Repost: [PATCH] Enable cross-compiling

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Marc Haisenko

unread,
Jan 9, 2008, 4:46:01 AM1/9/08
to vim...@googlegroups.com
Hi folks,
a few weeks back I posted a patch that helps enabling cross-compiling by
adding the necessary stuff in configure.in to tell "configure" the necessary
values when cross-compiling. The patch also includes a README explaining
everything.

As people asked me about it I'd like to know if there's anything to fix in
that patch before it can get accepted or if there are any other problems to
resolve first.

Thanks a lot,
Marc

--
Marc Haisenko

Comdasys AG
Rüdesheimer Str. 7
80686 München
Germany

Tel.: +49 (0)89 548 433 321

vim-7.1-akira-cross.patch

Philip Prindeville

unread,
Jan 9, 2008, 4:47:49 AM1/9/08
to vim...@googlegroups.com
I've used it. It works. I'd like to second it.

Marc Haisenko

unread,
Jan 10, 2008, 4:44:48 AM1/10/08
to vim...@googlegroups.com
On Wednesday 09 January 2008, Marc Haisenko wrote:
> Hi folks,
> a few weeks back I posted a patch that helps enabling cross-compiling by
> adding the necessary stuff in configure.in to tell "configure" the necessary
> values when cross-compiling. The patch also includes a README explaining
> everything.
>
> As people asked me about it I'd like to know if there's anything to fix in
> that patch before it can get accepted or if there are any other problems to
> resolve first.
>
> Thanks a lot,
> Marc

PING. Could I please get a comment about this, even if it's "go away" ?

Philip Prindeville

unread,
Jan 10, 2008, 4:12:34 PM1/10/08
to vim...@googlegroups.com
Marc Haisenko wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 January 2008, Marc Haisenko wrote:
>
>> Hi folks,
>> a few weeks back I posted a patch that helps enabling cross-compiling by
>> adding the necessary stuff in configure.in to tell "configure" the necessary
>> values when cross-compiling. The patch also includes a README explaining
>> everything.
>>
>> As people asked me about it I'd like to know if there's anything to fix in
>> that patch before it can get accepted or if there are any other problems to
>> resolve first.
>>
>> Thanks a lot,
>> Marc
>>
>
> PING. Could I please get a comment about this, even if it's "go away" ?
>
>

I second the patch. :-)

Although according the Ben's earlier posting, we're both "in the pipeline".

So I guess we just sit tight a little longer...

-Philip

Ben Schmidt

unread,
Jan 10, 2008, 5:22:26 PM1/10/08
to vim...@googlegroups.com
> Although according the Ben's earlier posting, we're both "in the pipeline".
>
> So I guess we just sit tight a little longer...

If you haven't seen Bram's post to you now (that should comt to you directly and
via the vim_dev list), let me know and I will forward its text only to you. Seems
he has been having trouble reaching you (emails bouncing). If ones he sends to you
via the mailing list bounce too, it could get tricky!

Ben.

Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com

Marc Haisenko

unread,
Jan 11, 2008, 6:59:16 AM1/11/08
to vim...@googlegroups.com
On Thursday 10 January 2008, Ben Schmidt wrote:
>
> > Although according the Ben's earlier posting, we're both "in the
pipeline".
> >
> > So I guess we just sit tight a little longer...
>
> If you haven't seen Bram's post to you now (that should comt to you directly
and
> via the vim_dev list), let me know and I will forward its text only to you.
Seems
> he has been having trouble reaching you (emails bouncing). If ones he sends
to you
> via the mailing list bounce too, it could get tricky!
>
> Ben.

Sorry, haven't received anything. Could you please forward it to me ?
Thank you,

Ben Schmidt

unread,
Jan 11, 2008, 7:21:31 AM1/11/08
to vim...@googlegroups.com, hais...@comdasys.com, philip...@redfish-solutions.com
> Sorry, haven't received anything. Could you please forward it to me ?
> Thank you,
> Marc

I think the note was for Philip Prindeville, but it is relevant to all
contributors to the patch, I'm sure. I'll send it to all you guys while I'm at it.
It's so frustrating when email systems decide to be grumpy and drop mail like this.

Ben.

Bram wrote:

The reason you don't hear from me is that most of my emails to you
bounce back.

What I tried to say: excluding /usr/local/[include|lib] is not specific
for cross compiling. This should be a separate setting. Then it can
also be set for cross compiling.

Most configure features are explained in the Makefile. Or in the
INSTALL file. I prefer the Makefile, there you can uncomment a line to
have it used, no need to type it (configure doesn't warn for
unrecognized arguments).

--

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages