The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
From: sc <tooth...@swbell.net>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 14:20:58 -0600
Local: Thurs, Mar 8 2012 3:20 pm
Subject: Re: No `oldfiles' in redhat vim 7.0.237.
On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 12:11:34PM -0800, howard Schwartz wrote: it sounds as if your runtime files (which include the help > On Thu, 8 Mar 2012, Ben Fritz wrote: > >:oldfiles was added in version 7.2.031, quite some time after > >7.0.237 was :released. You will need to upgrade to a more recent > >version of Vim to get :this feature. > Interesting that my 7.0 help files include a description of this > feature! I have read a description of it being first added as a > `tentative patch' in > version 7 that had a bug, and then withdrawn - only to be reintroduced later, apparently. modules) are newer than your vim > I could always write a brute force script using, for instance, awk, that simpler would be to download source and build your own current > grepped out the filenames from viminfo and offerred them in vim with a prompt. > Might run a bit slow, however. vim -- benefits from that would include runtime files that match the executable, many bugfixes and new features sc You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||