Received: by 10.204.6.19 with SMTP id 19mr399980bkx.8.1352301829762;
        Wed, 07 Nov 2012 07:23:49 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: vimorganizer@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.204.131.72 with SMTP id w8ls1977648bks.3.gmail; Wed, 07 Nov
 2012 07:23:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.204.6.19 with SMTP id 19mr399979bkx.8.1352301829239;
        Wed, 07 Nov 2012 07:23:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.204.6.19 with SMTP id 19mr399978bkx.8.1352301829227;
        Wed, 07 Nov 2012 07:23:49 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <hes...@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-la0-f47.google.com (mail-la0-f47.google.com [209.85.215.47])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 27si2213401bks.3.2012.11.07.07.23.49
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Wed, 07 Nov 2012 07:23:49 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of hes...@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.47 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.215.47;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of hes...@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.47 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=hes...@gmail.com; dkim=pass header...@gmail.com
Received: by mail-la0-f47.google.com with SMTP id h5so1232402lam.6
        for <vimorganizer@googlegroups.com>; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 07:23:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
         :subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=JqfIknP0+jgLIdNj0rQfUmqjgLWbhi8DMpACo4OL2Ow=;
        b=CBSwBBiokttoVGGsdYtc4F8BjW5gtG5YBE66T5z3G0nVbkvLvOjD2b1BGkMO5qLclD
         5BhI+N/gtsiKz5sQSEr70TCqMHBgFYrz57t+Y2bgpRT66tgCViJ9+yFfL5J2kxCQ5yer
         ZLNHhwbklx66OLzTbVkEr/pVGSmfBV9EYiws+0KIT3wg95UeqJctQk4N5nLxGv93bXVt
         WSbpyxwkTJoZNrw9ha2Ptw+/oWNlgz4g6xbEObo6dJQhYRuSnOY6Q1RZgQUd3LkHwx27
         AMxwgapVahaCF008o2LyjIQE/zscZ83j0F64Zsy93HwnuSdu+i73ziU403izxir4zCKE
         MunQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.112.40.227 with SMTP id a3mr1930695lbl.91.1352301829036; Wed,
 07 Nov 2012 07:23:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.112.92.47 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 07:23:48 -0800 (PST)
Reply-To: hes...@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <CAEKBWvw_vD0Yv1kuHhiXuJtGTmvK96tTW_dNh8q1UK35zjA...@mail.gmail.com>
References: <d7537ced-862f-4d75-a967-c3a82bc27424@googlegroups.com>
	<CAEKBWvw_vD0Yv1kuHhiXuJtGTmvK96tTW_dNh8q1UK35zjA...@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 07:23:48 -0800
Message-ID: <CAEKBWvyEgAMVoJTDih+BXCx_Sfa5r2dKuePhu3W8trkYm3T...@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: colors when using vimorganizer in terminal
From: Herbert Sitz <hes...@gmail.com>
To: vimorganizer@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 7:21 AM, Herbert Sitz <hes...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> . . ,  Do you have same problem with
> the stock colorschemes?  I'll have to take a look to see what could be
> causing this.

Whoops, sorry, see you already said Agenda problem exists with other
colorschemes.  I'll have to check into it to guess what might be
happening on your machine.  -- Herb