Accessing the full .NET Framework from Silverlight in Blend

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Josh Smith

unread,
Jan 6, 2010, 11:15:36 AM1/6/10
to wpf-di...@googlegroups.com
I just posted on my blog about a useful trick for those of us who must implement complicated design-time support for Silverlight.


Josh

Daniel Vaughan

unread,
Jan 6, 2010, 11:54:34 AM1/6/10
to WPF Disciples
Great tip Josh. I'll have to remember that one.

On Jan 6, 5:15 pm, Josh Smith <flappleja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I just posted on my blog about a useful trick for those of us who must
> implement complicated design-time support for Silverlight.
>

> http://joshsmithonwpf.wordpress.com/2010/01/06/the-ultimate-hack-for-...
>
> Josh

Peter O'Hanlon

unread,
Jan 6, 2010, 12:30:52 PM1/6/10
to wpf-di...@googlegroups.com
Waaaaayyyyyy cool Josh. Thanks.
--
Peter O'Hanlon

Josh Smith

unread,
Jan 6, 2010, 12:34:37 PM1/6/10
to wpf-di...@googlegroups.com
Thanks guys.  I'm sure that tip will be useful many times in the future.

Michael D. Brown

unread,
Jan 6, 2010, 6:57:12 PM1/6/10
to wpf-di...@googlegroups.com

Conversation view in outlook 2010 sucks because it places the original message at the bottom of the stack! Cool hack Josh!

Glenn Block

unread,
Jan 7, 2010, 6:33:46 AM1/7/10
to wpf-di...@googlegroups.com
Yeah I learned about this from Peter Blois recently as i was spiking on design time MVVM support in Blend with MEF, and I ran into having to jump through hoops to get to the assemblies.
 
Cool stuff....or a MAJOR hack depending on which perspective you take :-)

Peter O'Hanlon

unread,
Jan 7, 2010, 6:35:14 AM1/7/10
to wpf-di...@googlegroups.com
Who is this Major Hack you refer to? Is he in the same battalion as General Exception?
--
Peter O'Hanlon

Michael D. Brown

unread,
Jan 7, 2010, 8:44:53 AM1/7/10
to wpf-di...@googlegroups.com

I think Colonel 32 was also in that division.

 

From: wpf-di...@googlegroups.com [mailto:wpf-di...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Peter O'Hanlon


Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2010 6:35 AM
To: wpf-di...@googlegroups.com

Peter O'Hanlon

unread,
Jan 7, 2010, 8:53:37 AM1/7/10
to wpf-di...@googlegroups.com
Along with Private Bytes?
--
Peter O'Hanlon

Bill Kempf

unread,
Jan 7, 2010, 9:30:30 AM1/7/10
to wpf-di...@googlegroups.com
Thanks guys! My coworkers now think I've gone mad!

On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 8:53 AM, Peter O'Hanlon <pete.o...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Along with Private Bytes?
>
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Michael D. Brown
> <mike....@azurecoding.net> wrote:
>>
>> I think Colonel 32 was also in that division.
>>
>>
>>
>> From: wpf-di...@googlegroups.com
>> [mailto:wpf-di...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Peter O'Hanlon
>> Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2010 6:35 AM
>>
>>
>>

>> Who is this Major Hack you refer to? Is he in the same battalion as
>> General Exception?
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Glenn Block <glenn...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Yeah I learned about this from Peter Blois recently as i was spiking on
>> design time MVVM support in Blend with MEF, and I ran into having to jump
>> through hoops to get to the assemblies.
>>
>>
>>
>> Cool stuff....or a MAJOR hack depending on which perspective you take :-)
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 8:15 AM, Josh Smith <flappl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I just posted on my blog about a useful trick for those of us who must
>> implement complicated design-time support for Silverlight.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> http://joshsmithonwpf.wordpress.com/2010/01/06/the-ultimate-hack-for-silverlight-in-blend/
>>
>>
>>
>> Josh
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Peter O'Hanlon
>>
>> To: wpf-di...@googlegroups.com
>> Subject: Re: [WPF Disciples] Accessing the full .NET Framework from
>> Silverlight in Blend
>
>
> --
> Peter O'Hanlon
>

--
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
- Whatever is said in Latin sounds profound.

War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Bugs are features.

Laurent Bugnion, GalaSoft

unread,
Jan 7, 2010, 10:44:52 AM1/7/10
to wpf-di...@googlegroups.com
Gone?

(ha ha this time I am first ;)

Josh Smith

unread,
Jan 7, 2010, 10:52:07 AM1/7/10
to wpf-di...@googlegroups.com
Dammit!  I was asleep when you replied!  Not Fair!!!
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages