Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Naming convention for MP3s

0 views
Skip to first unread message

DAB is more than just bitrates

unread,
Jan 29, 2003, 12:44:12 PM1/29/03
to
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003 11:53:51 GMT, John H <nom...@mail.com> wrote:

>What is the correct naming convention for MP3 files themselves?
>Not the tags.
>
>I have seen MP3 files named like this:
> ARTIST - TRACKNAME
> TRACKNUMBER - ARTIST - TRACKNAME
> TRACKNUMBER - ALBUM - ARTIST - TRACKNAME.
>
>What is the full offical format?
>
>Does Kazaa use the filename or the ID3 tags when the user asks for
>a detailed search by searching for the contents of specific fields?
>For example, the album name search field.
>
>---
>
>(Of course, there are people sharing files out there who are not
>following any naming rules but I will ignore those folks!)

Personally I usually do Artist - Title for compilations (non-mixed),
Artist - Track# - Title for artist albums, and occasionaly; album name
- Track # - Artist Title, when I have a mix album

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Not got DAB digital radio yet?
Download free samples from http://www.dabi.co.uk/samples

Globe Times Newspaper

unread,
Jan 30, 2003, 10:55:15 AM1/30/03
to
If you have WinXP you can name the file only
Artist - Songname
and put the rest of the info (album, track #...) on the tag.
When you view your folders with the "details" option on, you can select
what tag info you want to see and/or organize your files

Negoti8r

unread,
Jan 31, 2003, 10:20:58 AM1/31/03
to
One ive seen and liked is:
[Artist] - Year - [Album] - track no. title


Mathew Hendry

unread,
Jan 31, 2003, 10:51:38 AM1/31/03
to
"Negoti8r" <no...@none.sk> wrote:

: One ive seen and liked is:


: [Artist] - Year - [Album] - track no. title

Filenames that long cause problems if you ever want to transfer your files
to CD. I prefer

Artist/Album (Year)/Track#.Title

or (for compilations)

Various/Album (Year)/Track#.Artist-Title

If you keep all the relevant information in ID3 tags you can always reformat
the filenames later.

-- Mat.

Wayne Youngman

unread,
Jan 31, 2003, 2:11:14 PM1/31/03
to
Hi,

I myself keep it simple,

Artist - Track

I myself don't see the reason to have a complicated file name as the *ID3*
tags take care of any cross reference needs I have. . . I spent about two
days straight tagging up all my MP3s and then I got Windows Media Player 9
which has an excellent *Juke-Box* function and *internal* database of all my
music, genres, moods, artist, year, playlists, etc, etc.

even if you called your file zogkon8787sedlk909kf.mp3 in wouldn't matter *as
long* as you had the file tagged up properly and you use a suitable ID3 tag
info sniffing program.

Since using WMP9 I no longer access my files from windows explorer, which
*was* the way I been doing it for years!

P.s: you lazy crossposter ;P better to send seperate messages to *each*
group rather than spamming the one across many.
--
Wayne ][


Mathew Hendry

unread,
Jan 31, 2003, 7:44:05 PM1/31/03
to
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003 19:11:14 +0000 (UTC), "Wayne Youngman"
<Big....@wardofpower.bigfoot.com> wrote:

>P.s: you lazy crossposter ;P better to send seperate messages to *each*
>group rather than spamming the one across many.

Yeah, but isn't it strange that news programs tend to make it easy to
crosspost but awkward to multipost? You'd think they'd make the better
way easier.

-- Mat.

Negoti8r

unread,
Feb 1, 2003, 6:00:46 AM2/1/03
to
[...]

> If you keep all the relevant information in ID3 tags you can always
reformat
> the filenames later.

[...]

Thats true, of course.


Paul D. Sullivan

unread,
Feb 1, 2003, 11:00:39 PM2/1/03
to
Music Match 7.5 has a nice "Super Tagging" feature.


"Negoti8r" <no...@none.sk> wrote in message
news:3e3ba8d8$0$128$edfa...@dtext02.news.tele.dk...

0 new messages