> It's closed as "Works for me".
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2983917&group_id=7801...
> From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com [mailto:
> softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Martin Chatterjee
> Sent: March-29-12 6:19 AM
> To: softim...@listproc.autodesk.com
> Subject: Re: Official Supported version of Python for SI?
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Stephen Blair <Stephen.Bl...@autodesk.com
> <mailto:Stephen.Bl...@autodesk.com>> wrote:
> Softimage ships with 2.6.4 (on Windows).
> We didn't go with 2.7 because it used pywin 214 which was buggy.
> Not sure if 215 is any better (I'm trying to find the bug numbers).
> Hi Stephen, hi everybody,
> I'd be very interested to know if that bug that made you stay with pywin
> 214 back then is fixed in the current pywin 217 version.
> Of course I'm happy to check the pywin changelogs myself - but I would
> need a bit more details about the issue that you encountered back then.
> Thanks in advance,
> Martin
> --
> Martin Chatterjee
> [ Freelance Technical Director ]
> [ http://www.chatterjee.de<http://www.chatterjee.de/> ]
> From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com<mailto:
> softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com> [mailto:
> softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com<mailto:
> softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com>] On Behalf Of Eric Thivierge
> Sent: February-22-11 11:23 AM
> To: softim...@listproc.autodesk.com<mailto:softim...@listproc.autodesk.com
> Subject: Official Supported version of Python for SI?
> What's the officially supported version of Python for Softimage if we
> install externally. Any reasons 2.7> wouldn't be recommended?
> --------------------------------------------
> Eric Thivierge
> Technical Director
> http://www.ethivierge.com