Seeking Support - We Want NG in us.* Hierarchy to Discuss US KIA
Vincent Henry Bartning
We currently want to create a newsgroup (NG) under the us.* hierarchy for
discussion of U.S. KIA. The proponents have been given a 3 to 6 month
waiting period to obtain support for the newsgroup we want for meaningful
discussion of KIA. Please contact me if you would like to support us in the
creation of a newsgroup on the USENET for the purposes mentioned. A
proposal to create the NG can appear as early as April 23rd in us.config.
Thank you,
--
Vincent Bartning
Proponent, us.military.killed-in-action-dow
Check Out the USA KIA/DOW Family Foundation @
http://usakiadowff.org
Check out the USA KIA/DOW Discussion Group @
http://groups.aol.com/usakiadowfamily
The United States Honors Their Memory on Presidential Memorial Certificates.
Duke of URL
Vincent Henry Bartning <Bart...@comcast.net> radiated into the
WorldWideWait:
> Hello all:
>
> We currently want to create a newsgroup (NG) under the us.*
> hierarchy for discussion of U.S. KIA. The proponents have been
> given a 3 to 6 month waiting period to obtain support for the
> newsgroup we want for meaningful discussion of KIA. Please contact
> me if you would like to support us in the creation of a newsgroup
> on the USENET for the purposes mentioned. A proposal to create the
> NG can appear as early as April 23rd in us.config.
>
> Thank you,
Why? It's a waste of time. The subject is covered in the discussion
groups for the various wars, and properly so.
And why are you dragging soc.religion into this?
redc1c4
because he hasn't a prayer of garnering the support he seeks?
redc1c4,
(tossing out a white smoke %-)
--
"Enlisted men are stupid, but extremely cunning and sly, and bear
considerable watching."
Army Officer's Guide
Paul H. Lemmen
"redc1c4" <red...@drunkenbastards.org.ies> wrote in message
news:401708F5...@drunkenbastards.org.ies...
> Duke of URL wrote:
<SNIP>
> redc1c4,
> (tossing out a white smoke %-)
> --
Left 50 and fire for effect.
Slainte,
--
Paul H. Lemmen
Just because I choose to act civilised
does not mean that I am.
Colonel Flagg
says...
>
> "redc1c4" <red...@drunkenbastards.org.ies> wrote in message
> news:401708F5...@drunkenbastards.org.ies...
> > Duke of URL wrote:
> <SNIP>
> > redc1c4,
> > (tossing out a white smoke %-)
> > --
>
> Left 50 and fire for effect.
>
> Slainte,
>
let it rain boys, let it rain.
--
Colonel Flagg
http://www.internetwarzone.org/
Privacy at a click:
http://www.cotse.net
Q: How many Bill Gates does it take to change a lightbulb?
A: None, he just defines Darkness? as the new industry standard..."
"...I see stupid people."
redc1c4
>
> "redc1c4" <red...@drunkenbastards.org.ies> wrote in message
> news:401708F5...@drunkenbastards.org.ies...
> > Duke of URL wrote:
> <SNIP>
> > redc1c4,
> > (tossing out a white smoke %-)
> > --
>
> Left 50 and fire for effect.
Roger. Be advised this will be "Stupid Close".
Take all appropriate cover...... %-)
redc1c4,
"ON THE WAYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY!"
edward ohare
<Bart...@comcast.net> wrote:
>Hello all:
>
>We currently want to create a newsgroup (NG) under the us.* hierarchy for
>discussion of U.S. KIA. The proponents have been given a 3 to 6 month
>waiting period to obtain support for the newsgroup we want for meaningful
>discussion of KIA. Please contact me if you would like to support us in the
>creation of a newsgroup on the USENET for the purposes mentioned. A
>proposal to create the NG can appear as early as April 23rd in us.config.
>
>Thank you,
Vincent, Vincent, Vincent.
There have already been pointers all over the place asking people to
support this during the RFDs. They didn't. It should be clear to you
that you aren't going to get support by asking for it.
