SPECIAL REPORT
mppowers
tec...@dragoncon.net wrote in message
<199808151437...@nsm.htp.org>...
>On 15 Aug 1998 02:44:33 GMT reb...@aol.com (Rebar5) wrote:
>
>>> Yopu haven't a clue about Moore. NOT a single clue. This is his modus
with
>>>lots of people and he has been thrown off ISP after ISP for it. I am
nowhere
>>>near his only target. Just his main antagonist for now. At least until he
can
>>>find some woman to harass.
>>
>>I'm well aware of that, and you can be rest assured that I do not condone
his
>>behavior, Pangborn, but neither do I condone yours. I know all about it. I
am
>>not new to this subject or the various newsgroups. I prefer to stay
anonymous
>>for various reasons, some of which you should be aware of.
>>
>>Furthermore, as he harrasses you, he more than likely is still harrassing
those
>>various women.
>>
>>But, I just wonder about how infantile you all act in your vendetta. You
have
>>all stooped to his level in this game. Listing of addresses, posting
pictures
>>and SS#'s. So, who ends it? You? evidently not, as he is back in full
force
>>and continues to harrass. So, on and on it goes as you respond and he
responds
>>and so on and so forth. And it will continue until charges are brought
against
>>him. There are lots of ISP's in his area. Getting him booted off will not
stop
>>him. He'll just jump on another bandwagon, so to speak. When he goes
through
>>the big ones, he'll start with the little guys. So, exactly what are you
>>accomplishing?
>>
>>I think you get the picture.
>
>First of all, I should point out that I have never harassed any women
>online, like Pangborn claims. The man is a chronic liar. He has
>forged posts in my name and has posted defamatory lies about me to the
>internet. Most of these lies can be proven false by anyone who cares
>to do a little research. When he tells these fish stories, Ken is
>counting on the fact that nobody will take the time to do that research.
>
>You're right about one thing....there are a lot of ISPs in my area.
>Due to a glitch in the mail forwarding service I was using, the
>identity of my last ISP was accidentally revealed, and of course
>Pangborn then began mailbombing them with his unfounded complaints.
>But I'm at a new ISP now, and I think the bugs are worked out. And I
>do intend to continue to point out the truth about Ken Pangborn--the
>fact that he is a liar and a harasser--until his attacks on me and
>others cease.
>
>http://members.tripod.com/~freedom23/pangk.html
>
>
>
Everybody's got a hungry heart
Everybody's got a hungry heart
Lay down your money
and you play your part
Everybody's got a
huh
huh
huh-o-reyheart
PangK
>Newsgroups: fl.general,milw.general,alt.psychology,alt.mens-rights
>First of all, I should point out that I have never harassed any women
>online, like Pangborn claims.
Would Stacy Anderson, Tracy Hornsuch, Judy McLinn, Karen Hayward, Nancy or the
others agree with you David? Nope just brand yourself a choronic liar AGAIN!
PangK
>Newsgroups: fl.general,alt.mens-rights
>Organization: mail...@replay.com
>I've never been to Green Bay. And even if I had, I wasn't aware of any law
which prohibits people from going to Green Bay.
Depends on whose house you went to visit David. And if it was a woman you
had threatened on the Internet, it is a crime.
>I never forged any post.
David, you forged a post from Joe OConner adding anti-semetic ranting to it.
AND you got caught, and fired from your job because you sent it though your
employer's system via reference.com.
> The little games disrupting my listserv. And
the phone deal.
>"The phone deal" is another one of your many defamatory lies.
Oh, are you admitting to the forgery to my webmaster?
>Computer vandalism is a federal crime Moore. When it crosses
>>state lies.
> ^^^^^^^^^^
>
>Yes, Ken, you DO state lies. A lot of them.
LINES David............................
>My new "liover"? Did you mean to say "liver"? Hope not...I can't
>stand liver. I hope they serve chili mac down at Stateville.
LOVER! Bubba your new boyfriend...
>Yeah I've heard....getting rapists out of jail so they can rape again. Does
the A-team then hire them so they can terrorize and rape the women who speak
out against you?
Only the wrongly convicted David. See, we'd NEVER represent a creep like
you. Just the wrongly accused.
>
>I never said any such thing. YOU said that there was a restraining order,
which says that I am to stay 1000 miles away from my child. And
you have yet to produce any such thing. Nor will you have any success in doing
so, because there simply is no such thing. Ken Pangborn is a liar.
Playing Slick Willie with me David? The 1,000 miles was hyperbole. But yoyu
WERE hit with a restraining order, and you ADMITTED it..
> First I was a "Section 8" (mentally incompetent).
Nope David, I said the discharge was "akin" to a section 8, a discharge for
the "convinience of the corps" due to your off base misconduct with your wife.
You grab on whatever words you like. Your conduct was unbecomming for that of a
Marine!
>Then, they supposedly "threw me out" for "beating my ex wife half to death on
a daily basis".
I said NEAR daily basis. And her affidavit kinda confirms that David.
>This lie has metamorphosized every time you've told it.
No, just every time YOU try to RE-TELL it with a spin on it I did't put
there.
>I never brought any dishonor to the service.
Yes, David. Any man in the military who beats up women brings dishonor to
the service. Marines, Air Force Navy etc.
>Do you deny that you responded to posts authored by "nob...@replay.com", and
that you put my name and email address into
the quoted material?
Not at all. BUT, it WAS there to IDENTIFY the author of the material, David,
YOU. And
was appropriate. I got in a little hot water with AOL till I could SHOW them
where YOU had screwed up and left markers tracing it back to you. When I did, I
was off the hook. As well as the little > you added.
>This is called forgery, because my name and email address did not appear
anywhere on the original posts. Nor did I author them.
Well they didn't appear there just like they don't appear on THIS post
either.
>Organization: mail...@replay.com
HOWEVER, they WERE, in point of fact authored by YOU as is this post I am
responding to from replay.com. Your problem is that you didn't like having your
own words come back to haunt you. Poor David.
John Reinhagen
<tec...@dragoncon.net> wrote:
>
>On 15 Aug 1998 02:54:45 GMT pa...@aol.com (PangK) wrote:
>
>>>From: reb...@aol.com (Rebar5)
>>>Newsgroups: fl.general
[re: David Moore's acitivites]
>>>And it will continue until charges are brought against him.
>>
>> He's too clueless to stop even then. He pretty well knows that it is only
>>a matter of time before he's arrested. He doesn't care.
>
>Gee, what's the charge?
Post forgery and harrassment sum it up pretty well, I think.
>Daring to speak out against the Great Ken Pangborn????
Many people badger Ken; those who do so and don't engage in the
above-named tactics don't get booted off of their ISP's. You did. Quit
whining.
JCR
--
"I wish I was in Tijuana
Eating barbecued iguana..."
John Reinhagen
<tec...@dragoncon.net> wrote:
>I never forged any post.
Hm. That's hard to believe. Several users here have posts forged in
their names using an anonymous remailer. Those very same users exposed a
previous forgery of yours (back before you knew about anonymous remailers
-- your learning curve has been painfully slow). You lose your MediaOne
account; the forgeries stop. What a remarkable coincidence!
It's no mystery, David. Your history of abusive posting is
well-documented at http://www.fc.net/~wrain/dmtc.html for anyone who cares
to look. Is it surprising that you graduated from obscene fantasies of
sadistic power and control to actual net-abuse?