|
| Groups | Results 101 - 110 of about 153 for gigapixel group:rec.photo.*. |
Sorted by relevance Sort by date |
| Gigapixel FB Tagging www.93metros.com/ Big 360º photos for sports & events Increase your social media value |
At 1 byte a pixel, you would have 1 Gigabyte for 1 Gigapixel, rather than 11 Gigabytes. Off the top of my As above 10.8 Gig!! head, a 1 Gigabyte IBM Microdrive is ... http://groups.google.com/g/8797fefd/t/980c8cde5150d3be/d/1afbbbcd13fe080e |
... have both at the same time - I shudder to think of the size of the printout required to show all the detail on that gigapixel image that was produced a while ago. http://groups.google.com/g/8797fefd/t/698e2dfd5918f2c3/d/b07a30f12885264d |
Hey, we all will love our first gigapixel camera in 15 years or so. I don't think the development will stop at some point. Just think of taking a landscape picture and ... http://groups.google.com/g/8797fefd/t/76938a163dca8162/d/4bc71d11108703d7 |
The 1Ds costs $8000 now... in some years time it will be almost worthless, having been superseded by the new 100 gigapixel networked mind reading thingy ... http://groups.google.com/g/8797fefd/t/fd4a4c5605bf5aeb/d/a10dc4be55cf8ede |
(1 divided by .00013) If you had a scanner with this resoluton and scanned a 4x6 photo, you'd wind up with a 1.4 gigapixel image. You're wrong about the digital ... http://groups.google.com/g/8797fefd/t/17d654abd517474f/d/747760b722843933 |
Indeed, the "ultimate" camera would simply take a gigapixel image of the entire sphere around it, and when you get home you decide what you actually wanted ... http://groups.google.com/g/8797fefd/t/3d693fc3027ecbe0/d/e624451dd9862c52 |
... nobody forced me to sell the D60 and it still does an excellent job. In fact, the gigapixel image of Bryce that everyone is talking about atm was taken on a D60. http://groups.google.com/g/8797fefd/t/982be1042e506dbb/d/376c618411aa9776 |
But I did find this on the web. The URL was recently posted in other threads: http://www.tawbaware.com/maxlyons/gigapixel.htm I'm guessing it takes a lot of R/W ... http://groups.google.com/g/8797fefd/t/4831020839752fa4/d/bbfef03290f88bcd |
That way we could get 1.5 gigapixel images from any old 35mm print film. Thinking about it, I don't know why I'm bothering with this digital rubbish... ;-) http://groups.google.com/g/8797fefd/t/a6f23635f701c5c4/d/7308ffe2b613d030 |
... said will get the best from an Epson, and if you really want the best, 1440 or 2880 ppi might do better, but it would require a gigapixel > if you want to crop a little. http://groups.google.com/g/8797fefd/t/a57cc3447ce62a90/d/369804de90d73b66 |
| Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |
| ©2009 Google |