As was stated to you in us.config, you need to start some threads that
are interesting to people and in which they will participate. If you
can't successfully start threads, that means that "want(ing)...
meaningful discussion" is just a dream. By not starting threads as
has been suggested, I can conclude that you are not capable of
meaningful discussion.
BTW... does the inclusion of soc.religion mean you're going to go back
to the "God and country" phrase? Haven't you figured out that's the
recipe to lose again?
EskW...@spamblock.panix.com
> Hello all:
> We currently want to create a newsgroup (NG) under the us.* hierarchy for
> discussion of U.S. KIA.
They're making those in the US now? I thought that they were Korean!
--
...I'm an air-conditioned gypsy...
- The Who
David Casey
us.military.history,us.military.army,us.military.navy,us.politics,soc.religion:
[soc.religion, us.politics removed]
>> (tossing out a white smoke %-)
>
> Left 50 and fire for effect.
You folks mind keeping the noise down? Us Signal types can't hear our
streaming por... I mean movie over our high speed Internet connection.
Dave
The generators are bad enough. ;-)
--
You can talk about us, but you can't talk without us!
US Army Signal Corps!!
http://www.geocities.com/davidcasey98
David Casey
us.military.history,us.military.army,us.military.navy,us.politics,soc.religion:
[soc.religion removed]
> Vincent, Vincent, Vincent.
>
> There have already been pointers all over the place asking people to
> support this during the RFDs. They didn't. It should be clear to you
> that you aren't going to get support by asking for it.
>
> As was stated to you in us.config, you need to start some threads that
> are interesting to people and in which they will participate. If you
> can't successfully start threads, that means that "want(ing)...
> meaningful discussion" is just a dream. By not starting threads as
> has been suggested, I can conclude that you are not capable of
> meaningful discussion.
>
> BTW... does the inclusion of soc.religion mean you're going to go back
> to the "God and country" phrase? Haven't you figured out that's the
> recipe to lose again?
My guess is that he is simply trying to get a flame-war started as soon as
someone says that phrase doesn't belong.
Dave
edward ohare
wrote:
>My guess is that he is simply trying to get a flame-war started as soon as
>someone says that phrase doesn't belong.
My guess is people is soc.religion looked at the subject line and read
no further, deciding they weren't interested in a group about a car.
Paul H. Lemmen
"David Casey" <david...@spamcop.net> wrote in message
news:1id2tsd4...@davidcaseyspamcop.net...
> On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 20:16:05 -0500, Paul H. Lemmen wrote in
>
us.military.history,us.military.army,us.military.navy,us.politics,soc.religi
on:
>
> [soc.religion, us.politics removed]
>
> >> (tossing out a white smoke %-)
> >
> > Left 50 and fire for effect.
>
> You folks mind keeping the noise down? Us Signal types can't hear our
> streaming por... I mean movie over our high speed Internet connection.
>
> Dave
> The generators are bad enough. ;-)
> --
I left you guys? Who's up for a midnight requisition patrol?
David Casey
us.military.history,us.military.army,us.military.navy:
>> You folks mind keeping the noise down? Us Signal types can't hear our
>> streaming por... I mean movie over our high speed Internet connection.
>>
>> Dave
>> The generators are bad enough. ;-)
>
> What happened? Did the jar heads 'liberate' the Bang und Olafson headphones
> I left you guys? Who's up for a midnight requisition patrol?
Where are they at? I can stop by during my usual midnight raiding of the
MKT. :-)
Dave
Mmmmm... peanut butter and jelly sandwiches and UHT milk boxes.
Paul H. Lemmen
> On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 08:04:02 -0500, Paul H. Lemmen wrote in
> us.military.history,us.military.army,us.military.navy:
>
> >> You folks mind keeping the noise down? Us Signal types can't hear our
> >> streaming por... I mean movie over our high speed Internet connection.
> >>
> >> Dave
> >> The generators are bad enough. ;-)
> >
> > What happened? Did the jar heads 'liberate' the Bang und Olafson
headphones
> > I left you guys? Who's up for a midnight requisition patrol?
