doc error on tutorials site

11 views
Skip to first unread message

Stephan Beal

unread,
Jan 3, 2012, 6:32:40 AM1/3/12
to vogella
Hi, all!

i'd like to report the following error on the tutorial site:

http://www.vogella.de/android.html

describes all of the examples as being for Android 2.x, whereas when
following the links the articles are described as being for 4.x. e.g.

-----------
Android Development Tutorial [Top]

This tutorial describes how to create Android applications with
Eclipse. It is based on Eclipse 3.7 (Indigo), Java 1.6 and Android
2.3.3 (Gingerbread).
Read Tutorial
-----------

Following the "Read Tutorial" links leads us to...

----------
Development with Android Gingerbread and Eclipse

This tutorial describes how to create Android applications with
Eclipse. It is based on Eclipse 3.7 (Indigo), Java 1.6 and Android 4.0
(Ice Cream Sandwich).
------------

That appears to be the case for all of the tutorials described on
http://www.vogella.de/android.html (or all of them i checked).

Which one is correct (2.x or 4.x), i cannot say, i can just say that
one of them is wrong ;).

Happy Hacking!

Lars Vogel

unread,
Jan 4, 2012, 5:30:28 AM1/4/12
to vog...@googlegroups.com
Hi Stephan,

thanks for letting me know. Fixed. Will be in the next update.

Best regards, Lars

2012/1/3 Stephan Beal <sgb...@googlemail.com>

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vogella" group.
To post to this group, send email to vog...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to vogella+u...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/vogella?hl=en.




--
Lars
http://www.vogella.de - Eclipse, Android and Java Tutorials
http://www.twitter.com/vogella - Lars on Twitter

Ajay k

unread,
Jan 4, 2012, 5:48:52 AM1/4/12
to vog...@googlegroups.com
Hello Lars,

i have a suggestion , why cant be the vogella.de source hosted on github so user can contribute directly via patches (pull requests) instead of mailing  list 

Thanks,
Ajay K
Thanks,
Ajay K
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages