I see that markmin is kind of 'standard' markup supported in web2py, but I use
reST markup and lot (even submitted feature request to Instant Press to support
it), but I wonder how does markmin, in general, compare with reST?
I noticed that there is no support for footnotes, tables look pretty simple...
Otoh, the web2py book is written in markmin...
I read 'Why?' (http://web2py.com/examples/static/markmin.html), but wonder what
was e.g. wrong with reST which is quite strongly tied with Python community?
Sincerely,
Gour
--
“In the material world, conceptions of good and bad are
all mental speculations…” (Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu)
http://atmarama.net | Hlapicina (Croatia) | GPG: 52B5C810
>
> Our goals were:
> - simpler then reST, similar to Markdown but more powerful
That's good one...I like markdown as well.
> - extensible
Any more info about it?
Do you find markmin semantically rich-enough for writing books like web2py one?
I wonder about footnotes, more complex tables, more subsubsections...
> Footnotes can be added easily
> and sublists too. It is on the todo list.
That's great. Thank you.
btw, hearing that markmin is more powerful than markdown, maybe it should be
renamed to MarkUp, or, at least, markmax. ;)