Tis the season to be stupid
The Mog
theres ever a limit as to the level of stupidity of the human race.
First story was about this Planet Satellite that just recently took the
money and ran leaving their customers out in the cold. Apparently, the
family profiled spent something like $ 4,600.00 for the equipment and 5
years of service. Now lets do some math here: Assuming 200 bucks
Canadian for the US DSS system would leave a $ 4,400.00 charge for 5
years programing. That means these people were paying 880 bucks a year
for programming. Kinda expensive considering you can just program the
satellite cards with any good 3M program for around 100 bucks! Then the
family said that the salesman from this satellite place came over and
said they had to 'upgrade' the satellite card for Y2K compliance and
proceeded to remove the card from their system! Nice one! I guarantee
this and (probably) other 'non-Y2K compliant' H cards are making the
rounds right now, putting additional money in the pockets of these
crooks. Don't people do a little research before spending enormous
amounts of cash on stupid things like TV programming?? Sheesh...
Second story (sorry if this is a little long) was about a family whose
house burned flat to the ground the previous evening. At first I felt
bad for them - couldn't happen at a worse time of the year (but then
again what time is a good time to loose everything?). Chequebook in
hand, I was all ready to send CKY a donation to help them when I heard
what caused the fire. Apparently these doofuses left a candle lit in a
storage space after they went to bed for the night and awoke later with
just enough time to get out! Nice one! And CKY has the nerve to ask the
public to help these idiots out?? Hey, if I go to bed and fall asleep
with a smoke in my hand, can I get a handout when my house burns flat?
Of course these morons didn't have insurance either so we're expected to
feel sorry for them and help them out even though they were responsible.
I hope the public sees through this and doesn't send them a dime.
Later,
The Mog
Mr.Smithers
The Mog wrote:
> I hope the public sees through this and doesn't send them a dime.
>
> Later,
>
> The Mog
So whos fault was it the kids? Maybe it was, do only kids who never make mistakes
deserve help?
Maybe there was a lack of forethought isn't that how a lot of accidents happen?
Fuck your stupid. Fuck your stupid. Fuck your Stupid.
Mr.Smithers
Karen Marie Cvitkovitch
Karen:)
The Mog
> So whos fault was it the kids? Maybe it was, do only kids who never make mistakes
> deserve help?
<snip>
No it wasn't the kid's fault (it's a 3 year old child). The parents are
the ones who lit the candle and left it burning in the storage space.
Sure it's not the kids fault. I say remove him/her from the clutches of
these morons called parents and place him in a *safe* household where he
can enjoy Christmas without worrying about being burned up in the night
>
> Fuck your stupid. Fuck your stupid. Fuck your Stupid.
Not so stupid as to leave a candle burning all night in a space filled
with flammable items (and BTW it's 'you're' not your).
;)
The Mog
Mr.Smithers
w3sp...@wpg.flame wrote:
> I'm a FUCKING MORON.
>
>
>
> ______
> spider
>
Your clear in your points, ya pathetic old pouch.
Mr.smithers
Mr.Smithers
Karen Marie Cvitkovitch wrote:
> The world just might end. I agree with Smithy.
>
> Karen:)
My my a sour cream stamp of approval.
Mr.smithers
Mr.Smithers
Mr.Smithers
The Mog wrote:
> Mr Smithers wrote:
>
> > So whos fault was it the kids? Maybe it was, do only kids who never make mistakes
> > deserve help?
>
> <snip>
>
> No it wasn't the kid's fault (it's a 3 year old child).
So wasn't the kids fault and you still feel as though their not deserving of any
financial goodwill...your still fucking stupid.
>
> Sure it's not the kids fault.
You said that already...
> > Fuck your stupid. Fuck your stupid. Fuck your Stupid.
>
> Not so stupid as to leave a candle burning all night in a space filled
> with flammable items
You mean not quite as stupid, as to leave a candle burning all night...but stupid
nonetheless.
Mr.Smithers
mani...@home.com
We got it the first time you posted it...
Fuckhead.
The Mog
> >
> > > So whos fault was it the kids? Maybe it was, do only kids who never make mistakes
> > > deserve help?
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> > No it wasn't the kid's fault (it's a 3 year old child).
>
> So wasn't the kids fault and you still feel as though their not deserving of any
> financial goodwill...your still fucking stupid.
>
> >
There's plenty of other families out there that are far more deserving
of financial support than these morons. I guess we just forget about
them and give a nice big handout to this one 'deserving' family courtesy
of CKY's schmaltzy begging campaign.
I thought this situation is what the Salvation Army was for...
The Mog
Mr.Smithers
Brent Mazur
"The Mog" <the...@fcmail.com> wrote in message
news:386270...@fcmail.com...
