It's a tricky one this month, so I buckled it...

[Peter O'Hanlon]

I've voted for Josh, Sacha and Daniel. Get yer votes in here and here.

--
Peter O'Hanlon

[Josh Smith]

Thanks Pete.  There's no need to vote for mine.  It's impossible for me to win, unless I write an article in VB.NET with Karl.  History has proven this bizarre theory to be true.  :)

[Peter O'Hanlon]

It's worth a try mate, but it does look as though you've got some real bunny boilers targetting your articles (and yours as well Sacha).

--
Peter O'Hanlon

[Daniel Vaughan]

Thanks heaps Pete.

The snooker article is not to bad, and is rocketing away. I like the
newer tech though myself.

On Dec 9, 10:16 pm, "Peter O'Hanlon" <pete.ohan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've voted for Josh, Sacha and Daniel. Get yer votes in

> here<http://www.codeproject.com/script/Surveys/VoteForm.aspx?srvid=986>
> and
> here <http://www.codeproject.com/script/Surveys/VoteForm.aspx?srvid=989>.
>
> --
> Peter O'Hanlon

[Peter O'Hanlon]

The way I look at it; I vote for something if it's going to help me in my day to day business. The snooker app, while cool, isn't really going to have much effect on what I do on a day to day basis.

--
Peter O'Hanlon

[Daniel Vaughan]

I often thought that an article called ‘none of the above’ could win
it. I’m sure a lot of people would check that.
I was a feeling dubious to be put in the C# category this month
actually. I was hoping I would be in the VB.NET so I wouldn’t have to
go up against Sacha and your good self. :)

On Dec 9, 10:19 pm, Josh Smith <flappleja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Pete.  There's no need to vote for mine.  It's impossible for me to
> win, unless I write an article in VB.NET with Karl.  History has proven this
> bizarre theory to be true.  :)
>

> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Peter O'Hanlon <pete.ohan...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > I've voted for Josh, Sacha and Daniel. Get yer votes in here<http://www.codeproject.com/script/Surveys/VoteForm.aspx?srvid=986> and

[Sacha Barber]

Well actually if you really want to know my thoughts.

 

The snooker one looks nice, but the chap could not get the rendering working (which is kinda weird as its pretty simply really) so he stored all ball positions. Mmmm

 

He should have had a thread and a timer and worked out the distance moved based on timer and velocity of stroke I feel, and NEVER have stored all the ball positions.

 

Imagine if 3d games did this, I feel its not a good example actually. But hey ho

--
Sacha Barber
sacha....@gmail.com

[Corrado Cavalli]

LOL that’s what I call “buggy project” J

 

-Corrado

 

From: wpf-di...@googlegroups.com [mailto:wpf-di...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Sacha Barber
Sent: giovedì 10 dicembre 2009 09:38
To: wpf-di...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [WPF Disciples] It's a tricky one this month, so I buckled it...

 

Well actually if you really want to know my thoughts.

 

The snooker one looks nice, but the chap could not get the rendering working (which is kinda weird as its pretty simply really) so he stored all ball positions. Mmmm

 

He should have had a thread and a timer and worked out the distance moved based on timer and velocity of stroke I feel, and NEVER have stored all the ball positions.

 

Imagine if 3d games did this, I feel its not a good example actually. But hey ho

On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 9:16 PM, Peter O'Hanlon <pete.o...@gmail.com> wrote:

--
Sacha Barber
sacha....@gmail.com