Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Harper Must Spend $500 Million On Investigating Commies In Canada`

1 view
Skip to first unread message

AB Thinker

unread,
Feb 11, 2006, 9:54:33 AM2/11/06
to
Now that everyone agrees that Joe McCarthy's hearings were a resounding
success, purging the American establishment of the evil influence of
Communism. It's time that we held our own hearings.

We should start with everyone who worked on a Liberal, NDP, Green or Natural
Life Party campaign since 1993, then we can move on to community leaders in
districts that failed to elect a Conservative Party MP in the 2006 election.
After that, our well intentioned inquest will move on to the leftist radicals,
musicians, actors, CBC employees, union leaders, union members, union member's
families, socialist Jews, Liberals and Quebecois.

This should be Harper's top priority. A clean Canada is a happy Canada.

mike wilcox

unread,
Feb 11, 2006, 10:40:26 AM2/11/06
to
AB Thinker wrote:

Shithead, being a member of the Communist party is not illegal.

SkyTracker

unread,
Feb 11, 2006, 11:05:51 AM2/11/06
to

"mike wilcox" <appra...@sympatico.ca> wrote

> >
> Shithead, being a member of the Communist party is not illegal.


Which one?

"The Communist Party of Canada" or "The Communist Party of Canada
(Marxist-Leninist)"?

I hear that they have superb exhibition hockey games against each other. The
only problem is that both of them want to wear the Red CCCP jerseys of the old
Soviet Union and that makes them difficult to tell apart!

Brian Bagnall

unread,
Feb 11, 2006, 12:12:39 PM2/11/06
to
"mike wilcox" <appra...@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:ZxnHf.5603$J%

>
> Shithead, being a member of the Communist party is not illegal.

Wow, Mike. You really have a hard time detecting sarcasm.

- B


Brian Bagnall

unread,
Feb 11, 2006, 12:13:17 PM2/11/06
to
Making things up - the primary weapon of the lefty.

- B

"AB Thinker" <abth...@klein.oil> wrote in message
news:43edfbef$0$11369$6d36...@titian.nntpserver.com...

David Kehler

unread,
Feb 11, 2006, 1:39:39 PM2/11/06
to
"Brian Bagnall" <bbag...@mts.net> wrote in news:4VoHf.1420$VM4.530
@fe19.lga:

> Making things up - the primary weapon of the lefty.
>
> - B

How do you come to this conclusion? Looks to me like you're making things
up in this thread as well.

David

mike wilcox

unread,
Feb 11, 2006, 1:54:34 PM2/11/06
to
SkyTracker wrote:

Well at least you don't have to worry if your "Team" will win or lose ;~)

mike wilcox

unread,
Feb 11, 2006, 1:55:43 PM2/11/06
to
Brian Bagnall wrote:


With a nym like "AB Thinker" you can never be sure ;~)

Peter D

unread,
Feb 11, 2006, 2:11:21 PM2/11/06
to
"Brian Bagnall" <bbag...@mts.net> wrote in message
news:4VoHf.1420$VM4...@fe19.lga...

> Making things up - the primary weapon of the lefty.

Ad Homin. The primary weapon of the terminally cluless.


Darren Gudmundson

unread,
Feb 11, 2006, 2:13:29 PM2/11/06
to

"AB Thinker" <abth...@klein.oil> wrote in message
news:43edfbef$0$11369$6d36...@titian.nntpserver.com...


Just wondering.

What do you intend to do with us?


Brian Bagnall

unread,
Feb 11, 2006, 6:18:11 PM2/11/06
to
"David Kehler" <dkeh...@REMOVEshaw.ca> wrote in message

>>
>> Making things up - the primary weapon of the lefty.
>
> How do you come to this conclusion? Looks to me like you're making
> things
> up in this thread as well.

Okay, if he's not making things up then I suppose Harper is spending
$500 million to investigate Commies in Canada? Can you find me the
article that says that?

Can you show me evidence of *anyone* saying opposition parties should
be, and I quote, purged?