>
> Where are they at? I can stop by during my usual midnight raiding of the
> MKT. :-)
>
> Dave
> Mmmmm... peanut butter and jelly sandwiches and UHT milk boxes.
Inside the Irish Spring packing crate (the one under the UHF radio) I
scrounged from the commisary (if you can call it that) in Kandahar...thought
it would be the safest place to hide them from Marines.
Vincent Henry Bartning
news:9jce109leoo57b6u2...@4ax.com...
<snip>
> BTW... does the inclusion of soc.religion mean you're going to go back
> to the "God and country" phrase? Haven't you figured out that's the
> recipe to lose again?
Here in the soc.religion site, I wonder if it's "the recipe to lose again"
if I want to have "God and country" in the RFD for a us.* hierarchy NG on
KIA? Anyway, Ed, I've had to block messages from so many poor critical
thinkers that I wonder if it's too much. You always write awkward posts
though...
--
Vincent
loki
headphones
> I left you guys? Who's up for a midnight requisition patrol?
Heh. I used to be the Queen of the Midnight Requisition. I'm wondering if
I'm still as good at it as I was then...
Loki
~Nins~
|| "edward ohare" <edward...@nospam.yahoo.com.invalid> wrote in
|| message news:9jce109leoo57b6u2...@4ax.com...
||
|| <snip>
||
||| BTW... does the inclusion of soc.religion mean you're going to go
||| back to the "God and country" phrase? Haven't you figured out
||| that's the recipe to lose again?
||
|| Here in the soc.religion site, I wonder if it's "the recipe to lose
|| again" if I want to have "God and country" in the RFD for a us.*
|| hierarchy NG on KIA? Anyway, Ed, I've had to block messages from so
|| many poor critical thinkers that I wonder if it's too much. You
|| always write awkward posts though...
Curiosity takes control of me. How are they "awkward"? What is your
criteria in determining who is or isn't in the category of "poor critical
thinkers"? I thought the suggestion given you, I believe by Ed IIRC, to
start threads and get participation in them was a good idea. My suggestion
to you is not to view and treat others with arrogance and superiority,
that's a turn-off and it won't help you with what you're trying to
attain/accomplish. It's just something I've noticed in your posts here and
there (i.e., when you 'demanded').
David Casey
us.military.history,us.military.army,us.military.navy,us.politics,soc.religion:
[groups trimmed]
>> BTW... does the inclusion of soc.religion mean you're going to go back
>> to the "God and country" phrase? Haven't you figured out that's the
>> recipe to lose again?
>
> Here in the soc.religion site, I wonder if it's "the recipe to lose again"
> if I want to have "God and country" in the RFD for a us.* hierarchy NG on
> KIA? Anyway, Ed, I've had to block messages from so many poor critical
> thinkers that I wonder if it's too much. You always write awkward posts
> though...
Said the Queen of Awkward Posts (Daryl being the King).
Dave
Le Mod Pol
>
> "edward ohare" <edward...@nospam.yahoo.com.invalid> wrote in message
> news:9jce109leoo57b6u2...@4ax.com...
>
> <snip>
>
> > BTW... does the inclusion of soc.religion mean you're going to go back
> > to the "God and country" phrase? Haven't you figured out that's the
> > recipe to lose again?
>
> Here in the soc.religion site, I wonder if it's "the recipe to lose again"
> if I want to have "God and country" in the RFD for a us.* hierarchy NG on
> KIA? Anyway, Ed, I've had to block messages from so many poor critical
> thinkers that I wonder if it's too much. You always write awkward posts
> though...
1- You are not just in soc.religion you are also in:
us.military.history, us.military.army,
us.military.navy, us.politics, and none of those groups
want to
discuss your failed RFD.
2- Apparently neither are the folks in soc.religion
because you got at least one followup that said in
effect 'get lost'.
