Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Vietnam Vets - A Bunch of Druggie Criminals

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Anonymous

unread,
Oct 4, 1998, 3:00:00 AM10/4/98
to
The Vietnam Police Action was lost for several reasons. But the myth that
most Vietnam Vets like to give is that the American government didn't want to
win. What a bunch of bullshit!!! The real reason that the Police Action was
lost was because the troops didn't want to win. They were more concerned with
getting stoned and laid than being soldiers (and to a lesser extent) Marines.
But what can you expect? The baby boom generation was a spoiled rotten group.

Most Vietnam Vets had already given up on life, before coming in the service,
so it was no surprise that they would give up on the military and war, as
well. Most had already given up on high school and morality. So why not the
war, too?

While there is a slim percentage of decent Vietnam Vets (Al Gore for example)
most were criminals before they came in the service, most were criminals in
the service, and most were criminals after the service.

But the Vets and Vet Groups can't accept that they were scum before the
service. They all want to blame the service for their short comings.
But instead of looking towards LBJ and General Westmoreland for their faults,
they need to look in a mirror.

AND TO ALL VIETNAM POLICE ACTION VETERANS - HANG THOSE NASTY ASS JUNGLE
FATIGUES UP, PUT ON CIVILIAN COTHES AND MAKE SOMETHING OF YOURSELF, LIKE YOUR
GRANDFATHERS DID AFTER WWI, YOUR DADS DID AFTER WWII, AND YOUR BROTHERS AND
FATHERS DID AFTER KOREA. IF YOU LIKE THOSE UNIFORMS SO MUCH WHY DIDN'T YOU
REENLIST???

Get on with your lives and quit blaming everybody but yourselves.

Thank you for your time.

- GenXVet


PBylin

unread,
Oct 4, 1998, 3:00:00 AM10/4/98
to

>Subject: Vietnam Vets - A Bunch of Druggie Criminals
>From: Anonymous <nob...@replay.com>
>Date: 10/4/98 8:44 PM !!!First Boot!!!
>Message-id: <1998100420...@replay.com>


I'm so frigging tierd of these fucking assholes coming in here and trying to
demean the `Nam vet...I got one thing to say asshole...I'M HERE FUCKING YOR
MOTHER!!!

Edward Combs Jr.

unread,
Oct 4, 1998, 3:00:00 AM10/4/98
to
You can't be very bright if you call the Nam war a "Police Action" that
was the Korean war. The Nam war was a "Regional Conflict". I have to
admit I did spend a fair amount of time "getting laid", but what can one
expect from the "under-class"? If it's October it must be Trolls.
............


Anonymous wrote:
>
> The Vietnam Police Action was lost for several reasons. But the myth that
> most Vietnam Vets like to give is that the American government didn't want to
> win. What a bunch of bullshit!!! The real reason that the Police Action was
> lost was because the troops didn't want to win. They were more concerned with
> getting stoned and laid than being soldiers (and to a lesser extent) Marines.
> But what can you expect? The baby boom generation was a spoiled rotten group.
>
> Most Vietnam Vets had already given up on life, before coming in the service,
> so it was no surprise that they would give up on the military and war, as
> well. Most had already given up on high school and morality. So why not the
> war, too?
>
> While there is a slim percentage of decent Vietnam Vets (Al Gore for example)
> most were criminals before they came in the service, most were criminals in
> the service, and most were criminals after the service.
>
> But the Vets and Vet Groups can't accept that they were scum before the
> service. They all want to blame the service for their short comings.
> But instead of looking towards LBJ and General Westmoreland for their faults,
> they need to look in a mirror.
>
> AND TO ALL VIETNAM POLICE ACTION VETERANS - HANG THOSE NASTY ASS JUNGLE
> FATIGUES UP, PUT ON CIVILIAN COTHES AND MAKE SOMETHING OF YOURSELF, LIKE YOUR
> GRANDFATHERS DID AFTER WWI, YOUR DADS DID AFTER WWII, AND YOUR BROTHERS AND
> FATHERS DID AFTER KOREA. IF YOU LIKE THOSE UNIFORMS SO MUCH WHY DIDN'T YOU
> REENLIST???
>
> Get on with your lives and quit blaming everybody but yourselves.
>

A&KT

unread,
Oct 4, 1998, 3:00:00 AM10/4/98
to

PBylin wrote in message <19981004183331...@ng76.aol.com>...

