First off, let me say this is an awesome project. There isn't much out
there for Linux and I'm very happy to see a solution this solid.
I'm running the latest Debian package on an ARM processor (NSLU2) and
the install couldn't have been easier...okay, maybe if I didn't have
to restart the logging service myself to get the logs in the right
place (I'M KIDDING!!)
I have a UV sensor on my OS WMR88A. Before coming to this package I
was running another solution (something about a frog) and it saw my UV
sensor data. WView doesn't. I've looked at the source and it appears
the driver supports it, but maybe the Debain package is somehow
restricted, or maybe turning on expanded graphics isn't enough to
enable it. In either case, can someone point me to a possible
solution? I've Googled for DAYs trying to find the answer myself, but
to no avail.
Have more or less the same configuration but with a WMR100N. Make sure
that you have the "Generate Extended Sensor Values" option selected in
the File Generation section of the configuration. Hopefully you have
been recording data but not seeing it.
This should generate graphs for UV, Solar Radiation and EVAPot (no
sensor for these on my station)
It hasn't been sunny enough to register anything on my station since I
got things working but I it does generate a graph for UV with a
flatline value of 1 (station reports 0). I'm lookiing forward to
seeing some higher values soon :-).
On Feb 11, 1:27 am, SteveB05 <ste...@connectricks.com> wrote:
> First off, let me say this is an awesome project. There isn't much out
> there for Linux and I'm very happy to see a solution this solid.
> I'm running the latest Debian package on an ARM processor (NSLU2) and
> the install couldn't have been easier...okay, maybe if I didn't have
> to restart the logging service myself to get the logs in the right
> place (I'M KIDDING!!)
> I have a UV sensor on my OS WMR88A. Before coming to this package I
> was running another solution (something about a frog) and it saw my UV
> sensor data. WView doesn't. I've looked at the source and it appears
> the driver supports it, but maybe the Debain package is somehow
> restricted, or maybe turning on expanded graphics isn't enough to
> enable it. In either case, can someone point me to a possible
> solution? I've Googled for DAYs trying to find the answer myself, but
> to no avail.
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Maxwell <maxwell.tay...@virgin.net> wrote: > Have more or less the same configuration but with a WMR100N. Make sure > that you have the "Generate Extended Sensor Values" option selected in > the File Generation section of the configuration. Hopefully you have > been recording data but not seeing it.
> This should generate graphs for UV, Solar Radiation and EVAPot (no > sensor for these on my station) > It hasn't been sunny enough to register anything on my station since I > got things working but I it does generate a graph for UV with a > flatline value of 1 (station reports 0). I'm lookiing forward to > seeing some higher values soon :-).
> On Feb 11, 1:27 am, SteveB05 <ste...@connectricks.com> wrote: > > Hey all,
> > First off, let me say this is an awesome project. There isn't much out > > there for Linux and I'm very happy to see a solution this solid.
> > I'm running the latest Debian package on an ARM processor (NSLU2) and > > the install couldn't have been easier...okay, maybe if I didn't have > > to restart the logging service myself to get the logs in the right > > place (I'M KIDDING!!)
> > I have a UV sensor on my OS WMR88A. Before coming to this package I > > was running another solution (something about a frog) and it saw my UV > > sensor data. WView doesn't. I've looked at the source and it appears > > the driver supports it, but maybe the Debain package is somehow > > restricted, or maybe turning on expanded graphics isn't enough to > > enable it. In either case, can someone point me to a possible > > solution? I've Googled for DAYs trying to find the answer myself, but > > to no avail.
> > Thanks! > > Steve
> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "wview" group. > To post to this group, send email to wview@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > wview+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/wview?hl=en.
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 9:00 AM, KT. Pedersen <kjel...@gmail.com> wrote: > It does support UV from wmr200. Enable the plus templates and the > variable is UV.
> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Maxwell <maxwell.tay...@virgin.net>wrote:
>> Have more or less the same configuration but with a WMR100N. Make sure >> that you have the "Generate Extended Sensor Values" option selected in >> the File Generation section of the configuration. Hopefully you have >> been recording data but not seeing it.
>> This should generate graphs for UV, Solar Radiation and EVAPot (no >> sensor for these on my station) >> It hasn't been sunny enough to register anything on my station since I >> got things working but I it does generate a graph for UV with a >> flatline value of 1 (station reports 0). I'm lookiing forward to >> seeing some higher values soon :-).
>> On Feb 11, 1:27 am, SteveB05 <ste...@connectricks.com> wrote: >> > Hey all,
>> > First off, let me say this is an awesome project. There isn't much out >> > there for Linux and I'm very happy to see a solution this solid.
>> > I'm running the latest Debian package on an ARM processor (NSLU2) and >> > the install couldn't have been easier...okay, maybe if I didn't have >> > to restart the logging service myself to get the logs in the right >> > place (I'M KIDDING!!)
>> > I have a UV sensor on my OS WMR88A. Before coming to this package I >> > was running another solution (something about a frog) and it saw my UV >> > sensor data. WView doesn't. I've looked at the source and it appears >> > the driver supports it, but maybe the Debain package is somehow >> > restricted, or maybe turning on expanded graphics isn't enough to >> > enable it. In either case, can someone point me to a possible >> > solution? I've Googled for DAYs trying to find the answer myself, but >> > to no avail.
>> > Thanks! >> > Steve
>> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "wview" group. >> To post to this group, send email to wview@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> wview+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/wview?hl=en.
Ahhh...interesting. I do have the graphs running but didn't think I
was getting data since I don't see any "received packet UV" in the
logs and the graphs are like Maxwell says...flatlined at 1. Guess I'll
wait for more Sun and see what I get!
Thanks!
On Feb 11, 1:02 am, "KT. Pedersen" <kjel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 9:00 AM, KT. Pedersen <kjel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > It does support UV from wmr200. Enable the plus templates and the
> > variable is UV.
> > On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Maxwell <maxwell.tay...@virgin.net>wrote:
> >> Have more or less the same configuration but with a WMR100N. Make sure
> >> that you have the "Generate Extended Sensor Values" option selected in
> >> the File Generation section of the configuration. Hopefully you have
> >> been recording data but not seeing it.
> >> This should generate graphs for UV, Solar Radiation and EVAPot (no
> >> sensor for these on my station)
> >> It hasn't been sunny enough to register anything on my station since I
> >> got things working but I it does generate a graph for UV with a
> >> flatline value of 1 (station reports 0). I'm lookiing forward to
> >> seeing some higher values soon :-).
> >> On Feb 11, 1:27 am, SteveB05 <ste...@connectricks.com> wrote:
> >> > Hey all,
> >> > First off, let me say this is an awesome project. There isn't much out
> >> > there for Linux and I'm very happy to see a solution this solid.
> >> > I'm running the latest Debian package on an ARM processor (NSLU2) and
> >> > the install couldn't have been easier...okay, maybe if I didn't have
> >> > to restart the logging service myself to get the logs in the right
> >> > place (I'M KIDDING!!)
> >> > I have a UV sensor on my OS WMR88A. Before coming to this package I
> >> > was running another solution (something about a frog) and it saw my UV
> >> > sensor data. WView doesn't. I've looked at the source and it appears
> >> > the driver supports it, but maybe the Debain package is somehow
> >> > restricted, or maybe turning on expanded graphics isn't enough to
> >> > enable it. In either case, can someone point me to a possible
> >> > solution? I've Googled for DAYs trying to find the answer myself, but
> >> > to no avail.
> >> > Thanks!
> >> > Steve
> >> --
> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> >> "wview" group.
> >> To post to this group, send email to wview@googlegroups.com.
> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> wview+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> >> For more options, visit this group at
> >>http://groups.google.com/group/wview?hl=en.
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 2:07 PM, SteveB05 <ste...@connectricks.com> wrote: > Ahhh...interesting. I do have the graphs running but didn't think I > was getting data since I don't see any "received packet UV" in the > logs and the graphs are like Maxwell says...flatlined at 1. Guess I'll > wait for more Sun and see what I get!
> Thanks!
> On Feb 11, 1:02 am, "KT. Pedersen" <kjel...@gmail.com> wrote: > > sorry wmr88..
> > On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 9:00 AM, KT. Pedersen <kjel...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > It does support UV from wmr200. Enable the plus templates and the > > > variable is UV.
> > > On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Maxwell <maxwell.tay...@virgin.net > >wrote:
> > >> Have more or less the same configuration but with a WMR100N. Make sure > > >> that you have the "Generate Extended Sensor Values" option selected in > > >> the File Generation section of the configuration. Hopefully you have > > >> been recording data but not seeing it.
> > >> This should generate graphs for UV, Solar Radiation and EVAPot (no > > >> sensor for these on my station) > > >> It hasn't been sunny enough to register anything on my station since I > > >> got things working but I it does generate a graph for UV with a > > >> flatline value of 1 (station reports 0). I'm lookiing forward to > > >> seeing some higher values soon :-).