3- what you should do is follow the advice you got from
Ed, Esk and Snark. Try posting the kind of stories
that you intend to run in the group if you get it and
see if you get any replies. If you get any replies,
(except the ones that say get lost) follow them up and
try to keep the thread going as long as you can. Post
as many as you can and repost the successful ones to
other military groups.
4- Forget "G-d and Country" it is a dead loser.
--
LP
In politics, moderation is the best policy.
Le Mod Pol
He would rather whine than do something constructive.
Tank Fixer
on Tue, 27 Jan 2004 20:16:05 -0500,
Paul H. Lemmen ple...@hotmail.com attempted to say .....
>
> "redc1c4" <red...@drunkenbastards.org.ies> wrote in message
> news:401708F5...@drunkenbastards.org.ies...
> > Duke of URL wrote:
> <SNIP>
> > redc1c4,
> > (tossing out a white smoke %-)
> > --
>
> Left 50 and fire for effect.
Shot, over..
--
When dealing with propaganda terminology one sometimes always speaks in
variable absolutes. This is not to be mistaken for an unbiased slant.
Tank Fixer
on Wed, 28 Jan 2004 03:24:29 +0000 (UTC),
EskW...@spamblock.panix.com EskW...@spamblock.panix.com attempted to
say .....
> In us.military.army Vincent Henry Bartning <Bart...@comcast.net> wrote:
> > Hello all:
>
> > We currently want to create a newsgroup (NG) under the us.* hierarchy for
> > discussion of U.S. KIA.
>
> They're making those in the US now? I thought that they were Korean!
They probably bought an surplus Honda factory in Smyrna
Tank Fixer
on Wed, 28 Jan 2004 12:40:56 +0000,
edward ohare edward...@nospam.yahoo.com.invalid attempted to say .....
Honk if you love Jesus ?
Tank Fixer
on Wed, 28 Jan 2004 06:51:18 GMT,
David Casey david...@spamcop.net attempted to say .....
> On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 20:16:05 -0500, Paul H. Lemmen wrote in
> us.military.history,us.military.army,us.military.navy,us.politics,soc.religion:
>
> [soc.religion, us.politics removed]
>
> >> (tossing out a white smoke %-)
> >
> > Left 50 and fire for effect.
>
> You folks mind keeping the noise down? Us Signal types can't hear our
> streaming por... I mean movie over our high speed Internet connection.
>
> Dave
> The generators are bad enough. ;-)
I could fix you up with a tactical quiet, for an appropriate "fee"
David Casey
us.military.army,us.military.history,us.military.navy:
>> You folks mind keeping the noise down? Us Signal types can't hear our
>> streaming por... I mean movie over our high speed Internet connection.
>>
>> Dave
>> The generators are bad enough. ;-)
>
> I could fix you up with a tactical quiet, for an appropriate "fee"
My former active duty Signal unit got them shortly after I left.
Sometimes, I kind miss that generator sound. Sure made sleeping in a tent
an experience all it's own. ;-)
Dave
Tank Fixer
on Wed, 28 Jan 2004 18:08:18 GMT,
~Nins~ nin...@mchsi.com attempted to say .....
He thinks "poorly" of us because we are "critical" of his idea as
presented.
Tank Fixer
on Wed, 28 Jan 2004 17:58:14 GMT,
loki lo...@mindspring.com attempted to say .....
I shall lumber down to the dungeon and dust it off m'lady.
bump, scrap.... bump, scrape......
Vincent Henry Bartning
news:MPG.1a823430...@news.west.earthlink.net...
Short but not sweet. What tactic is that, run and hide? Being critical of
someone's ideas is different than being critical of the person if you don't
know the difference. Many posts I've seen have ad hominems, criticisms of
the person... Also, hopefully I'll handle it better than I have so far....
Le Mod Pol
Stop whining, and pretend you are a man for a change.
Pursuing this idiotic thread is just pushing you
further and further from your goal
Try writing a couple of newsy posts that will
promote discussion of your topic, and posting
them in relevant groups
Vincent Henry Bartning
> On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 09:43:47 -0800, Vincent Henry Bartning wrote in
>
us.military.history,us.military.army,us.military.navy,us.politics,soc.religi
on:
>
> [groups trimmed]
>
> >> BTW... does the inclusion of soc.religion mean you're going to go back
> >> to the "God and country" phrase? Haven't you figured out that's the
> >> recipe to lose again?
