Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Somewhat surprised... but not really.

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Mr. Skutter

unread,
Sep 15, 2003, 5:16:51 PM9/15/03
to
Red Dwarf: The Movie: Originally slated to begin production next
month, it looks like a film version of the cult smash sci-fi sitcom
has pushed back its start of shooting date again to next year. Talking
to Sci-Fi Online, 'The Cat' himself Danny John-Jules said "Well... the
latest is that it's definitely going to start filming in the New Year.
I say 'definitely' but a few years of saying 'definitely' is not very
reliable [laughs]. That's the latest that I've heard from the horse's
mouth - i.e. Doug Naylor. I can only go by that really. Filming is due
to start in Australia on the Gold Coast early in 2004". Thanks to
'Cyberd'.

From http://www.darkhorizons.com/news.htm

--
You've reached Mr. Skutter's .sig.

But do you believe it?

Cathe B

unread,
Sep 15, 2003, 5:41:30 PM9/15/03
to

hmmmm was that shock on my face. or just ennui

C

Ang Rosin

unread,
Sep 15, 2003, 5:58:28 PM9/15/03
to
Ooooh, look! Mr. Skutter
<Benton7@***REMOVE-THIS-SPAMBLOCK***xtra.co.nz> said:

*yawns*

Ang

tactilefan

unread,
Sep 16, 2003, 6:03:01 PM9/16/03
to
They're all so old now they'll need to call the film Future Echoes 2

"Ang Rosin" <ang_...@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
news:3f6735f6...@news.CIS.DFN.DE...

justbob

unread,
Sep 22, 2003, 4:56:47 PM9/22/03
to

"Cathe B" <cat...@catheb.NOcomSPAMCom> wrote in message
news:emq9b.4539$UN4....@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
My personal theory is that it was a small shaved hamster... but thats just a
theory.
--
justbob (or a small flowering shrub. I'm not sure at the moment.)


bewtifulfreak

unread,
Sep 23, 2003, 1:33:16 AM9/23/03
to
People as funny as you should be outlawed - or confined to an institution,
even - but I'm very glad you're not; depressed people like me need something
to smile about (at least until they come and drag us to the institution and
feed us those really strong drugs that leave us chemically lobotomized and
drooling on our hospital gowns)....

Ann

--

http://www.angelfire.com/ca/bewtifulfreak

justbob

unread,
Sep 23, 2003, 3:48:08 PM9/23/03
to

"bewtifulfreak" <bewtifulfr...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:bkolvs$42n22$1...@ID-203359.news.uni-berlin.de...

> People as funny as you should be outlawed - or confined to an institution,
> even - but I'm very glad you're not; depressed people like me need
something
> to smile about (at least until they come and drag us to the institution
and
> feed us those really strong drugs that leave us chemically lobotomized and
> drooling on our hospital gowns)....
>
> Ann
>
I'm somewhat confused as to what you might have found amusing.... unless
your claiming that you've never woken up after a night of bar hopping with a
shaved hamster on your face... and I think we all know how unlikely that is.
On a side note I think I am illegal in Kentucky... but that's another story,
and not one I'll admit to. Besides, I swear the goat was the one driving.

Do let me know if I can un-depress you in any way . For now I reccomend back
to back watchings of "life of brian", "monty python and the holy grail","the
end" (burt reynolds, not the red dwarf episode)and "return of the living
dead part 2" (aka "you mean it wasn't supposed to be that funny? Then why
did we do the zombie micheal jackson bit?"... an unworkable title as you can
see, so the shorter one was chosen). I'd have reccomended Red Dwarf but you
would have been expecting that and as we all know, no body expects yada yada
yada

(you forgot the best part of happy acadamies... the huggy jackets. You know,
the ones that tie in the back).
--
justbob (morphine makes the world a better place... but it makes me chatty
any correct spellings in this missive are pure coincidence)


bewtifulfreak

unread,
Sep 23, 2003, 5:21:48 PM9/23/03
to
justbob wrote:

> I'm somewhat confused as to what you might have found amusing....
> unless your claiming that you've never woken up after a night of bar
> hopping with a shaved hamster on your face... and I think we all know
> how unlikely that is. On a side note I think I am illegal in
> Kentucky... but that's another story, and not one I'll admit to.
> Besides, I swear the goat was the one driving.

