Announcing the categories workgroup and inviting new members
6 views
Skip to first unread message
Jesse Groppi
Oct 12, 2009, 8:49:23 PM10/12/09
to wikied...@googlegroups.com
Hi all!
There's another workgroup a-brewin' down on the wiki! This one is about categories; yes, dreadful fun, I know. Before I talk about the workgroup, I'd like to introduce you to the concept, and the rationale behind their use.
What are categories?
A category is just what it sounds like: a method of grouping pages according to their content. Categories also work with parent-child connections in the same way that subpages do. The category you put a page in will actually be a subcategory of another. A category system will have many levels within it. Where the category system gets even more useful than the subpage system is in the number of relationships that can be defined by it. While a subpage can only have one parent page, any page or category can be in as many categories as we like. This is where the mediawiki software becomes genius in its use of virtual reality; even though there exists only one document, at a single url, it can be found and related to other documents in any number of ways. This creates a powerful browseability that is trumped only by the searchability of the SemanticWiki extension, which involves a steep learning curve.
Why categories?
The category system is a built-in method of organising content far better than the subpage system method. It creates relationships between content that cannot be defined by subpages, making it easier for members to move from page to page and between related information. Want to know what other projects there are on astrophysics? The category system will tell you that. Want to be able to find all the resources from Otago Poly-Tech easily? Curious about what 10 year old children are learning elsewhere in the world? The category system allows for these. Using the category system is preferred over contents pages because it requires far less effort from members to keep current. To add a page to a category, one never has to leave the page, itself!
The other key factor for categorising pages is a concept called "search engine optimisation" (SEO). You may have heard of this if you are in any way involved with web publishing. I'm not going to explain SEO, but I will tell you the point of it is to increase readership organically (they come to us, we don't market directly to them). This is done by appealing to the formulas Google and other search engines use to determine who goes at the top of any search list. The thing is, if there aren't any links to your page, Google never sees it! Categories create a link-based map of the website, allowing Google's programs to see each page that has a category.
The workgroup
Sounds great, right? Well, WE's category structure is a bit out of shape at the moment. For example, about 30% of the categories used don't actually exist, yet; there are a handful of central/root/contents categories, none of which go deeper than a few levels; there are (as I write this) 12,200 uncategorised pages out of 68,992 total, or about 15%; and most of the existing categories aren't connected to any other category.
So, Alison Snieckus and I have seeded a workgroup to get WE's category system in tip-top shape, as well as working to educate WE members on categories and advise the style guidelines workgroup on guidelines that affect category usage. We're still organising the group, and there are some tasks to be done, and we could use your help with both! WE would really benefit from your opinions and ideas, so please stop by ( http://www.wikieducator.org/Workgroup:Categories ) and sign up. There are lots of informational links, and it isn't necessary you be an expert on wikis or the category system to take part, but you might find you know a lot more when we're all done. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask here, or on the workgroup talk pages. As with the style guide workgroup, membership isn't required to participate in discussions, it just helps us to know who wants to be involved so we can give them credit and to make sure everyone has something to do to help.
Looking forward to seeing you there!
Jesse
http://www.wikieducator.org/User:Jesse_Groppi
skype: jesse.groppi
There's another workgroup a-brewin' down on the wiki! This one is about categories; yes, dreadful fun, I know. Before I talk about the workgroup, I'd like to introduce you to the concept, and the rationale behind their use.
What are categories?
A category is just what it sounds like: a method of grouping pages according to their content. Categories also work with parent-child connections in the same way that subpages do. The category you put a page in will actually be a subcategory of another. A category system will have many levels within it. Where the category system gets even more useful than the subpage system is in the number of relationships that can be defined by it. While a subpage can only have one parent page, any page or category can be in as many categories as we like. This is where the mediawiki software becomes genius in its use of virtual reality; even though there exists only one document, at a single url, it can be found and related to other documents in any number of ways. This creates a powerful browseability that is trumped only by the searchability of the SemanticWiki extension, which involves a steep learning curve.