In other words, it's all bullshit as usual. When lefties have to start
making up fantasies in order to make a point, you know things are
getting desperate.

- B


Brian Bagnall

unread,
Feb 11, 2006, 6:20:11 PM2/11/06
to
"Darren Gudmundson" <s8...@shaw.ca> wrote in message
news:tHqHf.374376$tl.233434@pd7tw3no...

>
> Just wondering.
>
> What do you intend to do with us?

Oh my God, Darren! You too!?! Turn on your sarcasm detector. Mike
Wilcox made the same mistake earlier in this thread.

I gotta say, the level of comprehension of people in these groups is
extremely disappointing.

- B


David Kehler

unread,
Feb 11, 2006, 6:31:03 PM2/11/06
to
"Brian Bagnall" <bbag...@mts.net> wrote in news:CfuHf.1423$VM4.304
@fe19.lga:

Um, please learn to read. My question was how you come to the conclusion
that making things up is the "primary weapon of the lefty". In fact, I put
forth that your statement was making things up as well.

David

David Kehler

unread,
Feb 11, 2006, 6:32:19 PM2/11/06
to
"Brian Bagnall" <bbag...@mts.net> wrote in news:vhuHf.1424$VM4.252
@fe19.lga:

Oh irony! Darren was JOKING!

David

Darren Gudmundson

unread,
Feb 11, 2006, 7:54:07 PM2/11/06
to

"Brian Bagnall" <bbag...@mts.net> wrote in message
news:vhuHf.1424$VM4...@fe19.lga...

>> Just wondering.

With all this stuff floating around about Bilderburg and Ford being a commie
ogranization - Brian, puhleeze, excuse me if it gets a litle difficult
ascertaining what is sarcasm and what is just entertaining.

But, the quesiton remains, so I'll ask you Brian. In your wet dream of a
neo-McCarthy era, what would you do with us?


Berth

unread,
Feb 12, 2006, 8:18:28 AM2/12/06
to
> Oh my God, Darren! You too!?! Turn on your sarcasm detector. Mike Wilcox
> made the same mistake earlier in this thread.
>
> I gotta say, the level of comprehension of people in these groups is
> extremely disappointing.
>
> - B

Agree with you Brian that some missed the point, the original post in this
thread was sarcastic (ironic?).

But, have you read David Brock - "Blinded By The Right" ? If your level of
comprehension is what you think it is, you'll learn that Brock created many
of the lies about Pinochet (remember him - now indicted murderer?). Created
the lies about Anita Hill that got Clarence Thomas (remember him, sex
offender) put on the US supreme court and created other lies, to which he
regretfully admits, that advanced the far right agenda.

- So specifically, what lies are you claiming the left is propagating?


Glen Hallick

unread,
Feb 12, 2006, 10:39:16 AM2/12/06
to

"Berth" <clarb...@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:vAGHf.32$_D5....@news20.bellglobal.com...


What exactly did Brock say about Pinochet?


Glen


Brian Bagnall

unread,
Feb 12, 2006, 12:02:50 PM2/12/06
to
"David Kehler" <dkeh...@REMOVEshaw.ca> wrote in message
>
> Oh irony! Darren was JOKING!
>
> David

No he wasn't. Read his reply below. Do you ever get tired of being so
consistently wrong?

- B


Glen Hallick

unread,
Feb 12, 2006, 12:41:15 PM2/12/06
to

"Brian Bagnall" <bbag...@mts.net> wrote in message
news:d3KHf.12906$aQ....@fe22.lga...

Brian...you have a very obvious problem in admitting you are wrong and
greatly prefer to dig yourself deeper and deeper into a hole. So with that
said all I have to add is..

FUCK BUDDY ARE YOU EVER A IDIOT!!!!


Glen


Brian Bagnall

unread,
Feb 12, 2006, 1:07:04 PM2/12/06
to
"Darren Gudmundson" <s8...@shaw.ca> wrote in message
news:PGvHf.601284$ki.524195@pd7tw2no...

>
> With all this stuff floating around about Bilderburg and Ford being
> a commie ogranization - Brian, puhleeze, excuse me if it gets a
> litle difficult ascertaining what is sarcasm and what is just
> entertaining.

