--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Webconverger Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to webc-...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to webc-users+...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/webc-users?hl=en.
The failure for 686 to boot on your machines could be down to grub.
Could you please retest using a syslinux based Webconverger? Like the
USB image?
I'm set to release 5.9 which has grub removed from the ISO version.
The GNU folks have sadly completely screwed up with grub2, so its time
to jump ship.
>I only want to switch to i686 if people can discern the speed
>difference.
My testPC (P4 3,0GHz 2GB RAM) had only about 1.5s difference between
5.7 and 5.8. Both booting from the original USB image.
>I'm set to release 5.9 which has grub removed from the ISO version.
>The GNU folks have sadly completely screwed up with grub2, so its time
>to jump ship.
A very wise decision. This grub2 thing is really not made for everyone/
everything.
You should try debug mode and remove all the splash options so you can
see the console and where it stops. You can also try change the user,
that will halt autologin.
> My testPC (P4 3,0GHz 2GB RAM) had only about 1.5s difference between
> 5.7 and 5.8. Both booting from the original USB image.
Thank you for running the test.
> A very wise decision. This grub2 thing is really not made for everyone/
> everything.
I thought that was the problem with grub2. ;) Completely over
engineered. grub2 seems like a pretty full featured unix that you get
booted into, before you boot into Linux.
I assume it's some evil plan to validate "GNU/Linux".
> I thought that was the problem with grub2. ;) Completely over
> engineered. grub2 seems like a pretty full featured unix that you get
> booted into, before you boot into Linux.
>
> I assume it's some evil plan to validate "GNU/Linux".
Full ack. ;)