<Ann bursts into another uncontrollable giggle fit, releasing the ever
elusive seritonin and endorphines gang, and thus, having to run and catch
them again>


> Do let me know if I can un-depress you in any way .

Ever so kind of you.... :)


For now I
> reccomend:

Ah, but of course....pure elixir!

[note to self: watch recommended movies owned, rent ones not owned, do so
ASAP before drowning in big sloppy puddle of spontaneous unwarrented
tearage]


I'd have reccomended Red Dwarf but you would
> have been expecting that and as we all know, no body expects yada
> yada yada

Besides, no recommendation needed - one of my most overused, though highly
efficient, survival tools....


> (you forgot the best part of happy acadamies... the huggy jackets.
> You know, the ones that tie in the back).

Why you're absolutely right, how could I forget? And here's me so in need
of a hug....

[note to self: call happy academy and inquire as to the price of huggy
jacket, find someone to do it up for me, lay on couch watching recommended
movies wrapped in warmth of self-love, or reasonable facsimile thereof]

Cheers, bob - they should sell you in a bottle (or sell you a bottle, either
way)....

Big Jacket Hugs,
Ann

--

http://www.angelfire.com/ca/bewtifulfreak


justbob

unread,
Sep 23, 2003, 7:37:58 PM9/23/03
to

"bewtifulfreak" <bewtifulfr...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:bkqdid$4pna2$1...@ID-203359.news.uni-berlin.de...
> justbob wrote:
<snip>

> Cheers, bob - they should sell you in a bottle
<snip>
>Big Jacket Hugs,
> Ann
>
so your saying that I should be imprisoned in a bottle, left to starve and
eventually drown in my own wastes????
Sherry? Is that you?? You still havent given be back my tapes. We haven't
dated in over 4 years, let it go.
--
justbob (now if the bottle was filled with ammeretto... different story
entirely)


bewtifulfreak

unread,
Sep 24, 2003, 1:07:40 AM9/24/03
to
justbob wrote:
> "bewtifulfreak" <bewtifulfr...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:bkqdid$4pna2$1...@ID-203359.news.uni-berlin.de...

>> Cheers, bob - they should sell you in a bottle

> so your saying that I should be imprisoned in a bottle, left to


> starve and eventually drown in my own wastes????

I would *never*....!


> justbob (now if the bottle was filled with ammeretto... different story
entirely)

*That's* the one :)

Ann

--

http://www.angelfire.com/ca/bewtifulfreak


Hercule Platini

unread,
Sep 26, 2003, 6:58:25 PM9/26/03
to

"bewtifulfreak" <bewtifulfr...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:bkolvs$42n22$1...@ID-203359.news.uni-berlin.de...

> People as funny as you should be outlawed - or confined to an institution,
> even - but I'm very glad you're not; depressed people like me need
something
> to smile about (at least until they come and drag us to the institution
and
> feed us those really strong drugs that leave us chemically lobotomized and
> drooling on our hospital gowns)....


I find that five minutes with a Judy Garland CD has much the same effect.
And it's cheaper than the drugs (and, sadly, legal).

Speaking of which, a bunch of sadistic mind-buggering bastardarinos have
unleashed a singalong version of The Wizard Of Oz on the London populace.
This follows on from singalong versions of The Sound of Music, Annie, Joseph
and his Amazing Technicolour Thingy and probably two or three other hideous
pieces of hideousness as well. Personally I'm waiting for a singalong South
Park, because I know 90% of the words and I do own a hooded anorak. Okay,
it's not dayglo orange, but I could get some paint.

