ask yourself to name your
influences, mention only punk bands. you never listen to other bands who release
similar stuff as you. people reading the interview will actually believe you
were listening to a clash record when you hit upon the idea of layering samples
of german morticians over a keyboard drone and some thumping noises, and that
it's a fucking accident that all the "artists" on your label sound the same."

goatleg2

unread,
Sep 10, 2002, 6:03:04 PM9/10/02
to
In article <clarence-53232E...@news.mi.comcast.giganews.com>, amaro jackhammer wrote:
> applause to jeff oakley for his well-assembled thoughts in recent posts.
> keep it up!
>

please let this nonsense die

your sig is too damn big

--
goatleg2 - Loki Ambrodious von Esling
| os: Slackware 9.0beta, kernel: 2.4.19, WM: Fluxbox 0.1.10
| aim: g0atl3g2, icq: 55010836, y!: goatleg2

se7en veils

unread,
Sep 10, 2002, 6:22:36 PM9/10/02
to
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002 21:44:50 GMT, amaro jackhammer
<clar...@boddicker.org> wrote:

>applause to jeff oakley for his well-assembled thoughts in recent posts.
>keep it up!

::jerk-off motion::


so step right up and ride the rubber road to freedom......

synthefux0r

unread,
Sep 10, 2002, 6:48:18 PM9/10/02
to
"amaro jackhammer" <clar...@boddicker.org> wrote in message
news:clarence-53232E...@news.mi.comcast.giganews.com...

> applause to jeff oakley for his well-assembled thoughts in recent posts.
> keep it up!

thanks, scott. i'll try.
unless you're being sarcastic. if that's the case then uh... shut up.

--
[synthesizor]
"i'm going to get an ice cream." -bill rieflin
http://placidmusic.com


amaro jackhammer

unread,
Sep 10, 2002, 6:39:11 PM9/10/02
to
In article <slrnansr0t.mi.x23x...@g0atbook.attbi.com>,
how...@browncow.com wrote:

> please let this nonsense die
>
> your sig is too damn big


specially modified just for you:

amaro jackhammer

unread,
Sep 10, 2002, 6:49:04 PM9/10/02
to
In article <allsrn$1qmj7j$1...@ID-60856.news.dfncis.de>, "synthefux0r"
<synth...@earthlink.net> wrote:


> unless you're being sarcastic. if that's the case then uh... shut up.

hahah... not the case.

goatleg2

unread,
Sep 10, 2002, 6:51:08 PM9/10/02
to
In article <clarence-B011AA...@news.mi.comcast.giganews.com>, amaro jackhammer wrote:
> In article <slrnansr0t.mi.x23x...@g0atbook.attbi.com>,
> how...@browncow.com wrote:
>
>> please let this nonsense die
>>
>> your sig is too damn big
>
>
> specially modified just for you:
>

way to abuse the laws of usenet.

synthefux0r

unread,
Sep 10, 2002, 7:00:22 PM9/10/02
to
"goatleg2" <x23x-1987WT...@attbi.com> wrote in message
news:slrnanstr2.mi.x23x...@g0atbook.attbi.com...

> way to abuse the laws of usenet.

oh, boo-hoo. call the fucking internet police.

n8 aka Dr Funky Jesus and his Super Death Ray of Hate

unread,
Sep 10, 2002, 10:27:53 PM9/10/02
to
amaro jackhammer wrote:

> applause to jeff oakley for his well-assembled thoughts in recent posts.
> keep it up!
>
>

got a lil somethin brown on ya nose there

-n8

amaro jackhammer

unread,
Sep 10, 2002, 10:34:36 PM9/10/02
to
In article <3D7EAA29...@macalester.edu>, n8 aka Dr Funky Jesus and
his Super Death Ray of Hate <nfo...@macalester.edu> wrote:


> got a lil somethin brown on ya nose there
>
> -n8
>

It's soy sauce.