> > >> On Feb 11, 1:27 am, SteveB05 <ste...@connectricks.com> wrote: > > >> > Hey all,
> > >> > First off, let me say this is an awesome project. There isn't much > out > > >> > there for Linux and I'm very happy to see a solution this solid.
> > >> > I'm running the latest Debian package on an ARM processor (NSLU2) > and > > >> > the install couldn't have been easier...okay, maybe if I didn't have > > >> > to restart the logging service myself to get the logs in the right > > >> > place (I'M KIDDING!!)
> > >> > I have a UV sensor on my OS WMR88A. Before coming to this package I > > >> > was running another solution (something about a frog) and it saw my > UV > > >> > sensor data. WView doesn't. I've looked at the source and it appears > > >> > the driver supports it, but maybe the Debain package is somehow > > >> > restricted, or maybe turning on expanded graphics isn't enough to > > >> > enable it. In either case, can someone point me to a possible > > >> > solution? I've Googled for DAYs trying to find the answer myself, > but > > >> > to no avail.
> > >> > Thanks! > > >> > Steve
> > >> -- > > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > > >> "wview" group. > > >> To post to this group, send email to wview@googlegroups.com. > > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > >> wview+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > > >> For more options, visit this group at > > >>http://groups.google.com/group/wview?hl=en.
> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "wview" group. > To post to this group, send email to wview@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > wview+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/wview?hl=en.
> Keep in mind that the OS UV sensor only shows increments of 1, not decimals.
> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 2:07 PM, SteveB05 <ste...@connectricks.com> wrote:
> > Ahhh...interesting. I do have the graphs running but didn't think I
> > was getting data since I don't see any "received packet UV" in the
> > logs and the graphs are like Maxwell says...flatlined at 1. Guess I'll
> > wait for more Sun and see what I get!
> > Thanks!
> > On Feb 11, 1:02 am, "KT. Pedersen" <kjel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > sorry wmr88..
> > > On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 9:00 AM, KT. Pedersen <kjel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > It does support UV from wmr200. Enable the plus templates and the
> > > > variable is UV.
> > > > On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Maxwell <maxwell.tay...@virgin.net
> > >wrote:
> > > >> Have more or less the same configuration but with a WMR100N. Make sure
> > > >> that you have the "Generate Extended Sensor Values" option selected in
> > > >> the File Generation section of the configuration. Hopefully you have
> > > >> been recording data but not seeing it.
> > > >> This should generate graphs for UV, Solar Radiation and EVAPot (no
> > > >> sensor for these on my station)
> > > >> It hasn't been sunny enough to register anything on my station since I
> > > >> got things working but I it does generate a graph for UV with a
> > > >> flatline value of 1 (station reports 0). I'm lookiing forward to
> > > >> seeing some higher values soon :-).
> > > >> On Feb 11, 1:27 am, SteveB05 <ste...@connectricks.com> wrote:
> > > >> > Hey all,
> > > >> > First off, let me say this is an awesome project. There isn't much
> > out
> > > >> > there for Linux and I'm very happy to see a solution this solid.
> > > >> > I'm running the latest Debian package on an ARM processor (NSLU2)
> > and
> > > >> > the install couldn't have been easier...okay, maybe if I didn't have
> > > >> > to restart the logging service myself to get the logs in the right
> > > >> > place (I'M KIDDING!!)
> > > >> > I have a UV sensor on my OS WMR88A. Before coming to this package I
> > > >> > was running another solution (something about a frog) and it saw my
> > UV
> > > >> > sensor data. WView doesn't. I've looked at the source and it appears
> > > >> > the driver supports it, but maybe the Debain package is somehow
> > > >> > restricted, or maybe turning on expanded graphics isn't enough to
> > > >> > enable it. In either case, can someone point me to a possible
> > > >> > solution? I've Googled for DAYs trying to find the answer myself,
> > but
> > > >> > to no avail.
> > > >> > Thanks!
> > > >> > Steve
> > > >> --
> > > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups
> > > >> "wview" group.
> > > >> To post to this group, send email to wview@googlegroups.com.
> > > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > >> wview+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > > >> For more options, visit this group at
> > > >>http://groups.google.com/group/wview?hl=en.
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "wview" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to wview@googlegroups.com.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > wview+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/wview?hl=en.
> Ok so, the console is showing 2 right now, but wview is still
> flatlined at 1. I would expect 3 or at least 2 from wview. Any
> suggestions?
> On Feb 11, 6:20 am, "KT. Pedersen" <kjel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Keep in mind that the OS UV sensor only shows increments of 1, not decimals.
> > On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 2:07 PM, SteveB05 <ste...@connectricks.com> wrote:
> > > Ahhh...interesting. I do have the graphs running but didn't think I
> > > was getting data since I don't see any "received packet UV" in the
> > > logs and the graphs are like Maxwell says...flatlined at 1. Guess I'll
> > > wait for more Sun and see what I get!
> > > Thanks!
> > > On Feb 11, 1:02 am, "KT. Pedersen" <kjel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > sorry wmr88..
> > > > On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 9:00 AM, KT. Pedersen <kjel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > It does support UV from wmr200. Enable the plus templates and the
> > > > > variable is UV.
> > > > > On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Maxwell <maxwell.tay...@virgin.net
> > > >wrote:
> > > > >> Have more or less the same configuration but with a WMR100N. Make sure
> > > > >> that you have the "Generate Extended Sensor Values" option selected in
> > > > >> the File Generation section of the configuration. Hopefully you have
> > > > >> been recording data but not seeing it.
> > > > >> This should generate graphs for UV, Solar Radiation and EVAPot (no
> > > > >> sensor for these on my station)
> > > > >> It hasn't been sunny enough to register anything on my station since I
> > > > >> got things working but I it does generate a graph for UV with a
> > > > >> flatline value of 1 (station reports 0). I'm lookiing forward to
> > > > >> seeing some higher values soon :-).
> > > > >> On Feb 11, 1:27 am, SteveB05 <ste...@connectricks.com> wrote:
> > > > >> > Hey all,
> > > > >> > First off, let me say this is an awesome project. There isn't much
> > > out
> > > > >> > there for Linux and I'm very happy to see a solution this solid.
> > > > >> > I'm running the latest Debian package on an ARM processor (NSLU2)
> > > and
> > > > >> > the install couldn't have been easier...okay, maybe if I didn't have
> > > > >> > to restart the logging service myself to get the logs in the right
> > > > >> > place (I'M KIDDING!!)
> > > > >> > I have a UV sensor on my OS WMR88A. Before coming to this package I
> > > > >> > was running another solution (something about a frog) and it saw my
> > > UV
> > > > >> > sensor data. WView doesn't. I've looked at the source and it appears
> > > > >> > the driver supports it, but maybe the Debain package is somehow
> > > > >> > restricted, or maybe turning on expanded graphics isn't enough to
> > > > >> > enable it. In either case, can someone point me to a possible
> > > > >> > solution? I've Googled for DAYs trying to find the answer myself,
> > > but
> > > > >> > to no avail.
> > > > >> > Thanks!
> > > > >> > Steve
> > > > >> --
> > > > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > > Groups
> > > > >> "wview" group.
> > > > >> To post to this group, send email to wview@googlegroups.com.
> > > > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > >> wview+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > > > >> For more options, visit this group at
> > > > >>http://groups.google.com/group/wview?hl=en.
> > > --
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > > "wview" group.
> > > To post to this group, send email to wview@googlegroups.com.
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > wview+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > > For more options, visit this group at
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/wview?hl=en.
> On Feb 11, 1:03 pm, SteveB05 <ste...@connectricks.com> wrote:
> > Ok so, the console is showing 2 right now, but wview is still
> > flatlined at 1. I would expect 3 or at least 2 from wview. Any
> > suggestions?
> > On Feb 11, 6:20 am, "KT. Pedersen" <kjel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Keep in mind that the OS UV sensor only shows increments of 1, not decimals.
> > > On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 2:07 PM, SteveB05 <ste...@connectricks.com> wrote:
> > > > Ahhh...interesting. I do have the graphs running but didn't think I
> > > > was getting data since I don't see any "received packet UV" in the
> > > > logs and the graphs are like Maxwell says...flatlined at 1. Guess I'll
> > > > wait for more Sun and see what I get!
> > > > Thanks!
> > > > On Feb 11, 1:02 am, "KT. Pedersen" <kjel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > sorry wmr88..
> > > > > On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 9:00 AM, KT. Pedersen <kjel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > It does support UV from wmr200. Enable the plus templates and the
> > > > > > variable is UV.
> > > > > > On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Maxwell <maxwell.tay...@virgin.net
> > > > >wrote:
> > > > > >> Have more or less the same configuration but with a WMR100N. Make sure
> > > > > >> that you have the "Generate Extended Sensor Values" option selected in
> > > > > >> the File Generation section of the configuration. Hopefully you have
> > > > > >> been recording data but not seeing it.
> > > > > >> This should generate graphs for UV, Solar Radiation and EVAPot (no
> > > > > >> sensor for these on my station)
> > > > > >> It hasn't been sunny enough to register anything on my station since I
> > > > > >> got things working but I it does generate a graph for UV with a
> > > > > >> flatline value of 1 (station reports 0). I'm lookiing forward to
> > > > > >> seeing some higher values soon :-).
> > > > > >> On Feb 11, 1:27 am, SteveB05 <ste...@connectricks.com> wrote:
> > > > > >> > Hey all,
> > > > > >> > First off, let me say this is an awesome project. There isn't much
> > > > out
> > > > > >> > there for Linux and I'm very happy to see a solution this solid.
> > > > > >> > I'm running the latest Debian package on an ARM processor (NSLU2)
> > > > and
> > > > > >> > the install couldn't have been easier...okay, maybe if I didn't have
> > > > > >> > to restart the logging service myself to get the logs in the right
> > > > > >> > place (I'M KIDDING!!)
> > > > > >> > I have a UV sensor on my OS WMR88A. Before coming to this package I
> > > > > >> > was running another solution (something about a frog) and it saw my
> > > > UV
> > > > > >> > sensor data. WView doesn't. I've looked at the source and it appears
> > > > > >> > the driver supports it, but maybe the Debain package is somehow
> > > > > >> > restricted, or maybe turning on expanded graphics isn't enough to
> > > > > >> > enable it. In either case, can someone point me to a possible
> > > > > >> > solution? I've Googled for DAYs trying to find the answer myself,
> > > > but
> > > > > >> > to no avail.
> > > > > >> > Thanks!
> > > > > >> > Steve
> > > > > >> --
> > > > > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > > > Groups
> > > > > >> "wview" group.
> > > > > >> To post to this group, send email to wview@googlegroups.com.
> > > > > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > > >> wview+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > > > > >> For more options, visit this group at
> > > > > >>http://groups.google.com/group/wview?hl=en.
> > > > --
> > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > > > "wview" group.
> > > > To post to this group, send email to wview@googlegroups.com.
> > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > wview+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > > > For more options, visit this group at
> > > >http://groups.google.com/group/wview?hl=en.
If you can build and run from a source tarball and are willing to capture debug logs and report them here, I am planning to publish a test version on the wviewweather.com site later today and I can place some debug logs in the UV processing for WMRUSB. You will need to annotate the console's value for UV corresponding to the logs you submit as well...
> One last try before I move on...can anyone help with figuring out why > the WRMUSB driver is not trapping the UV packets?
> On Feb 13, 3:27 pm, SteveB05<ste...@connectricks.com> wrote: >> Bump...anyone?
>> On Feb 11, 1:03 pm, SteveB05<ste...@connectricks.com> wrote:
>>> Ok so, the console is showing 2 right now, but wview is still >>> flatlined at 1. I would expect 3 or at least 2 from wview. Any >>> suggestions? >>> On Feb 11, 6:20 am, "KT. Pedersen"<kjel...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Keep in mind that the OS UV sensor only shows increments of 1, not decimals. >>>> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 2:07 PM, SteveB05<ste...@connectricks.com> wrote: >>>>> Ahhh...interesting. I do have the graphs running but didn't think I >>>>> was getting data since I don't see any "received packet UV" in the >>>>> logs and the graphs are like Maxwell says...flatlined at 1. Guess I'll >>>>> wait for more Sun and see what I get! >>>>> Thanks! >>>>> On Feb 11, 1:02 am, "KT. Pedersen"<kjel...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> sorry wmr88.. >>>>>> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 9:00 AM, KT. Pedersen<kjel...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> It does support UV from wmr200. Enable the plus templates and the >>>>>>> variable is UV. >>>>>>> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Maxwell<maxwell.tay...@virgin.net >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> Have more or less the same configuration but with a WMR100N. Make sure >>>>>>>> that you have the "Generate Extended Sensor Values" option selected in >>>>>>>> the File Generation section of the configuration. Hopefully you have >>>>>>>> been recording data but not seeing it. >>>>>>>> This should generate graphs for UV, Solar Radiation and EVAPot (no >>>>>>>> sensor for these on my station) >>>>>>>> It hasn't been sunny enough to register anything on my station since I >>>>>>>> got things working but I it does generate a graph for UV with a >>>>>>>> flatline value of 1 (station reports 0). I'm lookiing forward to >>>>>>>> seeing some higher values soon :-). >>>>>>>> On Feb 11, 1:27 am, SteveB05<ste...@connectricks.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> Hey all, >>>>>>>>> First off, let me say this is an awesome project. There isn't much >>>>> out >>>>>>>>> there for Linux and I'm very happy to see a solution this solid. >>>>>>>>> I'm running the latest Debian package on an ARM processor (NSLU2) >>>>> and >>>>>>>>> the install couldn't have been easier...okay, maybe if I didn't have >>>>>>>>> to restart the logging service myself to get the logs in the right >>>>>>>>> place (I'M KIDDING!!) >>>>>>>>> I have a UV sensor on my OS WMR88A. Before coming to this package I >>>>>>>>> was running another solution (something about a frog) and it saw my >>>>> UV >>>>>>>>> sensor data. WView doesn't. I've looked at the source and it appears >>>>>>>>> the driver supports it, but maybe the Debain package is somehow >>>>>>>>> restricted, or maybe turning on expanded graphics isn't enough to >>>>>>>>> enable it. In either case, can someone point me to a possible >>>>>>>>> solution? I've Googled for DAYs trying to find the answer myself, >>>>> but >>>>>>>>> to no avail. >>>>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>>>> Steve >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups >>>>>>>> "wview" group. >>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to wview@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>>>> wview+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/wview?hl=en. >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> *Best Regards,* >>>>>>> * >>>>>>> * >>>>>>> *Kjell Thomas Pedersen* >>>>>>> *kjel...@gmail.com* >>>>>>> * >>>>>>> * >>>>>>> * >>>>>>> * >>>>>> -- >>>>>> *Best Regards,* >>>>>> * >>>>>> * >>>>>> *Kjell Thomas Pedersen* >>>>>> *kjel...@gmail.com* >>>>>> * >>>>>> * >>>>>> * >>>>>> *- Hide quoted text - >>>>>> - Show quoted text - >>>>> -- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>>>> "wview" group. >>>>> To post to this group, send email to wview@googlegroups.com. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>> wview+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/wview?hl=en. >>>> -- >>>> *Best Regards,* >>>> * >>>> * >>>> *Kjell Thomas Pedersen* >>>> *kjel...@gmail.com* >>>> * >>>> * >>>> * >>>> *- Hide quoted text - >>>> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - >>> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - >> - Show quoted text -
I don't have a UV sensor so can't offer any direct help... But if it were me, I think I'd start by adding some debug writes. In stations/WMRUSB/wmrusbprotocol.c to see if you're getting UV sensor data in the work packet:
If you're getting data there, next thing would be to turn on debugging in stations/common/station.c to see if it's getting copied into the loop packet.
> One last try before I move on...can anyone help with figuring out why > the WRMUSB driver is not trapping the UV packets?
> On Feb 13, 3:27 pm, SteveB05<ste...@connectricks.com> wrote: >> Bump...anyone?
>> On Feb 11, 1:03 pm, SteveB05<ste...@connectricks.com> wrote:
>>> Ok so, the console is showing 2 right now, but wview is still >>> flatlined at 1. I would expect 3 or at least 2 from wview. Any >>> suggestions? >>> On Feb 11, 6:20 am, "KT. Pedersen"<kjel...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Keep in mind that the OS UV sensor only shows increments of 1, not decimals. >>>> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 2:07 PM, SteveB05<ste...@connectricks.com> wrote: >>>>> Ahhh...interesting. I do have the graphs running but didn't think I >>>>> was getting data since I don't see any "received packet UV" in the >>>>> logs and the graphs are like Maxwell says...flatlined at 1. Guess I'll >>>>> wait for more Sun and see what I get! >>>>> Thanks! >>>>> On Feb 11, 1:02 am, "KT. Pedersen"<kjel...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> sorry wmr88.. >>>>>> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 9:00 AM, KT. Pedersen<kjel...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> It does support UV from wmr200. Enable the plus templates and the >>>>>>> variable is UV. >>>>>>> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Maxwell<maxwell.tay...@virgin.net >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> Have more or less the same configuration but with a WMR100N. Make sure >>>>>>>> that you have the "Generate Extended Sensor Values" option selected in >>>>>>>> the File Generation section of the configuration. Hopefully you have >>>>>>>> been recording data but not seeing it. >>>>>>>> This should generate graphs for UV, Solar Radiation and EVAPot (no >>>>>>>> sensor for these on my station) >>>>>>>> It hasn't been sunny enough to register anything on my station since I >>>>>>>> got things working but I it does generate a graph for UV with a >>>>>>>> flatline value of 1 (station reports 0). I'm lookiing forward to >>>>>>>> seeing some higher values soon :-). >>>>>>>> On Feb 11, 1:27 am, SteveB05<ste...@connectricks.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> Hey all, >>>>>>>>> First off, let me say this is an awesome project. There isn't much >>>>> out >>>>>>>>> there for Linux and I'm very happy to see a solution this solid. >>>>>>>>> I'm running the latest Debian package on an ARM processor (NSLU2) >>>>> and >>>>>>>>> the install couldn't have been easier...okay, maybe if I didn't have >>>>>>>>> to restart the logging service myself to get the logs in the right >>>>>>>>> place (I'M KIDDING!!) >>>>>>>>> I have a UV sensor on my OS WMR88A. Before coming to this package I >>>>>>>>> was running another solution (something about a frog) and it saw my >>>>> UV >>>>>>>>> sensor data. WView doesn't. I've looked at the source and it appears >>>>>>>>> the driver supports it, but maybe the Debain package is somehow >>>>>>>>> restricted, or maybe turning on expanded graphics isn't enough to >>>>>>>>> enable it. In either case, can someone point me to a possible >>>>>>>>> solution? I've Googled for DAYs trying to find the answer myself, >>>>> but >>>>>>>>> to no avail. >>>>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>>>> Steve >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups >>>>>>>> "wview" group. >>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to wview@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>>>> wview+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/wview?hl=en. >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> *Best Regards,* >>>>>>> * >>>>>>> * >>>>>>> *Kjell Thomas Pedersen* >>>>>>> *kjel...@gmail.com* >>>>>>> * >>>>>>> * >>>>>>> * >>>>>>> * >>>>>> -- >>>>>> *Best Regards,* >>>>>> * >>>>>> * >>>>>> *Kjell Thomas Pedersen* >>>>>> *kjel...@gmail.com* >>>>>> * >>>>>> * >>>>>> * >>>>>> *- Hide quoted text - >>>>>> - Show quoted text - >>>>> -- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>>>> "wview" group. >>>>> To post to this group, send email to wview@googlegroups.com. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>> wview+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/wview?hl=en. >>>> -- >>>> *Best Regards,* >>>> * >>>> * >>>> *Kjell Thomas Pedersen* >>>> *kjel...@gmail.com* >>>> * >>>> * >>>> * >>>> *- Hide quoted text - >>>> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - >>> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - >> - Show quoted text -
I have the WMRUSB source but I'm not a Debian guy (been playing with
Arch and Fedora/Red Hat mostly) so I'm not sure how to compile. I've
learned how to use autoconfig to make the .configuration file but when
I run `./configure` I get this:
> I don't have a UV sensor so can't offer any direct help... But if it
> were me, I think I'd
> start by adding some debug writes. In stations/WMRUSB/wmrusbprotocol.c
> to see
> if you're getting UV sensor data in the work packet:
> If you're getting data there, next thing would be to turn on debugging
> in stations/common/station.c
> to see if it's getting copied into the loop packet.
> Try the above and let us know results...
> Michael
> On 2/18/2012 11:44 AM, SteveB05 wrote:
> > One last try before I move on...can anyone help with figuring out why
> > the WRMUSB driver is not trapping the UV packets?
> > On Feb 13, 3:27 pm, SteveB05<ste...@connectricks.com> wrote:
> >> Bump...anyone?
> >> On Feb 11, 1:03 pm, SteveB05<ste...@connectricks.com> wrote:
> >>> Ok so, the console is showing 2 right now, but wview is still
> >>> flatlined at 1. I would expect 3 or at least 2 from wview. Any
> >>> suggestions?
> >>> On Feb 11, 6:20 am, "KT. Pedersen"<kjel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> Keep in mind that the OS UV sensor only shows increments of 1, not decimals.
> >>>> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 2:07 PM, SteveB05<ste...@connectricks.com> wrote:
> >>>>> Ahhh...interesting. I do have the graphs running but didn't think I
> >>>>> was getting data since I don't see any "received packet UV" in the
> >>>>> logs and the graphs are like Maxwell says...flatlined at 1. Guess I'll
> >>>>> wait for more Sun and see what I get!
> >>>>> Thanks!
> >>>>> On Feb 11, 1:02 am, "KT. Pedersen"<kjel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> sorry wmr88..
> >>>>>> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 9:00 AM, KT. Pedersen<kjel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>> It does support UV from wmr200. Enable the plus templates and the
> >>>>>>> variable is UV.
> >>>>>>> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Maxwell<maxwell.tay...@virgin.net
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Have more or less the same configuration but with a WMR100N. Make sure
> >>>>>>>> that you have the "Generate Extended Sensor Values" option selected in
> >>>>>>>> the File Generation section of the configuration. Hopefully you have
> >>>>>>>> been recording data but not seeing it.
> >>>>>>>> This should generate graphs for UV, Solar Radiation and EVAPot (no
> >>>>>>>> sensor for these on my station)
> >>>>>>>> It hasn't been sunny enough to register anything on my station since I
> >>>>>>>> got things working but I it does generate a graph for UV with a
> >>>>>>>> flatline value of 1 (station reports 0). I'm lookiing forward to
> >>>>>>>> seeing some higher values soon :-).
> >>>>>>>> On Feb 11, 1:27 am, SteveB05<ste...@connectricks.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> Hey all,
> >>>>>>>>> First off, let me say this is an awesome project. There isn't much
> >>>>> out
> >>>>>>>>> there for Linux and I'm very happy to see a solution this solid.
> >>>>>>>>> I'm running the latest Debian package on an ARM processor (NSLU2)
> >>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>> the install couldn't have been easier...okay, maybe if I didn't have
> >>>>>>>>> to restart the logging service myself to get the logs in the right
> >>>>>>>>> place (I'M KIDDING!!)
> >>>>>>>>> I have a UV sensor on my OS WMR88A. Before coming to this package I
> >>>>>>>>> was running another solution (something about a frog) and it saw my
> >>>>> UV
> >>>>>>>>> sensor data. WView doesn't. I've looked at the source and it appears
> >>>>>>>>> the driver supports it, but maybe the Debain package is somehow
> >>>>>>>>> restricted, or maybe turning on expanded graphics isn't enough to
> >>>>>>>>> enable it. In either case, can someone point me to a possible
> >>>>>>>>> solution? I've Googled for DAYs trying to find the answer myself,
> >>>>> but
> >>>>>>>>> to no avail.
> >>>>>>>>> Thanks!
> >>>>>>>>> Steve
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >>>>> Groups
> >>>>>>>> "wview" group.
> >>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to wview@googlegroups.com.
> >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >>>>>>>> wview+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> >>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at
> >>>>>>>>http://groups.google.com/group/wview?hl=en.
> >>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>> *Best Regards,*
> >>>>>>> *
> >>>>>>> *
> >>>>>>> *Kjell Thomas Pedersen*
> >>>>>>> *kjel...@gmail.com*
> >>>>>>> *
> >>>>>>> *
> >>>>>>> *
> >>>>>>> *
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> *Best Regards,*
> >>>>>> *
> >>>>>> *
> >>>>>> *Kjell Thomas Pedersen*
> >>>>>> *kjel...@gmail.com*
> >>>>>> *
> >>>>>> *
> >>>>>> *
> >>>>>> *- Hide quoted text -
> >>>>>> - Show quoted text -
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> >>>>> "wview" group.
> >>>>> To post to this group, send email to wview@googlegroups.com.
> >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >>>>> wview+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> >>>>> For more options, visit this group at
> >>>>>http://groups.google.com/group/wview?hl=en.
> >>>> --
> >>>> *Best Regards,*
> >>>> *
> >>>> *
> >>>> *Kjell Thomas Pedersen*
> >>>> *kjel...@gmail.com*
> >>>> *
> >>>> *
> >>>> *
> >>>> *- Hide quoted text -
> >>>> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
> >>> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
> >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
Had some sun at the weekend which caused the sensor to read UV = 1 on
my station for a long period (WMR100N) but no movement within wview. I
am expecting to have some rather dull charts over the summer if I
don't fix the problem. Have downloaded source code - what changes do I
need to make to generate debug info?
On Feb 19, 4:16 pm, SteveB05 <ste...@connectricks.com> wrote:
> I have the WMRUSB source but I'm not a Debian guy (been playing with
> Arch and Fedora/Red Hat mostly) so I'm not sure how to compile. I've
> learned how to use autoconfig to make the .configuration file but when
> I run `./configure` I get this:
> I would certainly be willing to capture any debug info that is
> helpful. This is a sigle purpose machine so its no problem.
> On Feb 18, 10:19 am, Michael Gray <lmg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I don't have a UV sensor so can't offer any direct help... But if it
> > were me, I think I'd
> > start by adding some debug writes. In stations/WMRUSB/wmrusbprotocol.c
> > to see
> > if you're getting UV sensor data in the work packet:
> > If you're getting data there, next thing would be to turn on debugging
> > in stations/common/station.c
> > to see if it's getting copied into the loop packet.
