Google Code doesn't have the APSL (from what I can tell, although I would have guessed it was CDDL, which GC also does not have) that the code is under, so I'd recommend not putting the code there. If you want to use Google Code, ask nicely and you might be granted an exception since it's an existing project.
On 23 Oct 2009, at 21:51, Augie Fackler wrote:Google Code doesn't have the APSL (from what I can tell, although I would have guessed it was CDDL, which GC also does not have) that the code is under, so I'd recommend not putting the code there. If you want to use Google Code, ask nicely and you might be granted an exception since it's an existing project.
Yeah, the problem is that it's CDDL and they can't have anything there. But it might be easy enough to host the code at GitHub and use the Google Code for a wiki page/issue list; that worked for EGit.
Bitbucket has free repo hosting, wiki and issue tracking. It uses
mercurial instead of git, but hg is easy if you're already used to a
DVCS. I'm far from a license expert, but I've heard of fewer licensing
issues on Bitbucket on than Google Code and GitHub, too.
I cloned Dustin's git repo and pushed to BB so people can see, but if
people want to host there it should probably be under a committer's name
rather than mine. This is just for illustration, and I'll take it down.
http://bitbucket.org/dgc/mac-zfs/
--
-D. d...@uchicago.edu NSIT University of Chicago