V-Ray for Softimage released
Ben Rogall
Rob Wuijster
They should know that by now ;-)
Other than that, great release! It's good to see more renderers for Softimage. More choice = better!! :-)
Rob \/-------------\/----------------\/
On 20-2-2012 15:54, Ben Rogall wrote:
http://www.chaosgroup.com/en/2/vray_softimage.html?our=0215
-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.1913 / Virus Database: 2113/4820 - Release Date: 02/19/12
Cristobal Infante
Trying to check them out but it's sending me straight to resellers...
Darrin Hofmeyr
The official suggested end user price of a single new license of V-Ray
1.5 for Softimage is 890 Euro/ 1230 USD/ 770 GBP
--
Darrin Hofmeyr
Animation Supervisor
BlackGinger
+27 21 4881188
Darrin Hofmeyr
Softimage license you can start and use V-Ray GUI and tools inside the
platform, start one local render job, speed up batch rendering using
up to 5 render slaves with V-Ray Standalone or up to 5 render nodes
with Softimage batch.
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Darrin Hofmeyr <dbho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Pricing is at the bottom of that page.
> The official suggested end user price of a single new license of V-Ray
> 1.5 for Softimage is 890 Euro/ 1230 USD/ 770 GBP
>
Darrin Hofmeyr
"Chaos Group products are licensed per machine and with one V-Ray for
Maya license you can start and use V-Ray GUI and tools inside Maya
platform, start one local render job, speed up rendering with up to 10
render slaves for Distributed rendering using V-Ray Standalone, speed
up rendering with up to 10 render nodes using Maya batch."
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Darrin Hofmeyr <dbho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Chaos Group products are licensed per machine and with one V-Ray for
> Softimage license you can start and use V-Ray GUI and tools inside the
> platform, start one local render job, speed up batch rendering using
> up to 5 render slaves with V-Ray Standalone or up to 5 render nodes
> with Softimage batch.
>
Stefan Kubicek
"The official suggested end user price of a single new license of V-Ray 1.5 for Softimage is 890 Euro/ 1230 USD/ 770 GBP"
> Any ideas of price?
--
-------------------------------------------
Stefan Kubicek Co-founder
-------------------------------------------
keyvis digital imagery
Wehrgasse 9 - Grï¿œner Hof
1050 Vienna Austria
Phone: +43/699/12614231
--- www.keyvis.at ste...@keyvis.at ---
-- This email and its attachments are
--confidential and for the recipient only--
Francois Lord
"The official suggested end user price of a single new license of V-Ray 1.5 for Softimage is 890 Euro/ 1230 USD/ 770 GBP"
Dongle? wtf?
Marc-Andre Carbonneau
So you don’t get VRay 2.0 and the rendering is limited to 5 machines whereas it’s unlimited for MAX?!!
From: softimag...@listproc.autodesk.com
[mailto:softimag...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Francois
Lord
Sent: 20 février 2012 10:36
To: soft...@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: V-Ray for Softimage released
From the web page.
Eugen Sares
I remember the presentation of the beta by Rusko Ruskov in Siegen/Germany
October 2009...
Am 20.02.2012, 15:54 Uhr, schrieb Ben Rogall
<XSI_...@shaders.moederogall.com>:
> http://www.chaosgroup.com/en/2/vray_softimage.html?our=0215
Simon Reeves
Rob Chapman
Marc-Andre Carbonneau
Ya. I thought VRay would hurt Arnold but I’m pretty reassured now. :P
From: softimag...@listproc.autodesk.com
[mailto:softimag...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Simon
Reeves
Sent: 20 février 2012 11:17
To: soft...@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: V-Ray for Softimage released
So max has unlimited batch licences, and vray matches that.
Simon Reeves
Stephen Blair
It was always 5 Batch licenses with XSI.
Maya includes 5 Batch too, btw.
From: softimag...@listproc.autodesk.com [mailto:softimag...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Simon Reeves
Sent: February-20-12 11:48 AM
To: soft...@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: V-Ray for Softimage released
Did Autodesk change the licencing numbers when they took over Soft? Or was it always 5?
