prejudice
That Canadian Kid
"A prejudice is a preconceived belief, opinion, or judgment toward a group
of people or a single person because of race, social class, gender,
ethnicity, sexual orientation, age, disability, political beliefs ,
religion, line of work or other personal characteristics. It also means a
priori beliefs (without knowledge of the facts) and includes "any
unreasonable attitude that is unusually resistant to rational
influence."[1] Although positive and negative prejudice both exist, when
used negatively, "prejudice" implies fear and antipathy toward such a group
or person."
Bigotry
"A bigot is a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own
opinions and prejudices.
The correct use of the term requires the elements of obstinacy,
irrationality, and animosity toward those of differing devotion.
The origin of the word bigot and bigoterie in English dates back to at
least 1598, via Middle French, and started with the sense of "religious
hypocrite". Forms of bigotry may have a related ideology or world views."
Discrimination
"Discrimination is a sociological term referring to the treatment taken
toward or against a person of a certain group that is taken in
consideration based on class or category. The United Nations explains:
"Discriminatory behaviors take many forms, but they all involve some form
of exclusion or rejection."[1] Discriminatory laws such as redlining have
existed in many countries. In some countries, controversial attempts such
as racial quotas have been used to redress negative effects of
discrimination."
homepc
"That Canadian Kid" <Th...@Canadian.Kid> wrote in message
news:Xns9CD5AA6A2F26...@69.16.185.252...
D�j� vu
"I always find it funny that most of your posts are just regurgitations of
someone else's ramblings, do
you have any original thought?"
Diane Gall
> "That Canadian Kid" <T...@Canadian.Kid> wrote in messagenews:Xns9CD5AA6A2F26...@69.16.185.252...
>
> "I always find it funny that most of your posts are just regurgitations of
> someone else's ramblings, do
> you have any original thought?"
Well, original ≠ good. If more people took some time to learn what the
words they bandy about meant, as the Kid here seems to be offering,
perhaps we'd have fewer people shitting their pants in public.
Di
That Canadian Kid
news:hf726a$l0$1...@news.eternal-september.org:
"regurgitations of someone else's ramblings"?, Are you telling me you
never use a dictionary? Maybe I should have made the definitions up like
you and so many others tend to do.
These are definition right out of a dictionary posted here for people
such as yourself who fail understand when they use the terms. You and
others in here have a hard time with large words all the time, I was
simply trying to help, but as usual it is a loosing game.
As for original thought, I think you better look that one up before you
decide to use it.
homepc
"That Canadian Kid" <Th...@Canadian.Kid> wrote in message
Your thoughtful post just reminded me of comments made by yourself on
Monday, November 09, 2009 6:59 PM
As the previous poster wrote:
If more people took some time to learn what the words they bandy about
meant, perhaps we'd have fewer people shitting their pants in public.
Obviously I must have touched upon a raw nerve here. Someone better check
their shorts!
Diane Gall
> "That Canadian Kid" <T...@Canadian.Kid> wrote in messagenews:Xns9CD5C879D477...@202.177.16.121...
>
>
>
>
>
> > "homepc" <wiebe...@gmail.com> wrote in
> >news:hf726a$l0$1...@news.eternal-september.org:
>
> >> "That Canadian Kid" <T...@Canadian.Kid> wrote in message
>
> >> "I always find it funny that most of your posts are just
> >> regurgitations of someone else's ramblings, do
> >> you have any original thought?"
>
> > "regurgitations of someone else's ramblings"?, Are you telling me you
> > never use a dictionary? Maybe I should have made the definitions up like
> > you and so many others tend to do.
>
> > These are definition right out of a dictionary posted here for people
> > such as yourself who fail understand when they use the terms. You and
> > others in here have a hard time with large words all the time, I was
> > simply trying to help, but as usual it is a loosing game.
>
> > As for original thought, I think you better look that one up before you
> > decide to use it.
>
> Your thoughtful post just reminded me of comments made by yourself on
> Monday, November 09, 2009 6:59 PM
>
> As the previous poster wrote:
>
> If more people took some time to learn what the words they bandy about
> meant, perhaps we'd have fewer people shitting their pants in public.
>
> Obviously I must have touched upon a raw nerve here. Someone better check
> their shorts!
Look behind you.
homepc
"Diane Gall" <diane....@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:f0d7a7aa-94aa-448b...@u18g2000pro.googlegroups.com...
>
> >> "I always find it funny that most of your posts are just
> >> regurgitations of someone else's ramblings, do
> >> you have any original thought?"
>
> > "regurgitations of someone else's ramblings"?, Are you telling me you
> > never use a dictionary? Maybe I should have made the definitions up like
> > you and so many others tend to do.
