XTF and Z39.50

11 views
Skip to first unread message

dan haig

unread,
Jul 25, 2008, 12:15:27 PM7/25/08
to xtf-...@googlegroups.com
Asking the list since the answer could usefully bear to be archived:
Is there any documentation on XTF and Z39.50 compliance?

Failing that, a simple "yes it is" or "no it isn't" will suffice :-)

Here's the Wikipedia on it, for the sake of it:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Z39.50

Thanks!


.d

Martin Haye

unread,
Jul 25, 2008, 1:04:59 PM7/25/08
to xtf-...@googlegroups.com
Hi Dan,

No, XTF isn’t Z39.50 compliant. That said there is some experimental support for SRU and CQL.

--Martin

dan haig

unread,
May 2, 2013, 10:52:24 AM5/2/13
to xtf-...@googlegroups.com
Here's an old thread resurrected - has any further progress been made towards making XTF compliant with Z39.50 protocol?

.d

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "XTF Users List" group.
To post to this group, send email to xtf-...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to xtf-user-u...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/xtf-user?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---


Martin Haye

unread,
May 2, 2013, 12:52:58 PM5/2/13
to xtf-...@googlegroups.com
Not that I know of. Does anybody still use Z39.50 and if so, for what?

--Martin
________________________________________
From: xtf-...@googlegroups.com [xtf-...@googlegroups.com] on behalf of dan haig [hai...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2013 7:52 AM
To: xtf-...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [xtf-user] Re: XTF and Z39.50

Here's an old thread resurrected - has any further progress been made towards making XTF compliant with Z39.50 protocol?

.d

On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 1:04 PM, Martin Haye <marti...@ucop.edu<mailto:marti...@ucop.edu>> wrote:
Hi Dan,

No, XTF isn’t Z39.50 compliant. That said there is some experimental support for SRU and CQL.

--Martin



On 7/25/08 9:15 AM, "dan haig" <hai...@gmail.com<mailto:hai...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Asking the list since the answer could usefully bear to be archived:
Is there any documentation on XTF and Z39.50 compliance?

Failing that, a simple "yes it is" or "no it isn't" will suffice :-)

Here's the Wikipedia on it, for the sake of it:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Z39.50

Thanks!


.d





--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "XTF Users List" group.
To post to this group, send email to xtf-...@googlegroups.com<mailto:xtf-...@googlegroups.com>
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to xtf-user-u...@googlegroups.com<mailto:xtf-user-u...@googlegroups.com>
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/xtf-user?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "XTF Users List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to xtf-user+u...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to xtf-...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/xtf-user?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


dan haig

unread,
May 2, 2013, 1:31:45 PM5/2/13
to xtf-...@googlegroups.com
The reason I ask is that a large consortium we are trying to strike a deal with say they require it :-(

But it seems pretty ridiculous. If it hasn't been tackled til now, it seems unlikely anyone's going to bother. 

Thanks,
Dan
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages