Earlier this year, Christine suggested that VisibleGovernment.ca
produce some position papers to communicate what the organization is
about. I had a good excuse to put something down on paper this month
-- I was asked to write an article for Open Source Business Resource,
which I started over Christmas and finished on the weekend. It ended
up as a summary of much of the research I've been doing.
It's open for comment on scribd here:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/10254460/Transparency-Through-Open-Data-and-Open-SourceScribd
My dad thinks it's quite good, but he may be biased.
A quote:
Open Systems Make Failure Less Costly
Finding the best ways to analyze government information and collect
value from public feedback is going to take a lot of
experimentation. The probability of a successful solution is what
author Clay Shirkey might qualify as a scalar distribution pattern:
one where there’s a very large number of failures, some modest
successes, and a few solutions that will do amazingly well. Being
prepared to accept a lot of failures is the key to finding the
successes.
Government bureaucracies are failure-averse for very good reasons.
Public scrutiny and the spectre of being accused wasting of tax payer
funds make for a cautious environment, where money is only spent on
guaranteed successes. By publishing data in open, standardized
formats, governments can off-load the costs and stigma of failure to
external organizations. Like Goldcorps, governments can take the open
approach to innovation by challenging advocacy groups, the nascent
community of armchair egovernment-geeks, and the for-profit market to
‘build a better way’. The government can then take advantage of the
value created by the best solutions. Solutions that don’t work can
die quietly, without any tax dollars having been spent.
Jennifer