This discussion group is now closed. A new Forum has been set up on the new WFDF Rules Website: http:

I don't believe it has ever existed. You could claim that it is against the spirit of the game

Hi, The rules are a couple of pages. Doesnt seem so unmanagable, especially since things are setup in

>as in "stalling" 1 second pause "1" ..? Correct > you catch in-bounds and

If a foul did not affect the outcome of the play and is not dangerous, it should be withdrawn. So it

Given that there was no agreement, the disc going back to the thrower is the correct outcome in this

In the scenario you described Player A is standing behind the defender and Player B is "far away

"1. First of all, I cannot find rule 16.1.3.2 in the 2009 rules. Am I missing something?"

Hi, I tend to get straddled alot, however calling it usually leads the people not knowing and/or

The important thing is that people don't wear dangerous equipment. If someone is convinced that

It is not sensible for the stall count to go negative. We could add that as an interpretation.

It isn't a point. Because of this rule: 12.2. If the player loses control of the disc due to

"Does this mean that it is a score immediately when the disc is caught in the endzone regardless

I'm in favour of reducing roster size, even for a tournament as long and arduous as Worlds. Some

Hi Rueben, Thanks for getting back to me about this. Your explanation makes a lot sense. I'll

Not a turnover. I don't really see any question about it... If you look at the definitions:

10.1 mentions a "saftey stoppage" - this should be a "technical stoppage" (see