> > Try the above and let us know results...
> > Michael
> > On 2/18/2012 11:44 AM, SteveB05 wrote:
> > > One last try before I move on...can anyone help with figuring out why
> > > the WRMUSB driver is not trapping the UV packets?
> > > On Feb 13, 3:27 pm, SteveB05<ste...@connectricks.com> wrote:
> > >> Bump...anyone?
> > >> On Feb 11, 1:03 pm, SteveB05<ste...@connectricks.com> wrote:
> > >>> Ok so, the console is showing 2 right now, but wview is still
> > >>> flatlined at 1. I would expect 3 or at least 2 from wview. Any
> > >>> suggestions?
> > >>> On Feb 11, 6:20 am, "KT. Pedersen"<kjel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>> Keep in mind that the OS UV sensor only shows increments of 1, not decimals.
> > >>>> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 2:07 PM, SteveB05<ste...@connectricks.com> wrote:
> > >>>>> Ahhh...interesting. I do have the graphs running but didn't think I
> > >>>>> was getting data since I don't see any "received packet UV" in the
> > >>>>> logs and the graphs are like Maxwell says...flatlined at 1. Guess I'll
> > >>>>> wait for more Sun and see what I get!
> > >>>>> Thanks!
> > >>>>> On Feb 11, 1:02 am, "KT. Pedersen"<kjel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>> sorry wmr88..
> > >>>>>> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 9:00 AM, KT. Pedersen<kjel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>>> It does support UV from wmr200. Enable the plus templates and the
> > >>>>>>> variable is UV.
> > >>>>>>> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Maxwell<maxwell.tay...@virgin.net
> > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>> Have more or less the same configuration but with a WMR100N. Make sure
> > >>>>>>>> that you have the "Generate Extended Sensor Values" option selected in
> > >>>>>>>> the File Generation section of the configuration. Hopefully you have
> > >>>>>>>> been recording data but not seeing it.
> > >>>>>>>> This should generate graphs for UV, Solar Radiation and EVAPot (no
> > >>>>>>>> sensor for these on my station)
> > >>>>>>>> It hasn't been sunny enough to register anything on my station since I
> > >>>>>>>> got things working but I it does generate a graph for UV with a
> > >>>>>>>> flatline value of 1 (station reports 0). I'm lookiing forward to
> > >>>>>>>> seeing some higher values soon :-).
> > >>>>>>>> On Feb 11, 1:27 am, SteveB05<ste...@connectricks.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>> Hey all,
> > >>>>>>>>> First off, let me say this is an awesome project. There isn't much
> > >>>>> out
> > >>>>>>>>> there for Linux and I'm very happy to see a solution this solid.
> > >>>>>>>>> I'm running the latest Debian package on an ARM processor (NSLU2)
> > >>>>> and
> > >>>>>>>>> the install couldn't have been easier...okay, maybe if I didn't have
> > >>>>>>>>> to restart the logging service myself to get the logs in the right
> > >>>>>>>>> place (I'M KIDDING!!)
> > >>>>>>>>> I have a UV sensor on my OS WMR88A. Before coming to this package I
> > >>>>>>>>> was running another solution (something about a frog) and it saw my
> > >>>>> UV
> > >>>>>>>>> sensor data. WView doesn't. I've looked at the source and it appears
> > >>>>>>>>> the driver supports it, but maybe the Debain package is somehow
> > >>>>>>>>> restricted, or maybe turning on expanded graphics isn't enough to
> > >>>>>>>>> enable it. In either case, can someone point me to a possible
> > >>>>>>>>> solution? I've Googled for DAYs trying to find the answer myself,
> > >>>>> but
> > >>>>>>>>> to no avail.
> > >>>>>>>>> Thanks!
> > >>>>>>>>> Steve
> > >>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > >>>>> Groups
> > >>>>>>>> "wview" group.
> > >>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to wview@googlegroups.com.
> > >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > >>>>>>>> wview+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > >>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at
> > >>>>>>>>http://groups.google.com/group/wview?hl=en.
> > >>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>> *Best Regards,*
> > >>>>>>> *
> > >>>>>>> *
> > >>>>>>> *Kjell Thomas Pedersen*
> > >>>>>>> *kjel...@gmail.com*
> > >>>>>>> *
> > >>>>>>> *
> > >>>>>>> *
> > >>>>>>> *
> > >>>>>> --
> > >>>>>> *Best Regards,*
> > >>>>>> *
> > >>>>>> *
> > >>>>>> *Kjell Thomas Pedersen*
> > >>>>>> *kjel...@gmail.com*
> > >>>>>> *
> > >>>>>> *
> > >>>>>> *
> > >>>>>> *- Hide quoted text -
> > >>>>>> - Show quoted text -
> > >>>>> --
> > >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > >>>>> "wview" group.
> > >>>>> To post to this group, send email to wview@googlegroups.com.
> > >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > >>>>> wview+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > >>>>> For more options, visit this group at
> > >>>>>http://groups.google.com/group/wview?hl=en.
> > >>>> --
> > >>>> *Best Regards,*
> > >>>> *
> > >>>> *
> > >>>> *Kjell Thomas Pedersen*
> > >>>> *kjel...@gmail.com*
> > >>>> *
> > >>>> *
> > >>>> *
> > >>>> *- Hide quoted text -
> > >>>> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
> > >>> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
> > >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
I am a total novice when it comes to c and, to a lesser extent linux. I have updated wmrusbprotocol.c in line with Michael suggestions and successfully compiled the code. I originally installed my current version running on NSLU2 with Debian 6 using apt-get and the binaries reside in /usr/bin. I dont' particulary won't to mess with the current configuration and was hoping that I could insert a new module without too much bother.
When running ./configure I made sure that --prefix /usr was included as a suffix and this had the desired outcome of placing wviewd_wmrusb in the right directory. However when I started wview again I got the error: *Cannot create run directory: /usr/var/wview - aborting!* Is there something else that I need to change in ./configure to get things working properly.
On Tuesday, February 28, 2012 1:08:44 PM UTC, Maxwell wrote: > Had some sun at the weekend which caused the sensor to read UV = 1 on > my station for a long period (WMR100N) but no movement within wview. I > am expecting to have some rather dull charts over the summer if I > don't fix the problem. Have downloaded source code - what changes do I > need to make to generate debug info?
> On Feb 19, 4:16 pm, SteveB05 <ste...@connectricks.com> wrote: > > I have the WMRUSB source but I'm not a Debian guy (been playing with > > Arch and Fedora/Red Hat mostly) so I'm not sure how to compile. I've > > learned how to use autoconfig to make the .configuration file but when > > I run `./configure` I get this:
> > I would certainly be willing to capture any debug info that is > > helpful. This is a sigle purpose machine so its no problem.
> > On Feb 18, 10:19 am, Michael Gray <lmg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I don't have a UV sensor so can't offer any direct help... But if it > > > were me, I think I'd > > > start by adding some debug writes. In > stations/WMRUSB/wmrusbprotocol.c > > > to see > > > if you're getting UV sensor data in the work packet:
> > > If you're getting data there, next thing would be to turn on debugging > > > in stations/common/station.c > > > to see if it's getting copied into the loop packet.
> > > Try the above and let us know results...
> > > Michael
> > > On 2/18/2012 11:44 AM, SteveB05 wrote:
> > > > One last try before I move on...can anyone help with figuring out > why > > > > the WRMUSB driver is not trapping the UV packets?
> > > > On Feb 13, 3:27 pm, SteveB05<ste...@connectricks.com> wrote: > > > >> Bump...anyone?