> Not so stupid as to leave a candle burning all night in a space filled
I think the point was they were so stupid as to not have insurance. Anyone
*that* dumb doesn't deserve my help.
Brent
Mr.Smithers
The Mog wrote:
> > > Mr Smithers wrote:
> > >
> > > > So whos fault was it the kids? Maybe it was, do only kids who never make mistakes
> > > > deserve help?
> > >
> > > <snip>
> > >
> > > No it wasn't the kid's fault (it's a 3 year old child).
> >
> > So wasn't the kids fault and you still feel as though their not deserving of any
> > financial goodwill...your still fucking stupid.
> >
> > >
> - Fuck the children.
Well I though thats how you felt...what a winner.
>
> There's plenty of other families out there that are far more deserving
> of financial support than these morons.
Like your own.
> I guess we just forget about
> them and give a nice big handout to this one
A small one would probably be sufficient.
>
> I thought this situation is what the Salvation Army was for...
No, their for your benefit, when your rimming bums, and eating garbage in the new
millennium.
Mr.Smithers
The Mog
Brent Mazur wrote:
> I think the point was they were so stupid as to not have insurance. Anyone
> *that* dumb doesn't deserve my help.
>
> Brent
Exactly. At least if people make the effort to safeguard against this
type of situation then they deserve some consideration. How anyone can
NOT have insurance in this day and age is beyond me. It should be
factored into the cost of the mortgage or rent payments.
The Mog
Mr.Smithers
w3sp...@wpg.flame wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Dec 1999 19:00:32 GMT, The Mog <the...@fcmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Not so stupid as to leave a candle burning all night in a space filled
> > with flammable items (and BTW it's 'you're' not your).
> > ;)
> >
> > The Mog
>
> Mog, Mog, Mog,
> I'm jealous of Mr Smithers; his gene-pool is superior and he's
> shoving my head in my own excrement.
>
> Dumb it down, for my benefit.
> ______
> spider
>
> Free Flames
> email: w3sp...@wpg.flame
There how's that.
Mr.smithers
Mr.Smithers
w3sp...@wpg.flame wrote:
>
> I don't mind fucking my dog, but the wife feels a wee bit left out.
>
> What scintillating wit.
Thanks.
>
> Whatever shall I do?
Auto fellat...as usual.
>
>
> You poor inbred puppy.
You stupid old man.
Mr.Smithers
mani...@home.com
>Exactly. At least if people make the effort to safeguard against this
>type of situation then they deserve some consideration. How anyone can
>NOT have insurance in this day and age is beyond me. It should be
>factored into the cost of the mortgage or rent payments.
Insurance is factored into rent and it's a condition of most if not
all mortgages. The insurance refered to would be to cover their own
personal property, not the landlord's property. Wait until they find
out that they can be sued by the landlords insurance company for their
stupidity.
mani...@home.com
>Fuckhead.
Deja vu...
Mr.Smithers
w3sp...@wpg.flame wrote:>
> > I don't mind fucking my dog, but the wife feels a wee bit left out.
>
> No-one cares about my lack of life. Leave it out.
>
>
> > > Whatever shall I do?
> >
> > Auto fellat...as usual.
>
> My dad spells his name with an O.
>
> Check my diapers.
>
> >
No thanks you have your mom for that.
Mr.Smithers
Mr.Smithers
w3sp...@wpg.flame wrote:
>
> See I'm As pathetic as usual.
>
> ______
> spider
>
> Free Flames
> email: w3sp...@wpg.flame
Yes
Mr.Smithers
The Mog
mani...@home.com wrote:
>
> Insurance is factored into rent and it's a condition of most if not
> all mortgages. The insurance refered to would be to cover their own
> personal property, not the landlord's property.
Actually I meant personal property insurance should be factored into
rent/mortgage payments by the resident.
Maybe it's impractical to do it this way (since personal acquisitions
change from year to year)?
The Mog
The Mog
w3sp...@wpg.flame wrote:
>
> Mog, Mog, Mog,
> You're talking to Mr Slithers; his gene-pool is a pisspuddle and he's
> drowning in his own excrement.
> Dumb it down, or you'll be explaining for weeks.
> ______
> spider
>
> Free Flames
> email: w3sp...@wpg.flame
Kind of assumed that from his previous replies. ;)
The Mog
mani...@home.com
>Actually I meant personal property insurance should be factored into
>rent/mortgage payments by the resident.
>Maybe it's impractical to do it this way (since personal acquisitions
>change from year to year)?
Oh. So let's see if I get this. You want a landlord or morgage holder
to act as a broker/agent for a private insurance company to apply
compulsory personal property...
Wait, wait, I got it...let's make it that this insurance business must
be handed over to the government insurance corporation...you know the
sister company of the one that does Autopac.
Great stuff. Then we can have no fault limited recovery on claims, and
a whole host of new bureaucrats deciding what your risk is and
validity of your claim...