Brett Banditelli

unread,
Sep 10, 2002, 11:15:34 PM9/10/02
to
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002 21:44:50 GMT, amaro jackhammer
<clar...@boddicker.org> wrote:

>applause to jeff oakley for his well-assembled thoughts in recent posts.
>keep it up!

jeff oakley is my favorite ex-placid bassist:)

i still need to get the pics ov me and him devd, theyre so cute;)

Brett/banditelli
--
See parents, this is why you should keep your children tied down with a
rope until they are old enough to understand the consequences of their
actions. But beware, some children never develop this ability, and will
therefore never learn not to do moronic self-mutilating things. :-P
-Jesper Marksell

Brett Banditelli

unread,
Sep 10, 2002, 11:35:44 PM9/10/02
to
On 10 Sep 2002 22:51:08 GMT, goatleg2
<x23x-1987WT...@attbi.com> wrote:

>In article <clarence-B011AA...@news.mi.comcast.giganews.com>, amaro jackhammer wrote:
>> In article <slrnansr0t.mi.x23x...@g0atbook.attbi.com>,
>> how...@browncow.com wrote:
>>
>>> please let this nonsense die
>>>
>>> your sig is too damn big
>>
>>
>> specially modified just for you:
>>
>
>way to abuse the laws of usenet.

WE HAVE MORE POWER THAN THAT WHICH IS USENET

synthefux0r

unread,
Sep 11, 2002, 12:11:49 AM9/11/02
to
"Brett Banditelli" <ba...@pitt.edu> wrote in message
news:1adtnuka2h40842g0...@4ax.com...

> jeff oakley is my favorite ex-placid bassist:)

(live) guitarist, and studio programmin' guy. though i did play bass on a
couple of recordings.
actually i played quite a bit of guitar on the recordings too.

> i still need to get the pics ov me and him devd, theyre so cute;)

yeah, i want to see how all those pics from the whisky turned out. i'm
willing to bet i look like shit.
<3

Brett Banditelli

unread,
Sep 11, 2002, 8:48:57 AM9/11/02
to
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002 21:11:49 -0700, "synthefux0r"
<synth...@earthlink.net> wrote:

>"Brett Banditelli" <ba...@pitt.edu> wrote in message
>news:1adtnuka2h40842g0...@4ax.com...
>> jeff oakley is my favorite ex-placid bassist:)
>
>(live) guitarist, and studio programmin' guy. though i did play bass on a
>couple of recordings.
>actually i played quite a bit of guitar on the recordings too.
>
>> i still need to get the pics ov me and him devd, theyre so cute;)
>
>yeah, i want to see how all those pics from the whisky turned out. i'm
>willing to bet i look like shit.
><3

dont you always:) <3

Message has been deleted

Crudbreeder

unread,
Sep 12, 2002, 2:00:12 PM9/12/02
to
amaro airhorn wrote:
>
>
> I just gave anal birth to a thick green paste. I think it's from
> eating nothing but boo berry cereal (only available for the fall
> season, start hoarding now), almonds, and sushi with a high wasabi
> content for the past few days.

I am soo happy to share this moment with you. <3

Mine is more kindof umbra

--
Old, FForEign aNd Drunken Minister
--
"Please exchange and twist, and give up"

Billl

unread,
Sep 12, 2002, 3:47:06 PM9/12/02
to
amaro airhorn remarked on 12 Sep 2002, to alt.music.mdfmk:

>boo berry cereal (only available for the fall
>season, start hoarding now),

/\
Yep, I live on a boo berries farm, and we can only harvest them at the end
of summer. Never fear, we are working on some green house techniques, and
with a few South American governments to bring you those boo berries year-
around.
Trust me when I say crunch berries are much easier to grow, they just
aren't considered a cash crop like boo berries.
--
Billl with three buttdarts <3<3<3
aim low, kids: billlwith3ls
http://shinu.hn.org/billl/

Billl

unread,
Sep 12, 2002, 3:50:24 PM9/12/02
to
Crudbreeder remarked on 12 Sep 2002, to alt.music.mdfmk:

>Mine is more kindof umbra

/\
Are you so ^^flapp^^ you shit black?
I hope you mean 'umber', earthy brown; not 'umbra', shaded. Maybe you like
to turn the light off when you're in there?

goatleg2

unread,
Sep 12, 2002, 3:49:49 PM9/12/02
to
In article <12639bde.02091...@posting.google.com>, amaro airhorn wrote:
> goatleg2 <x23x-1987WT...@attbi.com> wrote in message news:<slrnanstr2.mi.x23x...@g0atbook.attbi.com>...
>
>> way to abuse the laws of usenet.
>
> While we're on the topic of law, here's one I assume you're familiar
> with:
>

while we're bible thumping (which is something i hate) i'll point you to

Ecc 3:19
"The lot of man and the lot of beast is of the same, and man has no
advantage over the beast, for all is vanity."

and the fact that the over-the-top laws of the Torah were written to
keep the early hebrews in line and not turn to idolatry, and the fact
that they remain in the Christian bible is to show how fucked-up life
was back then before Jesus came and was all "do unto others".

Fundies on the other hand, take it word to word. This country was
founded by fundamentalist protestants, thus we have laws against
homosexual marriages, bestaility taboo, abortion, etc.

Now that i'm bashing them. I may not agree with their ways but that's
how they are, although it generally fucks up alot of things.

Notice that countries like Germany and the other sane european countries
don't have laws like this, and Bush seems like a revival of the early
days of presidents. yeesh.

Crudbreeder

unread,
Sep 12, 2002, 3:56:33 PM9/12/02
to
Billl wrote:
>
> Crudbreeder remarked on 12 Sep 2002, to alt.music.mdfmk:
>
> >Mine is more kindof umbra
> /\
> Are you so ^^flapp^^ you shit black?
> I hope you mean 'umber', earthy brown; not 'umbra', shaded. Maybe you like
> to turn the light off when you're in there?

Yes, I ment 'umber', please forgive me dear Mr. Elitist Prick!


np: Wiseblood - Grease Nipples
This is something Phil should listen to...
"I'd like to strap you on sometime"

synthefux0r

unread,
Sep 12, 2002, 4:21:10 PM9/12/02
to
"goatleg2" <x23x-1987WT...@attbi.com> wrote in message
news:slrnao1rv3.6q.x23x...@g0atbook.attbi.com...

> Ecc 3:19
> "The lot of man and the lot of beast is of the same, and man has no
> advantage over the beast, for all is vanity."

that means you should be their friend and not enslave them or kill them for
fun. it doesn't mean you should get freaky with them.

amaro jackhammer

unread,
Sep 12, 2002, 6:11:39 PM9/12/02
to
In article <3D80D62C...@psynet.net>, Crudbreeder
<TJONKcru...@psynet.net> wrote:


> Mine is more kindof umbra

"what the fuck is umber, and who fucking burnt it?"

Josh Hammonds

unread,
Sep 12, 2002, 7:48:48 PM9/12/02
to
"goatleg2" <x23x-1987WT...@attbi.com> wrote in message
news:slrnao1rv3.6q.x23x...@g0atbook.attbi.com...

> Notice that countries like Germany and the other sane european countries
> don't have laws like this, and Bush seems like a revival of the early
> days of presidents. yeesh.

Bush seems like a revival of the early days of cavemen.

Josh Hammonds
---
jos...@aol.com
><]]]*>
Rivethead Extraordinaire
"When I grow up, I want to be a Transformer."


Jesster

unread,
Sep 12, 2002, 8:24:15 PM9/12/02
to
"goatleg2" <x23x-1987WT...@attbi.com> wrote in message
news:slrnao1rv3.6q.x23x...@g0atbook.attbi.com...

> >> way to abuse the laws of usenet.

i didn't think usenet courtesies applied to amm... <scraches chin
thoughtfully>

> Ecc 3:19
> "The lot of man and the lot of beast is of the same, and man has no
> advantage over the beast, for all is vanity."

i have to <gasp> agree with synth on this one. does not apply to WHERE YUO
PUT TEH PENIS.

*** athiests need not read further, this is religious talk now, hehe ***

> and the fact that the over-the-top laws of the Torah were written to
> keep the early hebrews in line and not turn to idolatry, and the fact

i agree here. also since tattoos back then were generally of a religious or
idolatrous nature, you can add that to the list of torah rules that may not
apply today.