> > > >> On Feb 11, 1:03 pm, SteveB05<ste...@connectricks.com> wrote:
> > > >>> Ok so, the console is showing 2 right now, but wview is still > > > >>> flatlined at 1. I would expect 3 or at least 2 from wview. Any > > > >>> suggestions? > > > >>> On Feb 11, 6:20 am, "KT. Pedersen"<kjel...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >>>> Keep in mind that the OS UV sensor only shows increments of 1, > not decimals. > > > >>>> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 2:07 PM, SteveB05<ste...@connectricks.com> > wrote: > > > >>>>> Ahhh...interesting. I do have the graphs running but didn't > think I > > > >>>>> was getting data since I don't see any "received packet UV" in > the > > > >>>>> logs and the graphs are like Maxwell says...flatlined at 1. > Guess I'll > > > >>>>> wait for more Sun and see what I get! > > > >>>>> Thanks! > > > >>>>> On Feb 11, 1:02 am, "KT. Pedersen"<kjel...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >>>>>> sorry wmr88.. > > > >>>>>> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 9:00 AM, KT. Pedersen<kjel...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >>>>>>> It does support UV from wmr200. Enable the plus templates > and the > > > >>>>>>> variable is UV. > > > >>>>>>> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Maxwell< > maxwell.tay...@virgin.net > > > >>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>> Have more or less the same configuration but with a WMR100N. > Make sure > > > >>>>>>>> that you have the "Generate Extended Sensor Values" option > selected in > > > >>>>>>>> the File Generation section of the configuration. Hopefully > you have > > > >>>>>>>> been recording data but not seeing it. > > > >>>>>>>> This should generate graphs for UV, Solar Radiation and > EVAPot (no > > > >>>>>>>> sensor for these on my station) > > > >>>>>>>> It hasn't been sunny enough to register anything on my > station since I > > > >>>>>>>> got things working but I it does generate a graph for UV with > a > > > >>>>>>>> flatline value of 1 (station reports 0). I'm lookiing forward > to > > > >>>>>>>> seeing some higher values soon :-). > > > >>>>>>>> On Feb 11, 1:27 am, SteveB05<ste...@connectricks.com> > wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>> Hey all, > > > >>>>>>>>> First off, let me say this is an awesome project. There > isn't much > > > >>>>> out > > > >>>>>>>>> there for Linux and I'm very happy to see a solution this > solid. > > > >>>>>>>>> I'm running the latest Debian package on an ARM processor > (NSLU2) > > > >>>>> and > > > >>>>>>>>> the install couldn't have been easier...okay, maybe if I > didn't have > > > >>>>>>>>> to restart the logging service myself to get the logs in the > right > > > >>>>>>>>> place (I'M KIDDING!!) > > > >>>>>>>>> I have a UV sensor on my OS WMR88A. Before coming to this > package I > > > >>>>>>>>> was running another solution (something about a frog) and it > saw my > > > >>>>> UV > > > >>>>>>>>> sensor data. WView doesn't. I've looked at the source and it > appears > > > >>>>>>>>> the driver supports it, but maybe the Debain package is > somehow > > > >>>>>>>>> restricted, or maybe turning on expanded graphics isn't > enough to > > > >>>>>>>>> enable it. In either case, can someone point me to a > possible > > > >>>>>>>>> solution? I've Googled for DAYs trying to find the answer > myself, > > > >>>>> but > > > >>>>>>>>> to no avail. > > > >>>>>>>>> Thanks! > > > >>>>>>>>> Steve > > > >>>>>>>> -- > > > >>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the > Google > > > >>>>> Groups > > > >>>>>>>> "wview" group. > > > >>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to wview@googlegroups.com. > > > >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > >>>>>>>> wview+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > > > >>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at > > > >>>>>>>>http://groups.google.com/group/wview?hl=en. > > > >>>>>>> -- > > > >>>>>>> *Best Regards,* > > > >>>>>>> * > > > >>>>>>> * > > > >>>>>>> *Kjell Thomas Pedersen* > > > >>>>>>> *kjel...@gmail.com* > > > >>>>>>> * > > > >>>>>>> * > > > >>>>>>> * > > > >>>>>>> * > > > >>>>>> -- > > > >>>>>> *Best Regards,* > > > >>>>>> * > > > >>>>>> * > > > >>>>>> *Kjell Thomas Pedersen* > > > >>>>>> *kjel...@gmail.com* > > > >>>>>> * > > > >>>>>> * > > > >>>>>> * > > > >>>>>> *- Hide quoted text - > > > >>>>>> - Show quoted text - > > > >>>>> -- > > > >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the > Google Groups > > > >>>>> "wview" group. > > > >>>>> To post to this group, send email to wview@googlegroups.com. > > > >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > >>>>> wview+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > > > >>>>> For more options, visit this group at > > > >>>>>http://groups.google.com/group/wview?hl=en. > > > >>>> -- > > > >>>> *Best Regards,* > > > >>>> * > > > >>>> * > > > >>>> *Kjell Thomas Pedersen* > > > >>>> *kjel...@gmail.com* > > > >>>> * > > > >>>> * > > > >>>> * > > > >>>> *- Hide quoted text - > > > >>>> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > >>> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
> Hi, > I am a total novice when it comes to c and, to a lesser extent linux. > I have updated wmrusbprotocol.c in line with Michael suggestions and > successfully compiled the code. I originally installed my current > version running on NSLU2 with Debian 6 using apt-get and the binaries > reside in /usr/bin. I dont' particulary won't to mess with the current > configuration and was hoping that I could insert a new module without > too much bother. > When running ./configure I made sure that --prefix /usr was included > as a suffix and this had the desired outcome of placing > wviewd_wmrusb in the right directory. However when I started wview > again I got the error: *Cannot create run directory: /usr/var/wview - > aborting!* Is there something else that I need to change in > ./configure to get things working properly. > Thanks, Max
> On Tuesday, February 28, 2012 1:08:44 PM UTC, Maxwell wrote:
> Had some sun at the weekend which caused the sensor to read UV = 1 on > my station for a long period (WMR100N) but no movement within > wview. I > am expecting to have some rather dull charts over the summer if I > don't fix the problem. Have downloaded source code - what changes > do I > need to make to generate debug info?
> On Feb 19, 4:16 pm, SteveB05 <ste...@connectricks.com> wrote: > > I have the WMRUSB source but I'm not a Debian guy (been playing > with > > Arch and Fedora/Red Hat mostly) so I'm not sure how to compile. > I've > > learned how to use autoconfig to make the .configuration file > but when > > I run `./configure` I get this:
> > I would certainly be willing to capture any debug info that is > > helpful. This is a sigle purpose machine so its no problem.
> > On Feb 18, 10:19 am, Michael Gray <lmg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I don't have a UV sensor so can't offer any direct help... > But if it > > > were me, I think I'd > > > start by adding some debug writes. In > stations/WMRUSB/wmrusbprotocol.c > > > to see > > > if you're getting UV sensor data in the work packet:
> > > If you're getting data there, next thing would be to turn on > debugging > > > in stations/common/station.c > > > to see if it's getting copied into the loop packet.
> > > Try the above and let us know results...
> > > Michael
> > > On 2/18/2012 11:44 AM, SteveB05 wrote:
> > > > One last try before I move on...can anyone help with > figuring out why > > > > the WRMUSB driver is not trapping the UV packets?
> > > > On Feb 13, 3:27 pm, SteveB05<ste...@connectricks.com> wrote: > > > >> Bump...anyone?
> > > >> On Feb 11, 1:03 pm, SteveB05<ste...@connectricks.com> wrote:
> > > >>> Ok so, the console is showing 2 right now, but wview is still > > > >>> flatlined at 1. I would expect 3 or at least 2 from wview. > Any > > > >>> suggestions? > > > >>> On Feb 11, 6:20 am, "KT. Pedersen"<kjel...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >>>> Keep in mind that the OS UV sensor only shows increments > of 1, not decimals. > > > >>>> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 2:07 PM, > SteveB05<ste...@connectricks.com> wrote: > > > >>>>> Ahhh...interesting. I do have the graphs running but > didn't think I > > > >>>>> was getting data since I don't see any "received packet > UV" in the > > > >>>>> logs and the graphs are like Maxwell says...flatlined at > 1. Guess I'll > > > >>>>> wait for more Sun and see what I get! > > > >>>>> Thanks! > > > >>>>> On Feb 11, 1:02 am, "KT. Pedersen"<kjel...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >>>>>> sorry wmr88.. > > > >>>>>> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 9:00 AM, KT. > Pedersen<kjel...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >>>>>>> It does support UV from wmr200. Enable the plus > templates and the > > > >>>>>>> variable is UV. > > > >>>>>>> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 8:37 AM, > Maxwell<maxwell.tay...@virgin.net > > > >>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>> Have more or less the same configuration but with a > WMR100N. Make sure > > > >>>>>>>> that you have the "Generate Extended Sensor Values" > option selected in > > > >>>>>>>> the File Generation section of the configuration. > Hopefully you have > > > >>>>>>>> been recording data but not seeing it. > > > >>>>>>>> This should generate graphs for UV, Solar Radiation > and EVAPot (no > > > >>>>>>>> sensor for these on my station) > > > >>>>>>>> It hasn't been sunny enough to register anything on > my station since I > > > >>>>>>>> got things working but I it does generate a graph for > UV with a > > > >>>>>>>> flatline value of 1 (station reports 0). I'm lookiing > forward to > > > >>>>>>>> seeing some higher values soon :-). > > > >>>>>>>> On Feb 11, 1:27 am, SteveB05<ste...