--
Captain Hercule "Ron" Platini

Ningy nongy nob nob neeble narble noo.
Nub nub nibberty nob narby nibberty neeb.


Hercule Platini

unread,
Sep 26, 2003, 6:58:27 PM9/26/03
to

"justbob" <no...@hamster.net> wrote in message
news:vn18rns...@corp.supernews.com...

>
> Do let me know if I can un-depress you in any way . For now I reccomend
back
> to back watchings of "life of brian", "monty python and the holy
grail","the
> end" (burt reynolds, not the red dwarf episode)and "return of the living
> dead part 2" (aka "you mean it wasn't supposed to be that funny? Then why
> did we do the zombie micheal jackson bit?"... an unworkable title as you
can
> see, so the shorter one was chosen). I'd have reccomended Red Dwarf but
you
> would have been expecting that and as we all know, no body expects yada
yada
> yada


I was sort of with you until you mentioned ROTLD2, which I'm afraid is as
piss poor as very poor piss. I hated it. I really hated it. I really,
really hated it. I reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeally hated it.

justbob

unread,
Sep 26, 2003, 8:15:52 PM9/26/03
to

"Hercule Platini" <ningy...@nobnob.com> wrote in message
news:bl2gag$l4o$9...@titan.btinternet.com...

>
> "bewtifulfreak" <bewtifulfr...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:bkolvs$42n22$1...@ID-203359.news.uni-berlin.de...
> > People as funny as you should be outlawed - or confined to an
institution,
> > even - but I'm very glad you're not; depressed people like me need
> something
> > to smile about (at least until they come and drag us to the institution
> and
> > feed us those really strong drugs that leave us chemically lobotomized
and
> > drooling on our hospital gowns)....
>
>
> I find that five minutes with a Judy Garland CD has much the same effect.
> And it's cheaper than the drugs (and, sadly, legal).
>
> Speaking of which, a bunch of sadistic mind-buggering bastardarinos have
> unleashed a singalong version of The Wizard Of Oz on the London populace.
> <snip>
I suggest the use of tactical nuclear weapons. (but then I suggest that for
most things... I guess I just like mushrooms too much)
--
justbob (ouch)


justbob

unread,
Sep 26, 2003, 8:19:56 PM9/26/03
to

"Hercule Platini" <ningy...@nobnob.com> wrote in message
news:bl2gai$l4o$1...@titan.btinternet.com...

>
> "justbob" <no...@hamster.net> wrote in message
> news:vn18rns...@corp.supernews.com...
> >
> > Do let me know if I can un-depress you in any way . For now I reccomend
> back
> > to back watchings of "life of brian", "monty python and the holy
> grail","the
> > end" (burt reynolds, not the red dwarf episode)and "return of the living
> > dead part 2" (aka "you mean it wasn't supposed to be that funny? Then
why
> > did we do the zombie micheal jackson bit?"... an unworkable title as you
> can
> > see, so the shorter one was chosen). I'd have reccomended Red Dwarf but
> you
> > would have been expecting that and as we all know, no body expects yada
> yada
> > yada
>
>
> I was sort of with you until you mentioned ROTLD2, which I'm afraid is as
> piss poor as very poor piss. I hated it. I really hated it. I really,
> really hated it. I reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeally hated it.
>
>
But that's the charm of it. It's so incredibly awful that it cant help but
undepress a person if for no other reason that the knowledge that said
person didn't star in it.
--
justbob (or is it....)