On 20 February 2012 16:41, Marc-Andre Carbonneau <marc-andre...@ubisoft.com<mailto:marc-andre...@ubisoft.com>> wrote:
Ya. I thought VRay would hurt Arnold but I'm pretty reassured now. :P
From: softimag...@listproc.autodesk.com<mailto:softimag...@listproc.autodesk.com> [mailto:softimag...@listproc.autodesk.com<mailto:softimag...@listproc.autodesk.com>] On Behalf Of Simon Reeves
Sent: 20 février 2012 11:17
To: soft...@listproc.autodesk.com<mailto:soft...@listproc.autodesk.com>
Subject: Re: V-Ray for Softimage released
So max has unlimited batch licences, and vray matches that.
Softimages has 5, so vray has 5
Does that mean Maya has 10 and Vray has 10?
Still it's an odd policy to be different for different software I think.
On 20 February 2012 15:55, Eugen Sares <soft...@keyvis.at<mailto:soft...@keyvis.at>> wrote:
Very good news!!
I remember the presentation of the beta by Rusko Ruskov in Siegen/Germany October 2009...
Am 20.02.2012, 15:54 Uhr, schrieb Ben Rogall <XSI_...@shaders.moederogall.com<mailto:XSI_...@shaders.moederogall.com>>:
http://www.chaosgroup.com/en/2/vray_softimage.html?our=0215
Ben Beckett
Kamen Lilov
So you don’t get VRay 2.0 and the rendering is limited to 5 machines whereas it’s unlimited for MAX?!!
The version is numbered 1.5 because it does not yet support RT which now comes standard (included) with the flagship products, VRay for Max and VRay for Maya.
Matt Morris
Marc-Andre Carbonneau
Aaah! Thanks for the clarification. It can be misleading. ;)
So all in all, I can exchange VRay scenes between MAX and Softimage without a problem then!
VRay RT is super interesting. Hopefully it makes it way this side too.
From: softimag...@listproc.autodesk.com
[mailto:softimag...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Kamen
Lilov
Sent: 20 février 2012 12:24
To: soft...@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: V-Ray for Softimage released
On 2/20/2012 5:54 PM, Marc-Andre Carbonneau wrote:
Adam Sale
Thats the feature we really want here.
Just hope it arrives withing the year.
Adam
Simon Reeves
Simon Reeves
Rob Chapman
phil harbath
----- Original Message -----From: Rob ChapmanSent: Monday, February 20, 2012 6:45 PMSubject: Re: V-Ray for Softimage released
Greg Punchatz
I have not seen a render region in any of the demos and it seems they have to press “render frame” to see any changes…does anyone know if that is a real issue or just an oversight in the demo vids?
Does Vray have a progressive rendering like Arnold?
Thanks
Greg
From: softimag...@listproc.autodesk.com [mailto:softimag...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Rob Chapman
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2012 5:46 PM
To: soft...@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: V-Ray for Softimage released
just watched the VRay hair & fur video - good stuff! so far its been an educational explanation, simple to setup, fast rendering, & looks fantastic. so.. whats the catch? theres always a catch right? :)
James De Colling
james,
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Greg Punchatz <gr...@janimation.com> wrote:
> I have not seen a render region in any of the demos and it seems they have
> to press �render frame� to see any changes�does anyone know if that is a
> real issue or just an oversight in the demo vids?
>
>
>
> Does Vray have a progressive rendering like Arnold?
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Greg
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: softimag...@listproc.autodesk.com
> [mailto:softimag...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Rob Chapman
> Sent: Monday, February 20, 2012 5:46 PM
>
>
> To: soft...@listproc.autodesk.com
> Subject: Re: V-Ray for Softimage released
>
>
>
> just watched the VRay hair & fur video - good stuff! so far its been an
> educational explanation, simple to setup, fast rendering, & looks fantastic.
> so.. � whats the catch? �theres always a catch right? �:)
>
>
Kamen Lilov
I have not seen a render region in any of the demos and it seems they have to press “render frame” to see any changes…
Does Vray have a progressive rendering like Arnold?
Kamen Lilov
> does anyone know if Rendermap is supported with vray?
>
textures, due to the important role Softimage plays in game development.
PM me (at kamen...@chaosgroup.com) for more info.
pet...@skynet.be
Juhani Karlsson
pet...@skynet.be
.Rob Wuijster
But some aren't needed anymore (no more shortcuts), some might be missing and some are added by 3rd party writers.