@connectricks.com> > wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>> Hey all, > > > >>>>>>>>> First off, let me say this is an awesome project. > There isn't much > > > >>>>> out > > > >>>>>>>>> there for Linux and I'm very happy to see a solution > this solid. > > > >>>>>>>>> I'm running the latest Debian package on an ARM > processor (NSLU2) > > > >>>>> and > > > >>>>>>>>> the install couldn't have been easier...okay, maybe > if I didn't have > > > >>>>>>>>> to restart the logging service myself to get the > logs in the right > > > >>>>>>>>> place (I'M KIDDING!!) > > > >>>>>>>>> I have a UV sensor on my OS WMR88A. Before coming to > this package I > > > >>>>>>>>> was running another solution (something about a > frog) and it saw my > > > >>>>> UV > > > >>>>>>>>> sensor data. WView doesn't. I've looked at the > source and it appears > > > >>>>>>>>> the driver supports it, but maybe the Debain package > is somehow > > > >>>>>>>>> restricted, or maybe turning on expanded graphics > isn't enough to > > > >>>>>>>>> enable it. In either case, can someone point me to a > possible > > > >>>>>>>>> solution? I've Googled for DAYs trying to find the > answer myself, > > > >>>>> but > > > >>>>>>>>> to no avail. > > > >>>>>>>>> Thanks! > > > >>>>>>>>> Steve > > > >>>>>>>> -- > > > >>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed > to the Google > > > >>>>> Groups > > > >>>>>>>> "wview" group. > > > >>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to > wview@googlegroups.com <mailto:wview@googlegroups.com>. > > > >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > >>>>>>>> wview+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com > <mailto:wview%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com>. > > > >>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at > > > >>>>>>>>http://groups.google.com/group/wview?hl=en > <http://groups.google.com/group/wview?hl=en>. > > > >>>>>>> -- > > > >>>>>>> *Best Regards,* > > > >>>>>>> * > > > >>>>>>> * > > > >>>>>>> *Kjell Thomas Pedersen* > > > >>>>>>> *kjel...@gmail.com* > > > >>>>>>> * > > > >>>>>>> * > > > >>>>>>> * > > > >>>>>>> * > > > >>>>>> -- > > > >>>>>> *Best Regards,* > > > >>>>>> * > > > >>>>>> * > > > >>>>>> *Kjell Thomas Pedersen* > > > >>>>>> *kjel...@gmail.com* > > > >>>>>> * > > > >>>>>> * > > > >>>>>> * > > > >>>>>> *- Hide quoted text - > > > >>>>>> - Show quoted text - > > > >>>>> -- > > > >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to > the Google Groups > > > >>>>> "wview" group. > > > >>>>> To post to this group, send email to > wview@googlegroups.com <mailto:wview@googlegroups.com>. > > > >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > >>>>> wview+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com > <mailto:wview%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com>. > > > >>>>> For more options, visit this group at > > > >>>>>http://groups.google.com/group/wview?hl=en > <http://groups.google.com/group/wview?hl=en>. > > > >>>> -- > > > >>>> *Best Regards,* > > > >>>> * > > > >>>> * > > > >>>> *Kjell Thomas Pedersen* > > > >>>> *kjel...@gmail.com* > > > >>>> * > > > >>>> * > > > >>>> * > > > >>>> *- Hide quoted text - > > > >>>> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > >>> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
> > - Show quoted text -
> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "wview" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/wview/-/mgpuoHPH0HwJ. > To post to this group, send email to wview@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > wview+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/wview?hl=en.
I've already added a debug statement that logs the byte of data received for UV in the latest test build (Latest Stable on wviewweather.com).
If you can build/run that version then when your WMR station is showing UV values above 1, make note of the station's values alongside the wview logs and submit them here or to me personally for analysis.
> Had some sun at the weekend which caused the sensor to read UV = 1 on > my station for a long period (WMR100N) but no movement within wview. I > am expecting to have some rather dull charts over the summer if I > don't fix the problem. Have downloaded source code - what changes do I > need to make to generate debug info?
> On Feb 19, 4:16 pm, SteveB05<ste...@connectricks.com> wrote: >> I have the WMRUSB source but I'm not a Debian guy (been playing with >> Arch and Fedora/Red Hat mostly) so I'm not sure how to compile. I've >> learned how to use autoconfig to make the .configuration file but when >> I run `./configure` I get this:
>> I would certainly be willing to capture any debug info that is >> helpful. This is a sigle purpose machine so its no problem.
>> On Feb 18, 10:19 am, Michael Gray<lmg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I don't have a UV sensor so can't offer any direct help... But if it >>> were me, I think I'd >>> start by adding some debug writes. In stations/WMRUSB/wmrusbprotocol.c >>> to see >>> if you're getting UV sensor data in the work packet: >>> *************** >>> *** 216,221 **** >>> --- 219,228 ---- >>> { >>> wmrWork.sensorData.UV = ptr[0]& 0x0F; >>> } >>> + if (! wmrWork.started) >>> + { >>> + radMsgLog (PRI_MEDIUM, "received UV packet... UV: %f", >>> wmrWork.sensorData.UV); >>> + } >>> } >>> static int IsFFFFPacketStart (UCHAR* value) >>> If you're getting data there, next thing would be to turn on debugging >>> in stations/common/station.c >>> to see if it's getting copied into the loop packet. >>> Try the above and let us know results... >>> Michael >>> On 2/18/2012 11:44 AM, SteveB05 wrote: >>>> One last try before I move on...can anyone help with figuring out why >>>> the WRMUSB driver is not trapping the UV packets? >>>> On Feb 13, 3:27 pm, SteveB05<ste...@connectricks.com> wrote: >>>>> Bump...anyone? >>>>> On Feb 11, 1:03 pm, SteveB05<ste...@connectricks.com> wrote: >>>>>> Ok so, the console is showing 2 right now, but wview is still >>>>>> flatlined at 1. I would expect 3 or at least 2 from wview. Any >>>>>> suggestions? >>>>>> On Feb 11, 6:20 am, "KT. Pedersen"<kjel...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> Keep in mind that the OS UV sensor only shows increments of 1, not decimals. >>>>>>> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 2:07 PM, SteveB05<ste...@connectricks.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> Ahhh...interesting. I do have the graphs running but didn't think I >>>>>>>> was getting data since I don't see any "received packet UV" in the >>>>>>>> logs and the graphs are like Maxwell says...flatlined at 1. Guess I'll >>>>>>>> wait for more Sun and see what I get! >>>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>>> On Feb 11, 1:02 am, "KT. Pedersen"<kjel...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> sorry wmr88.. >>>>>>>>> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 9:00 AM, KT. Pedersen<kjel...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> It does support UV from wmr200. Enable the plus templates and the >>>>>>>>>> variable is UV. >>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Maxwell<maxwell.tay...@virgin.net >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Have more or less the same configuration but with a WMR100N. Make sure >>>>>>>>>>> that you have the "Generate Extended Sensor Values" option selected in >>>>>>>>>>> the File Generation section of the configuration. Hopefully you have >>>>>>>>>>> been recording data but not seeing it. >>>>>>>>>>> This should generate graphs for UV, Solar Radiation and EVAPot (no >>>>>>>>>>> sensor for these on my station) >>>>>>>>>>> It hasn't been sunny enough to register anything on my station since I >>>>>>>>>>> got things working but I it does generate a graph for UV with a >>>>>>>>>>> flatline value of 1 (station reports 0). I'm lookiing forward to >>>>>>>>>>> seeing some higher values soon :-). >>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 11, 1:27 am, SteveB05<ste...@connectricks.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Hey all, >>>>>>>>>>>> First off, let me say this is an awesome project. There isn't much >>>>>>>> out >>>>>>>>>>>> there for Linux and I'm very happy to see a solution this solid. >>>>>>>>>>>> I'm running the latest Debian package on an ARM processor (NSLU2) >>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>> the install couldn't have been easier...okay, maybe if I didn't have >>>>>>>>>>>> to restart the logging service myself to get the logs in the right >>>>>>>>>>>> place (I'M KIDDING!!) >>>>>>>>>>>> I have a UV sensor on my OS WMR88A. Before coming to this package I >>>>>>>>>>>> was running another solution (something about a frog) and it saw my >>>>>>>> UV >>>>>>>>>>>> sensor data. WView doesn't. I've looked at the source and it appears >>>>>>>>>>>> the driver supports it, but maybe the Debain package is somehow >>>>>>>>>>>> restricted, or maybe turning on expanded graphics isn't enough to >>>>>>>>>>>> enable it. In either case, can someone point me to a possible >>>>>>>>>>>> solution? I've Googled for DAYs trying to find the answer myself, >>>>>>>> but >>>>>>>>>>>> to no avail. >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>>>>>>> Steve >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>>> Groups >>>>>>>>>>> "wview" group. >>>>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to wview@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>>>>>>> wview+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/wview?hl=en. >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> *Best Regards,* >>>>>>>>>> * >>>>>>>>>> * >>>>>>>>>> *Kjell Thomas Pedersen* >>>>>>>>>> *kjel...@gmail.com* >>>>>>>>>> * >>>>>>>>>> * >>>>>>>>>> * >>>>>>>>>> * >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> *Best Regards,* >>>>>>>>> * >>>>>>>>> * >>>>>>>>> *Kjell Thomas Pedersen* >>>>>>>>> *kjel...@gmail.com* >>>>>>>>> * >>>>>>>>> * >>>>>>>>> * >>>>>>>>> *- Hide quoted text - >>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text - >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>>>>>>> "wview" group. >>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to wview@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>>>>> wview+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/wview?hl=en. >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> *Best Regards,* >>>>>>> * >>>>>>> * >>>>>>> *Kjell Thomas Pedersen* >>>>>>> *kjel...@gmail.com* >>>>>>> * >>>>>>> * >>>>>>> * >>>>>>> *- Hide quoted text - >>>>>>> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - >>>>>> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - >>>>> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - >>> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - >> - Show quoted text -
I noticed that the test code looked a little different as I downloaded this before the 5.19 source. In the end I modified 5.19 by putting the addition that Michael suggested (without "if (! wmrWork.started) )" and included the statement that you included in the test version of wmrusbprotocol.c. Had some sun today and by tilting the sensor got values on the station up to 4 but no change in the values logged by wview. The output below is consistent regardless of sensor reading. Took the batteries out of the sensor and stopped getting packets when station showed "--" so wview definitely knows the sensor is there. I ran wfrog with python and collected values consistent with the UV sensor so that should rule out a problem with the station.
