I think the bottom line is that it's a matter of taste. Haskell is
very different from Lisp and for some reason (that I can't explain) I
leaned towards Lisp. One could write an excellent web framework in
Haskell. Haskell is a much cleaner, safer language than Common Lisp
and sometimes I miss it. When I was coding in Haskell though,
sometimes I missed Common Lisp.
The choice of Common Lisp was more of a random occurance rather than a
conscious decision.
Nick Mudge
http://nickmudge.info/
On Aug 4, 12:06 am, "Vyacheslav Akhmechet" <coffee...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I wanted to write an article about that but never got around to it.
>
> I think the bottom line is that it's a matter of taste. Haskell is
> very different from Lisp and for some reason (that I can't explain) I
> leaned towards Lisp. One could write an excellent web framework in
> Haskell. Haskell is a much cleaner, safer language than Common Lisp
> and sometimes I miss it. When I was coding in Haskell though,
> sometimes I missed Common Lisp.
>
> The choice of Common Lisp was more of a random occurance rather than a
> conscious decision.
>