Having complete rendertrees move over from renderer to renderer would be awesome, but with all the different approaches to rendering, this is not going to happen any time soon I guess.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but atm even V-ray shaderlibraries exist only in their own eco-system, it's not possible to swap/move shaders from max to maya to softimage.
Rob Wuijster E ro...@casema.nl \/-------------\/----------------\/
On 21-2-2012 12:35, Juhani Karlsson wrote:
Great to see this happen! : )
- Juhani
How is rendertree support with VRay?
There�s so many usefull nodes/shaders coming with softimage, some obscure ones being really essential � which ones will work and is there� documentation on this?And the other way around, what shaders come with Vray? (this is probably pushing things � will they work on other renderers?)�
A renderer without very extensive support of the rendertree has only limited appeal.Rendering is half of the equation, the other half is making things look they way you want them to.That is the main caveat with third party renderers IMO: you have to redo the shading networks, and stick to basics and third party provided nodes.
I�d love to be wrong though.�����
From: Kamen LilovSent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 2:12 AMSubject: Re: V-Ray for Softimage released
�
On 2/21/2012 2:35 AM, Greg Punchatz wrote:
I have not seen a render region in any of the demos and it seems they have to press �render frame� to see any changes�
It's just a choice for the demo video. Render regions work as expected. Export speed may be an issue if you are tweaking the geometry a lot, but that applies to all Softimage-integrated renderers (even MR), as the host itself is somewhat slow at tesselation.
�
That would be V-Ray RT. Not in this version of VRay | Softimage; but integration with RT is priority number one for the next upgrade.Does Vray have a progressive rendering like Arnold?
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.1913 / Virus Database: 2113/4822 - Release Date: 02/20/12
Rob Wuijster
Regarding Mental Ray, looking at the ongoing integration into the AD CAD apps, and fxb transfer of materials between those apps, MR isn't going away any time soon. For us 3d people who are getting tired of MR getting long in the tooth, there's a nice set of alternatives now.
Rob \/-------------\/----------------\/
On 21-2-2012 13:26, pet...@skynet.be wrote:
Oh, and another question I should add: is there a �unified cross platform licensing� policy for Vray?�I�ve had my producer asking me spontaneously if I wanted VRay on Softimage � I must say I never had that happen before a producer asking to add tools.
Studio has Vray for max already and the whole �standardise on Vray� idea sounds appealing � buying duplicate licenses for softimage/max/maya less so.
Platform independent licenses, that would unlock Vray for whatever supported soft that requests it, would be great, and go a long way in replacing mental ray.
�
Finally, Autodesk offering the choice of renderer that comes with the software would be great too.
It�s a shame to think of all the licensing money flowing from autodesk to mental images that doesn�t translate into product innovation.
Offering the choice of preferred rendering engine, directing the flow of money to the software clients believe in, could stirr things up for mental images, and perhaps kick them out of catatonia. Or not.
���
From: Juhani KarlssonSent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 12:35 PMSubject: Re: V-Ray for Softimage released
�
Great to see this happen! : )
- Juhani
How is rendertree support with VRay?
There�s so many usefull nodes/shaders coming with softimage, some obscure ones being really essential � which ones will work and is there� documentation on this?And the other way around, what shaders come with Vray? (this is probably pushing things � will they work on other renderers?)�
A renderer without very extensive support of the rendertree has only limited appeal.Rendering is half of the equation, the other half is making things look they way you want them to.That is the main caveat with third party renderers IMO: you have to redo the shading networks, and stick to basics and third party provided nodes.
I�d love to be wrong though.����
�
From: Kamen LilovSent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 2:12 AMSubject: Re: V-Ray for Softimage released
�
On 2/21/2012 2:35 AM, Greg Punchatz wrote:
I have not seen a render region in any of the demos and it seems they have to press �render frame� to see any changes�
It's just a choice for the demo video. Render regions work as expected. Export speed may be an issue if you are tweaking the geometry a lot, but that applies to all Softimage-integrated renderers (even MR), as the host itself is somewhat slow at tesselation.
�
That would be V-Ray RT. Not in this version of VRay | Softimage; but integration with RT is priority number one for the next upgrade.Does Vray have a progressive rendering like Arnold?