> >
> > Here in the soc.religion site, I wonder if it's "the recipe to lose
again"
> > if I want to have "God and country" in the RFD for a us.* hierarchy NG
on
> > KIA? Anyway, Ed, I've had to block messages from so many poor critical
> > thinkers that I wonder if it's too much. You always write awkward posts
> > though...
>
> Said the Queen of Awkward Posts (Daryl being the King).
So what are you trying to become, Ad Hominem King?
Vincent Henry Bartning
news:101dvuq...@corp.supernews.com...
<snip>
> Why? It's a waste of time. The subject is covered in the discussion
> groups for the various wars, and properly so.
> And why are you dragging soc.religion into this?
Somehow your group reminds me of a cross between "pirates of the Caribbean"
and the unfriendly ghosts Casper knows. However, I don't know if you're
part of the 404th Group Mission and Troll Posters, aka Benedict Arnold's
Really Bad Boys. LOL!
Vincent Henry Bartning
news:mUSRb.45151$U%5.238610@attbi_s03...
There's something wrong with missives from the 404th Group Mission Trolls
and Posters gang. It's probably also a violation of the RICO act.
They use ad hominems and other psuedoreason, so it's "poor critical
thinking."
I appreciate your suggestions and do not view you as one of them. Any
suggestions to accomplish the goals you suggest, but have you read their
posts? Even other proponents of our tabled RFD think it's "a lion's den"
with these people and do not come in here right now because of it. So
you're a minority saying otherwise BTW...
Vincent Henry Bartning
news:4019BD18...@igs.net...
<snip>
> > Short but not sweet. What tactic is that, run and hide? Being critical
of
> > someone's ideas is different than being critical of the person if you
don't
> > know the difference. Many posts I've seen have ad hominems, criticisms
of
> > the person... Also, hopefully I'll handle it better than I have so
far....
> > --
> > Vincent
>
> Stop whining, and pretend you are a man for a change.
> Pursuing this idiotic thread is just pushing you
> further and further from your goal
Yeah, I guess I'm a man now.
> Try writing a couple of newsy posts that will
> promote discussion of your topic, and posting
> them in relevant groups
I began one, but the usual GMT&P gang presents a lot of riducule. I have
heard you're Edward Ohare in disguise too BTW. If so, you're being an
"imposter" type of flame warrior.
> --
> LP
> In politics, moderation is the best policy.
Moderation should be much easier...
Mike P
"Vincent Henry Bartning" <Bart...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:7pWdnbKg4Yq...@comcast.com...
> "David Casey" <david...@spamcop.net> wrote in message
> news:yidi32h3...@davidcaseyspamcop.net...
> > On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 09:43:47 -0800, Vincent Henry Bartning wrote in
> >
>
us.military.history,us.military.army,us.military.navy,us.politics,soc.religi
> on:
> >
> > [groups trimmed]
> >
> > >> BTW... does the inclusion of soc.religion mean you're going to go
back
> > >> to the "God and country" phrase? Haven't you figured out that's the
> > >> recipe to lose again?
> > >
> > > Here in the soc.religion site, I wonder if it's "the recipe to lose
> again"
> > > if I want to have "God and country" in the RFD for a us.* hierarchy NG
> on
> > > KIA? Anyway, Ed, I've had to block messages from so many poor
critical
> > > thinkers that I wonder if it's too much. You always write awkward
posts
> > > though...
> >
> > Said the Queen of Awkward Posts (Daryl being the King).
>
> So what are you trying to become, Ad Hominem King?
> --
> Vincent
Why did this guy quit. Could it be because he knows your nuts?
