On 4/20/10 4:40 PM, Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Dan Stillman<
dsti...@zotero.org> wrote:
>
>> On 4/20/10 4:23 PM, Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
>>
>>> And exactly what IS this? I see a blog post, but it's pretty vague.
>>>
>> It's the infrastructure to allow Zotero to run as a standalone app in
>> XULRunner, which is just the underlying Mozilla framework without the full
>> browser interface. Code to make it work with other browsers isn't yet
>> available, but that's where it's headed.
>>
> So in some ways the "other browser" connection is not essential to the
> standalone XULRunner app; right?
>
That's correct—there's no reason other browsers shouldn't be able to
work with the regular Firefox Zotero as well—but most of the people
clamoring for support for other browsers are doing so because they'd
prefer to stop using Firefox, which this will enable, along with a nicer
interface. Yes, Firefox Zotero in full-screen mode is fairly similar,
but that hasn't stopped people from asking for a standalone version. And
this will focus development on the cross-browser features, since
otherwise various things will be broken in the standalone version.
> And what about the bookmarklet idea? Is that in fact how the
> connection will be made? And if yes, will it be possible to have the
> bookmarklet send the URIs to the server instead?
Bookmarklets would only work for a subset of the currently supported
sites, so no, that won't be the default method. There's no reason a
bookmarklet can't happen as well for the greatest possible
compatibility, but there's no way to offer the full functionality people
are used to via a bookmarklet.