Tooltips implemented
(OK, they are there, but the ranges are not accurate….. Working on it J )
Ummm, the elements you asked for are not among the implemented ones. But I think that the generic "send" field is implemented....
Try the other data points. See if they work.
I didn't design the hex encode/transmit routine so...
I will work on reworking the interface to add the functionality you need
Look at the interface.
In addition to the 3 new fields, are there any others that you will be wanting? It's easy to design the interface, but a ROYAL pain in the ass to change one :-)
So, if you can send me complete requirements, I will design version 2.0 of the interface
If you can ge the new requirements this morning, I may have it ready for the meeting this evening
Hey guys,
all the commands are implemented in the sense that the buttons that send the commands are already active and there are functions already built for each button and command. There is a variable for each command that you just need to set as the hex string that you want to send and it will start working. There is a seperate function that validates values to be entered and merges them with the command string. Thats all setup and active.
I left the hex codes blank because we couldn't verify the ones on the wiki were correct, but everything should alread be setup.
Jonathan Clark
jdc...@gmail.com
Look at the code... (well, at 11am) it's not quite as you had it.
I didn't see what you described.
By the way, if the wiki hex codes are wrong.... Dude.....
Question: the send routine takes the data and type and sends it to the validation routine. If the data is the wrong type or is missing, it's failed. Cool
But
The only way I can see to send "dataless" commands is to send a 0x00 along, and that may cause a problem. Did you have a different workaround that I am missing?
If $send = "" And $hex = "" Then ;check for no data or hex
_wsdbug("_VerifyData: No Data and No Hex, Should exit now", 1)
$dataerr = 9
Send = the data value
Waaaait…
;datavalue to send, data type(si9n or unsi9n), number of bytes, command to send, hex optional send specific hex instead of data value
Oh, I think I get it…. Fixing send strings now…
From: white-sta...@googlegroups.com [mailto:white-sta...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jonathan Clark
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2012 10:15 AM
To: white-sta...@googlegroups.com
HAHAHA… I was wondering about that J
I changed em in lots of places… missed that line
I changed the wsdebug to send to the console. Too confusing to send it all to the output windows since they are all “in use” now
It LOOKS like all is working, but I would feel better if someone was able to say, Yup, the board IS seeing the data you send, and is reacting correctly
Last was for Jon...
Dan, I will prettify the tooltips in a few minutes
Ok, the actual send line was commented out... D'oh!
Fixed.
Tool tips, fixed
Send was sending some number before the actual hex... Suppressed unless I need to put it back
Jon -look at the code, see if I am missing something massive
Dump x grams ballast is broken... Debugging after the game O:-)
So…. Jon, You will be there tonight, right?
Patrick McCarthy
From: white-sta...@googlegroups.com [mailto:white-sta...@googlegroups.com]
On Behalf Of Jonathan Clark
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2012 3:48 PM
To: white-sta...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: {WhiteStar} Ground Support Terminal next steps
Pat,
Johnathon Clark:
OK, We need to talk… and work together, ESPECIALLY before I attempt V 2.0 I will bring my laptop…
First, the code I saw when I got the key to the directory did not even compile (End Function was missing in 1 spot, and a next was commented out in another spot, so I did not have a stellar start point.
I pushed all I found down 1 level & pulled working copies up… (you can see the pushdown folder in the drop box)
Next, working with no knowledge of future implementation “plans”, I may have reinvented the wheel a wee bit J
OK, it sounds like I may have reinvented quite a bit… including the Hex assignments. I created an entire raft of cmd_ codes that are phrase type, for readability….
Task 1 was to config all the output windows to display (done) and to do so legibly (Also done)
Task 2 was to config all the data transmit windows… I followed the lead of the 1 that was done, and did all the rest
Since task 2 began, I’ve been asking… need to confirm data is actually getting sent, and is “correct”
I worked with the code that was not commented out, figuring that it was “correct”
PLEASE, look at what I have, to see where we need to make changes:
1. How do I configure imperitive commands, with no data
2. IS the thing sending
3. Is it sending to the right place
4. Is the data “correct” (Correct hex codes)
5. What in the world is wrong with the @!*$&)%#&)! Dump x grams of Ballast button…
6. Thoughts on my plan to tabularize 2.0 (Raises the Koda complexity, but I’ve done it before)
I will be at the space as soon as I can, to work on the Makerbot… ~8, I’ll get with you to work on the above
Found the problem. Will fix tonight
Brad,can you do something to reduce the amount of heartbeat text streaming into the ground support board.? It's hard to work with the text streaming faster than I can read...
1. I think I found the problem… will fix it tonight
2. I loaded 3.8.1 Autoit3 and SciTE on the computer, you can now drive the thing thru team viewer while watching the console (yea)
3. A google hangout…. Oh lord, ANOTHER connection tool? I want my ICQ back J