Subject: Re: official resignation
Date: 12/21/03 3:08 PM PST
Author: Bart...@aol.com
In a message dated 12/20/2003 11:59:29 PM Pacific Standard Time,
ajameso...@aol.com writes:
I alan Jameson officialy withdraw from this group as it supports by its
founder the beginning of world war III
Al:
Detox'd be too good for ya! ROFL! At least it's only a DUI on the
Internet! You even slur!
Anyway, I'd like a good board, and with off-the-wall comments like that
after you've had a whole lot more to drink than me (not that I didn't want a
little more mind you), especially when I told you World War III would not be
in the best interests of our corporation (would it?)... Are you trying to
be funny?
If you're gonna quit from the group, I haven't seen you. If you're talking
about the board, I'd rather see someone who keeps the corporaiton's
interests in mind on it, and if you can do it, you're welcome on it
certainly, but the Bylaws need to be signed before you can officially resign
as far as I can tell... Right now, the Articles of Incorporation that you
signed say, "The specific purposes for which this corporation is organized
are to provide research, education, and relief involving families of U.S.
KIA. It will organize grant and other money to disseminate for these
purposes." Our proposed Bylaws include, "... Remembering KIA and those who
fall under its definition, i.e., those who die of their wounds directly
associated with being mortally wounded on the battlefield... Promote justice
and healing for the families of these soldiers and for our country."
As the discussion group says, "It's here to discuss issues for
relatives/friends and provide support for family of U.S. killed in action
(KIA), those killed in U.S. military operations while in the U.S. Armed
Forces."
Hopefully, you can still do good work, but it appears you've bought a house
now.
Vincent
Le Mod Pol
Does your father read these posts? If he does it is
amazing that he has not yet hung you out to dry.
> They use ad hominems and other psuedoreason, so it's "poor critical
> thinking."
How would you know anything about 'critical thinking?
> I appreciate your suggestions and do not view you as one of them. Any
> suggestions to accomplish the goals you suggest, but have you read their
> posts? Even other proponents of our tabled RFD think it's "a lion's den"
> with these people and do not come in here right now because of it. So
> you're a minority saying otherwise BTW...
Keep on whining and moaning; it will get you right out
of usenet, and it could not happen to a nicer and more
deserving guy
Le Mod Pol
>
> "Le Mod Pol" <mod...@igs.net> wrote in message
> news:4019BD18...@igs.net...
>
your response is wholly irrelevant, and for that matter
so are you.
>
> > > Short but not sweet. What tactic is that, run and hide? Being critical
> of
> > > someone's ideas is different than being critical of the person if you
> don't
> > > know the difference. Many posts I've seen have ad hominems, criticisms
> of
> > > the person... Also, hopefully I'll handle it better than I have so
> far....
fact you are doing every thing *badly*. In fact you
could not do worse. You are not going to get your
"group" and the fault is 100% Vincent Bartning.
> > Stop whining, and pretend you are a man for a change.
> > Pursuing this idiotic thread is just pushing you
> > further and further from your goal
>
> Yeah, I guess I'm a man now.
old child, and with comparable intelligence
>
> > Try writing a couple of newsy posts that will
> > promote discussion of your topic, and posting
> > them in relevant groups
>
> I began one, but the usual GMT&P gang presents a lot of riducule.
article is not enough. You should post at least 2 or 3
new ones daily and to different groups. Also you
should abandon this thread -- it too, is
counterproductive
I have
> heard you're Edward Ohare in disguise too BTW. If so, you're being an
> "imposter" type of flame warrior.
LOL anything you hear from daryl, believe the opposite.
He is inflicted with Munchhausen's disease.
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Munchhausen
Ed and I are friendly enemies.
> > --
> > LP
> > In politics, moderation is the best policy.
>
> Moderation should be much easier...
If you knew anything at all about usenet you would
realize that you_have_no_clue
Tank Fixer
on Sat, 31 Jan 2004 18:09:42 -0800,
Vincent Henry Bartning Bart...@comcast.net attempted to say .....
So take it to the DOJ. I'm sure they would enjoy the laugh.
> They use ad hominems and other psuedoreason, so it's "poor critical
> thinking."