Why categories?
The category system is a built-in method of organising content far better than the subpage system method. It creates relationships between content that cannot be defined by subpages, making it easier for members to move from page to page and between related information. Want to know what other projects there are on astrophysics? The category system will tell you that. Want to be able to find all the resources from Otago Poly-Tech easily? Curious about what 10 year old children are learning elsewhere in the world? The category system allows for these. Using the category system is preferred over contents pages because it requires far less effort from members to keep current. To add a page to a category, one never has to leave the page, itself!
The other key factor for categorising pages is a concept called "search engine optimisation" (SEO). You may have heard of this if you are in any way involved with web publishing. I'm not going to explain SEO, but I will tell you the point of it is to increase readership organically (they come to us, we don't market directly to them). This is done by appealing to the formulas Google and other search engines use to determine who goes at the top of any search list. The thing is, if there aren't any links to your page, Google never sees it! Categories create a link-based map of the website, allowing Google's programs to see each page that has a category.
The workgroup
Sounds great, right? Well, WE's category structure is a bit out of shape at the moment. For example, about 30% of the categories used don't actually exist, yet; there are a handful of central/root/contents categories, none of which go deeper than a few levels; there are (as I write this) 12,200 uncategorised pages out of 68,992 total, or about 15%; and most of the existing categories aren't connected to any other category.
So, Alison Snieckus and I have seeded a workgroup to get WE's category system in tip-top shape, as well as working to educate WE members on categories and advise the style guidelines workgroup on guidelines that affect category usage. We're still organising the group, and there are some tasks to be done, and we could use your help with both! WE would really benefit from your opinions and ideas, so please stop by ( http://www.wikieducator.org/Workgroup:Categories ) and sign up. There are lots of informational links, and it isn't necessary you be an expert on wikis or the category system to take part, but you might find you know a lot more when we're all done. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask here, or on the workgroup talk pages. As with the style guide workgroup, membership isn't required to participate in discussions, it just helps us to know who wants to be involved so we can give them credit and to make sure everyone has something to do to help.
Looking forward to seeing you there!
Jesse
http://www.wikieducator.org/User:Jesse_Groppi
skype: jesse.groppi
elizabeth mbasu
Oct 13, 2009, 12:50:13 AM10/13/09
to wikied...@googlegroups.com
Dear Jesse,
I know about web pages in terms of pages and sub-pages i.e parent, children, grandchildren etc. and can generate a structure for this. I have read your write up and am signing in hoping to learn more about categories along the way. I am not sure that I really understand everything about categories.
Many thanks,
|
NELLIE DEUTSCH
Oct 13, 2009, 12:57:21 AM10/13/09
to wikied...@googlegroups.com
Hi Jesse,
Congratulations to you and Alison for taking the initiative. I am sure the two of you will get the job done in no time.
Warm wishes,
Nellie Deutsch
Sharing is Caring!
Doctoral Student
Educational Leadership
Curriculum and Instruction
Get ready for CO10: http://connecting-online.ning.com/
Free online workshops on WikiEducator: http://www.wikieducator.org/Workshops
Congratulations to you and Alison for taking the initiative. I am sure the two of you will get the job done in no time.
Warm wishes,
Nellie Deutsch
Sharing is Caring!
Doctoral Student
Educational Leadership
Curriculum and Instruction
Get ready for CO10: http://connecting-online.ning.com/
Free online workshops on WikiEducator: http://www.wikieducator.org/Workshops
Jesse Groppi
Oct 13, 2009, 2:05:45 AM10/13/09
to wikied...@googlegroups.com
Elizabeth,
This is exactly what I was hoping to see! Please have a look at what Alison and I have already begun, and ask as many questions as you can. <smile>
Jesse
This is exactly what I was hoping to see! Please have a look at what Alison and I have already begun, and ask as many questions as you can. <smile>
Jesse
Wayne Mackintosh
Oct 13, 2009, 2:11:59 AM10/13/09
to wikied...@googlegroups.com
Hi Everyone,
I must commend Jesse and Alison's amazing work in moving the power of categories forward for WE. This has huge potential for improving the utility of our project and I am inspired by the gifting culture of so many in our community!