I gotta analyze this... are you saying Bilderburg doesn't exist? Are
you saying Stephen Harper didn't visit them? Just what exactly are you
objecting to in regards to that?

And who said Ford Foundation was a Commie organization? They are
obviously radical left, anti-capitalism as *Henry Ford's grandson*
himself said. Again, what is it you are objecting to specifically? Do
you think perhaps you know more than the guy who was actually on the
board of trustees?

- B


Berth

unread,
Feb 12, 2006, 1:25:58 PM2/12/06
to
> What exactly did Brock say about Pinochet?
>
> Glen
David Brock: "Blinded By The Right" pp 31-32

"So wild-eyed was my anti-communism that I cultivated a relationship with
Chile's ambassador in Washington, and parlayed that into a "world exclusive"
interview with Chilean military dictator Augusto Pinochet ....... With a
plebiscite in Pinochet's regime approaching in 1987, I donned a bulletproof
vest and boarded the Chilean equivalent of Air Force One, joining Pinochet
and his generals on a campaign swing to Easter Island ....

In seeking out and executing this assignment, I was flippantly engaging in
the extremist one-upmanship that characterized not only me, but many young
conservatives of the era. Supporting the contras was one thing, but
defending Pinochet? You couldn't get any more hard core than that. Though I
had been shaken by reports of Pinochet's record of torturing and even
murdering political opponents, as a result of my own discomposure and
impaired judgement, I did not investigate or confront the subject in my
ten-thousand-work takeout. .... As a young zealot, I disciplined myself to
ignore the soft tug of my conscience, and see only what I was supposed to
see. ... I turned a blind eye to the facts that did not suit my political
aims. ... I proved myself capable of papering over monstorous moral wrongs
in the service of the perceived morality of my cause."


Darren Gudmundson

unread,
Feb 12, 2006, 2:45:46 PM2/12/06
to

"Brian Bagnall" <bbag...@mts.net> wrote in message
news:xNKHf.12916$aQ....@fe22.lga...

> "Darren Gudmundson" <s8...@shaw.ca> wrote in message
> news:PGvHf.601284$ki.524195@pd7tw2no...
>>
>> With all this stuff floating around about Bilderburg and Ford being a
>> commie ogranization - Brian, puhleeze, excuse me if it gets a litle
>> difficult ascertaining what is sarcasm and what is just entertaining.

> I gotta analyze this... are you saying Bilderburg doesn't exist? Are you
> saying Stephen Harper didn't visit them? Just what exactly are you
> objecting to in regards to that?

What I object to is your characterization of conferences such as this as
being controlled by shadowy organizations controlled by Jews who are to
dominate the world.

> And who said Ford Foundation was a Commie organization? They are obviously
> radical left, anti-capitalism as *Henry Ford's grandson* himself said.
> Again, what is it you are objecting to specifically? Do you think perhaps
> you know more than the guy who was actually on the board of trustees?

Ford is radical left?

Not even worth responding to.

I believe in examing the governance structures and organizations in the
world in which we live with a critical eye. The problem is when people such
as yourself create these fantastical theories it makes rational discourse
difficult.

Try and stay on the planet.


Brian Bagnall

unread,
Feb 12, 2006, 6:53:19 PM2/12/06
to
"Darren Gudmundson" <s8...@shaw.ca> wrote in message news:KfMHf.484524

>
>> I gotta analyze this... are you saying Bilderburg doesn't exist?
>> Are you saying Stephen Harper didn't visit them? Just what exactly
>> are you objecting to in regards to that?
>
> What I object to is your characterization of conferences such as
> this as being controlled by shadowy organizations controlled by Jews
> who are to dominate the world.

I never said or even implied any such thing! You are absolutely
putting words into my mouth.

I'm curious - if those words weren't said, why would *you* be saying
them?

>> And who said Ford Foundation was a Commie organization? They are
>> obviously radical left, anti-capitalism as *Henry Ford's grandson*
>> himself said. Again, what is it you are objecting to specifically?
>> Do you think perhaps you know more than the guy who was actually on
>> the board of trustees?
>
> Ford is radical left?