Derek Custer

unread,
Sep 27, 2003, 1:37:02 AM9/27/03
to

"Hercule Platini" <ningy...@nobnob.com> wrote in message
news:bl2gai$l4o$1...@titan.btinternet.com...
>
> "justbob" <no...@hamster.net> wrote in message
> news:vn18rns...@corp.supernews.com...
> >
> > Do let me know if I can un-depress you in any way . For now I reccomend
> back
> > to back watchings of "life of brian", "monty python and the holy
> grail","the
> > end" (burt reynolds, not the red dwarf episode)and "return of the living
> > dead part 2" (aka "you mean it wasn't supposed to be that funny? Then
why
> > did we do the zombie micheal jackson bit?"... an unworkable title as you
> can
> > see, so the shorter one was chosen). I'd have reccomended Red Dwarf but
> you
> > would have been expecting that and as we all know, no body expects yada
> yada
> > yada
>
>
> I was sort of with you until you mentioned ROTLD2, which I'm afraid is as
> piss poor as very poor piss. I hated it. I really hated it. I really,
> really hated it. I reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeally hated it.

Wait a second. Are you telling us you really hated it?


Walter Ian Kaye

unread,
Sep 27, 2003, 9:14:10 PM9/27/03
to
In article <vn18rns...@corp.supernews.com>,
"justbob" <no...@hamster.net> wrote:

> Do let me know if I can un-depress you in any way . For now I reccomend back
> to back watchings of "life of brian", "monty python and the holy grail","the
> end" (burt reynolds, not the red dwarf episode)and "return of the living
> dead part 2" (aka "you mean it wasn't supposed to be that funny? Then why
> did we do the zombie micheal jackson bit?"... an unworkable title as you can
> see, so the shorter one was chosen). I'd have reccomended Red Dwarf but you
> would have been expecting that and as we all know, no body expects yada yada
> yada

Our chief weapons are fear, surprise, and an eye the size of a meatball!

Lister: Cardinal Kryten, poke her with the soft hologram.
Kryten: It doesn't seem to be hurting her, sir.
Lister: Have you got all the photons up at one end?
Kryten: Yes sir.
Cat: She must be made of stronger stuff.


-boo :)

Hercule Platini

unread,
Sep 29, 2003, 3:29:50 PM9/29/03
to

"justbob" <no...@hamster.net> wrote in message
news:vn9ltck...@corp.supernews.com...

>
> "Hercule Platini" <ningy...@nobnob.com> wrote in message
> news:bl2gai$l4o$1...@titan.btinternet.com...
> >
> >
> >
> > I was sort of with you until you mentioned ROTLD2, which I'm afraid is
as
> > piss poor as very poor piss. I hated it. I really hated it. I really,
> > really hated it. I reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeally hated
it.
> >
> >
> But that's the charm of it. It's so incredibly awful that it cant help but
> undepress a person if for no other reason that the knowledge that said
> person didn't star in it.

Uh-uh. If you want a serious otter turd of a movie, might I direct you in
the direction of Jennifer Lopez's newie "Gigli", which stinks big-time.
It's almost, but not quite, bad enough to be offensive, but way bad enough
to rank as deeply bloody awful. Incredibly, there have been at least three
films even worse: House of 1000 Corpses (bunch of brainless teenaged
imbeciles get tortured and yelled at for two hours in Dolby Stereo by a
bunch of backwoods redneck psycho nutbags), Dreamcatcher (yet another
hopeless Stephen King ragbag of flatulence, aliens, Army nutbags and a
creepy kid) and the woeful shovelful of week-old weasel vomit known as The
Truth About Charlie, for which the genius responsible for The Silence of the
Lambs thought that casting Mark Wahlberg as a Cary Grant figure was a great
idea, and conjures up the magic of Paris by hauling on a decrepit-looking
Charles Aznavour to mumble into the camera while accordian music honks away
in the background. By comparison, your Return of the Living Dead 2 (for
which, incidentally, I have the T-shirt) is merely painfully and tediously
inadequate bollocks made by untalented tossers. There's some evidence that
the masterminds behind Gigli, Dreamcatcher and Charlie have done good stuff
in the past. ROTLD2's director Ken Wiederhorn's finest hour and a bit was a
mouldy old Peter Cushing underwater Nazi zombie flick entitled Shock Waves.