>
>>Subject: Vietnam Vets - A Bunch of Druggie Criminals
>>From: Anonymous <nob...@replay.com>
>>Date: 10/4/98 8:44 PM !!!First Boot!!!
>>Message-id: <1998100420...@replay.com>
>>
>I'm so frigging tierd of these fucking assholes coming in here and trying
to
>demean the `Nam vet...I got one thing to say asshole...I'M HERE FUCKING YOR
>MOTHER!!!
>Wow! I wouldn't do that to his mother or sisters.Gotta be some serious
problems for that family to spawn such narrow minded trash. Manly as I
rthink I have been and am, I still have some standards. Be careful she may
still have some of that bad stuff she passed on to that piece of crap. Jus'
Art
>

Dennis Brand

unread,
Oct 4, 1998, 3:00:00 AM10/4/98
to
Again, forward to ab...@replay.com

Anonymous wrote:

> The Vietnam Police Action was lost for several reasons. But the myth that
> most Vietnam Vets like to give is that the American government didn't want to
> win. What a bunch of bullshit!!! The real reason that the Police Action was
> lost was because the troops didn't want to win. They were more concerned with
> getting stoned and laid than being soldiers (and to a lesser extent) Marines.
> But what can you expect? The baby boom generation was a spoiled rotten group.
>
> Most Vietnam Vets had already given up on life, before coming in the service,
> so it was no surprise that they would give up on the military and war, as
> well. Most had already given up on high school and morality. So why not the
> war, too?
>
> While there is a slim percentage of decent Vietnam Vets (Al Gore for example)
> most were criminals before they came in the service, most were criminals in
> the service, and most were criminals after the service.
>
> But the Vets and Vet Groups can't accept that they were scum before the
> service. They all want to blame the service for their short comings.
> But instead of looking towards LBJ and General Westmoreland for their faults,
> they need to look in a mirror.
>
> AND TO ALL VIETNAM POLICE ACTION VETERANS - HANG THOSE NASTY ASS JUNGLE
> FATIGUES UP, PUT ON CIVILIAN COTHES AND MAKE SOMETHING OF YOURSELF, LIKE YOUR
> GRANDFATHERS DID AFTER WWI, YOUR DADS DID AFTER WWII, AND YOUR BROTHERS AND
> FATHERS DID AFTER KOREA. IF YOU LIKE THOSE UNIFORMS SO MUCH WHY DIDN'T YOU
> REENLIST???
>
> Get on with your lives and quit blaming everybody but yourselves.
>

Muff

unread,
Oct 4, 1998, 3:00:00 AM10/4/98
to
FOAD !!!!

MUFF
Anonymous wrote in message <1998100420...@replay.com>...

SNIPPED THE BULL SHI....

Michele Devine

unread,
Oct 4, 1998, 3:00:00 AM10/4/98
to
When will it become understood that the battle is not between the groups of
vets that did do their duty, in honor to their country and to the beliefs
with which they were raised, but with those who did all they could not to
serve.

You have a commander-in-chief destroying the moral integrity and social
fabric of this country right before your eyes, and you guys only have the
time to bitch about one another. That's why 'they' will continue to get
away with this crap; you're fighting the wrong people. The battle is with
those using us as pawns to do their bidding, all the while shedding not so
much as an ounce of sweat for the bounties they enjoy as citizens. Vets of
all ages, of all wars, or of no wars, must begin to realize that their lot
in life will improve only upon uniting a force to be reckoned with, or
continue to being reduced to this internecine warfare that saps both
strength and resources needlessly. Don't you hear 'them' mocking you?

danny
post-vn vet


Anonymous wrote in message <1998100420...@replay.com>...

Perry

unread,
Oct 4, 1998, 3:00:00 AM10/4/98
to
In article <1998100420...@replay.com>, nob...@replay.com says...