> that they remain in the Christian bible is to show how fucked-up life
> was back then before Jesus came and was all "do unto others".
>
> Fundies on the other hand, take it word to word. This country was
> founded by fundamentalist protestants, thus we have laws against
> homosexual marriages, bestaility taboo, abortion, etc.

notice that those examples all are in regards to sex. not all that is
fundamentalist is bad. i have a tremendous amount of respect for purity.
it's something very simple and also very rare. and it can apply to almost
every area in our life. i still view sex as something special, and the
ideas that homosexuality, bestiality, casual sex and the inevitable abortion
issue that comes [mostly] from casual sex are ok is up to debate. they may
be socially acceptable and perhaps even trendy, but that does not mean that
they are compatible with spiritual integrity. for those that have no
spiritual integrity, they at least have an excuse. for those who claim to
be spiritual, however, it simply makes them hypocritical. if i had to sum
the real world applications of christianity up in one verse, it's this one:

"finally, brethren, whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are
honest, whatsoever things are just, whatsoever things are pure, whatsoever
things are lovely, whatsoever things are of good report; if there be any
virtue, if there be any praise, think on these things." phillipians 4:8

by the way, this was not meant to be taken as a flame. just discussion...

jesse
do we need a religious thread like we have ebay and desktop threads?
--
http://members.cox.net/sirj944/main.html
np » nothing
- the greatest good for the greatest number -


Billl

unread,
Sep 12, 2002, 9:22:44 PM9/12/02
to
Crudbreeder remarked on 12 Sep 2002, to alt.music.mdfmk:

>Yes, I ment 'umber', please forgive me dear Mr. Elitist Prick!
/\
Hey, I only corrected you because I thought it was a funny mix up of words
that I would expect anyone could make. Don't get bent.

Jesster

unread,
Sep 12, 2002, 9:33:01 PM9/12/02
to
"Billl" <jeze...@notmail.com> wrote in message
news:9287C51A2...@130.133.1.4...

> >Yes, I ment 'umber', please forgive me dear Mr. Elitist Prick!
> /\
> Hey, I only corrected you because I thought it was a funny mix up of words
> that I would expect anyone could make. Don't get bent.

yes. besides, crud, you speak better english than most ammers. and all
those... funny named colors are for sissies! hehe

jesse
--
http://members.cox.net/sirj944/main.html
np » front line assembly - masterslave [wumpscut mix]

Josh Hammonds

unread,
Sep 12, 2002, 10:35:04 PM9/12/02
to
"Jesster" <sir...@cox.net> wrote in message
news:Peag9.20034$Pf7.6...@news1.west.cox.net...

> notice that those examples all are in regards to sex. not all that is
> fundamentalist is bad. i have a tremendous amount of respect for purity.

Why does sex make you dirty?

SonOfAGun

unread,
Sep 12, 2002, 10:48:52 PM9/12/02
to
> > notice that those examples all are in regards to sex. not all that is
> > fundamentalist is bad. i have a tremendous amount of respect for
purity.
>
> Why does sex make you dirty?

because he always cums all over his hands and stomach

--
:/SonOfAGun !! - POEE Legionairre of the Legion of Dynamic Discord
:\np: nein!


Jesster

unread,
Sep 12, 2002, 11:09:14 PM9/12/02
to
"Josh Hammonds" <jos...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:alrisf$g8fo$1...@ID-62018.news.dfncis.de...

> "Jesster" <sir...@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:Peag9.20034$Pf7.6...@news1.west.cox.net...
> > notice that those examples all are in regards to sex. not all that is
> > fundamentalist is bad. i have a tremendous amount of respect for
purity.
>
> Why does sex make you dirty?

sex isn't dirty. i never said it was. but the way it's used for nothing
more than gratification, you have to admit that when you think of purity,
going doggystyle with some girl you just met at a college party in her
parents' bedroom isn't the first thing that comes to mind.

jesse
--
http://members.cox.net/sirj944/main.html
np » kmfdm - don't blow your top

Josh Hammonds

unread,
Sep 12, 2002, 11:14:38 PM9/12/02
to
"Jesster" <sir...@cox.net> wrote in message
news:uFcg9.20934$Pf7.7...@news1.west.cox.net...