Test Version Statement: Mar 3 15:12:21 chester wviewd[1067]: <1330787541320> : WMRUSB: received UV: 01 Michaels Statement: Mar 3 15:12:21 chester wviewd[1067]: <1330787541321> : received UV packet... UV: 0.000000
I only modified decodeUV - if there are additional statements in the test code that will help with debugging let me know and I will compile your test code directly without edits. Otherwise I assume it's a case of checking the raw values. How do I do that?
Thanks Max
For reference this is how my modified wmrprotocol.c looks:
} On Saturday, March 3, 2012 12:03:39 PM UTC, mteel wrote: > I've already added a debug statement that logs the byte of data received > for UV in the latest test build (Latest Stable on wviewweather.com).
> If you can build/run that version then when your WMR station is showing > UV values above 1, make note of the station's values alongside the wview > logs and submit them here or to me personally for analysis.
> Thanks, > Mark
> On 2/28/12 7:08 AM, Maxwell wrote: > > Had some sun at the weekend which caused the sensor to read UV = 1 on > > my station for a long period (WMR100N) but no movement within wview. I > > am expecting to have some rather dull charts over the summer if I > > don't fix the problem. Have downloaded source code - what changes do I > > need to make to generate debug info?
> > On Feb 19, 4:16 pm, SteveB05<ste...@connectricks.com> wrote: > >> I have the WMRUSB source but I'm not a Debian guy (been playing with > >> Arch and Fedora/Red Hat mostly) so I'm not sure how to compile. I've > >> learned how to use autoconfig to make the .configuration file but when > >> I run `./configure` I get this:
> >> I would certainly be willing to capture any debug info that is > >> helpful. This is a sigle purpose machine so its no problem.
> >> On Feb 18, 10:19 am, Michael Gray<lmg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> I don't have a UV sensor so can't offer any direct help... But if it > >>> were me, I think I'd > >>> start by adding some debug writes. In stations/WMRUSB/wmrusbprotocol.c > >>> to see > >>> if you're getting UV sensor data in the work packet: > >>> *************** > >>> *** 216,221 **** > >>> --- 219,228 ---- > >>> { > >>> wmrWork.sensorData.UV = ptr[0]& 0x0F; > >>> } > >>> + if (! wmrWork.started) > >>> + { > >>> + radMsgLog (PRI_MEDIUM, "received UV packet... UV: %f", > >>> wmrWork.sensorData.UV); > >>> + } > >>> } > >>> static int IsFFFFPacketStart (UCHAR* value) > >>> If you're getting data there, next thing would be to turn on debugging > >>> in stations/common/station.c > >>> to see if it's getting copied into the loop packet. > >>> Try the above and let us know results... > >>> Michael > >>> On 2/18/2012 11:44 AM, SteveB05 wrote: > >>>> One last try before I move on...can anyone help with figuring out why > >>>> the WRMUSB driver is not trapping the UV packets? > >>>> On Feb 13, 3:27 pm, SteveB05<ste...@connectricks.com> wrote: > >>>>> Bump...anyone? > >>>>> On Feb 11, 1:03 pm, SteveB05<ste...@connectricks.com> wrote: > >>>>>> Ok so, the console is showing 2 right now, but wview is still > >>>>>> flatlined at 1. I would expect 3 or at least 2 from wview. Any > >>>>>> suggestions? > >>>>>> On Feb 11, 6:20 am, "KT. Pedersen"<kjel...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>> Keep in mind that the OS UV sensor only shows increments of 1, not > decimals. > >>>>>>> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 2:07 PM, SteveB05<ste...@connectricks.com> > wrote: > >>>>>>>> Ahhh...interesting. I do have the graphs running but didn't think > I > >>>>>>>> was getting data since I don't see any "received packet UV" in the > >>>>>>>> logs and the graphs are like Maxwell says...flatlined at 1. Guess > I'll > >>>>>>>> wait for more Sun and see what I get! > >>>>>>>> Thanks! > >>>>>>>> On Feb 11, 1:02 am, "KT. Pedersen"<kjel...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> sorry wmr88.. > >>>>>>>>> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 9:00 AM, KT. Pedersen<kjel...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> It does support UV from wmr200. Enable the plus templates and > the > >>>>>>>>>> variable is UV. > >>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Maxwell< > maxwell.tay...@virgin.net > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> Have more or less the same configuration but with a WMR100N. > Make sure > >>>>>>>>>>> that you have the "Generate Extended Sensor Values" option > selected in > >>>>>>>>>>> the File Generation section of the configuration. Hopefully > you have > >>>>>>>>>>> been recording data but not seeing it. > >>>>>>>>>>> This should generate graphs for UV, Solar Radiation and EVAPot > (no > >>>>>>>>>>> sensor for these on my station) > >>>>>>>>>>> It hasn't been sunny enough to register anything on my station > since I > >>>>>>>>>>> got things working but I it does generate a graph for UV with a > >>>>>>>>>>> flatline value of 1 (station reports 0). I'm lookiing forward > to > >>>>>>>>>>> seeing some higher values soon :-). > >>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 11, 1:27 am, SteveB05<ste...@connectricks.com> > wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hey all, > >>>>>>>>>>>> First off, let me say this is an awesome project. There isn't > much > >>>>>>>> out > >>>>>>>>>>>> there for Linux and I'm very happy to see a solution this > solid. > >>>>>>>>>>>> I'm running the latest Debian package on an ARM processor > (NSLU2) > >>>>>>>> and > >>>>>>>>>>>> the install couldn't have been easier...okay, maybe if I > didn't have > >>>>>>>>>>>> to restart the logging service myself to get the logs in the > right > >>>>>>>>>>>> place (I'M KIDDING!!) > >>>>>>>>>>>> I have a UV sensor on my OS WMR88A. Before coming to this > package I > >>>>>>>>>>>> was running another solution (something about a frog) and it > saw my > >>>>>>>> UV > >>>>>>>>>>>> sensor data. WView doesn't. I've looked at the source and it > appears > >>>>>>>>>>>> the driver supports it, but maybe the Debain package is > somehow > >>>>>>>>>>>> restricted, or maybe turning on expanded graphics isn't > enough to > >>>>>>>>>>>> enable it. In either case, can someone point me to a possible > >>>>>>>>>>>> solution? I've Googled for DAYs trying to find the answer > myself, > >>>>>>>> but > >>>>>>>>>>>> to no avail. > >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks! > >>>>>>>>>>>> Steve > >>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the > Google > >>>>>>>> Groups > >>>>>>>>>>> "wview" group. > >>>>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to wview@googlegroups.com. > >>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >>>>>>>>>>> wview+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > >>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at > >>>>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/wview?hl=en. > >>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>> *Best Regards,* > >>>>>>>>>> * > >>>>>>>>>> * > >>>>>>>>>> *Kjell Thomas Pedersen* > >>>>>>>>>> *kjel...@gmail.com* > >>>>>>>>>> * > >>>>>>>>>> * > >>>>>>>>>> * > >>>>>>>>>> * > >>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>> *Best Regards,* > >>>>>>>>> * > >>>>>>>>> * > >>>>>>>>> *Kjell Thomas Pedersen* > >>>>>>>>> *kjel...@gmail.com* > >>>>>>>>> * > >>>>>>>>> * > >>>>>>>>> * > >>>>>>>>> *- Hide quoted text - > >>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text - > >>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the > Google Groups > >>>>>>>> "wview" group. > >>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to wview@googlegroups.com. > >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >>>>>>>> wview+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > >>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at > >>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/wview?hl=en. > >>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>> *Best Regards,* > >>>>>>> * > >>>>>>> * > >>>>>>> *Kjell Thomas Pedersen* > >>>>>>> *kjel...@gmail.com* > >>>>>>> * > >>>>>>> * > >>>>>>> * > >>>>>>> *- Hide quoted text - > >>>>>>> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > >>>>>> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > >>>>> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > >>> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > >> - Show quoted text -