>
> AND TO ALL VIETNAM POLICE ACTION VETERANS - HANG THOSE NASTY ASS JUNGLE
> FATIGUES UP, PUT ON CIVILIAN COTHES AND MAKE SOMETHING OF YOURSELF, LIKE YOUR
> GRANDFATHERS DID AFTER WWI, YOUR DADS DID AFTER WWII, AND YOUR BROTHERS AND
> FATHERS DID AFTER KOREA. IF YOU LIKE THOSE UNIFORMS SO MUCH WHY DIDN'T YOU
> REENLIST???
>
> Get on with your lives and quit blaming everybody but yourselves.
>
> Thank you for your time.
>
> - GenXVet
>
>
>
>
Check your facts you stupid fuck, lot of us did reup to fix the military
so idiots like you wouldn't get killed when they served. The only time
Vietnam Veterans get riled up is when jerks like you share their wisdom
to the world. Also be careful with your attitude because the next Vietnam
veteran you meet may be a cop, a doctor, fireman or the judge you will
most likely see some day because of that attitude of yours.

PangK

unread,
Oct 5, 1998, 3:00:00 AM10/5/98
to

>From: Dennis Brand <den...@startext.net>
>Newsgroups: soc.veterans

>Again, forward to ab...@replay.com
>

Like of like trying to screw a hobby horse. LOVE'S LABOR LOST! Replayhg com
is FOR that kind of shit! It is 100% of why it exists. To spew puire SHIT
worldwide. They coundln't give a fuck LESS about that. They ENCOURAGE that
kind of computer vanbdalism because that's what those Danish weenies ARE
them,selves, PUNKS with computers. With a real screw you attitude. The ONLY
hope you have is in joining a lonbny that's underway to block ALL traffic from
Denmark into the US Net! ALl of replay.com and it's MANY other anonymous
remailers.

PangK

unread,
Oct 5, 1998, 3:00:00 AM10/5/98
to

>From: pma...@ionet.net (Perry)
>Newsgroups: soc.veterans

>Check your facts you stupid fuck, lot of us did reup to fix the military so
idiots like you wouldn't get killed when they served. The only time Vietnam
Veterans get riled up is when jerks like you share their wisdom to the world.
Also be careful with your attitude because the next Vietnam veteran you meet
may be a cop, a doctor, fireman or the judge you will most likely see some day
because of that attitude of yours.

David Moore, the author of that tome was a Marine who got the old heave-ho
for conduct unbecomming. He's the same WUSS who a few months ago was bent out
of shape because I commented that I was told he was kicked out of the Marines.
He threw a hissy fit, demanding that I PROVE I had info anout him. He demanded
that I post his middle name (Dennis)
and his serial number. Twice I challenged him,
"do you REALLy want me to do that?" Twice he came back calling me a liar. When
I *did*
post his middle name and his number, he hasn't quit whining since. Crying like
a baby.

IN dealing with Mr. Moore's trolls, you gotta remember he is a bitter you
man who really didn't make the grade in the military.
He had to have his discharge upgraded. A concept that I still have STRONG
disagreement with. I believe your discharge SHOULD reflect the calibre of your
service.
When I served, an HONORABLE discharge like mine meant something. It wasn't a
diploma you could get by WHINING loudly! Yopu had to EARN it. To give it to a
cretin whose behavior was substandard demeans the service the rest of us gave
out nation.

>
>

fathers...@dragoncon.net

unread,
Oct 5, 1998, 3:00:00 AM10/5/98
to
On 5 Oct 1998 12:32:38 GMT, pa...@aol.com (PangK) wrote:
>
>>From: pma...@ionet.net (Perry)
>>Newsgroups: soc.veterans
>
>>Check your facts you stupid fuck, lot of us did reup to fix the military so
>idiots like you wouldn't get killed when they served. The only time Vietnam
>Veterans get riled up is when jerks like you share their wisdom to the world.
>Also be careful with your attitude because the next Vietnam veteran you meet
>may be a cop, a doctor, fireman or the judge you will most likely see some day
>because of that attitude of yours.
>
> David Moore, the author of that tome was a Marine who got the old heave-ho
>for conduct unbecomming. He's the same WUSS who a few months ago was bent out
>of shape because I commented that I was told he was kicked out of the Marines.
>He threw a hissy fit, demanding that I PROVE I had info anout him. He demanded
>that I post his middle name (Dennis)
>and his serial number. Twice I challenged him,

Since my middle name is not Dennis, you must have info about a
different David Moore. This would also explain the glaring
discrepancy between the actual character of my service and what
you have posted about it.

