In article <18698
...@MVB.SAIC.COM>, Esra ESEN <esen%TRBOUN.BIT
...@FRMOP11.CNUSC.FR> writes:
>Hi,
>Can anybody help me? There is a problem following message.
>From: MX%"uz@micmac" 13-DEC-1993 12:00:41.53
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> MX%"uz@micmac....." ?
>This is a Internet addres but as a Bitnet addres and there isn't
> MX%"u...@micmac.BITNET"
>Mx sent it I don't understand, how?
Are you saying that MX *was* able to send mail to the address uz@micmac?
I'm really surprised that it worked; it shouldn't have.
The problem is with some mailer between micmac.bitnet and your site; some
mailer determined there was a problem, and inserted an X-Delivery-Notice
header (see the 3rd header from the top); Hunter, please correct me, but
I don't believe MX is inserting this X-Delivery-Notice header (I believe
all of MX's X-* headers look like "X-MX-*").
>Return-Path: <u
...@micmac.BITNET>
>Received: from URIACC.URI.EDU (MAILER) by TRBOUN (MX V3.3 VAX) with BSMTP; Sun,
> 12 Dec 1993 11:51:17 +0200
>X-Delivery-Notice: SMTP MAIL FROM does not correspond to sender.
>Received: from URIACC (SMTP) by URIACC.URI.EDU (Mailer R2.10 ptf000) with BSMTP
> id 2008; Thu, 09 Dec 93 18:46:26 EST
>Received: from micmac.gso.uri.EDU by URIACC.URI.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with
> TCP; Thu, 09 Dec 93 18:46:23 EST
>Received: by micmac.gso.uri.EDU (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA25241; Thu, 9 Dec 93
> 18:46:58 EST
>Date: Thu, 9 Dec 93 18:46:58 EST
>From: <uz@micmac>
>Message-ID: <9312092346.AA25
...@micmac.gso.uri.EDU>
>To: dalfes%TRBOUN.bit
...@URIACC.BITNET, ay
...@rcf.rsmas.miami.edu,
> e
...@ufcc.ufl.edu, alti
...@chip.cba.ufl.edu,
> ori602579
...@emunix.mich.edu
I see, though, from the top Received: header, that you're running JNET
on your VAX, so I'll defer to someone that knows JNET to really provide you
with an answer to your question.
-Dan Wing, Systems Administrator, University Hospital, Denver
dw...@uh01.colorado.edu or w...@eisner.decus.org