�
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Tim Leydecker
It would be marvelous to not have to buy three instances of the renderengine
when all you�d want is to buy the plug-in exporters for Maya, Softimage and
3DSMax and one renderlicense (even coming with 5-10 batch licenses maybe)
From an artsy sight of things, this also looks like less work in the longrun,
having the actual renderer separate from the 3Dapp-specific exporter plug-ins.
finalrender and at least one other competitor seem to go that route, either
allowing to buy exporter plug-ins without more renderer licenses or even
providing various 3dapp exporter plug-ins but charging only for the renderer licenses,
which then can be used freely between supported apps.
I can imagine this would help Vray break into new markets, especially now that
there�s various Autodesk Bundle options that help to "just have a look into Softimage"
or "run Maya alongside 3DSMax" and so on.
If all you�d need is to purchase a new exporter plug-in to support your existing VRay
license (from, let�s say 3DsMax) in Softimage as well, there�d be less hesistation to
go and invest into that as testing things out (and running the farm) would feel harmless.
Cheers
tim
On 21.02.2012 13:26, pet...@skynet.be wrote:
> Oh, and another question I should add: is there a �unified cross platform licensing� policy for Vray?
> I�ve had my producer asking me spontaneously if I wanted VRay on Softimage � I must say I never had that happen before a producer asking to add tools Winking smile.
> Studio has Vray for max already and the whole �standardise on Vray� idea sounds appealing � buying duplicate licenses for softimage/max/maya less so.
> Platform independent licenses, that would unlock Vray for whatever supported soft that requests it, would be great, and go a long way in replacing mental ray.
> Finally, Autodesk offering the choice of renderer that comes with the software would be great too.
> It�s a shame to think of all the licensing money flowing from autodesk to mental images that doesn�t translate into product innovation.
> Offering the choice of preferred rendering engine, directing the flow of money to the software clients believe in, could stirr things up for mental images, and perhaps kick them
> out of catatonia. Or not.
> *From:* Juhani Karlsson <mailto:juhani....@talvi.com>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 21, 2012 12:35 PM
> *To:* soft...@listproc.autodesk.com <mailto:soft...@listproc.autodesk.com>
> *Subject:* Re: V-Ray for Softimage released
> Great to see this happen! : )
>
> - Juhani
>
> 2012/2/21 <pet...@skynet.be <mailto:pet...@skynet.be>>
>
> How is rendertree support with VRay?
> There�s so many usefull nodes/shaders coming with softimage, some obscure ones being really essential � which ones will work and is there documentation on this?
> And the other way around, what shaders come with Vray? (this is probably pushing things � will they work on other renderers?)
> A renderer without very extensive support of the rendertree has only limited appeal.
> Rendering is half of the equation, the other half is making things look they way you want them to.
> That is the main caveat with third party renderers IMO: you have to redo the shading networks, and stick to basics and third party provided nodes.
> I�d love to be wrong though.
> *From:* Kamen Lilov <mailto:kamen...@chaosgroup.com>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 21, 2012 2:12 AM
> *To:* soft...@listproc.autodesk.com <mailto:soft...@listproc.autodesk.com>
> *Subject:* Re: V-Ray for Softimage released
> On 2/21/2012 2:35 AM, Greg Punchatz wrote:
>>
>> I have not seen a render region in any of the demos and it seems they have to press �render frame� to see any changes�
>>
Vladimir Koylazov
the translator plugins. Those years of development for V-Ray for
Softimage were spent on the translator alone, getting to terms with the
quirks of Softimage, implementing UIs, keeping pace with the changing
APIs, looking for work-arounds for bugs and so forth - in short
everything that is necessary to expose the V-Ray features to users who
don't have programming knowledge - and there is still much more to be
done. It also takes quite a bit of time and effort to train developers
for this task, as there is practically zero chance to find people who
already know the Softimage/Maya/3ds Max APIs (or the V-Ray SDK for that
matter) to the extent that we need. On the other hand, the effort spent
on the V-Ray core itself can be amortized across the various V-Ray
implementations - optimizing the core engine affects all the V-Ray
products. It is also relatively easy to work on the core as we have all
the code, whereas the translator plugins depend on things which are out
of our control. For this reason V-Ray render licenses are a lot cheaper
than a workstation license. And you can still share batch/standalone
rendering licenses between V-Ray for Maya and V-Ray for Softimage.