I've said this many times before -- but my faith in education has been restored witnessing the tireless contributions of educators around the world who are returning to the core values of our noble profession -- that is to share knowledge freely!
BIG thanks and community kudos to our emerging Category team :-)
Cheers
W
--
Wayne Mackintosh, Ph.D.
Director,
International Centre for Open Education,
Otago Polytechnic, New Zealand.
Board of Directors, OER Foundation.
Founder and Community Council Member, Wikieducator, www.wikieducator.org
Mobile +64 21 2436 380
Skype: WGMNZ1
Twitter: OERFoundation, Mackiwg
I must commend Jesse and Alison's amazing work in moving the power of categories forward for WE. This has huge potential for improving the utility of our project and I am inspired by the gifting culture of so many in our community!
I've said this many times before -- but my faith in education has been restored witnessing the tireless contributions of educators around the world who are returning to the core values of our noble profession -- that is to share knowledge freely!
BIG thanks and community kudos to our emerging Category team :-)
Cheers
W
2009/10/13 Jesse Groppi <jagr...@gmail.com>
--
Wayne Mackintosh, Ph.D.
Director,
International Centre for Open Education,
Otago Polytechnic, New Zealand.
Board of Directors, OER Foundation.
Founder and Community Council Member, Wikieducator, www.wikieducator.org
Mobile +64 21 2436 380
Skype: WGMNZ1
Twitter: OERFoundation, Mackiwg
Gita Mathur
Oct 13, 2009, 5:01:27 AM10/13/09
to wikied...@googlegroups.com
Hi Jessie & Alison
Thanks for the initiative. I have been thinking about this too but am not highly skilled to do it myself. I have seen the well detailed account on the link sent by you & have signed up. I hope to be useful there as I learn along the way. I am sure this will help the collaborative content development by presenting more organized structure.
Warm wishes
Gita
http://www.wikieducator.org/User:Gita_Mathur
Thanks for the initiative. I have been thinking about this too but am not highly skilled to do it myself. I have seen the well detailed account on the link sent by you & have signed up. I hope to be useful there as I learn along the way. I am sure this will help the collaborative content development by presenting more organized structure.
Warm wishes
Gita
http://www.wikieducator.org/User:Gita_Mathur
valerie
Oct 13, 2009, 10:19:16 AM10/13/09
to WikiEducator
Thanks for taking the initiative! I'll help.
On Oct 12, 5:49 pm, Jesse Groppi <jagro...@gmail.com> wrote:
... *What are categories?*
On Oct 12, 5:49 pm, Jesse Groppi <jagro...@gmail.com> wrote:
... *What are categories?*
Jesse Groppi
Oct 13, 2009, 6:36:46 PM10/13/09
to wikied...@googlegroups.com
Nellie: Thanks for your confidence, but it won't just be the two of us
accomplishing this big task. I'm confident that WE will do it together.
Wayne: I am very equally glad there are people like that, here.
Gita & Valerie: Good to hear others are on the same page. Thank you both for offering to help!
Wayne: I am very equally glad there are people like that, here.
Gita & Valerie: Good to hear others are on the same page. Thank you both for offering to help!
Jesse
On 12/10/2009 23:50, elizabeth mbasu wrote:
NELLIE DEUTSCH
Oct 13, 2009, 6:51:54 PM10/13/09
to wikied...@googlegroups.com
Jesse,
You can always count on me, too. :)
You can always count on me, too. :)
Warm wishes,
Nellie Deutsch
Sharing is Caring!
Doctoral Student
Educational Leadership
Curriculum and Instruction
Get ready for CO10: http://connecting-online.ning.com/
Free online workshops on WikiEducator: http://www.wikieducator.org/Workshops
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages