An address problem..
Esra ESEN
Can anybody help me? There is a problem following message.
From: MX%"uz@micmac" 13-DEC-1993 12:00:41.53
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
MX%"uz@micmac....." ?
This is a Internet addres but as a Bitnet addres and there isn't
MX%"u...@micmac.BITNET"
Mx sent it I don't understand, how?
Thanx.
Esra ESEN
----------------------original message-----------------------------
From: MX%"uz@micmac" 13-DEC-1993 12:00:41.53
To: DALFES
CC:
Subj:
Return-Path: <u...@micmac.BITNET>
Received: from URIACC.URI.EDU (MAILER) by TRBOUN (MX V3.3 VAX) with BSMTP; Sun,
12 Dec 1993 11:51:17 +0200
X-Delivery-Notice: SMTP MAIL FROM does not correspond to sender.
Received: from URIACC (SMTP) by URIACC.URI.EDU (Mailer R2.10 ptf000) with BSMTP
id 2008; Thu, 09 Dec 93 18:46:26 EST
Received: from micmac.gso.uri.EDU by URIACC.URI.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with
TCP; Thu, 09 Dec 93 18:46:23 EST
Received: by micmac.gso.uri.EDU (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA25241; Thu, 9 Dec 93
18:46:58 EST
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 93 18:46:58 EST
From: <uz@micmac>
Message-ID: <931209234...@micmac.gso.uri.EDU>
To: dalfes%TRBOUN...@URIACC.BITNET, ay...@rcf.rsmas.miami.edu,
em...@ufcc.ufl.edu, alt...@chip.cba.ufl.edu,
ori602...@emunix.mich.edu
Dan Wing
>Hi,
>
>Can anybody help me? There is a problem following message.
>
>From: MX%"uz@micmac" 13-DEC-1993 12:00:41.53
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> MX%"uz@micmac....." ?
>This is a Internet addres but as a Bitnet addres and there isn't
> MX%"u...@micmac.BITNET"
>Mx sent it I don't understand, how?
Are you saying that MX *was* able to send mail to the address uz@micmac?
I'm really surprised that it worked; it shouldn't have.
The problem is with some mailer between micmac.bitnet and your site; some
mailer determined there was a problem, and inserted an X-Delivery-Notice
header (see the 3rd header from the top); Hunter, please correct me, but
I don't believe MX is inserting this X-Delivery-Notice header (I believe
all of MX's X-* headers look like "X-MX-*").
>Return-Path: <u...@micmac.BITNET>
>Received: from URIACC.URI.EDU (MAILER) by TRBOUN (MX V3.3 VAX) with BSMTP; Sun,
> 12 Dec 1993 11:51:17 +0200
>X-Delivery-Notice: SMTP MAIL FROM does not correspond to sender.
>Received: from URIACC (SMTP) by URIACC.URI.EDU (Mailer R2.10 ptf000) with BSMTP
> id 2008; Thu, 09 Dec 93 18:46:26 EST
>Received: from micmac.gso.uri.EDU by URIACC.URI.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with
> TCP; Thu, 09 Dec 93 18:46:23 EST
>Received: by micmac.gso.uri.EDU (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA25241; Thu, 9 Dec 93
> 18:46:58 EST
>Date: Thu, 9 Dec 93 18:46:58 EST
>From: <uz@micmac>
>Message-ID: <931209234...@micmac.gso.uri.EDU>
>To: dalfes%TRBOUN...@URIACC.BITNET, ay...@rcf.rsmas.miami.edu,
> em...@ufcc.ufl.edu, alt...@chip.cba.ufl.edu,
> ori602...@emunix.mich.edu
I see, though, from the top Received: header, that you're running JNET
on your VAX, so I'll defer to someone that knows JNET to really provide you
with an answer to your question.
-Dan Wing, Systems Administrator, University Hospital, Denver
dw...@uh01.colorado.edu or wi...@eisner.decus.org
Carl J Lydick
=In article <1869...@MVB.SAIC.COM>, Esra ESEN <esen%TRBOUN...@FRMOP11.CNUSC.FR> writes:
=>Hi,
=>
=>Can anybody help me? There is a problem following message.
=>
=>From: MX%"uz@micmac" 13-DEC-1993 12:00:41.53
=> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
=> MX%"uz@micmac....." ?
=>This is a Internet addres but as a Bitnet addres and there isn't
=> MX%"u...@micmac.BITNET"
=>Mx sent it I don't understand, how?
=
=Are you saying that MX *was* able to send mail to the address uz@micmac?
=I'm really surprised that it worked; it shouldn't have.
It would appear that he's complaining that MX delivered the message with the
above From: address, which is, of course, unrepliable in general.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Carl J Lydick | INTERnet: CA...@SOL1.GPS.CALTECH.EDU | NSI/HEPnet: SOL1::CARL
Disclaimer: Hey, I understand VAXen and VMS. That's what I get paid for. My
understanding of astronomy is purely at the amateur level (or below). So
unless what I'm saying is directly related to VAX/VMS, don't hold me or my
organization responsible for it. If it IS related to VAX/VMS, you can try to
hold me responsible for it, but my organization had nothing to do with it.