Received: by 10.58.169.70 with SMTP id ac6mr8970269vec.8.1351267530445;
        Fri, 26 Oct 2012 09:05:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: vim_use@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.52.89.80 with SMTP id bm16ls4965366vdb.9.gmail; Fri, 26 Oct
 2012 09:05:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.72.100 with SMTP id c4mr7826151vdv.5.1351267521458;
        Fri, 26 Oct 2012 09:05:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.72.100 with SMTP id c4mr7826149vdv.5.1351267521448;
        Fri, 26 Oct 2012 09:05:21 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <jimmywu...@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-vc0-f180.google.com (mail-vc0-f180.google.com [209.85.220.180])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q19si217112vds.3.2012.10.26.09.05.21
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Fri, 26 Oct 2012 09:05:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jimmywu...@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.180 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.220.180;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jimmywu...@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.180 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jimmywu...@gmail.com; dkim=pass header...@gmail.com
Received: by mail-vc0-f180.google.com with SMTP id fl13so4372845vcb.39
        for <vim_use@googlegroups.com>; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 09:05:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        bh=VSWYkPnBvHaotaUUbuuOfO768gpk6/Sn0Sivj7ROsy4=;
        b=zGShXPCFzGdcXLiAG2Z3Y7L6P3CQdlQem1/5Q2zrUJEgn0YKiiFRnPfpQzQ9jqfR99
         1/FPqmH+F1zr+jhltBceNnveVYDHVXljmLEgpkQV0AE5ELR/vFcBCWPZynDQx6T5Xvq0
         ucABagX/kwL1kwHKnbE5iECqg89g38nfrxUzkWO/n4D3QmR9e3vD0c9IpJAj3L/ghSMP
         Y3+Cw6zc6kDKBUYyMGUMMf6bMMBady6mLSjGEWhv4fP5SRA/Wiz8Sm2HbbnwYP6eJFJL
         XoessWMK2XrVx7V26waGTOHGECgnncEhWasf9OJNlrbKtFGA5DW+4NAA/AMJiorLnnDV
         D2kA==
Received: by 10.220.221.193 with SMTP id id1mr19420282vcb.8.1351267521081;
 Fri, 26 Oct 2012 09:05:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.5.73 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 09:05:00 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <9103bbce-4075-4be3-92bc-854878e433ec@googlegroups.com>
References: <CAF5DW8J3FXOgd-AMw3hG5PLfTmj_4bD2tkY9OCKaxxhjUmP...@mail.gmail.com>
 <20121026132510.4c08cd3f@homerow> <CALaPA7AX-YbT0oqD7fyTyzrypw9yDkZVnSrBqbfopL_iquW...@mail.gmail.com>
 <20121026174716.73cd1539@homerow> <9103bbce-4075-4be3-92bc-854878e433ec@googlegroups.com>
From: Jimmy Wu <jimmywu...@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 12:05:00 -0400
Message-ID: <CAN0j2Y7X720S2gc9gnYZ3kcasjQcvvZVPTvOJby-J+c_Xk9...@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Tmux-style window resizing in vim?
To: vim_use@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Ben Fritz <fritzophre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> What if you have 3 windows? Which separator should be acted on then?

With 3 pane splits in tmux version 1.6, it appears the behavior is to
always move the bottom/right separator of the currently active pane,
except for the bottom/right-most pane which uses the top/left
separator.

(Note: tmux pane ~ vim window; tmux window ~ vim tab page)