I have yet to see you discuss anyhting without resorting to attacks by the
third of fourth post.
> I appreciate your suggestions and do not view you as one of them. Any
> suggestions to accomplish the goals you suggest, but have you read their
> posts? Even other proponents of our tabled RFD think it's "a lion's den"
> with these people and do not come in here right now because of it. So
> you're a minority saying otherwise BTW...
The suggestion is to start some threads discussing the topic you wish to
have a group for.
Tank Fixer
on Sun, 01 Feb 2004 03:13:19 GMT,
~Nins~ nin...@mchsi.com attempted to say .....
>
> Btw, I don't believe there is a us.military.navy (look under the sci.
> listing for the naval IIRC), so I've removed it from the lineup.
>
There is, it's fairly new and your server may not carry it.
Not much traffic but it is growing slowly.
RTO Trainer
> There's something wrong with missives from the 404th Group Mission Trolls
> and Posters gang. It's probably also a violation of the RICO act.
>
> They use ad hominems and other psuedoreason, so it's "poor critical
> thinking."
>
How does poor critical thinking constitute a RICO violation?
Do you know what RICO is?
Duke of URL
Vincent Henry Bartning <Bart...@comcast.net> radiated into the
WorldWideWait:
> "Duke of URL" <macbenahATkdsiDOTnet> wrote in message
> news:101dvuq...@corp.supernews.com...
>
> <snip>
>
>> Why? It's a waste of time. The subject is covered in the discussion
>> groups for the various wars, and properly so.
>> And why are you dragging soc.religion into this?
>
> Somehow your group reminds me of a cross between "pirates of the
> Caribbean" and the unfriendly ghosts Casper knows. However, I
> don't know if you're part of the 404th Group Mission and Troll
> Posters, aka Benedict Arnold's Really Bad Boys. LOL!
??? I'm a group? I asked a perfectly reasonable IMHO question. Well,
actually two. Why am I being insulted? That is, I think I am - it's
not all that clear, what with an lol ending.
~Nins~
|| In article <i9_Sb.194990$I06.2153355@attbi_s01>,
|| on Sun, 01 Feb 2004 03:13:19 GMT,
|| ~Nins~ nin...@mchsi.com attempted to say .....
||
|||
||| Btw, I don't believe there is a us.military.navy (look under the
||| sci. listing for the naval IIRC), so I've removed it from the
||| lineup.
|||
||
|| There is, it's fairly new and your server may not carry it.
|| Not much traffic but it is growing slowly.
Ah ok, no I don't think mine does carry it.
~Nins~
Here is a link to and a post in part of the 'prohibited activities' under
RICO:
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/1962.html
[Q] It shall be unlawful for any person who has received any income derived,
directly or indirectly, from a pattern of racketeering activity or through
collection of an unlawful debt in which such person has participated as a
principal within the meaning of section 2, title 18, United States Code, to
use or invest, directly or indirectly, any part of such income, or the
proceeds of such income, in acquisition of any interest in, or the
establishment or operation of, any enterprise which is engaged in, or the
activities of which affect, interstate or foreign commerce. ...... [/Q]
Tank Fixer
on Sun, 1 Feb 2004 08:50:00 -0600,
"Duke of URL" <macbenahATkdsiDOTnet> "Duke of URL" <macbenahATkdsiDOTnet>
attempted to say .....
You dared to challange his "wants".
In his would this is not allowed. IMHO he thinks by adding in soc.religion
he will gain support to keep the words "for god and country" in the RFD
for the proposed group.
He has not apparently heard of the Quakers, Amish or Seventh Day
Adventist's, none of whom are too keen on fighting "for god and country"
but may still be found in the armed forces. Though SDA representation is
most likely not too high.
I am suprised he did not call you treasonious. Wait, he did.
Le Mod Pol
Duke of URL
Tank Fixer <paul.deek...@us.army.mil> radiated into the
WorldWideWait:
Oh. I've been gone for some days and just now got to read this. I note
that V didn't bother to reply to me. So I'm now officially a
treasonous group... Gee...