Hercule Platini

unread,
Sep 29, 2003, 3:30:30 PM9/29/03
to

"Derek Custer" <kle...@cox-internet.com> wrote in message
news:vna8fj4...@corp.supernews.com...


What gave it away? The fact that I've got fully ten seconds without telling
you I really really hated it?

Hercule Platini

unread,
Sep 29, 2003, 3:31:20 PM9/29/03
to

"justbob" <no...@hamster.net> wrote in message
news:vn9llmr...@corp.supernews.com...

>
> ... I guess I just like mushrooms too much


Oh, that much is evident. :-)

justbob

unread,
Sep 29, 2003, 4:20:08 PM9/29/03
to

"Hercule Platini" <ningy...@nobnob.com> wrote in message
news:bla17d$4eg$1...@sparta.btinternet.com...
I stand (well.... more like sit) humbled before the master. No more shall I
mention this movie to people (though I've only done so once since it came
out). I also wont mention gigli simply because I detest jello
--
justbob (not, I repeat not an eggplant.)


g2k

unread,
Oct 1, 2003, 5:45:36 AM10/1/03
to
"justbob" <no...@hamster.net> wrote in message
> I stand (well.... more like sit) humbled before the master. No more shall I
> mention this movie to people (though I've only done so once since it came
> out). I also wont mention gigli simply because I detest jello

I've yet to find one person who *liked* gigli...

Garth - who refuses to watch any film with Jennifer Lopez in it.

Hercule Platini

unread,
Oct 4, 2003, 6:22:32 PM10/4/03
to

"g2k" <gar...@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:85fa921a.03100...@posting.google.com...


Okay, I'll be honest here....

I went to see Gigli, and....No, I didn't like it. I thought it was
hideously misjudged, woefully unfunny, morally questionable, hopelessly
badly scripted, massively overbudgeted, patronising drivel. I'm not that
impressed with Ben Affleck at the best of times, to the extent that I don't
think I've seen him in anything where I haven't felt he was miscast: too
young for his role in The Sun of All Fears; pointless in Armageddon, and
outshone by Minnie Driver in Good Will Hunting (and those three films
weren't very good in the first place - GWH was particularly terrible). And
even given that, I think Affleck thoroughly disgraced himself with Gigli.

By contrast, Jennifer Lopez [1] is a physically good-looking woman, [2] has
done some reasonably good movies in the past (I liked Angel Eyes, for
instance), and [3] gave as good an account of herself in Gigli as could be
expected given the hopeless script, poor character and having to act with
Ben Affleck. Al Pacino's shouty cameo in the last act woke me up briefly,
the music score doesn't seem to be much more than a small Easy Listening
ensemble having a very subtle jam session; neither of these help. It's
still a terrible, terrible film.

We now return you to your regular programming of innuendo, non sequiturs and
where are my pants?. Would anyone like any toast?

Hercule Platini

unread,
Oct 4, 2003, 6:22:30 PM10/4/03
to

"justbob" <no...@hamster.net> wrote in message
news:vnh4vpn...@corp.supernews.com...

>
> >
> I stand (well.... more like sit) humbled before the master. No more shall
I
> mention this movie to people (though I've only done so once since it came
> out). I also wont mention gigli simply because I detest jello

If by jello you mean that wobbly thing we call jelly, then I won't argue
with you (unless it's lemon, which is faberoo, but that's blatantly
obvious). If by jello you mean Jennifer Lopez, then....well, I've seen
worse. (Mollie Sugden, Anne Widdecombe, Dame Edith Evans, Hattie Jacques,
Hilda Ogden, Westlife, Grace Jones, Champion the Wonder Horse, Bletchley
railway station, the Sinclair C5, the Vietnam War, Davros, Duct Soup,
Whigfield, Lou Ferrigno, haggis, Mr Goatse, Hannibal Lector and Father
Abraham....I think you get my drift.)

g2k

unread,
Oct 5, 2003, 6:36:48 PM10/5/03
to
"Hercule Platini" <ningy...@nobnob.com> wrote in message news:<blnh77

> "g2k" <gar...@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
> > I've yet to find one person who *liked* gigli...
> >
> > Garth - who refuses to watch any film with Jennifer Lopez in it.
> Okay, I'll be honest here....