And the rates can be calculated based on all of the claims in Canada
and adjusted by the incident risk in all of North America...
Hmmmmm...you're either a socialist, a fascist, or someone very
niave...(now there's an oxymoron)...
COWW (Stan Olson)
>
> mani...@home.com wrote:
> >
> > Insurance is factored into rent and it's a condition of most if not
> > all mortgages. The insurance refered to would be to cover their own
> > personal property, not the landlord's property.
>
> rent/mortgage payments by the resident.
> Maybe it's impractical to do it this way (since personal acquisitions
> change from year to year)?
>
Stan: most consumer products purchased/marketed have very little
actual value anyway ...
Paying to insure them is just another form of consumption tax.
Most people/insurers/banks know the price of everything
but the value, of nothing.
Sheila Paterson
>I was watching CKY newshour last night. Two stories left me wondering if
>theres ever a limit as to the level of stupidity of the human race.
[snip]
No, there's not.
Sheila Paterson
Note: address transmogrified.
The Mog
mani...@home.com wrote:
>
> On Fri, 24 Dec 1999 04:23:04 GMT, The Mog <the...@fcmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Actually I meant personal property insurance should be factored into
> >rent/mortgage payments by the resident.
> >Maybe it's impractical to do it this way (since personal acquisitions
> >change from year to year)?
>
> Oh. So let's see if I get this. You want a landlord or morgage holder
> to act as a broker/agent for a private insurance company to apply
> compulsory personal property...
No No No. I meant the people making the rent/mortgage payments should
factor in what their personal insurance costs should be and add that to
the total cost of their payment. In other words, if a person/persons buy
a house, their mortgage payment should include a payment to the
respective insurance company of their choice (entirely handled by them).
> Wait, wait, I got it...let's make it that this insurance business must
> be handed over to the government insurance corporation...you know the
> sister company of the one that does Autopac.
>
> Great stuff. Then we can have no fault limited recovery on claims, and
> a whole host of new bureaucrats deciding what your risk is and
> validity of your claim...
>
> And the rates can be calculated based on all of the claims in Canada
> and adjusted by the incident risk in all of North America...
Totally a bad idea. No argument here.
> Hmmmmm...you're either a socialist, a fascist, or someone very
> niave...(now there's an oxymoron)...
>
Sorry none of the above. The whole point of this is if people are going
to assume the responsibility of purchasing a house, they should be able
to afford not only the payments to the bank for the mortgage but the
insurance to cover their own possesions. And that should be taken into
account when budgeting for the costs of the house (along with property
tax, maintenance, etc.)
The Mog
mani...@home.com
>Sorry none of the above. The whole point of this is if people are going
>to assume the responsibility of purchasing a house, they should be able
>to afford not only the payments to the bank for the mortgage but the
>insurance to cover their own possesions. And that should be taken into
>account when budgeting for the costs of the house (along with property
>tax, maintenance, etc.)
Hmmmm...why not extend that thinking into life insurance...add it to
the cost of having children. I can see it all now...not tonight dear,
we have no fucking insurance...
(Stan Olson)
Stan: its called, welfare ... hampers to the working
poor/poor never include condoms, dontyaknow ....
If we had a higher standard of living (like in the 60's)
this would be less important ...
mani...@home.com
<stan...@s1.interpasscard.net> wrote:
>Stan: its called, welfare ... hampers to the working
> poor/poor never include condoms, dontyaknow ....
>
> If we had a higher standard of living (like in the 60's)
> this would be less important ...
WTF are you going on about. It has nothing to do with welfare. It's a
case of stupidity, and the expectation that stupidity should somehow
be accepted and rewarded. In this case, these two didn't have a
problem getting a XMas tree and presents, and by the looks the
remanents of the fire in the media, probably could have purchased some
insurance at one time or another.
Tennant insurance packages usually run from $100 to $200 a year and
many insurance brokers are willing to work out some type of terms of
payment.
The least of anyone's worries should be if the working poor/poor (sic)
are sawing off a piece of tail and what they have their sausage
wrapped in.
There's a big difference between a social responsibility to help those
who are **unable** and those who are **unwilling** to fend for
themselves.
A single parent who continually fucks and reproduces like a rabbit has
no business expecting society to support her and whatever she
reproduces. At the same time no one has a right to force her to ensure
her partner uses condoms.
(Stan Olson)
Stan: nobody has the right to make you wear a seatbelt
either, splattery ....
Anybody that is willing to not bet against themselves
through insurance, deserves to be dispossed or die ?
Now theres the hard sell of a neo-con insurance agent ....
Stan
mani...@home.com
If an individual doesn't exercise common sense they deserve the
consequences. Society does not deserve the consequences of individual
stupidity, especially through laws meant to prevent stupidity.