You are confusing Ford Motor Company with the Ford Foundation. Two
seperate entities.

> Not even worth responding to.
>
> I believe in examing the governance structures and organizations in
> the world in which we live with a critical eye. The problem is when
> people such as yourself create these fantastical theories it makes
> rational discourse difficult.
>
> Try and stay on the planet.

Your reply hasn't shed any light on what you find fantastical about my
position.

- B


Message has been deleted

Brian Bagnall

unread,
Feb 12, 2006, 9:57:51 PM2/12/06
to
"Karl Pollak" <gu...@nospam.org> wrote in message
news:43eeff21...@news.pacificcoast.net...
>
> Hey Baggy, why don't you look up the meaning of the word "satire"
> and fuck
> off already, eh?

Satire is another popular tool of the left for the same reason
mentioned - they get to make shit up that doesn't exist (enter the
straw man) and then gleefully bash it down. It's pretty damn hard to
make valid points when they stick to factual information.

- B


CalgaryBill

unread,
Feb 12, 2006, 10:01:36 PM2/12/06
to

"Brian Bagnall" <bbag...@mts.net> wrote in message
news:TzSHf.311$2D7...@fe23.lga...

I guess they'd better start using imaginary material then, just so you can
make some 'valid' points!


Walter Roberson

unread,
Feb 12, 2006, 11:20:10 PM2/12/06
to
In article <TzSHf.311$2D7...@fe23.lga>, Brian Bagnall <bbag...@mts.net> wrote:
>Satire is another popular tool of the left for the same reason
>mentioned - they get to make shit up that doesn't exist (enter the
>straw man) and then gleefully bash it down. It's pretty damn hard to
>make valid points when they stick to factual information.

It's a good thing for the sake of our society that
conservative commentators would never do anything like that.

http://www.rall.com/2006_02_01_archive.html

Saturday, February 11, 2006

Republican columnist Ann Coulter spoke earlier today to the
Conservative Political Action Committee, where the audience
included 1000 right-wingers including Vice President Dick
Cheney. There, among other things, she is reported to have said
the following:

"Iran is soliciting cartoons on the Holocaust. So far, only Ted
Rall, Garry Trudeau, and the NY Times have made submissions."

klunk

unread,
Feb 13, 2006, 7:27:14 AM2/13/06
to
> But, have you read David Brock - "Blinded By The Right" ? If your level of
> comprehension is what you think it is, you'll learn that Brock created many of
> the lies about Pinochet (remember him - now indicted murderer?). Created the
> lies about Anita Hill that got Clarence Thomas (remember him, sex offender)
> put on the US supreme court and created other lies, to which he regretfully
> admits, that advanced the far right agenda.

> - So specifically, what lies are you claiming the left is propagating?

i've often noticed that those whom are first to call others liars do so after
perpetuating their own lies and that more often than not, such behaviour is
indulged in by those whom declare themselves to be on the right side of the
political spectrum...


gap...@vcn.bc.ca

unread,
Feb 13, 2006, 8:16:23 AM2/13/06
to
"AB Thinker" <abth...@klein.oil> wrote:
"T> Now that everyone agrees that Joe McCarthy's hearings were a resounding
"T> success, purging the American establishment of the evil influence of
"T> Communism. It's time that we held our own hearings.

Last I heard, everyone agreed that McCarthy was a fucking nutbar who should
never have gotten as high up as he was1


--

Because I care,

|<+]::-( ("Cyberpope," the Bishop of ROM!)
(aka Reverend George A. Pope)
(Please quote with "gapope wrote...")
-=-
In essentials, unity;
In non-essentials, liberty;
in all things, charity. -- Baxter quoting Augustine
-=-
note new preferred reply email: Cyberpope67(at)yahoo(dot)com

PS This post specially encoded for verification purposes
--
.
from gapope(at)vcn(dot)bc(dot)ca << Official Reply Address for Usenet Post
.

0 new messages