Best regards,
Vlado
Jason Brynford-Jones
Really well done
Jason "Chinny" Brynford-Jones
Technical Product Manager
pet...@skynet.be
and 'cross platform floating' renderlicenses.
or should I say I get more and more feedback from studio owners and
producers that this is where they want to go:
a number of 'autodesk 3D seats' - kept under maintenance, with each seat
launching either of the 3 apps - softimage/maya/max
and then the same for an accompanying renderer - which could potentially be
Vray now.
this way they could decide on a number of artists, dictating the number of
workstations / interactive autodesk seats to maintain,
and the amount of rendernodes will dictate the amount of render licenses
needed, leaving the studio free to swapping resources as needed.
Right now it's a nightmare, caused by the will to use only licensed software
and the need to adapt software choice to the needs of the project at hand.
The producers tell me they hear the exact same difficulties from several
animation studios all over europe.
A software vendor understanding and accomodating this will not go
unnoticed...
Kamen Lilov
> I would like to congratulate you and your whole team. This is one of those rare occasions where something very exciting comes along.
>
corner. Now it's out in the field, and the community will have the
chance to "cast their vote," figuratively speaking.
I'm flattered that you guys (meaning "The Softimage team at AD") think
V-Ray | SI could become an important part of the Softimage ecosystem.
Eric Thivierge
--------------------------------------------
Eric Thivierge
http://www.ethivierge.com
Steven Caron
Javier Vega
Javier Vega
www.zao3d.com
http://www.chaosgroup.com/en/2/vray_softimage.html?our=0215
Simon Reeves
Eugen Sares
- feature complete (more or less)
- fully integrated (more or less)
- animation-proof (rules out most unbiased renderers)
gives:
Arnold - still beta though, expensive for small studios.
3delight - how does it perform with GI these days?
Plenty of room for another render option besides mental ray.
On the 3ds max side, afaik, VRay became the de-facto standard 3rd-party
renderer.
Thomas Volkmann
Same here... VRay instead of MR feels great, but working in Max is no fun nevertheless :/
Steffen Dünner
Arnold - still beta though, expensive for small studios.
--
PGP-ID(RSA): 0xCCE2E989 / 0xE045734C CCE2E989
Fingerprint: 394B 3DA9 9A9A 96C6 3A5A 0595 EF92 EE1F
Eugen Sares
many smaller studios not feeding a render farm day-to-day.
Are they going to release SIToA anytime soon then?
Am 22.02.2012, 11:59 Uhr, schrieb Steffen Dï¿œnner
<steffen...@googlemail.com>:
Sandy Sutherland
S.
Sandy Sutherland
Technical Supervisor
sandy.su...@triggerfish.co.za
_____________________________
________________________________________
From: softimag...@listproc.autodesk.com [softimag...@listproc.autodesk.com] on behalf of Eugen Sares [soft...@keyvis.at]
Sent: 22 February 2012 13:13
To: soft...@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: V-Ray for Softimage released
Ok, right. I know. Yet pricing policy is what puts it out of reach for
many smaller studios not feeding a render farm day-to-day.
Are they going to release SIToA anytime soon then?
Am 22.02.2012, 11:59 Uhr, schrieb Steffen D�nner
Eugen Sares
Sorry for getting a bit off-topic...
Am 22.02.2012, 12:40 Uhr, schrieb Sandy Sutherland
<Sandy.Su...@triggerfish.co.za>:
> We use SITOA and Arnold here - and it is WAYYYY worth the cost!
>
> S.
>
> Sandy Sutherland
> Technical Supervisor
> sandy.su...@triggerfish.co.za
> _____________________________
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________________
> From: softimag...@listproc.autodesk.com
> [softimag...@listproc.autodesk.com] on behalf of Eugen Sares
> [soft...@keyvis.at]
> Sent: 22 February 2012 13:13
> To: soft...@listproc.autodesk.com
> Subject: Re: V-Ray for Softimage released
>
> Ok, right. I know. Yet pricing policy is what puts it out of reach for
> many smaller studios not feeding a render farm day-to-day.
> Are they going to release SIToA anytime soon then?
>
> Am 22.02.2012, 11:59 Uhr, schrieb Steffen Dï¿œnner
Sandy Sutherland
S.
_____________________________
Sandy Sutherland
Technical Supervisor
sandy.su...@triggerfish.co.za
_____________________________
________________________________________
From: softimag...@listproc.autodesk.com [softimag...@listproc.autodesk.com] on behalf of Eugen Sares [soft...@keyvis.at]
Sent: 22 February 2012 13:45
To: soft...@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: V-Ray for Softimage released
By the way: what's the rendernodes pricing policy for Arnold?
Sorry for getting a bit off-topic...
Am 22.02.2012, 12:40 Uhr, schrieb Sandy Sutherland
<Sandy.Su...@triggerfish.co.za>:
> We use SITOA and Arnold here - and it is WAYYYY worth the cost!
>
> S.
>
> Sandy Sutherland
> Technical Supervisor
> sandy.su...@triggerfish.co.za
> _____________________________
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________________
> From: softimag...@listproc.autodesk.com
> [softimag...@listproc.autodesk.com] on behalf of Eugen Sares
> [soft...@keyvis.at]
> Sent: 22 February 2012 13:13
> To: soft...@listproc.autodesk.com
> Subject: Re: V-Ray for Softimage released
>
> Ok, right. I know. Yet pricing policy is what puts it out of reach for
> many smaller studios not feeding a render farm day-to-day.
> Are they going to release SIToA anytime soon then?
>
> Am 22.02.2012, 11:59 Uhr, schrieb Steffen D�nner
Tim Leydecker
Probably not. So here it is:
Thank you for bringing V-Ray to Softimage.
I´ve spent most of the last 6 months working with
V-Ray in production and am glad I had that opportunity.
Even thought I haven´t used V-Ray RT myself, I liked how
well it accelerated fellow artist´s workflows for lighting
and shading or even cleanups and scene/reference assemblies.
I hope all your efforts will amortize quickly enough, not just
because it´s worth it but also because you guys may then find
yourself in the lucky position to be able to finally bundle
the translator plug-ins anyway, as maintaining will hopefully
be less expensive than developing everything from scratch...
I´d like to think of that as just a matter of time, even if
you´ve clearly stated otherwise :-)
Cheers,
tim
piotrek marczak
excellent work on translator, it's gazillion times faster than older beta
builds Ive tried.
I've noticed that demo's resolution limit doesn't apply to render region, is
that intentional?
-----Oryginalna wiadomość-----
From: Kamen Lilov
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 12:54 AM
To: soft...@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: V-Ray for Softimage released
On 2/21/2012 11:10 PM, Jason Brynford-Jones wrote:
Kamen Lilov
> hey guys,
> excellent work on translator, it's gazillion times faster than older beta
> builds Ive tried.
>
> I've noticed that demo's resolution limit doesn't apply to render
> region, is
> that intentional?
>
limitations in place that would make the scenario "render a complete
picture to the region, then screen-grab it and save to file" impractical
for most real-life uses. ;)
Morten Bartholdy
Same here - very happy with it.
Best Regards
Morten Bartholdy
VFX Supervisor/3D Lead
www.gimmickvfx.com
Den 22. februar 2012 kl. 12:40 skrev Sandy Sutherland <Sandy.Su...@triggerfish.co.za>:
> We use SITOA and Arnold here - and it is WAYYYY worth the cost!
>
> S.
>
> Sandy Sutherland
> Technical Supervisor
> sandy.su...@triggerfish.co.za
> _____________________________
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________________
> From: softimag...@listproc.autodesk.com [softimag...@listproc.autodesk.com] on behalf of Eugen Sares [soft...@keyvis.at]
> Sent: 22 February 2012 13:13
> To: soft...@listproc.autodesk.com
> Subject: Re: V-Ray for Softimage released
>
> Ok, right. I know. Yet pricing policy is what puts it out of reach for
> many smaller studios not feeding a render farm day-to-day.
> Are they going to release SIToA anytime soon then?
>
J. Jones
J. Jones
Len Krenzler
-- _________________________________________________ Len Krenzler - Creative Control Media Productions Phone: 780.463.3126 www.creativecontrol.ca - l...@creativecontrol.ca