>
> > These are definition right out of a dictionary posted here for people
> > such as yourself who fail understand when they use the terms. You and
> > others in here have a hard time with large words all the time, I was
> > simply trying to help, but as usual it is a loosing game.
>
> > As for original thought, I think you better look that one up before you
> > decide to use it.
>
> Your thoughtful post just reminded me of comments made by yourself on
> Monday, November 09, 2009 6:59 PM
>
> As the previous poster wrote:
>
> If more people took some time to learn what the words they bandy about
> meant, perhaps we'd have fewer people shitting their pants in public.
>
> Obviously I must have touched upon a raw nerve here. Someone better check
> their shorts!
Look behind you.
No worries here. I was just making a candid observation.
Fortunately most users here genuinely want to initiate discussion of ideas
or add their own perspective. A few however just use this forum as an
veiled opportunity to muck rake and sling insults to satisfy their own
personal needs.
That Canadian Kid
news:hf7dkh$5c2$1...@news.eternal-september.org:
>
> "Diane Gall" <diane....@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:f0d7a7aa-94aa-448b...@u18g2000pro.googlegroups.com.
> .. On Dec 2, 6:59 pm, "homepc" <wiebe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> "That Canadian Kid" <T...@Canadian.Kid> wrote in
>> messagenews:Xns9CD5C879D477...@202.177.16.121...
>>
<snip>
>> Obviously I must have touched upon a raw nerve here. Someone better
>> check their shorts!
>
> Look behind you.
>
>
>
> No worries here. I was just making a candid observation.
>
> Fortunately most users here genuinely want to initiate discussion of
> ideas or add their own perspective. A few however just use this forum
> as an veiled opportunity to muck rake and sling insults to satisfy
> their own personal needs.
>
You should really take a long look at your history and at the times you
were bayomi's stalker and how many times you threatened to go to his ISP
Sling Insults is really your middle name, you have just forgotten,time to
remember.
WTF
wrote:
-->"homepc" <wieb...@gmail.com> wrote in
-->news:hf7dkh$5c2$1...@news.eternal-september.org:
-->
-->>
-->> "Diane Gall" <diane....@gmail.com> wrote in message
-->> news:f0d7a7aa-94aa-448b...@u18g2000pro.googlegroups.com.
-->> .. On Dec 2, 6:59 pm, "homepc" <wiebe...@gmail.com> wrote:
-->>> "That Canadian Kid" <T...@Canadian.Kid> wrote in
-->>> messagenews:Xns9CD5C879D477...@202.177.16.121...
-->>>
-->
--><snip>
-->
-->>> Obviously I must have touched upon a raw nerve here. Someone better
-->>> check their shorts!
-->>
-->> Look behind you.
-->>
-->>
-->>
-->> No worries here. I was just making a candid observation.
-->>
-->> Fortunately most users here genuinely want to initiate discussion of
-->> ideas or add their own perspective. A few however just use this forum
-->> as an veiled opportunity to muck rake and sling insults to satisfy
-->> their own personal needs.
-->>
-->
-->You should really take a long look at your history and at the times you
-->were bayomi's stalker and how many times you threatened to go to his ISP
-->
-->Sling Insults is really your middle name, you have just forgotten,time to
-->remember.
Now this is funny. You then remember Bayomi at his best, he was no choir boy,
he was a great friend of Chris who beat his wife, left her to take the heat
while he ran off with investors money. Then there were his assine posts about
his shitbox Fiat, he still posts garbage from the library computers in the hope
he can annoy someone enough to get a comment. Then there were he fiasco at
the Kings head where he recorded people without their knowledge.
He pulled all kinds of shit, it justs seems you have a short memory.
homepc
"That Canadian Kid" <Th...@Canadian.Kid> wrote in message
I don't have a clue what instances you are referring to. If this is another
effort to share your self-effacing skill at sleuthing email headers, then by
all means, please help me out. Perhaps someone is spoofing my email
accounts used to post and you can be of some use after all.
That Canadian Kid
news:2cieh5lh9o8bnsasj...@4ax.com:
You seem confused simply because I never mentioned all this, I have tin
hats that work better than yours, would you like one?
That Canadian Kid
news:2cieh5lh9o8bnsasj...@4ax.com:
> On Wed, 02 Dec 2009 22:53:26 -0600, That Canadian Kid
Lol, so now it is the library and not U of W, tell me when you get it
straight.
If I was you I would also take a writing course so you learn how to
separate your characters, it gets a tad confusing for your fans, lololol
> get a comment. Then there were he fiasco at the Kings head where he
> recorded people without their knowledge. He pulled all kinds of shit,
> it justs seems you have a short memory.
Oh one other thing, since you say you have nothing to hide why in the world
would you have changed your nic, seems you have so much more to hide.
Lololol...