> > Why does sex make you dirty?
>
> sex isn't dirty. i never said it was. but the way it's used for nothing
> more than gratification, you have to admit that when you think of purity,
> going doggystyle with some girl you just met at a college party in her
> parents' bedroom isn't the first thing that comes to mind.

Ah, ok, I can see your point.

Jesster

unread,
Sep 12, 2002, 11:15:23 PM9/12/02
to
"Josh Hammonds" <jos...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:alrl6l$hauq$1...@ID-62018.news.dfncis.de...

> > > Why does sex make you dirty?
> >
> > sex isn't dirty. i never said it was. but the way it's used for
nothing
> > more than gratification, you have to admit that when you think of
purity,
> > going doggystyle with some girl you just met at a college party in her
> > parents' bedroom isn't the first thing that comes to mind.
>
> Ah, ok, I can see your point.

of course, soag had a valid point, too... <blushes>

jesse
--
http://members.cox.net/sirj944/main.html
np » kmfdm - liebeslied leibesleid

synthefux0r

unread,
Sep 13, 2002, 12:00:21 AM9/13/02
to
"Jesster" <sir...@cox.net> wrote in message
news:uFcg9.20934$Pf7.7...@news1.west.cox.net...

> sex isn't dirty. i never said it was. but the way it's used for nothing
> more than gratification, you have to admit that when you think of purity,
> going doggystyle with some girl you just met at a college party in her
> parents' bedroom isn't the first thing that comes to mind.

what is the problem, if both parties are consentual and no harm is done?
humpin's natural. we all have a sex drive. what you're talking about is
repressing natural urges.
i mean, i do feel that we have a responsibility to repress animal instincts
to a degree (don't rape, don't murder, etc.). but come on, you only live
once.
i'm not saying sex should be one's priority in life, i'm just saying i think
that purity is pointless.
if you don't want to have sex (or just not casual sex, or whatever), that's
cool. but i've never heard a good, solid reason for not doing it. with
substance use, there's the excuse that it messes up your body. what's the
argument against protected sex? i often suspect that the purity thing is a
facade, and pure folk are actually scared of sex, scared to try sex, and/or
just ashamed to admit they have trouble getting it.
i barely get any sex, but i enjoy the hell out of what i do get. why
shouldn't i?

the bottom line is, for whatever creationary or evolutionary reason, sex is
fun and it feels good. it's also harmless (with proper protection).
soooo.... what's the problem?

Jesster

unread,
Sep 13, 2002, 12:25:13 AM9/13/02
to
"synthefux0r" <synth...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:alrnt4$gl4j$1...@ID-60856.news.dfncis.de...

> what is the problem, if both parties are consentual and no harm is done?

i think we can agree that it's simply whether or not you choose to strive
for purity or not. if you don't care either way, then it's simply an issue
of consent. if you decide to strive for purity, then it's either put up or
shut up. otherwise you look like a fool. that's the catch. i /try/ not to
opt for the fool option. :-)

jesse
--
http://members.cox.net/sirj944/main.html
np » kmfdm - no peace

Workbreeder

unread,
Sep 13, 2002, 3:49:45 AM9/13/02
to
Jesster wrote:
>
> "Josh Hammonds" <jos...@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:alrisf$g8fo$1...@ID-62018.news.dfncis.de...
> > "Jesster" <sir...@cox.net> wrote in message
> > news:Peag9.20034$Pf7.6...@news1.west.cox.net...
> > > notice that those examples all are in regards to sex. not all that is
> > > fundamentalist is bad. i have a tremendous amount of respect for
> purity.
> >
> > Why does sex make you dirty?
>
> sex isn't dirty. i never said it was. but the way it's used for nothing
> more than gratification, you have to admit that when you think of purity,
> going doggystyle with some girl you just met at a college party in her
> parents' bedroom isn't the first thing that comes to mind.