My apologies if I was hostile to you in my post yesterday. Seems
there may be some mistaken identity here.

For the record, I, David Moore of Chicago, did not post the
original in this thread.

PangK

unread,
Oct 5, 1998, 3:00:00 AM10/5/98
to

>From: fathers...@dragoncon.net
>Newsgroups: soc.veterans

>Organization: mail...@replay.com

>X-NNTP-Posting-Host: basement.replay.com

>Since my middle name is not Dennis, you must have info about a different
David Moore. This would also explain the glaring discrepancy between the
actual character of my service and what you have posted about it.

Gede why have you sued the name "DENNIS" on the job then Davey boy?????
Reality is SO fluid around you. HWen you want it to be one thing it is, another
then it is that.

>For the record, I, David Moore of Chicago, did not post the original in this
thread.

Try BOLINGBROOK, ILLINOIS Moore.

Jen

unread,
Oct 5, 1998, 3:00:00 AM10/5/98
to
People people people.....

Don't give thismoron the satisfaction... this is a TROLL... designed soley
for the purpose of getting a rise out of you. By the number of responses
this dolt is getting, I'd say y'all are playing right into his hand.

--
The only thing you must understand...
Is that it is not necessary to understand...
But to enjoy...

http://www.pacifier.com/~kokopeli

fathers...@dragoncon.net

unread,
Oct 5, 1998, 3:00:00 AM10/5/98
to
On 5 Oct 1998 14:42:22 GMT, pa...@aol.com (PangK) wrote:
>
>>From: fathers...@dragoncon.net
>>Newsgroups: soc.veterans
>
>>Organization: mail...@replay.com
>
>>X-NNTP-Posting-Host: basement.replay.com
>
>>Since my middle name is not Dennis, you must have info about a different
>David Moore. This would also explain the glaring discrepancy between the
>actual character of my service and what you have posted about it.
>
> Gede why have you sued the name "DENNIS" on the job then Davey boy?????

I have never "sued", or used, the name "DENNIS" on any job.
You are either lying again, or you are confusing me with
someone else.

Though your track record for telling the truth is, shall we say,
a little spotted, I'm willing to give you the benefit of the
doubt and assume that you have me confused with someone else.
After all, you do have trouble comprehending even simple
concepts like internet anonymity, not to mention the completely
alien concept of a spellchecker. Perhaps you should consider
getting off the internet until you learn some of the basics,
plus some basic internet etiquette? Just a suggestion.


>Reality is SO fluid around you. HWen you want it to be one thing it is, another
>then it is that.


You just described yourself perfectly.

PangK

unread,
Oct 6, 1998, 3:00:00 AM10/6/98
to

>From: fathers...@dragoncon.net
>Newsgroups: soc.veterans
>Organization: mail...@replay.com

>I have never "sued", or used, the name "DENNIS" on any job.You are either


lying again, or you are confusing me with
someone else.

Not confusing you with anyone Moore. And you KNOW it. Let';s see, are you
going to deny being fired from the Sara Lee Corporation in Chicago? For
forging a anti-semetic post and attributing it to Joe OConnor?

>Though your track record for telling the truth is, shall we say, a little
spotted, I'm willing to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that you
have me confused with someone else.

Why don't you post your web site, what is it,
www.members.tripod.com/~freedom23/pangk.html? Is it still up, btw? I heard
Tripod was going to kick it off just like Worldnet, Geocities, and Mediaone did

>After all, you do have trouble comprehending even simple concepts like
internet anonymity, not to mention the completely alien concept of a
spellchecker.

Oh David, I know whole bunches more than you think I do. As I said, when
the anonymizing software was developed, it took about 6 days for somebody to
come along with decryption software to break it. Jesus man, if guys can break
into the pentagon computers with their levekl of encryption, how hard do you
think it is to beat some silly assed Danish anonymizer? And it expecially ain't
hard when the cops have had your phone lines tapped for the past 6 months
MORON!

