Web Images Videos Maps News Shopping Gmail more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Palm's App Store Woes
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  3 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
John L. Cunningham  
View profile  
 More options Oct 2, 1:00 pm
From: "John L. Cunningham" <djoh...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 13:00:21 -0400
Local: Fri, Oct 2 2009 1:00 pm
Subject: Palm's App Store Woes
Read the sad saga of JWZ trying to add his free, open source
application's to Palm's App store:

http://tinyurl.com/yb662as

When they announced the Pre, I feared that Palm was going to copy
everything that was bad about the iPhone.  It looks like my fears may be
reality.
--
John L. Cunningham


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
The Trekkie  
View profile  
 More options Oct 2, 11:41 pm
From: The Trekkie <trekkie17...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2009 22:41:07 -0500
Local: Fri, Oct 2 2009 11:41 pm
Subject: Re: [woyp] Palm's App Store Woes
Yet another thing pushing me more towards that new Android phone that's
coming to Sprint over actually going for a Pre or a Pixi...


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Bert Latamore  
View profile  
 More options Oct 3, 12:29 pm
From: Bert Latamore <bert.latam...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 12:29:15 -0400
Local: Sat, Oct 3 2009 12:29 pm
Subject: Re: [woyp] Re: Palm's App Store Woes

From what I have heard generally the Android seems to be the real deal in
terms of openness and strong technology. The iPhone seems to have good
underlying technology also, but Apple is ruthless about controlling what
applications can be provided for it, which means that third party app
developers take a big risk developing for it -- they could invest a lot of
time and effort and then find themselves denied access to the market. I know
that really bothers CESD in his plans to port Pimlical to different
platforms, because he has commended about that several times. The Pre seems
to be a disappointment from a technical standpoint, and it apparently is not
selling that well in the market, either. A few days ago Palm said their
revenues will not improve significantly, which certainly didn't help their
stock price. I think Palm is pretty much used up. All those years of playing
internal politics and looking for an easy market instead of bringing out a
real next generation technology have caught up with them.

I think the big question in the market is the RIM Blackberry. Right now it
has a stranglehold on the corporate marketplace. But I keep hearing hints
from the technical cogniscanti that its present platform may be running out
of steam. The Blackberry has done very well because most smart phone users
are only interested in voice, email, chat and access to their Facebook
pages. But the companies that are handing most of these things out really
want to use them for mobile, out-of-office connection to enterprise
applications such as ERP and CRM. And with the growing trend toward SaaS
rather than in-house installations of enterprise software, in part to
facilitate mobile, connect-anywhere strategies, this pressure will grow
fast. My question is can the Blackberry support front ends to those
applications and the front-end data handling that they inevitably will
require. And is browser-only connectivity enough. In North America no
carrier can provide 100% connectivity across the entire geography.
Particularly in the center of the continent, there are huge gaps in coverage
still, and what is there is usually fairly slow-speed stuff.

If the Blackberry does run out of steam, then does RIM have a next
generation close to introduction? If so, they have been very successful at
keeping that quiet. Certainly their initial foray into touch screen systems,
which are basic to most other handhelds, was less than impressive. If they
do not, then they may open the door to Android, which certainly does have
the guts to handle complex handheld environments. And Google seems committed
to the long haul with Android. I am sure they went into this realizing they
weren't going to get an instant huge market. And Google has the deep pockets
to support staying power. From that standpoint, I think Android may be in a
position to start picking up steam in the next two years.

Just my guess, of course. And I am not qualified to judge the internal
technology base of these machines, so for that I depend on others.

All the best,

Bert

--
Bert Latamore
IT Journalist, Report Writer and Book Doctor
From tweets and blogs to white papers and books --
You provide the information; I craft the words.

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google