Limbaugh
wadd...@bellsouth.net
"Speaking of Satan, I was watching Rush Limbaugh the other day. Doesn't
Rush Limbaugh remind you of one of those gay guys who likes to lay in a tub
while other men pee on him? Can't you see his fat body in a tub while
Reagan, Quayle, and Bush just stand around pissing on him, and his little
piggly wiggly dick can't get hard?
Rush: 'Uhh, I can't get hard. Reagan, pee in my mouth.'
Reagan: "Well...How's that, Rush?"
Still can't get hard, so they call in Barbara Bush. She takes her pearls
off and puts them up his ass, then squats over him, undoes her girdle...Her
wrinkled, flaccid labia unfolds halfway down to her knees like some
ball-less scrotum...She squeezes out a link into his mouth...Finally his
dick gets half-hard. A little clear bubble forms on the end with a maggot
inside. The maggot pops the bubble and runs off and joins a pro-life group
somewhere.
Am I the only one who sees that? I'm not? Thank god I'm not alone. Thank
god I had the insight to notice Rush Limbaugh is a scat-muncher. HE MUNCHES
SCAT!"
Truer words have never been spoken.
Replicant
wrote:
> The late Bill Hicks on Limbaugh:
<lots of juvenile witless "potty mouth" snipped>
> Truer words have never been spoken.
Hicks apparently suffered and died of some kind of brain disease. I
can't imagine that he really thought that this would pass for humor.
It's not that it's about people I admire that I don't find it funny...it
just lacks any kind of irony or wit. It wouldn't be funny even if you
replace all the names with people I disike. It's kind of like a 12 year
old boy who just learned about sex and figured out how all the "dirty"
words fit together, feeling the need to excercise his new-found
vocabulary. Maybe he thought he deluded by his disease into thinking
that he was Richard Pryor or even maybe Lenny Bruce. The difference of
course was that the two of them didn't rely on the four letter words
themselves for the humor, but they merely were a part of the bigger
joke. Sad.
*ps. I know that Hicks didn't really die of brain disease. I believe
he died of self-inflicted cancer didn't he? Maybe his hate (on top of
the cigarettes) ate at him from the inside.
Ben There
Replicant <a_rep...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:a_replicant-282C...@news.wirefire.com...
> In article <Wyc74.10951$7Q3....@news4.atl>, <wadd...@bellsouth.net>
> wrote:
>
> > The late Bill Hicks on Limbaugh:
>
> <lots of juvenile witless "potty mouth" snipped>
>
> > Truer words have never been spoken.
>
> Hicks apparently suffered and died of some kind of brain disease. I
> can't imagine that he really thought that this would pass for humor.
> It's not that it's about people I admire that I don't find it funny...it
> just lacks any kind of irony or wit. It wouldn't be funny even if you
> replace all the names with people I disike. It's kind of like a 12 year
> old boy who just learned about sex and figured out how all the "dirty"
> words fit together, feeling the need to excercise his new-found
> vocabulary.
Yes, but that's good enough for liberal loons. Look
at Voltain't, Gdyloon and the like.
Jeff Mullen
there's at least one liberal out here who agrees with your assesment: me.
I don't happen to like any of the people whose names were mentioned
in that post. Nothing personal, but the post still sucks.
So it seems that there are things that liberals and conservatives can
agree on after all...
Replicant wrote:
> In article <Wyc74.10951$7Q3....@news4.atl>, <wadd...@bellsouth.net>
> wrote:
>
> > The late Bill Hicks on Limbaugh:
>
> <lots of juvenile witless "potty mouth" snipped>
>
> > Truer words have never been spoken.
>
> Hicks apparently suffered and died of some kind of brain disease. I
> can't imagine that he really thought that this would pass for humor.
> It's not that it's about people I admire that I don't find it funny...it
> just lacks any kind of irony or wit. It wouldn't be funny even if you
> replace all the names with people I disike. It's kind of like a 12 year
> old boy who just learned about sex and figured out how all the "dirty"
> words fit together, feeling the need to excercise his new-found
Joe1138
Limbaugh's sex life, and like to imagine him in some strange
homo-erotic setting. You guys are weird.
>The late Bill Hicks on Limbaugh:
>
Ben There
Joe1138 <joe_...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:385f1a84...@news.earthlink.net...
> Like the other liberal geeks in this NG, you seem obsessed with
> Limbaugh's sex life, and like to imagine him in some strange
> homo-erotic setting. You guys are weird.
It does seem to be a commonality among the loonier lefties
here. They all listen to Limbaugh faithfully, and they all have
an underlying homoerotic theme to their posts. You don't
suppose Gdy, Trebor, Voltain't and Travsky are all hot
for Rush...oh they must be! LOL!
NonDeskript
> Despite what some narrow-minded conservative types may have to say,
> there's at least one liberal out here who agrees with your assesment: me.
>
> I don't happen to like any of the people whose names were mentioned
> in that post. Nothing personal, but the post still sucks.
>
> So it seems that there are things that liberals and conservatives can
> agree on after all...
Bad taste is usually bi-partisan ;)
-David
Meyahoo3
>Limbaugh's sex life, and like to imagine him in some strange
>homo-erotic setting. You guys are weird.
That's the part that's funny to me. Konservatives generally proclaim
themselves as travellers of the moral high road, yet many Rush-sucklers enjoy
kinks that would make the leather queens in the Castro district blush.
And it's no great secret that the people most outspoken in their hatred and
disgust of homosexuals are often latent queers themselves. You Konservative
fag-bashers could probably not watch a male-to-male porno vid without getting
all hot and boned out! "God how disgusting", you'd say as you hurried home to
whack off.
Our beat your stupid wives. . .
Ron in Seattle
Ben There
Meyahoo3 <meya...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:19991222154903...@ng-cn1.aol.com...
Heh heh, sounds like you're projecting your personal problems
Ronny dahling.