>Perhaps you should consider getting off the internet until you learn some of
the basics,
plus some basic internet etiquette? Just a suggestion.

Who's gonmna educate me? YOU? The guy thrown off a record number of ISP's
for abuse?
Let's see, in the past year you have gone through a dozen ISP's, while I have
had the same one for the past 4 years. Is there a message in there somewhere
Moore? And *I*
don't have to use anonymous remailers.

Let's see, Hotmail, replay.com, Geocities, Worldnet, Mediaone, and er..
Tripod????
How many is it Moore?


PangK

unread,
Oct 6, 1998, 3:00:00 AM10/6/98
to

>From: Anonymous <nob...@replay.com>

>youre full of shit. you dont have any of this information. and you have
clearly NEVER seen this guys service record. stop
trolling.

You are right, to a point David. I hhave never seen your 201 file. I was
only TOLD about it from a sergeant from your old Marine unit. He **COULD** have
been lying. But given YOUR claims that I ran to Canada to escape service (even
though I served HONORABLY in the Air Force) I wasn't much given to question
what I was told. AND, then I was sent a SCANNED copy of the restraining order
from your ex-wife. Actually the affidavit in support of the RO. That COULD have
been faked too. As I have said before, I have watched YOUR behavior on the net,
factored into my OPINION the things you TRIED to get me to help you do to
others, and frankly
Mr. Moore, **YOUR** behavior has led me to conclude that the information I was
provided was true. YOUR behavior on usenet is entirely consistant with a coward
who beats up women and children. One who would disgrace the uniform of ANY
branch.

You know, from my past contact with Marines, I always held them in the
utmost respect believing that the Maries demanded MORE of its MEN than what the
other services, likke the Air Force did of us. That the Marines were something
special. YOU have pretty well dispensed with that as a MYTH! Because if
they made a SISSY like YOU an NCO, they must be the PANSY CORPS! Somehow I have
to beleive you are just an abberation that slipped by somehow.


Charles Johnson

unread,
Oct 6, 1998, 3:00:00 AM10/6/98
to
Although I never served in the military my father is a vet. I was taught
to respect the military and those that served (and are serving) in it.

The posting entitled "Vietnam Vets-A Bunch of Druggie Criminals" was the
grossest example of stereotype I have ever seen! Whoever this person is
who wrote this obviously has never met some of the fine caliber of men,
(and women) who served in South East Asia, that I have.

Was there drug use by the men who served in Vietnam? Yes there was! But
at the same time there was an increased amount of drug use in our
country by civilians as well! The thing to remember is that it was a
different time in the country during Vietnam then ever before. Soldiars
are taken from America's sons and daughters...and America's sons and
daughters were a diferent group then what was used to fight any war in
the past.

And this Gen-Xer is forgeting a very important thing...the WWI WWII and
Korean vets he refered to may not have smoked grass etc...but Scotch and
Whiskey were used to dull the senses and calm the nerves streched to the
max in combat. Just a quick poll...how many of you older vets either had
or knew someone who had a canteen filled with hooch while serving in
Europe or the Pacific?

As far as the soldiars wanting to get laid...VD films were not invented
for Vietnam era soldiars. Soldiars in all times of combat have been
primarily 18-25 year old young men. I don't know too many men in this
age group that AREN'T trying to get a little loving!

You also mentioned something about the Nam Vets hanging up their jungle
fatigues and getting on with their lives like their Brothers and
Fathers...Read your hstory books pal! Although the vets before Nam saw
as many horrible things as the Nam Vets did, they were welcomed home
with open arms and treated like heros! (and rightly so!) The Vietnam
vets...after sacrificing as much as any man who ever served in combat
did...were greated with shouts of Baby Killer and by being spat on. Do
they have a right to be bitter? Damn Right they do!!!

All I am saying is ALL vets deserve respect and honor. If it weren't for
their efforts there may not be a forum for people like you to express
your opinion and for me to respond.

And to any vet reading this I would just like to say: Thank you, Welcome
home and God Bless you!


0 new messages