Leave Brad Alone
Anonymous
Quit being personal or you shall pay !!!!!
Joseph P. Arco
>
> All of you that keep messing with Brad are DOOMED.
> Quit being personal or you shall pay !!!!!
...with Baltic Avenue.
don't spam me .wavefront .com
: All of you that keep messing with Brad are DOOMED.
Perhaps Brad should stop being personal himself, oh Anonymous
one. Perhaps he should not be posting home addresses across
usenet, or spamming bits of resume here or there.
I still say Brad is a terrible HTML-author. Really bad
style. Really bad.
--
jeremy wavefront com 1989 Honda VTR250
DoD #WildCard BNASPAM #3 1971 Honda CL350
"I could not move any faster if we were under full scale
attack..." -- Scotty
Skidmark says: http://members.iglou.com/bathroom/uhfanderson.html
Cognitee
is amazing how quickly you got enemies on Usenet. Perhaps this should
tell you something. You are offensive, abrasive, judgmental (yet
inconsiderate and do not read stuff) and you are abusive.
In any case: Please do not post allegations against me for which
there is no evidence. You would not want this to happen to you, would
you ??
don't spam me .wavefront .com
: As I have said, Jeremy, your allegations are false and unfounded.
Wow. I never thought it could happen, but it has: You have
actually surprised me, Brad. I never thought anyone could be
as cowardly as you are. You want to threaten me, you want
to frighten me, but you don't have the cajones (to use the
vernacular) to stand behind what you say.
: It is amazing how quickly you got enemies on Usenet.
Just two: You and Skidmark.
: Perhaps this should tell you something.
It tells me how seriously you take Usenet. Seriously enough
to spam my resume about. Seriously enough to leave a telltale
trace when you hijacked my resume. Rather careless of you,
Brad. Quite careless, in fact.
You have threatened my educational career--and remember, you
did that under your own name, not under a veil of anonymity.
: You are offensive, abrasive, judgmental (yet inconsiderate and
: do not read stuff) and you are abusive.
Not at all. I _do_ read a post before I reply to it. I read
books voraciously. Judgemental? Not at all. But arguing
that wouldn't convince you a bit. You'd merely come back as
a sock puppet and threaten me.
Have you managed to find any email addresses which actually
are/were mine? Keep looking. It isn't hard.
: In any case: Please do not post allegations against me for which
: there is no evidence. You would not want this to happen to you, would
: you ??
I have evidence. Don't worry. Future.net has it now, too.
But I don't think they'll do anything about it. If they were
the type of ISP to respond to outside complaints, then they
would have booted you long ago.
And you really do write terrible HTML. I have proof--your
web pages. Really, really crappy stuff.
Anonymous
umn.general, when Brad works for the university system. This was
just to embarass him. And how about the malicious libelous spamming
you supported to mn.general and the "carpet bombing" (no holds barred)
abuse you supported from Peter Hood. I can assure you that your
malice would not have stopped unless we had something on you.
Anonymous lo14
don't spam me .wavefront .com
: Jeremy: Maybe you would like to explain your posting about Brad in
Huh. Looks like I forgot to killfile this anonymous account
too.
Problem corrected!
don't spam me .wavefront .com
: Jeremy: Maybe you would like to explain your posting about Brad in
: umn.general, when Brad works for the university system. This was
: just to embarass him. And how about the malicious libelous spamming
: you supported to mn.general and the "carpet bombing" (no holds barred)
: abuse you supported from Peter Hood. I can assure you that your
: malice would not have stopped unless we had something on you.
Ooops. Forgot to killfile this one, too.
Wow. My killfile is really growing!
lpacker
>Jeremy: Maybe you would like to explain your posting about Brad in
>umn.general, when Brad works for the university system.
Where is the evidence that Brad works for the university system? Let
Brad make that claim/assertion in a signed post if it is true.
>This was
>just to embarass him. And how about the malicious libelous spamming
>you supported to mn.general and the "carpet bombing" (no holds barred)
>abuse you supported from Peter Hood. I can assure you that your
>malice would not have stopped unless we had something on you.
>
I don't detect any change in Jeremy's posting behavior, so I don't
know what you think you have on him, but it doesn't seem to have made
a difference.