You americans are strange...

Workbreeder

unread,
Sep 13, 2002, 3:47:53 AM9/13/02
to
Billl wrote:
>
> Crudbreeder remarked on 12 Sep 2002, to alt.music.mdfmk:
>
> >Yes, I ment 'umber', please forgive me dear Mr. Elitist Prick!
> /\
> Hey, I only corrected you because I thought it was a funny mix up of words
> that I would expect anyone could make. Don't get bent.

:p

jo...@amnin.com

unread,
Sep 13, 2002, 9:44:07 AM9/13/02
to
Jesster <sir...@cox.net> wrote:

> i agree here. also since tattoos back then were generally of a religious or
> idolatrous nature, you can add that to the list of torah rules that may not
> apply today.

afaik, you still can't get buried in a jewish cemetery if you have
tattoos (of course, holocaust related tattoos are an exception). good
thing i'm going to be cremated (which is also a no-no)

*shrug* if i wanted to be buried in a jewish cemetery, my gentile
husband wouldn't be allowed in anyway (not to mention his tattoos too!)

love and friends,
jody :)

--
********************************************************************************
jody tamar cross :) (jo-jo on #amnin NewNet & #nin EFnet) e-mail:jo...@amnin.com
"stay sane inside insanity" - columbia
"fare thee well...let your life proceed by its own design." - gd

<honeybee> i mean really...what twisted god put me and jody together!?!?

http://www.amnin.com/jojo *** http://www.amnin.com

http://www.livejournal.com/users/j0j0bean

Jesster

unread,
Sep 13, 2002, 5:21:32 PM9/13/02
to
"Workbreeder" <TJONG.cr...@psynet.net> wrote in message
news:3D819899...@psynet.net...

> > sex isn't dirty. i never said it was. but the way it's used for
nothing
> > more than gratification, you have to admit that when you think of
purity,
> > going doggystyle with some girl you just met at a college party in her
> > parents' bedroom isn't the first thing that comes to mind.
>
> You americans are strange...

like yuo are any better, yuo crazy swede. doggystyle isn't just for
americans, doggystyle is for everyone! besides, wooden goats are hard and
difficult to mount.

jesse
--
http://members.cox.net/sirj944/main.html
np » nothing

Crudbreeder

unread,
Sep 13, 2002, 5:30:29 PM9/13/02
to
Jesster wrote:
>
> like yuo are any better, yuo crazy swede. doggystyle isn't just for
> americans, doggystyle is for everyone! besides, wooden goats are hard and
> difficult to mount.

Not to mention, they are dangerous to ride down steep slopes and are
higly unstable at high speeds...

--
Old, FForEign aNd Drunken Minister
--

"doggystyle isn't just for americans, doggystyle is for everyone!"

~Jesster

Billl

unread,
Sep 14, 2002, 3:30:33 AM9/14/02
to
synthefux0r remarked on 12 Sep 2002, to alt.music.mdfmk:

> it messes up your body. what's the
>argument against protected sex?

/\
It messes you up your EMOTIONS.

Drago

unread,
Sep 14, 2002, 11:05:54 AM9/14/02
to

"Jesster" <sir...@cox.net> wrote in message
news:uFcg9.20934$Pf7.7...@news1.west.cox.net...

> "Josh Hammonds" <jos...@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:alrisf$g8fo$1...@ID-62018.news.dfncis.de...
> > "Jesster" <sir...@cox.net> wrote in message
> > news:Peag9.20034$Pf7.6...@news1.west.cox.net...
> > > notice that those examples all are in regards to sex. not all that is
> > > fundamentalist is bad. i have a tremendous amount of respect for
> purity.
> >
> > Why does sex make you dirty?
>
> sex isn't dirty. i never said it was. but the way it's used for nothing
> more than gratification, you have to admit that when you think of purity,
> going doggystyle with some girl you just met at a college party in her
> parents' bedroom isn't the first thing that comes to mind.
>

if you met a girl at a college party why would you be in her parent's
bedroom?

-=john=-


0 new messages