Welcome to the wonderful world of LogParser, Simon. As for your question, I don't think there is one (the docs refer only to the RTP parm for controlling how many to show per screen).
Instead, though, this is where you can rely on SQL to control what goes INTO the grid. Consider the TOP nn directive (as in SELECT TOP 50000 ...). Check out the docs and do a search on TOP. The first two entries explain it and show examples.
[mailto:visual-log-parser@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of storri Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 12:03 PM To: Visual Log Parser Subject: Results grid limited to 5000 rows?
Is the rowlimit of the results grid configurable?
If not, can you increase the limit to 50000 rows perhaps?
Thanks, Simon
ps Great tool, just discovered and started exploring it today............. :-)
Thanks for the quick reply. I'd already tried the TOP command but despite setting it to 10000 the rows in the grid (and the text on the Messages tab for ROWS AFFECTED) are still limited to 5000. Might there be a hardcoded TOP clause in the program? Simon
On Jan 5, 5:30 pm, "Charlie Arehart" <char...@carehart.org> wrote:
> Welcome to the wonderful world of LogParser, Simon. As for your question, I > don't think there is one (the docs refer only to the RTP parm for > controlling how many to show per screen).
> Instead, though, this is where you can rely on SQL to control what goes INTO > the grid. Consider the TOP nn directive (as in SELECT TOP 50000 ...). Check > out the docs and do a search on TOP. The first two entries explain it and > show examples.
Ah, sorry. I missed that you were wanting to show *more*. My apologies.
This is interesting. I find no reference in the docs or in a google search to anything related to a 5000 row limit. Perhaps someone else will chime in.
[mailto:visual-log-parser@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of storri Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 5:13 AM To: Visual Log Parser Subject: Re: Results grid limited to 5000 rows?
Thanks for the quick reply. I'd already tried the TOP command but despite setting it to 10000 the rows in the grid (and the text on the Messages tab for ROWS AFFECTED) are still limited to 5000. Might there be a hardcoded TOP clause in the program? Simon
> Ah, sorry. I missed that you were wanting to show *more*. My apologies.
> This is interesting. I find no reference in the docs or in a google search > to anything related to a 5000 row limit. Perhaps someone else will chime in.
> [mailto:visual-log-parser@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of storri > Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 5:13 AM > To: Visual Log Parser > Subject: Re: Results grid limited to 5000 rows?
> Thanks for the quick reply. > I'd already tried the TOP command but despite setting it to 10000 the rows > in the grid (and the text on the Messages tab for ROWS AFFECTED) are still > limited to 5000. > Might there be a hardcoded TOP clause in the program? > Simon- Dölj citerad text -
Discussion subject changed to "Anyone know if there's a discussion group about log parser itself (not the visual product of this list)?" by Charlie Arehart
I can report some good news, since I last wrote. As you may notice, the old logparser.com site redirects to iis.net. Well, I found a very recent discussion thread acknowledging the move with a suggestion that they are working on migrating the old site content in:
In a comment there, I just asked if they could create the forums sooner rather than later.
BTW, I also point out there a link to the fabulous archive.org pages holding a point in time snapshot of the old logparser site from just a couple months ago. Plenty of good content accessible there, though not the old forum content.
/charlie
_____
From: visual-log-parser@googlegroups.com [mailto:visual-log-parser@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Brian Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 2:52 PM To: visual-log-parser@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Anyone know if there's a discussion group about log parser itself (not the visual product of this list)?
yes, the logparser site is indeed gone :( i wish there was another group or forum, but i havent found one yet.
and this visual log parser group seems to be dead also. nobody ever replies anymore
jake
On 7/27/07, Charlie Arehart <char...@carehart.org> wrote:
Anyone know if there's a discussion group about log parser itself (not the visual product of this list)?
There used to be a logparser.com site, but it seems to have vanished.