<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>WPF Disciples Google Group</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/wpf-disciples</link>
  <description>Group for all WPF lovers, to share knowledge on WPF</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [WPF Disciples] Re: New Year Starting Off NICE!</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/wpf-disciples/browse_frm/thread/a6d79f5d8a0bd8f9/fbbb65f0c2fbf1da?show_docid=fbbb65f0c2fbf1da</link>
  <description>
  That&#39;s very kind of you sir. I hope that you can get it for Daniel at least, &lt;br&gt; he really is outstanding.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/wpf-disciples/browse_frm/thread/a6d79f5d8a0bd8f9/fbbb65f0c2fbf1da?show_docid=fbbb65f0c2fbf1da</guid>
  <author>
  pete.ohan...@gmail.com
  (Peter O&#39;Hanlon)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 14:15:13 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [WPF Disciples] Re: New Year Starting Off NICE!</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/wpf-disciples/browse_frm/thread/a6d79f5d8a0bd8f9/aadcb62b24c1758b?show_docid=aadcb62b24c1758b</link>
  <description>
  Yeah its not as easy to vote someone in as I would have hoped, you must &lt;br&gt; contact your MVP lead, give evidence etc etc &lt;br&gt; We shall do you next Pete, how about that
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/wpf-disciples/browse_frm/thread/a6d79f5d8a0bd8f9/aadcb62b24c1758b?show_docid=aadcb62b24c1758b</guid>
  <author>
  sacha.bar...@gmail.com
  (Sacha Barber)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 13:42:56 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [WPF Disciples] Re: New Year Starting Off NICE!</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/wpf-disciples/browse_frm/thread/a6d79f5d8a0bd8f9/bd1d01c154689770?show_docid=bd1d01c154689770</link>
  <description>
  I&#39;d love to vote for him, but I can&#39;t. It&#39;s not out of malice, more that I&#39;m &lt;br&gt; not an MVP. Mind you, Daniel has done much more to earn it than me so that&#39;s &lt;br&gt; fair.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/wpf-disciples/browse_frm/thread/a6d79f5d8a0bd8f9/bd1d01c154689770?show_docid=bd1d01c154689770</guid>
  <author>
  pete.ohan...@gmail.com
  (Peter O&#39;Hanlon)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 12:19:08 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [WPF Disciples] Re: XML namespace usurpage</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/wpf-disciples/browse_frm/thread/132dc39cf4d353c6/c114ef2ec445ecf8?show_docid=c114ef2ec445ecf8</link>
  <description>
  Hi Daniel, &lt;br&gt; Correct. Suppose you referenced Magellan, and Magellan&#39;s evil twin, &lt;br&gt; Bagellan. And they both had a &amp;lt;Layout&amp;gt; element. To differentiate you would &lt;br&gt; have to do: &lt;br&gt; &amp;lt;UserControl &lt;br&gt; xmlns:magellan=&amp;quot;clr-namespace: ...&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; xmlns:bagellan=&amp;quot;clr-namespace: ...&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; &amp;lt;bagellan:Layout .../&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; &amp;lt;magellan:Layout .../&amp;gt;
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/wpf-disciples/browse_frm/thread/132dc39cf4d353c6/c114ef2ec445ecf8?show_docid=c114ef2ec445ecf8</guid>
  <author>
  p...@paulstovell.com
  (Paul Stovell)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 12:12:02 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [WPF Disciples] Re: New Year Starting Off NICE!</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/wpf-disciples/browse_frm/thread/a6d79f5d8a0bd8f9/8a72926cd6515531?show_docid=8a72926cd6515531</link>
  <description>
  Looking into it now actually. I&#39;ll let the group know when I have done it, &lt;br&gt; and they can also cast their own votes in your honour.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/wpf-disciples/browse_frm/thread/a6d79f5d8a0bd8f9/8a72926cd6515531?show_docid=8a72926cd6515531</guid>
  <author>
  sacha.bar...@gmail.com
  (Sacha Barber)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 11:29:25 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: New Year Starting Off NICE!</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/wpf-disciples/browse_frm/thread/a6d79f5d8a0bd8f9/35cdf3081047b32d?show_docid=35cdf3081047b32d</link>
  <description>
  Congrats on the renewal Sacha. Well earned. &lt;br&gt; Thanks in advance for the nomination buddy. Much appreciated!
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/wpf-disciples/browse_frm/thread/a6d79f5d8a0bd8f9/35cdf3081047b32d?show_docid=35cdf3081047b32d</guid>
  <author>
  dbvaug...@gmail.com
  (Daniel Vaughan)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 11:26:00 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: XML namespace usurpage</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/wpf-disciples/browse_frm/thread/132dc39cf4d353c6/1917737b9e6831bd?show_docid=1917737b9e6831bd</link>
  <description>
  Merging namespaces is fine until a collision occurs I guess. Then I &lt;br&gt; suppose you can fall back to explicit qualification. In your &lt;br&gt; experimentation, is that the way it works?
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/wpf-disciples/browse_frm/thread/132dc39cf4d353c6/1917737b9e6831bd?show_docid=1917737b9e6831bd</guid>
  <author>
  dbvaug...@gmail.com
  (Daniel Vaughan)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 11:00:13 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [WPF Disciples] New Year Starting Off NICE!</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/wpf-disciples/browse_frm/thread/a6d79f5d8a0bd8f9/4498848ecada69fe?show_docid=4498848ecada69fe</link>
  <description>
  I have not nominated him yet, but will do today, and thanks
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/wpf-disciples/browse_frm/thread/a6d79f5d8a0bd8f9/4498848ecada69fe?show_docid=4498848ecada69fe</guid>
  <author>
  sacha.bar...@gmail.com
  (Sacha Barber)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 10:26:38 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [WPF Disciples] Re: Merry Christmas</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/wpf-disciples/browse_frm/thread/e441612826b14b90/67c371c0bfafa14c?show_docid=67c371c0bfafa14c</link>
  <description>
  I would have loved to be a fly on the wall in that conversation :-)
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/wpf-disciples/browse_frm/thread/e441612826b14b90/67c371c0bfafa14c?show_docid=67c371c0bfafa14c</guid>
  <author>
  glenn.bl...@gmail.com
  (Glenn Block)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 10:15:29 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>RE: [WPF Disciples] XML namespace usurpage</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/wpf-disciples/browse_frm/thread/132dc39cf4d353c6/9ff789cd31dc4611?show_docid=9ff789cd31dc4611</link>
  <description>
  I&#39;m not sure about this. Of course, it&#39;s a convenient thing, and it greatly helps novice developers to get things stuff running because they don&#39;t have to struggle with NS declarations. But then, I think we do have differentiation through namespaces for a reason, and R# helps a great deal in managing the imports anyway. I don&#39;t think it&#39;s a show stopper though, and as evil Paul states on his blog, it&#39;s not a problem as long as not everybody&#39;s doing it. But I&#39;d probably sacrifice the convenience of &amp;quot;automagic&amp;quot; imports to explicit and more expressive XAML - especially for a public library.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/wpf-disciples/browse_frm/thread/132dc39cf4d353c6/9ff789cd31dc4611?show_docid=9ff789cd31dc4611</guid>
  <author>
  phil...@hardcodet.net
  (Philipp Sumi)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:56:36 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [WPF Disciples] RIAlity TV</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/wpf-disciples/browse_frm/thread/c9a45391da7f05e3/161c59c7715714b4?show_docid=161c59c7715714b4</link>
  <description>
  I&#39;m interested as well.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/wpf-disciples/browse_frm/thread/c9a45391da7f05e3/161c59c7715714b4?show_docid=161c59c7715714b4</guid>
  <author>
  pete.ohan...@gmail.com
  (Peter O&#39;Hanlon)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:45:28 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [WPF Disciples] XML namespace usurpage</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/wpf-disciples/browse_frm/thread/132dc39cf4d353c6/60df790964edef54?show_docid=60df790964edef54</link>
  <description>
  Paul - the libraries that we supply to our clients make use of this trick so &lt;br&gt; that they don&#39;t have to differentiate between our extensions and what&#39;s &lt;br&gt; available by default. I&#39;ve avoided doing this with samples because I haven&#39;t &lt;br&gt; wanted to confuse people who are reading my articles, but it might be time
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/wpf-disciples/browse_frm/thread/132dc39cf4d353c6/60df790964edef54?show_docid=60df790964edef54</guid>
  <author>
  pete.ohan...@gmail.com
  (Peter O&#39;Hanlon)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:41:26 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [WPF Disciples] New Year Starting Off NICE!</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/wpf-disciples/browse_frm/thread/a6d79f5d8a0bd8f9/082a7cd43d537311?show_docid=082a7cd43d537311</link>
  <description>
  Congratulations Sacha. Your MVP renewal was only to be expected, and good &lt;br&gt; job on nominating Daniel.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/wpf-disciples/browse_frm/thread/a6d79f5d8a0bd8f9/082a7cd43d537311?show_docid=082a7cd43d537311</guid>
  <author>
  pete.ohan...@gmail.com
  (Peter O&#39;Hanlon)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:37:28 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [WPF Disciples] RIAlity TV</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/wpf-disciples/browse_frm/thread/c9a45391da7f05e3/b7cc9282c180f852?show_docid=b7cc9282c180f852</link>
  <description>
  Intersted.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/wpf-disciples/browse_frm/thread/c9a45391da7f05e3/b7cc9282c180f852?show_docid=b7cc9282c180f852</guid>
  <author>
  sacha.bar...@gmail.com
  (Sacha Barber)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 08:32:16 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: [WPF Disciples] New Year Starting Off NICE!</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/wpf-disciples/browse_frm/thread/a6d79f5d8a0bd8f9/7e17457d3728bfea?show_docid=7e17457d3728bfea</link>
  <description>
  Must be about time we all tried to get Daniel/Jer/Bill and any others I have &lt;br&gt; missed into the MVP club. Mine just got renewed last night too, but I feel &lt;br&gt; at least those 3 that I just named need to get the award too. &lt;br&gt; Someone want to nominate them, Ill do Daniel, anyone else?
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/wpf-disciples/browse_frm/thread/a6d79f5d8a0bd8f9/7e17457d3728bfea?show_docid=7e17457d3728bfea</guid>
  <author>
  sacha.bar...@gmail.com
  (Sacha Barber)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 08:31:15 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