Are you sure that's wise?

> I went to see Gigli,

Well, don't say I didn't try to warn you.. ;-)

> and....No, I didn't like it. I thought it was hideously misjudged, woefully > unfunny, morally questionable, hopelessly badly scripted, massively
> overbudgeted, patronising drivel.

So, that's the good points then.. :-)

> I'm not that impressed with Ben Affleck at the best of times, to the extent
> that I don't think I've seen him in anything where I haven't felt he was
> miscast: too young for his role in The Sun of All Fears;

Nods.

> pointless in Armageddon,

the scenery out-acted him ;-)

> and outshone by Minnie Driver in Good Will Hunting (and those three films
> weren't very good in the first place - GWH was particularly terrible).

Hey! I .. no, I didn't like that much either... still it did revive
Robin Williams film career (someone correct me if I'm wrong)

> And even given that, I think Affleck thoroughly disgraced himself with Gigli.

He was good in Dogma. Whatever possessed someone to cast him as
Daredevil, though was an idiot (unless it was Stan Lee, in which case
it's forgiveable)

> By contrast, Jennifer Lopez [1] is a physically good-looking woman, [2] has
> done some reasonably good movies in the past (I liked Angel Eyes, for
> instance), and [3] gave as good an account of herself in Gigli as could be
> expected given the hopeless script, poor character and having to act with
> Ben Affleck.

Sadly, I reluctantly agree with you... :-/

> Al Pacino's shouty cameo in the last act woke me up briefly,

Oh, well, if you going to let someone who can act appear in it, even
as a cameo, you know you're (the "benifer", as some clever clogs
dreamed up) in trouble.. I mean, didn't anyone learn from "Copland"?
(although I will give kudos points for Sly to have a crack at acting)

> the music score doesn't seem to be much more than a small Easy Listening
> ensemble having a very subtle jam session; neither of these help. It's
> still a terrible, terrible film.

Hmm, kinda reminds me of the music playing before I watched
"Underworld".. again. :-0

> We now return you to your regular programming of innuendo, non sequiturs and
> where are my pants?. Would anyone like any toast?

Yes. I'm hungry.

Garth

SmUK

unread,
Oct 8, 2003, 8:08:30 AM10/8/03
to
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 15:56:47 -0500, "justbob" <no...@hamster.net>
wrote:

>
>"Cathe B" <cat...@catheb.NOcomSPAMCom> wrote in message
>news:emq9b.4539$UN4....@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...

>> hmmmm was that shock on my face. or just ennui
>>


>My personal theory is that it was a small shaved hamster... but thats just a
>theory.

Knowing about CBs pets, I'd be more inclined to suggest it was a
shaved rat :-P

--
SmUX
"Do not walk behind me, for I may not lead.
Do not walk ahead of me, for I may not follow.
Do not walk beside me, just fuck off and leave me alone."

justbob

unread,
Oct 8, 2003, 11:03:23 AM10/8/03
to

"SmUK" <SmeggerUK-SP...@mailandnews.com> wrote in message
news:3f83fe1e...@news.cis.dfn.de...

> On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 15:56:47 -0500, "justbob" <no...@hamster.net>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Cathe B" <cat...@catheb.NOcomSPAMCom> wrote in message
> >news:emq9b.4539$UN4....@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>
> >> hmmmm was that shock on my face. or just ennui
> >>
> >My personal theory is that it was a small shaved hamster... but thats
just a
> >theory.
>
> Knowing about CBs pets, I'd be more inclined to suggest it was a
> shaved rat :-P
>
You could well be correct but I refuse to acknowledge that fact.
--
justbob (not, I repeat, not an aardvark no matter what you may have heard)


0 new messages